Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of prostate cancer metastases yields samples suitable for genomics and personalised oncology

Prostate cancer cell-intrinsic interferon signaling regulates dormancy and metastatic outgrowth in bone

The latency associated with bone metastasis emergence in castrate-resistant prostate cancer is attributed to dormancy, a state in which cancer cells persist prior to overt lesion formation. Using single-cell transcriptomics and ex vivo profiling, we have uncovered the critical role of tumor-intrinsic immune signaling in the retention of cancer cell dormancy. We demonstrate that loss of tumor-intrinsic type I IFN occurs in proliferating prostate cancer cells in bone. This loss suppresses tumor immunogenicity and therapeutic response and promotes bone cell activation to drive cancer progression. Restoration of tumor-intrinsic IFN signaling by HDAC inhibition increased tumor cell visibility, promoted long-term antitumor immunity, and blocked cancer growth in bone. Key findings were validated in patients, including loss of tumor-intrinsic IFN signaling and immunogenicity in bone metastases compared to primary tumors. Data herein provide a rationale as to why current immunotherapeutics fail in bone-metastatic prostate cancer, and provide a new therapeutic strategy to overcome the inefficacy of immune-based therapies in solid cancers.

A Prospective Correlation of Tissue Histopathology With Nucleic Acid Yield in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Biopsy Specimens

Objective

To determine histopathologic, exome, and transcriptome nucleic acid material yield from prospectively collected metastatic tissue biopsy specimens in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

Patients and Methods

Patients with mCRPC initiating abiraterone acetate therapy underwent 2 serial metastatic site core needle biopsies after study activation on May 17, 2013. Multiple cores were obtained, and from each core, 1- to 2-mm segments were separated and formalin fixed for histopathologic examination. Tumor purity was determined for DNA and RNA from the rest of the biopsy specimen. RNA quality was assessed by calculation of an RNA integrity number and a DV200 score.

Results

A total of 89 patients underwent 172 uniformly processed core needle biopsies (89 on visit 1 and 83 on visit 2) between May 30, 2013, and September 10, 2015. Metastatic sites biopsied included bone (131), lymph nodes (31), liver (5), lung (3), and pelvic soft tissues (2). Of the 172 biopsy specimens, 85 (49%) had at least one of the multiple cores positive for tumor on histopathologic examination (53 of 88 [60%] from visit 1 and 32 of 83 [39%] from visit 2; P=.006). Metastatic carcinoma was observed in 50 of 130 bone lesion specimens (38%), compared to 35 of 41 nonbone specimens (85%) (P<.001). More than 10% tumoral DNA purity was observed in 89% and 80% of visit 1 and visit 2 biopsy specimens, respectively. Similarly, more than 10% tumor RNA purity was observed in 79% of visit 1 vs 59% for visit 2 (P=.008). In all, 134 of 172 procedures (78%) yielded tumor material either by histopathologic or nucleic acid purity analysis.

Conclusion

This study found that biopsy specimens from mCRPC sites yield adequate histopathologic, exome, and transcriptome material in most, but not all, cases. This finding has relevance for future genome sequencing studies on the introduction of targeted therapeutic agents.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 01953640.

The prognostic utility of the transcription factor SRF in docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer: in-vitro discovery and in-vivo validation

Background

Docetaxel based therapy is one of the first line chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. However, one of the major obstacles in the treatment of these patients is docetaxel-resistance. Defining the mechanisms of resistance so as to inform subsequent treatment options and combinations represents a challenge for clinicians and scientists.

Previous work by our group has shown complex changes in pro and anti-apoptotic proteins in the development of resistance to docetaxel. Targeting these changes individually does not significantly impact on the resistant phenotype but understanding the central signalling pathways and transcription factors (TFs) which control these could represent a more appropriate therapeutic targeting approach.

Methods

Using a number of docetaxel-resistant sublines of PC-3 cells, we have undertaken a transcriptomic analysis by expression microarray using the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST Array and in conjunction with bioinformatic analyses undertook to predict dysregulated TFs in docetaxel resistant prostate cancer. The clinical significance of this prediction was ascertained by performing immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of an identified TF (SRF) in the metastatic sites from men who died of advanced CRPC. Investigation of the functional role of SRF was examined by manipulating SRF using SiRNA in a docetaxel-resistant PC-3 cell line model.

