The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review

Basic study on cryopreservation of rat calvarial osteoblasts with different cryoprotectants

Cryopreservation is a method adopted for storage of autologous skulls. Herein, this current research sought to explore the effects of different cryoprotectants on the biological characteristics of rat calvarial osteoblasts after cryopreservation. Neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats were selected and their skull tissues were isolated. The skull tissues were allocated into the refrigerating-3M, refrigerating-6M, M199-3M, M199-6M, povidone iodine-3M, and povidone iodine-6M groups according to the usage of cryoprotectants and treatment time (month) and the fresh group. Osteoblasts were isolated from skull tissues in each group through digestion. The histomorphology of the skull was evaluated by H&E staining and cell morphology was observed by microscopy. The viability, proliferation, apoptosis, and osteogenic activity of osteoblasts were assessed by trypan blue staining, MTT, flow cytometry, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining. The skull histomorphology and osteoblast morphology were similar between the fresh and refrigerating groups. Osteoblast viability was weakened after cryopreservation. The longer the refrigeration time, the lower the number of living cells and the higher the apoptosis rate. However, cryopreservation using different cryoprotectants did not evidently affect osteoblast proliferation and ALP activity. Different cryoprotectants show no apparent effect on the osteogenic activity of rat calvarial osteoblasts after cryopreservation.

Unseparated Temporal Muscle and Duramater Cranioplasty Methods Following Decompressive Craniectomy: Technical Note

Objective

Cranioplasty (CP) is used to repair cranial defects after decompressive craniectomy. During this procedure, the temporal muscle can contract or retract toward the base and adhere to the scalp flaps above and/or below the dura. Several complications including functional and cosmetic problems can occur following CP. This study presents the technical notes and outcomes of CP.

Methods

This retrospective observational study collect data of CP-procedures using unseparated muscle-dura technique performed at our hospital in 2019-2022. Technical note is presented regarding the lack of separation of the temporal muscles from the dura mater. A bone flap or titanium mesh was placed above the temporal muscle layer, which was still attached to the dura mater. Functional outcomes were evaluated using OHIP-14 Questionnaire to assess mastication quality.

Results

Twenty-three patients were included in this study. Initial surgeries were mostly caused by trauma (65.2%). Most patients underwent autologous bone flap CP (52.2%), during which the bone flap was stored in either the abdominal subcutaneous pocket or cryoprecipitated. Only one patient experienced mastication problems after CP (p<0.001). Temporal hollowing remained a problem in this technique. However, dissection of the temporalis muscle to reduce temporal hollowing can cause facial nerve injuries and masticatory problems. Due to the lack of temporal muscle manipulation, our patients had minimal mastication problems.

Conclusion

CP should be performed to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. A CP technique with the temporal muscle unseparated from the dura mater can be selected to avoid damage to the muscle and mastication problems after surgery.

Lowering Cranioplasty Infection Incidence with Novel Bone Flap Storage Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

After craniectomy, autologous bone flaps may be stored using wet or dry cryopreservation. After brain edema subsides, they are replaced during an operation termed cranioplasty. Cranioplasty is associated with 15% infection incidence.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective comparison of infection outcomes between wet and dry cryopreservation of cranioplasty bone flaps. Historically, bone flaps were stored utilizing wet cryopreservation-bone flap storage in 1 L of lactated Ringer's solution containing 80 mg gentamicin and 2 g nafcillin in a sterile plastic container secured in an unsterile plastic bag. Our newer dry cryopreservation protocol involved storage in gauze soaked in 80 mg gentamicin and 2 g nafcillin within a 3-layer sterile bag system.

RESULTS

A total of 119 autologous bone flaps were included, with median follow-up of 3.9 months from cranioplasty. Overall, 10.9% became infected, requiring subsequent surgery; 18.4% of 49 bone flaps stored using wet cryopreservation became infected compared with only 5.7% of 70 dry cryopreservation bone flaps (P = 0.038; relative risk [RR] 0.311; absolute risk reduction 12.7%). Tobacco use (P = 0.076; RR 3.17) was not associated with increased infection risk. Infection incidence was similar for traumatic craniectomy indications compared to the other indications (12.0% trauma vs. 10.1% other; P = 0.750). On average, infected cranioplasty patients spent 8.5 more days hospitalized and faced increased risk of additional complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Dry cryopreservation significantly decreases infection after cranioplasty when compared with wet cryopreservation, and this mitigates additional morbidity, mortality, and costs attributable to cranioplasty infection. Other nonmodifiable risk factors for cranioplasty infection were identified.

