Comparative evaluation of bioburden and sterility of indigenously prepared bone allograft with and without gentamicin

Effect of gamma and Ultraviolet-C sterilization on BMP-7 level of indigenously prepared demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft

The presence of bone morphogenetic proteins in demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) are responsible for developing hard tissues in intraosseous defects. The most common mode of sterilization of bone allografts, i.e., Gamma rays, have dramatic effects on the structural and biological properties of DFDBA, leading to loss of BMPs. Ultraviolet-C radiation is a newer approach to sterilize biodegradable scaffolds, which is simple to use and ensures efficient sterilization. However, UV-C radiation has not yet been effectively studied to sterilize bone allografts. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of Gamma and Ultraviolet-C rays in sterilizing indigenously prepared DFDBA and assess their effect on the quantity of BMP-7 present in the allograft. DFDBA samples from non-irradiated, gamma irradiated, and UV-C irradiated groups were tested for BMP-7 level and samples sterilized with gamma and UV-C rays were analysed for sterility testing. The estimated mean BMP-7 level was highest in non-irradiated DFDBA samples, followed by UV-C irradiated, and the lowest in gamma irradiated samples. Our study concluded that UV-C rays effectively sterilized DFDBA as indicated by negative sterility test and comprised lesser degradation of BMP-7 than gamma irradiation.

Management of grade II and III furcation defects with intramarrow penetration along with indigenously prepared DFDBA and amniotic membrane: a clinical and radiographic study

Managing furcation defects constitutes a problem in successful periodontal therapy. Guided tissue regeneration (GTR) is the mainstay for the management of such defects but is expensive. This study makes use of indigenously prepared demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and amniotic membrane (AM) as a cost-effective alternative. The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical outcome of grade II and III furcation defects with and without using indigenous DFDBA and AM prepared at Central Tissue Bank, MAIDS. 18 systemically healthy patients with chronic periodontitis displaying either grade II or III furcation defects were treated with open flap debridement (OFD) + intramarrow penetration (IMP) (control group) and OFD + IMP + DFDBA + AM (test group). The clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. All parameters were statistically analyzed. Both treatment modalities resulted in improvement in all clinical variables evaluated. Radiographic dimensions evaluating bone fill showed a statistically significant difference in the test group compared to the control group. Within the limitations of this study, data suggest GTR using indigenously prepared DFDBA and amniotic membrane to be an economical and viable option for treating furcation defects.

Bacterial contamination of bone allografts in the tissue banks: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Bone allografts are harvested and transplanted under sterile conditions. However, the risk of bacterial contamination of grafts during these processes is a health concern. Bioburden testing and bacterial contamination detection are conducted to ensure allograft sterility.

AIM

The present study aimed to determine the incidence of bacterial contamination in bone allografts based on different classifications.

METHODS

PROSPERO registration number was received for the study. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed and EMBASE databases with relevant keywords from January 2000 to March 2021. After choosing related studies according to the PRISMA flow diagram, Stata software was used for data analysis. We considered I² ˃ 50% as heterogeneity between studies.

FINDINGS

The overall incidence of bacterial contamination was 12.6% (95% CI 0.100, 0.152) among 19,805 bone allografts of 17 studies. The bacterial contamination rate among bone allografts was 10.8% before 2010 and 14.7% in 2010-March 2021. The contamination frequency in Asia, Europe, and Australia was 11.5%, 14.3%, and 5.2%, respectively. Bone contamination rates were higher in cadaver donors (19.9%), retrieval time sampling (13.5%), and swab samples (13.2%) compared to those in living donors (7.5%), implantation time sampling (6.9%), and bone fragments cultures (6.3%). Bacterial contamination was recovered 24.4%, 19.7%, 13.2%, and 21% from tibia, fibula, femoral, and other bones, respectively. Staphylococcus spp. was the predominant isolated bacteria from bones (63.2% of all isolated genera), followed by Propionibacterium spp. (10.6%).

CONCLUSION

The high contamination of bone allografts is a health concern, indicating the need for more health monitoring and improvement of standards.

The potential of radiation sterilized and banked tissue allografts for management of nuclear casualties

Processed and radiation sterilized allograft tissues that can be banked for use on demand are a precious therapeutic resource for the repair or reconstruction of damaged or injured tissues. Skin dressings or skin substitutes like allograft skin, amniotic membrane and bioengineered skin can be used for the treatment of thermal burns and radiation induced skin injuries. Bone grafts can be employed for repairing fracture defects, filling in destroyed regions of bone, and treatment of spinal and joint injuries. A nuclear scenario would result in a large number of casualties due to the heat, blast and radiation effects of the weapon. Perspective of radiation sterilized biological tissues provided by the tissue banks for management of casualties in a nuclear disaster scenario is presented.