Results

The transcription factors identified include serum response factor (SRF), nuclear factor kappa-B (NFκB), heat shock factor protein 1 (HSF1), testicular receptor 2 & 4 (TR2 &4), vitamin-D and retinoid x receptor (VDR-RXR) and oestrogen-receptor 1 (ESR1), which are predicted to be responsible for the differential gene expression observed in docetaxel-resistance. IHC analysis to quantify nuclear expression of the identified TF SRF correlates with both survival from date of bone metastasis (p = 0.003), survival from androgen independence (p = 0.00002), and overall survival from prostate cancer (p = 0.0044). Functional knockdown of SRF by siRNA demonstrated a reversal of apoptotic resistance to docetaxel treatment in the docetaxel-resistant PC-3 cell line model.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that SRF could aid in treatment stratification of prostate cancer, and may also represent a therapeutic target in the treatment of men afflicted with advanced prostate cancer.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3100-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A urinary microRNA signature can predict the presence of bladder urothelial carcinoma in patients undergoing surveillance

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine whether microRNA (miRNA) profiling of urine could identify the presence of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) and to compare its performance characteristics to that of cystoscopy.

METHODS

In the discovery cohort we screened 81 patients, which included 21 benign controls, 30 non-recurrers and 30 patients with active cancer (recurrers), using a panel of 12 miRNAs. Data analysis was performed using a machine learning approach of a Support Vector Machine classifier with a Student's t-test feature selection procedure. This was trained using a three-fold cross validation approach and performance was measured using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). The miRNA signature was validated in an independent cohort of a further 50 patients.

RESULTS

The best predictor to distinguish patients with UCB from non-recurrers was achieved using a combination of six miRNAs (AUC=0.85). This validated in an independent cohort (AUC=0.74) and detected UCB with a high sensitivity (88%) and sufficient specificity (48%) with all significant cancers identified. The performance of the classifier was best in detecting clinically significant disease such as presence of T1 Stage disease (AUC=0.92) and high-volume disease (AUC=0.81). Cystoscopy rates in the validation cohort would have been reduced by 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

Urinary profiling using this panel of miRNAs shows promise for detection of tumour recurrence in the surveillance of UCB. Such a panel may be useful in reducing the morbidity and costs associated with cystoscopic surveillance, and now merits prospective evaluation.

Tracking the origins and drivers of subclonal metastatic expansion in prostate cancer

Tumour heterogeneity in primary prostate cancer is a well-established phenomenon. However, how the subclonal diversity of tumours changes during metastasis and progression to lethality is poorly understood. Here we reveal the precise direction of metastatic spread across four lethal prostate cancer patients using whole-genome and ultra-deep targeted sequencing of longitudinally collected primary and metastatic tumours. We find one case of metastatic spread to the surgical bed causing local recurrence, and another case of cross-metastatic site seeding combining with dynamic remoulding of subclonal mixtures in response to therapy. By ultra-deep sequencing end-stage blood, we detect both metastatic and primary tumour clones, even years after removal of the prostate. Analysis of mutations associated with metastasis reveals an enrichment of TP53 mutations, and additional sequencing of metastases from 19 patients demonstrates that acquisition of TP53 mutations is linked with the expansion of subclones with metastatic potential which we can detect in the blood.

How does genome sequencing impact surgery?

Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide. Great efforts are dedicated to the development of prognostic and predictive biomarkers to improve diagnosis and achieve optimal treatment selection, thereby, introducing precision medicine in the multimodality treatment of cancer. Genomic aberrations are the basis of tumour development, representing excellent candidates for the development of promising clinical biomarkers. Over the past decade, single-gene mutations and genomic profiling have been increasingly used in multidisciplinary consultations for risk-assessment and treatment planning for patients with cancer. We discuss the impact of such genetic-based information on surgical decision-making. Single-gene mutations have already influenced surgical decision-making in breast, colorectal and thyroid cancer. However, the direct impact of genomic profiling on surgical care has not yet been fully established. We discuss the direct and indirect influences of genomic profiling on surgery, and analyse the limitations and unresolved issues of a genotypic-approach to the surgical management of cancer.