Explanted Skull Flaps after Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Demonstrate Relevant Bone Avitality-Is Their Reimplantation Worth the Risk?

BACKGROUND

Reimplantations of autologous skull flaps after decompressive hemicraniectomies (DHs) are associated with high rates of postoperative bone flap resorption (BFR). We histologically assessed the cell viability of explanted bone flaps in certain periods of time after DH, in order to conclude whether precursors of BRF may be developed during their storage.

METHODS

Skull bone flaps explanted during a DH between 2019 and 2020 were stored in a freezer at either -23 °C or -80 °C. After their thawing process, the skulls were collected. Parameters of bone metabolism, namely PTH1 and OPG, were analyzed via immunohistochemistry. H&E stain was used to assess the degree of avital bone tissue, whereas the repeated assays were performed after 6 months.

RESULTS

A total of 17 stored skull flaps (8 at -23 °C; 9 at -80 °C) were analyzed. The duration of cryopreservation varied between 2 and 17 months. A relevant degree of bone avitality was observed in all skull flaps, which significantly increased at the repeated evaluation after 6 months (p < 0.001). Preservation at -23 °C (p = 0.006) as well as longer storage times (p < 0.001) were identified as prognostic factors for higher rates of bone avitality in a linear mixed regression model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our novel finding shows a clear benefit from storage at -80° C, which should be carefully considered for the future management and storage of explanted skull flaps. Our analysis also further revealed a significant degree of bone avitality, a potential precursor of BFR, in skull flaps stored for several weeks. To this end, we should reconsider whether the reimplantation of autologous skull flaps instead of synthetic skull flaps is still justified.

Effect of microorganisms isolated by preoperative osseous sampling on surgical site infection after autologous cranioplasty: A single-center experience

PURPOSE

The most frequent postoperative complication in autologous cranioplasty (AC) is infection. European recommendations include osseous sampling before cryogenic storage of a bone flap. We evaluated the clinical impact of this sampling.

METHODS

All patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy (DC) and AC in our center between November 2010 and September 2021 were reviewed. The main outcome was the rate of reoperation for infection of the cranioplasty. We evaluated risk factors for bone flap infection, rate of reoperation for any reason (hematoma, skin erosion, cosmetic request, or bone resorption), and radiological evidence of bone flap resorption.

RESULTS

A total of 195 patients with a median age of 50 (interquartile range: 38.0-57.0) years underwent DC and AC between 2010 and 2021. Of the 195 bone flaps, 54 (27.7%) had a positive culture, including 48 (88.9%) with Cutibacterium acnes. Of the 14 patients who underwent reoperation for bone flap re-removal for infection, 5 and 9 had positive and negative bacteriological cultures, respectively. Of patients who did not have bone flap infection, 49 and 132 had positive and negative bacteriological cultures, respectively. There were no significant differences between patients with and without positive bacteriological culture of bone flaps in the rates of late bone necrosis and reoperation for bone flap infection.

CONCLUSIONS

A positive culture of intraoperative osseous sampling during DC is not associated with a higher risk of re-intervention after AC.

Infection-related failure of autologous versus allogenic cranioplasty after decompressive hemicraniectomy - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Cranioplasty is required after decompressive craniectomy (DC) to restore brain protection and cosmetic appearance, as well as to optimize rehabilitation potential from underlying disease. Although the procedure is straightforward, complications either caused by bone flap resorption (BFR) or graft infection (GI), contribute to relevant comorbidity and increasing health care cost. Synthetic calvarial implants (allogenic cranioplasty) are not susceptible to resorption and cumulative failure rates (BFR and GI) tend therefore to be lower in comparison with autologous bone. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to pool existing evidence of infection-related cranioplasty failure in autologous versus allogenic cranioplasty, when bone resorption is removed from the equation.

Materials and methods

A systematic literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science medical databases was performed on three time points (2018, 2020 and 2022). All clinical studies published between January 2010 and December 2022, in which autologous and allogenic cranioplasty was performed after DC, were considered for inclusion. Studies including non-DC cranioplasty and cranioplasty in children were excluded. The cranioplasty failure rate based on GI in both autologous and allogenic groups was noted. Data were extracted by means of standardized tables and all included studies were subjected to a risk of bias (RoB) assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment tool.

