Investigation on the synthesis of new 3-[4-(arylalkoxy)phenylethyl]-2-thioxo-1,3-thiazolidin-4-ones and their biological evaluation against cancer cells

Anticancer Profile of Rhodanines: Structure-Activity Relationship (SAR) and Molecular Targets-A Review

The rhodanine core is a well-known privileged heterocycle in medicinal chemistry. The rhodanines, as subtypes of thiazolidin-4-ones, show a broad spectrum of biological activity, including anticancer properties. This review aims to analyze the anticancer features of the rhodanines described over the last decade in the scientific literature. The structure–activity relationship of rhodanine derivatives, as well as some of the molecular targets, were discussed. The information contained in this review could be of benefit to the design of new, effective small molecules with anticancer potential among rhodanine derivatives or their related heterocycles.

Recent developments with rhodanine as a scaffold for drug discovery

INTRODUCTION

Rhodanines, as one of the 4-thiazolidinones subtypes, are recognized as privileged heterocycles in medicinal chemistry. The main achievements include the development of drug-like molecules with numerous biological activities as well as approved drugs. Among rhodanines, 5-ene-rhodanines are of special interest, and are often claimed as pan assay interference compounds due to Michael acceptor functionality. Areas covered: Herein, the synthetic protocols for rhodanines and their transformation are reviewed. Biological activity is briefly discussed as well as biotargets, mode of actions and optimization directions. Furthermore, the utilization of 5-ene-rhodanines in Michael additions are discussed while both pro and contra arguments have been outlined within medicinal chemistry application. Expert opinion: Rhodanines remain privileged heterocycles in drug discovery. They are accessible building blocks for optimization and transformation into related heterocycles, simplified analogues and fused heterocycles with a thiazolidine framework. Michael acceptor functionality, as well as the thesis about low selectivity towards biotargets of rhodanines, must be confirmed experimentally and it cannot be based on just the presence of conjugated α,β-unsaturated carbonyl. Moreover, the positive aspects of Michael acceptors must be considered as well as their multitarget properties. New criteria for target affinity must be found. In conclusion, rhodanines are generally not problematic per se.