Biological tests carried out on serum/plasma samples from donors of human body material for transplantation: Belgian experience and practical recommendations

Preanalytical variables influencing the interpretation and reporting of biological tests on blood samples of living and deceased donors for human body materials

With the present paper, the Working Group on Cells, Tissues and Organs and other experts of the Superior Health Council of Belgium aimed to provide stakeholders in material of human origin with advice on critical aspects of serological and nucleic acid test (NAT) testing, to improve virological safety of cell- and tissue and organ donation. The current paper focusses on a number of preanalytical variables which can be critical for any medical biology examination: (1) sampling related variables (type of samples, collection of the samples, volume of the sample, choice of specific tubes, identification of tubes), (2) variables related to transport, storage and processing of blood samples (transport, centrifugation and haemolysis, storage before and after centrifugation, use of serum versus plasma), (3) variables related to dilution (haemodilution, pooling of samples), and (4) test dependent variables (available tests and validation). Depending on the type of donor (deceased donor (heart-beating or non-heart beating) versus living donor (allogeneic, related, autologous), and the type of donated human material (cells, tissue or organs) additional factors can play a role: pre- and post-mortem sampling, conditions of sampling (e.g. morgue), haemodilution, possibility of retesting.

Screening algorithms for HBV, HCV, HIV and syphilis in an anatomical donation program

BACKGROUND

Users of anatomical donors are at risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens. This study evaluated screening algorithms for hepatitis B and C virus, human immunodeficiency virus and Treponema pallidum during donor allocation and assessed the impact of postmortem time on hemolysis and how hemolysis affects test results and donor discard rate.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2018, demographic data of anatomical donors, time of postmortem blood sampling, presence of sample hemolysis, serological test results (negative; active infection; false reactive screening test; historic infection; inconclusive; technically impracticable) and the actual donor allocation were collected.

RESULTS

Donors (n = 537) had a mean age of 77.53 ± 13.67 (24-103) year. Nine (1.68%) had laboratory test results indicative for active infection for hepatitis B (n = 1) and C virus (n = 2), human immunodeficiency virus (n = 5) and T. pallidum (n = 1). Negative screenings ranged from 74.67 to 97.58%, depending on the pathogen. According to the original screening algorithms, 479 (89.20%) donors should have been accepted. In practice, a donor acceptance rate of 91.20% was found. Analysis of potential donor allocation interpretation obstacles resulted in simplification of the in-house laboratory testing algorithms and addition of a nucleic acid test to increase the reliability for identification of active (acute) human immunodeficiency virus infection. Hemolysis was more common when sampling was performed more than 24 h after death (p < 0.001). Hemolytic samples more frequently showed a reactive or indeterminate human immunodeficiency virus test result (p < 0.001). Screening for human immunodeficiency virus and T. pallidum was technically more impracticable when hemolysis was present (p = 0.042 and p = 0.003, respectively). Donors with hemolytic blood samples were more often discarded (46.88%) compared to bodies with non-hemolytic samples (6.32%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the implementation of donor screening algorithms, a significant number of bodies have an inconsistent allocation. New algorithms, to be evaluated in future research, were suggested. Early postmortem blood sampling is key as hemolysis can influence certain test results and donor allocation.

Beyond cells: The extracellular circulating 20S proteasomes

Accumulating evidence arising from numerous clinical studies indicate that assembled and functional 20S proteasome complexes circulate freely in plasma. Elevated levels of this core proteolytic complex have been found in the plasma of patients suffering from blood, skin and solid cancers, autoimmune disorders, trauma and sepsis. Moreover, in various diseases, there is a positive correlation between circulating 20S proteasome (c20S) levels and treatment efficacy and survival rates, suggesting the involvement of this under-studied c20S complex in pathophysiology. However, many aspects of this system remain enigmatic, as we still do not know the origin, biological role or mechanisms of extracellular transport and regulation of c20S proteasomes. In this review, we provide an overview of the current understanding of the c20S proteasome system and discuss the remaining gaps in knowledge.

Interpretation of EBV serology for human body material donors: Is there a need for early antigen IgG and heterophile antibodies testing?

In this report we evaluated a diagnostic algorithm, proposed by the Belgian Superior Health Council, to detect acute and past Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections by means of serology in donors of human body material for transplantation. The available EBV serology parameters were tested on eighty serum samples on three random access analysers: Architect i2000 SR, Liasion XL and BioPlex 2200. The EBV sero-status was determined according to the proposed algorithm and results were compared between the different analysers. Seventy one % of the samples gave concordant interpretations on the three analysers. Most of the discordant results were attributable to early antigen (EA) IgG. The knowledge of the EA IgG and heterophile antibodies (HA) IgM status provided only limited added value and was only useful to distinguish between a very early acute infection and false positivity of viral capsid antigen IgM. The diagnostic algorithm proposed by the Belgian Superior Health Council is merely directive and each individual lab remains responsible for the interpretation and implementation of test combinations for the detection of EBV infections. Our study shows the limited added value of testing for EA IgG and HA IgM, based both on clinical and technical performance.