Results

A total of 411 articles were identified and screened. After duplicate removal, 106 full-texts were analyzed. Eventually, 14 studies fulfilled the defined inclusion criteria including one randomized controlled trial, one prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies. All but one study were rated as of poor quality based on the RoB analysis, mainly due to lacking disclosure why which material (autologous vs. allogenic) was chosen and how GI was defined. The infection-related cranioplasty failure rate was 6.9% (125/1808) for autologous and 8.3% (63/761) for allogenic implants resulting in an OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.13 (Z ​= ​1.24; p ​= ​0.22).

Conclusion

In respect to infection-related cranioplasty failure, autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy does not underperform compared to synthetic implants. This result must be interpreted in light of limitations of existing studies. Risk of graft infection does not seem a valid argument to prefer one implant material over the other. Offering an economically superior, biocompatible and perfect fitting cranioplasty implant, autologous cranioplasty can still have a role as the first option in patients with low risk of developing osteolysis or for whom BFR might not be of major concern.

Trial registration

This systematic review was registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews. PROSPERO: CRD42018081720.

Ten-Year Institutional Experience to Predict Risk of Calvarial Bone Flap Loss Using Long-Term Outcome Data

BACKGROUND

Calvarial bone flap (CBF) loss is a common complication following craniotomy and subsequent skull reconstruction can be challenging. Defining predictors of CBF failure not only improves patient outcomes but reduces the need for complex reconstruction often requiring plastic surgery consultation. As CBF failure can occur many years following craniotomy, this study aimed to determine risk factors of CBF loss using long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included patients who underwent craniotomy with CBF reinsertion between 2003 and 2013 at a tertiary academic institution. Patients were included if demographics, comorbidities, and long-term outcomes were available. Multivariable logistic regression modeled the odds of CBF failure, defined as permanent removal for bone flap-related issues. The median follow-up was 6.9 years (interquartile range: 1.8-10.8 y).

RESULTS

There were 222 patients who met inclusion criteria and underwent craniotomy with CBF reinsertion, primarily for tumor resection or intracranial pressure relief. CBF failure occurred in 76 (34.2%) patients. Up to 4 CBF reinsertions were performed in both failure and nonfailure groups. The risks of CBF loss increased with each additional CBF elevation by 17-fold (P<0.001), male sex by 3-fold (P=0.005), and tumor etiology by 3-fold (P=0.033) (C-index=0.942).

CONCLUSIONS

Each CBF reinsertion dramatically increases the risk of CBF loss. This finding may optimize patient selection and surgical planning. Early multidisciplinary discussions between plastic surgeons and neurosurgeons may avoid multiple CBF elevations and prevent the adverse sequela of high-risk calvarial reconstruction efforts.

Cryopreservation of autologous bone flaps following decompressive craniectomy: A new method reduced positive cultures without increase in post-cranioplasty infection rate

Introduction

Cranioplasty (CP) after decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common neurosurgical procedure. Implementation of European Union (EU) directives recommending bacterial cultures before cryopreservation, lead to increased number of autologous bone flaps being discarded due to positive cultures. A new method for handling bone flaps prior to cryopreservation, including the use of pulsed lavage, was developed.

Research question

The aim was to evaluate the effect of a new method on proportion of positive bacterial cultures and surgical site infection (SSI) following CP surgery.

Material and methods

Sixty-one bone flaps from 53 consecutive DC surgery patients were retrospectively included and the study period was divided into before and after method implementation. Patient demographics, laboratory and culture results, type of CP and occurrence of SSI were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-six and 18 bone flaps were available for analysis during the first and second period, respectively. The proportion of positive bacterial cultures was higher in the first period compared to the second (n ​= ​9(35%) vs 0(0%); p ​= ​0.001), and thus the use of custom made implants was considerably higher in the first study period (p ​= ​0.001). There was no difference in the frequency of post-cranioplasty SSI between the first and second study period (n ​= ​3 (11.5%) vs 1 (4.8%), p ​= ​0.408).

Discussion and conclusion

The new method for handling bone flaps resulted in a lower frequency of positive bacterial cultures, without increased frequency of post-cranioplasty SSI, thus demonstrating it is safe to use, allows compliance with the EU-directives, and may reduce unnecessary discarding of bone flaps.

•

New method of bone flap handling and preservation reduced positive bacterial cultures from 35% to 0%.

•

The new method used pulsed lavage of bone flap with saline solution and subsequent swab culture.

•

There was no increase in post-cranioplasty surgical site infection following introduction of the new method.