1
|
Law WK, Yaremych HE, Ferrer RA, Richardson E, Wu YP, Turbitt E. Decision-making about genetic health information among family dyads: a systematic literature review. Health Psychol Rev 2021; 16:412-429. [PMID: 34546151 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1980083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Decisions involving two individuals (i.e., dyadic decision-making) have been increasingly studied in healthcare research. There is evidence of bi-directional influences in decision-making processes among spousal, provider-patient and parent-child dyads. Genetic information can directly impact biologically related individuals. Thus, it is important to understand dyadic decision-making about genetic health information among family members. This systematic literature review aimed to identify literature examining decision-making among family dyads. Peer-reviewed publications were included if they reported quantitative empirical research on dyadic decision-making about genetic information, published between January 1998 and August 2020 and written in English. The search was conducted in 6 databases and returned 3167 articles, of which 15 met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were in the context of cancer genetic testing (n = 8) or reproductive testing or screening (n = 5). Studies reported two broad categories of decisions with dyadic influence: undergoing screening or testing (n = 10) and sharing information with family (n = 5). Factors were correlated between dyads such as attitudes, knowledge, behaviors and psychological wellbeing. Emerging evidence shows that dyad members influence each other when making decisions about receiving or sharing genetic information. Our findings emphasize the importance of considering both members of a dyad in intervention design and clinical interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wai Ki Law
- The Discipline of Genetic Counselling, The University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Haley E Yaremych
- Department of Psychology & Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.,Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca A Ferrer
- Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Ebony Richardson
- The Discipline of Genetic Counselling, The University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
| | - Yelena P Wu
- Department of Dermatology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Erin Turbitt
- The Discipline of Genetic Counselling, The University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia.,Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Mattei V, Ferrari F, Perego G, Tobia V, Mauro F, Candiani M. Decision-making factors in prenatal testing: A systematic review. Health Psychol Open 2021; 8:2055102920987455. [PMID: 33489303 PMCID: PMC7809316 DOI: 10.1177/2055102920987455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This review examines the factors that affect the decision-making process of parental couples evaluating prenatal screening and diagnostic tests. A systematic search was performed using PubMed and PsycInfo databases. The 46 included studies had to: investigate the decision-making process about prenatal testing; focus on tests detecting trisomy 21, 18, 13, and abnormalities of sex chromosomes; be published in English peer-reviewed journals. The decision-making process seems composed of different levels: an individual level with demographic, clinical, and psychological aspects; a contextual level related to the technical features of the test and the information received; a relational level involving family and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Di Mattei
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy.,IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Fabio Mauro
- IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Italy.,IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carroll FE, Al-Janabi H, Flynn T, Montgomery AA. Women and their partners' preferences for Down's syndrome screening tests: a discrete choice experiment. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33:449-56. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.4086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fran E. Carroll
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; England UK
| | - Hareth Al-Janabi
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences; University of Birmingham; England UK
| | - Terry Flynn
- Centre for the Study of Choice; University of Technology; Sydney Australia
| | - Alan A. Montgomery
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; England UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Godino L, Turchetti D, Skirton H. A systematic review of factors influencing uptake of invasive fetal genetic testing by pregnant women of advanced maternal age. Midwifery 2013; 29:1235-43. [PMID: 23453699 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2012.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2012] [Revised: 09/13/2012] [Accepted: 11/10/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Women of advanced maternal age have a higher risk of having a child affected by a chromosomal disorder than younger childbearing women and are frequently offered invasive testing during pregnancy. The aim of our systematic review was to identify and analyse the current evidence base regarding factors that influence the uptake of invasive fetal testing by pregnant women of advanced maternal age. We conducted a systematic review. A search of The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase and Medline databases was undertaken for papers published in English and Italian from January 2002 to May 2012. Eleven studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, were subjected to quality assessment and included in the review. We analysed the data using thematic analysis. The factors influencing women were classified as either external or psychosocial factors. External factors included the opportunity for screening, screening results and use of genetic counselling. Psychosocial factors related to ethnicity, socio-demographic status and attendance of partners during counselling. It is difficult to draw firm conclusions as to the principle factors that influence uptake of invasive tests by women of AMA. More research is needed to enhance understanding of relevant factors to ensure that services are offered in a way that acknowledges practical as well as psychosocial influences. This type of research will help to equip midwives and other professionals caring for women during pregnancy to ensure that women are supported to make the choices that are appropriate for them and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Godino
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Università di Bologna, Italy; School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Education and Society, Plymouth University, United Kingdom.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carroll FE, Owen-Smith A, Shaw A, Montgomery AA. A qualitative investigation of the decision-making process of couples considering prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32:57-63. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.2901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fran E. Carroll
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| | - Amanda Owen-Smith
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| | - Alison Shaw
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| | - Alan A. Montgomery
- School of Social and Community Medicine; University of Bristol; Bristol UK
| |
Collapse
|