2-Arachidonoylglycerol Attenuates Myocardial Fibrosis in Diabetic Mice Via the TGF-β1/Smad Pathway

The mechanisms and therapeutic potential of clopidogrel in mitigating diabetic cardiomyopathy in db/db mice

Clopidogrel has been shown to play a protective role against diabetic nephropathy. However, whether clopidogrel exerts a protective effect against diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is unknown. Three-month-old male db/db mice were administered clopidogrel daily at doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg by gavage for 5 months. Here, we showed that clopidogrel effectively attenuated diabetes-induced cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac dysfunction by inhibiting cardiac fibrosis, inflammatory responses, and oxidative stress damage in db/db mice. Diabetes-induced cardiac fibrosis was inhibited by clopidogrel treatment via blockade of the TGF-β1/Smad3/P2RY12 pathway and inhibition of macrophage infiltration in db/db mice. The protective effects of clopidogrel against oxidative damage were mediated by the induction of the Nrf2 signaling pathway. Taken together, our findings provide strong evidence that clopidogrel is a promising effective agent for the treatment of DCM by alleviating diabetes-induced cardiac hypertrophy and dysfunction. P2RY12 might be an effective target for the treatment of DCM.

The combination of exercise and metformin inhibits TGF-β1/Smad pathway to attenuate myocardial fibrosis in db/db mice by reducing NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response

Persistent hyperglycemia increases inflammation response, promoting the development of myocardial fibrosis. Based on our previous research that exercise and metformin alone or their combination intervention could attenuate myocardial fibrosis in db/db mice, this study aimed to further explore the underlying mechanisms by which these interventions attenuate myocardial fibrosis in early diabetic cardiomyopathy. Forty BKS db/db mice were randomly divided into four groups. Diabetic db/db mice without intervention were in the C group. Aerobic exercise (7-12 m/min, 30-40 min/day, 5 days/week) was performed in the E group. Metformin (300 mg·kg^-1·day^-1) was administered in the M group. Exercise combined with metformin was performed in the EM group. Ten wild-type mice were in the WT group. All interventions were administered for 8 weeks. Results showed that the expression levels of α-SMA, Collagen I, and Collagen III were increased in 16-week-old db/db mice, which were reversed by exercise and metformin alone or their combination intervention. All interventions attenuated the level of TGF-β1/Smad2/3 pathway-related proteins and reduced the expression of inflammatory signaling pathway-regulated proteins TNF-α, p-IκBα/IκBα, and p-NF-κB p65/NF-κB p65 in db/db mice. Furthermore, metformin intervention inhibited HNF4α expression via AMPK activation, whereas exercise intervention increased the expression of IL-6 instead of activating AMPK. In conclusion, exercise and metformin alone or their combination intervention inhibited the TGF-β1/Smad pathway to attenuate myocardial fibrosis by reducing NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response. The anti-fibrotic effects were regulated by metformin-activated AMPK or exercise-induced elevation of IL-6, whereas their combination intervention showed no synergistic effects.

Why Multitarget Vasodilatory (Endo)cannabinoids are Not Effective as Antihypertensive Compounds after Chronic Administration: Comparison of Their Effects on Systemic and Pulmonary Hypertension

Systemic and pulmonary hypertension are multifactorial, high-pressure diseases. The first one is a civilizational condition, and the second one is characterized by a very high mortality rate. Searching for new therapeutic strategies is still an important task. (Endo)cannabinoids, known for their strong vasodilatory properties, have been proposed as possible drugs for different types of hypertension. Unfortunately, our review, in which we summarized all publications found in the PubMed database regarding chronic administration of (endo)cannabinoids in experimental models of systemic and pulmonary hypertension, does not confirm any encouraging suggestions, being based mainly on in vitro and acute in vivo experiments. We considered vasodilator or blood pressure (BP) responses and cardioprotective, anti-oxidative, and the anti-inflammatory effects of particular compounds and their influence on the endocannabinoid system. We found that multitarget (endo)cannabinoids failed to modify higher BP in systemic hypertension since they induced responses leading to decreased and increased BP. In contrast, multitarget cannabidiol and monotarget ligands effectively treated pulmonary and systemic hypertension, respectively. To summarize, based on the available literature, only (endo)cannabinoids with a defined site of action are recommended as potential antihypertensive compounds in systemic hypertension, whereas both mono- and multitarget compounds may be effective in pulmonary hypertension.