The transition to the metastatic phenotype of rat lymphoma cells involves up-regulation of IL-10 receptor expression and IL-10 secretion

Cytomegalovirus and tumors: two players for one goal-immune escape

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and the human tumor cell share the same objectives: escape the recognition and destruction by the immune system and establish a state of immune tolerance conducive for their development. For early tumor development, the escape of the first lines of defense of the immune surveillance is a critical step which determines survival or destruction. The presence of CMV on the tumor site and its involvement in carcinogenesis as initiator or promoter is increasingly documented. In this article, we highlight the similarity between mechanisms used by tumors and CMV to circumvent the immune defenses and evade from immune surveillance. We suggest that CMV and tumors help one another for their common objective. CMV gets shelter in immunologically poor environment of the tumor cells. In return CMV, by acting directly on the cancer cell and/or on the tumor microenvironment, provides the tumor cell the ways to promote its immune escape and development of immune tolerance.

IL-10 promotes resistance to apoptosis and metastatic potential in lung tumor cell lines

Treatment of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains at a disappointingly low success rate. Not only is metastatic spread common in NSCLC, but therapeutic success decreases dramatically once metastases are present. Understanding factors which contribute to poor prognosis in NSCLC is critical for development of more successful therapeutic approaches. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) expression has been shown in several studies to correlate with a poorer prognosis in NSCLC; however, the mechanisms by which IL-10 affects lung tumor growth and metastases are unclear. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of tumor-derived IL-10 on the growth and metastasis of lung cancer cells in a murine model. Lewis lung carcinoma cells were stably transfected with the chicken ovalbumin gene (cOVA) as a model tumor antigen (LL43 tumor cells) and subsequently transfected with the murine IL-10 gene (LL43-10 tumor cells). Subcutaneous growth of the LL43 tumor cells was not affected by expression of IL-10. However, LL43-10 tumors had a fourfold increase in tumor microvessel density, as indicated by CD31 staining. Metastatic potential was also increased in IL-10-expressing lung tumor cells, leading to a greater number of tumor cells in lymph nodes draining the primary tumor site. Finally, exposure of Lewis lung tumor cells in vitro to exogenous IL-10 dramatically increased their resistance to UV-induced apoptosis. These results indicate that a primary effect of IL-10 on lung cancer cells may be to increase their metastatic potential by promoting angiogenesis and resistance to apoptosis.

Dynamic cross-talk between tumor and immune cells in orchestrating the immunosuppressive network at the tumor microenvironment

Accumulating evidence indicates that a dynamic cross-talk between tumors and the immune system can regulate tumor growth and metastasis. Increased understanding of the biochemical nature of tumor antigens and the molecular mechanisms responsible for innate and adaptive immune cell activation has revolutionized the fields of tumor immunology and immunotherapy. Both the protective effects of the immune system against tumor cells (immunosurveillance) and the evasion of tumor cells from immune attack (tumor-immune escape) have led to the concept of cancer immunoediting, a proposal which infers that a bidirectional interaction between tumor and inflammatory/regulatory cells is ultimately responsible for orchestrating the immunosuppressive network at the tumor site. In this context, a major challenge is the potentiation or redirection of tumor antigen-specific immune responses. The success in reaching this goal is highly dependent on an improved understanding of the interactions and mechanisms operating during the different phases of the cancer immunoediting process. In this review, we discuss the multiple defense and counterattack strategies that tumors have devised in order to evade immune attack and to thwart the effectiveness of several immunotherapeutic approaches.

The cancer stem cell: evidence for its origin as an injured autoreactive T cell

This review explores similarities between lymphocytes and cancer cells, and proposes a new model for the genesis of human cancer. We suggest that the development of cancer requires infection(s) during which antigenic determinants from pathogens mimicking self-antigens are co-presented to the immune system, leading to breaking T cell tolerance. Some level of autoimmunity is normal and necessary for effective pathogen eradication. However, autoreactive T cells must be eliminated by apoptosis when the immune response is terminated. Apoptosis can be deficient in the event of a weakened immune system, the causes of which are multifactorial. Some autoreactive T cells suffer genomic damage in this process, but manage to survive. The resulting cancer stem cell still retains some functions of an inflammatory T cell, so it seeks out sites of inflammation inside the body. Due to its defective constitutive production of inflammatory cytokines and other growth factors, a stroma is built at the site of inflammation similar to the temporary stroma built during wound healing. The cancer cells grow inside this stroma, forming a tumor that provides their vascular supply and protects them from cellular immune response.

As cancer stem cells have plasticity comparable to normal stem cells, interactions with surrounding normal tissues cause them to give rise to all the various types of cancers, resembling differentiated tissue types. Metastases form at an advanced stage of the disease, with the proliferation of sites of inflammation inside the body following a similar mechanism. Immunosuppressive cancer therapies inadvertently re-invigorate pathogenic microorganisms and parasitic infections common to cancer, leading to a vicious circle of infection, autoimmunity and malignancy that ultimately dooms cancer patients. Based on this new understanding, we recommend a systemic approach to the development of cancer therapies that supports rather than antagonizes the immune system.