Considering variables for the assignment of patients with schizophrenia to a case management programme

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on suicide-related risk among college students: A cross-sectional analysis

This study aimed to investigate the factors contributing to suicide-related risks among college students during a stressful life event, specifically the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing a Classification and Regression Tree (CART) model, data from 808 college students were analyzed, revealing key interactions and predictive insights into suicide-related risk. Results indicated that preexisting depression emerged as the most significant risk factor, followed by anxiety, discrimination, stress, and younger age. These findings emphasize the importance of preventive measures targeting depression and anxiety to enhance college students' mental health and well-being. The study's implications extend to informing future research, practical interventions, and policy-making efforts addressing suicide-related risk among college students.

Incidence and Risk Profiles for Suicide Mortality in Patients With Schizophrenia Receiving Homecare Case Management in Taiwan

Case management (CM)-based community therapy for patients with schizophrenia had little effect on reducing suicide mortality. We investigate the long-term suicide mortality outcome and associated risk factors in patients with schizophrenia receiving homecare (CM) in Taiwan. We enrolled a nationwide cohort of patients with schizophrenia who newly received homecare CM intervention (n = 13 317) between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2015; their data were derived from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. We calculated the incidence rate of suicide methods. We examined the demographic and medical utilization profile for suicide and then performed a nested case-control study and multivariate regression to identify independent risk factors for suicide mortality. Among the 13 317 patients who received homecare CM intervention, 1766 died during the study period, of whom 213 died by suicide, which is the leading cause of unnatural death. Jumping from a high place, self-poisoning, and hanging were the top 3 suicide methods. Increased medical utilization was noted for both psychiatric and non-psychiatric services within 3 months of suicide mortality. Comorbidities of depressive disorder, nonspecific heart diseases, pneumonia, and gastrointestinal ulcers were identified as independent risk factors for suicide mortality. Suicide was the leading cause of unnatural mortality in patients with schizophrenia receiving homecare CM intervention in Taiwan. We noted the preferred suicide methods, high medical utilization, and comorbidities before suicide. Thus, we suggest that the CM team should assess lethal methods for suicide and ensure that patients adhere to psychiatry treatment for improving the current care model for this specified population.

Effect of Case Management Interventions for Patients with Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Substance use disorder (SUD) is an important health problem that requires a complex range of care because of the chronic nature of the disorder and the multiple psychosocial problems involved. Current outpatient programs often have difficulties in delivering and coordinating ongoing care and access to different health-care providers. Various case management (CM) models have been developed, first for patients in other psychiatric domains and then for patients with SUD, in order to improve treatment outcomes.

AIM

This paper aims to assess the effectiveness of CM for patients with SUD.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of CM interventions for patients with SUD by analyzing randomized controlled studies published on the subject between 1996 and 2016 found on the electronic database PubMed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Fourteen studies were included in the analysis. Differences between studies in outcome measures, populations included, and intervention characteristics made it difficult to compare results. Most of these studies reported improvement in some of the chosen outcomes. Treatment adherence mostly improved, but substance use was reported to decrease in only a third of the studies. Overall functioning improved in about half of the studies. The heterogeneity of the results might be linked to these differences between studies. Further research is needed in the field.

What Is Case Management? A Scoping and Mapping Review

The description of case management in research and clinical practice is highly variable which impedes quality analysis, policy and planning. Case management makes a unique contribution towards the integration of health care, social services and other sector services and supports for people with complex health conditions. There are multiple components and variations of case management depending on the context and client population. This paper aims to scope and map case management in the literature to identify how case management is described in the literature for key complex health conditions (e.g., brain injury, diabetes, mental health, spinal cord injury). Following literature searches in multiple databases, grey literature and exclusion by health condition, community-based and adequate description, there were 661 potential papers for data extraction. Data from 79 papers (1988–2013) were analysed to the point of saturation (no new information) and mapped to the model, components and activities. The results included 22 definitions, five models, with 69 activities or tasks of case managers mapped to 17 key components (interventions). The results confirm the significant terminological variance in case management which produces role confusion, ambiguity and hinders comparability across different health conditions and contexts. There is an urgent need for an internationally agreed taxonomy for the coordination, navigation and management of care.

The brain injury case management taxonomy (BICM-T); a classification of community-based case management interventions for a common language

BACKGROUND

Case management is a complex intervention. Complexity arises from the interaction of different components: the model (theoretical basis), implementation context (service), population and health condition, focus for the intervention (client and/or their family), case manager's actions (interventions) and the target of case management (integrated care and support, client's community participation). There is a lack of understanding and a common language. To our knowledge there is no classification (taxonomy) for community-based case management.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a community-based case management in brain injury taxonomy (BICM-T), as a common language and understanding of case management for use in quality analysis, policy, planning and practice.

METHODS

The mixed qualitative methods used multiple sources of knowledge including scoping, framing and a nominal group technique to iteratively develop the Beta version (draft) of the taxonomy. A two part developmental evaluation involving case studies and mapping to international frameworks assessed the applicability and acceptability (feasibility) before finalization of the BICM-T.

RESULTS

The BICM-T includes a definition of community-based case management, taxonomy trees, tables and a glossary. The interventions domain tree has 9 main actions (parent category): engagement, holistic assessment, planning, education, training and skills development, emotional and motivational support, advising, coordination, monitoring; 17 linked actions (children category); 8 related actions; 63 relevant terms defined in the glossary.

CONCLUSIONS

The BICM-T provides a knowledge map with the definitions and relationships between the core actions (interventions domain). Use of the taxonomy as a common language will benefit practice, quality analysis, evaluation, policy, planning and resource allocation.

Clinical case management for patients with schizophrenia with high care needs

The aim of this study is to establish the effectiveness of a clinical case management (CM) programme compared to a standard treatment programme (STP) in patients with schizophrenia. Patients for the CM programme were consecutively selected among patients in the STP with schizophrenia who had poor functioning. Seventy-five patients were admitted to the CM programme and were matched to 75 patients in the STP. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1 year follow-up. At baseline, patients in the CM programme showed lower levels of clinical and psychosocial functioning and more care needs than patients in the STP. Both treatment programmes were effective in maintaining contact with services but the CM programme did not show advantages over the STP on outcomes. Differences between groups at baseline may be masking the effects of CM at one year follow-up. A longer follow-up may be required to evaluate the real CM practices effects.