Analysis of potential contamination factors in musculoskeletal tissues

Exploring the Role of Intraoperative Positive Culture of Allograft Bone in Subsequent Postoperative Infections among Donors and Recipients in Bone Bank Processing

BACKGROUND

Allografts have been frequently used in orthopedic procedures. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the discard rates and bacterial contamination of a bone bank, and to assess the clinical outcomes of recipients with bacterial culture-positive donor allografts.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1764 allografts which were harvested from living donors and stored in a bone bank from 2018 to 2022. The donors whose allografts displayed bacterial contamination at retrieval of the primary hip or knee arthroplasty were followed for microbiology and subsequent prosthetic joint infection analysis. The infected pathogens, antibiotic treatment and subsequent infection were reviewed for the intraoperative positive culture group.

RESULTS

The discard rate was 17%, and the bacterial contamination rate of bone retrieval was 2.15%. Thirty-eight allografts at retrieval displayed confirmed bacterial growth, and 37 patients did not reveal infective signs at 6 months follow-up. A total of 1464 allografts were stored and implanted, among which 28 allografts (1.91%) were confirmed to be positive for bacterial growth and 13 cases (0.89%) were confirmed as surgical site infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results validate the suggestion that our bone bank system performs good quality monitoring to eliminate the risk of dissemination of viral and bacterial diseases and to decrease surgical site infection after allograft implantation. By ensuring aseptic conditions and contamination-reducing strategies during harvesting and thawing, the allografts can be safely stored and implanted while limiting bacterial contamination. Our findings confirm that the intraoperative positive cultures of allografts did not contribute to subsequent postoperative surgical site infection in donors and recipients.

Experience with Tissue Bank Services in 2014 and 2020 in Turku, Finland

BACKGROUND

The objective of a musculoskeletal tissue bank is to collect, test, store, and provide musculoskeletal tissue allografts required in orthopedic procedures. Strict exclusion criteria are followed when selecting suitable cadaver musculoskeletal tissue donors, and the allografts are procured under sterile conditions to avoid bacterial contamination. Tissue banking in Turku, Finland, began in 1972, and tissue bank services were last reviewed in 2003. This study aimed to review the operation of the musculoskeletal tissue bank in Turku, Finland, between 2014 and 2020 and to analyze the number, types, and contamination rate of the allografts procured from the cadaver donors. Potential donor-related factors causing bacterial contamination of the allografts and whether potential musculoskeletal tissue donors were overlooked among multiorgan donors were also studied.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all cadaver musculoskeletal tissue donors used in the Hospital District of Southwest Finland Tyks Orto Musculoskeletal Tissue Bank during the study period was conducted, and data on the procured allograft was collected and presented. The donors were selected among patients treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Turku University Hospital (TYKS).

RESULTS

A total of 28 cadaver donors were used, and 636 allografts were procured between 2014 and 2020. The bacterial contamination rate was 2.5%, which was lower than that in the previous international literature. The median treatment time in the ICU was significantly longer, and the median value of the highest C-reactive protein level was significantly higher in the group of donors with positive allograft bacterial cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

The bacterial contamination rate in the tissue bank was low on an international scale. Some suitable musculoskeletal tissue donors were overlooked among multiorgan donors.

Bacterial contamination of bone allografts in the tissue banks: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bone allografts are harvested and transplanted under sterile conditions. However, the risk of bacterial contamination of grafts during these processes is a health concern. Bioburden testing and bacterial contamination detection are conducted to ensure allograft sterility.

AIM

The present study aimed to determine the incidence of bacterial contamination in bone allografts based on different classifications.

METHODS

PROSPERO registration number was received for the study. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed and EMBASE databases with relevant keywords from January 2000 to March 2021. After choosing related studies according to the PRISMA flow diagram, Stata software was used for data analysis. We considered I² ˃ 50% as heterogeneity between studies.

FINDINGS

The overall incidence of bacterial contamination was 12.6% (95% CI 0.100, 0.152) among 19,805 bone allografts of 17 studies. The bacterial contamination rate among bone allografts was 10.8% before 2010 and 14.7% in 2010-March 2021. The contamination frequency in Asia, Europe, and Australia was 11.5%, 14.3%, and 5.2%, respectively. Bone contamination rates were higher in cadaver donors (19.9%), retrieval time sampling (13.5%), and swab samples (13.2%) compared to those in living donors (7.5%), implantation time sampling (6.9%), and bone fragments cultures (6.3%). Bacterial contamination was recovered 24.4%, 19.7%, 13.2%, and 21% from tibia, fibula, femoral, and other bones, respectively. Staphylococcus spp. was the predominant isolated bacteria from bones (63.2% of all isolated genera), followed by Propionibacterium spp. (10.6%).

CONCLUSION

The high contamination of bone allografts is a health concern, indicating the need for more health monitoring and improvement of standards.

Barriers to the Development and Sustainability of Bone Banking Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review

Purpose: The number of bone allograft transplantations required in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is growing very quickly. No previous study has investigated the challenges clinical banks face to sustain operations or meet this demand. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the barriers to implementation and sustainability of clinical bone tissue banks in LMICs. Barriers identified in clinical bone banking can shed light on strategies for overcoming obstacles in other biobanking programs. Methods: A systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO under identification number CRD42019136045. LMIC was defined using World Bank criteria. A search strategy targeting PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and the World Health Organization (WHO) Global Health Library was used. Studies from the inception of bone banking until June 4, 2019, that discussed an identifiable barrier to bone banking were included. Study quality was assessed using The Critical Appraisals Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Checklist. Results: Of studies identified, 33 studies were included in the final analysis. Based on the full-text review, the primary barriers identified were lack of regulation, low donor rates, and insufficient training and staffing. CASP analysis performed on the 24 qualitative articles showed an average of 3.6 qualitative measurements met. Conclusions: As international organizations such as the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) restructure their participation in global bone banking regulation, these barriers such as lack of regulation, low donor rates, and insufficient training and staffing could pose a challenge to meeting the rising demand for bone transplantation in LMICs. Articles with higher quality evidence are needed to better define barriers and propose evidence-based solutions.

Bacterial contamination rate and associated factors during bone and tendon allograft procurement from Spanish donors: exploring the contamination patterns

BACKGROUND

Allograft contamination during extraction represents a major limiting factor for tissue bank availability. Contamination rates remain persistently high independent of the hospital, country or year considered.

AIM

To analyse the factors associated with contamination of bone and tendon samples extracted from Spanish donors.

METHODS

Data for 1162 bone and tendon samples extracted from 102 donors between 2014 and 2017 were collected retrospectively from the hospital database. Descriptive statistics, potentially associated factors and correlation of contamination between samples extracted from different anatomical locations of the same donor were analysed.

FINDINGS

In total, 227 (19.54%) of the extracted samples [131 (18.49%) bone samples and 96 (20.92%) tendon samples] rendered positive cultures and were discarded. Male sex [odds ratio (OR) 2.023; P=0.019], extraction of >10 samples per donor (OR 1.997; P<0.001) and extraction time >240 min (OR 1.755; P=0.001) were factors independently associated with a higher contamination rate. Meanwhile, the tissue sample type 'bone-patellar tendon-bone' was associated with a significantly lower contamination rate (OR 0.446; P=0.001). Significant correlation between certain localization of contaminated samples and the concordance of bacterial species was also observed.

CONCLUSION

Factors related to the extraction procedure, such as total extraction time, extraction sequence, number of samples extracted and anatomical location of extracted samples, play a major role in allograft contamination. Further optimization of procedures, guided by the contamination patterns analysed in this study, should help to increase tissue bank availability.