OCD Taboo Thoughts and Stigmatizing Attitudes in Clinicians

Rethinking Unacceptable Thoughts: Validation of an Expanded Version of the Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale

The Dimensional Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (DOCS) is widely used to measure obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) severity across four broad symptom dimensions (i.e., contamination, responsibility for harm, unacceptable thoughts, symmetry). Despite its proven utility, there is reason to suspect that the unacceptable thoughts subscale conflates different types of unacceptable thoughts that are meaningfully distinct from one another. In the current study, we first evaluated the psychometric properties of a newly developed DOCS violent and/or aggressive thoughts subscale. We then examined the factor structure, psychometric properties, and diagnostic sensitivity of a seven-factor version of the DOCS that includes the four original DOCS subscales and three more-specific versions of the unacceptable thoughts scale (i.e., sexually intrusive thoughts, violent and/or aggressive thoughts, and scrupulous or religious thoughts). The sample included 329 residential and intensive outpatients, the majority of which had a diagnosis of OCD (75.2%). The new unacceptable thoughts subscales demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity with unique associations between the subscales and depression, suicide, and perceived threat from emotions that were not present in the broader unacceptable thoughts subscale. The seven-factor version of the DOCS demonstrated slightly lower levels of diagnostic sensitivity than the original DOCS. Thus, the four-factor version of the DOCS is recommended for screening purposes. A score of 40 or higher on the seven-factor version of the DOCS best predicted a diagnosis of OCD. Overall, the three additional unacceptable thoughts subscales appear to be distinct factors that have potential value in research and clinical settings.

Prevalence and psychopathology features of mental rituals in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A descriptive exploratory study of 1001 patients

INTRODUCTION

Mental rituals (MR) are compulsions with no overt behavioural or motoric signs. It is presently unclear whether MR found in obsessive-compulsive disorder are associated with a distinctive clinical profile.

OBJECTIVES

The main objectives of this paper were to assess the prevalence and psychopathological correlates of mental rituals in a large sample of OCD patients.

METHODS

This exploratory case-control study compared 519 patients with versus 447 without MR in terms of sociodemographics, presence and severity of obsessive-compulsive symptoms, psychiatric comorbidities, sensory phenomena, suicidality, and insight.

RESULTS

Current MR were found in 51.8%, while lifetime MR were found in 55.4% of the sample. The multiple logistic regression model determined that the most relevant clinical factors independently associated with current MR in OCD patients were the absence of any sensory phenomena and the presence of lifetime suicide ideation.

CONCLUSION

Due to its relation to OCD clinical aspects, MR are a frequent feature among OCD patients. It also seems to be associated with a range of features that are probably relevant for treatment, especially sensory phenomena and suicidality.

Enhancing mental health literacy in obsessive-compulsive disorder and reducing stigma via smartphone: A randomized controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling disorder that can be successfully treated. However, individuals with OCD do not seek or delay seeking treatment. This delay may be explained by poor mental health literacy and stigmatizing attitudes toward OCD in community. In order to work on these variables, a gamified mental health mobile application (app) called esTOCma has been developed. The purpose of this study is to describe the protocol for a study to test the efficacy of esTOCma, increasing mental health literacy and help-seeking intention, reducing the stigmatizing attitudes and social distance suffered by people with OCD, as well as the distress associated with obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial with a crossover design with two conditions (immediate-use App group versus delayed-use App group) will be conducted on a non-clinical adult sample of the community of a minimum size of 200 participants. Participants in the immediate-use App group will start using the app at baseline until completion (10 days); whereas participants in the delayed-use App group will wait 10 days, and then start using the app until completion (10 days). The outcomes will be measured at four assessment points (baseline; 10 days from baseline; and 20 days from baseline; and after 3 months). The following instruments will be administered: Attribution Questionnaire, General Help-Seeking Questionnaire, Social Distance Scale, Mental Health Literacy, Psychoeducation Questionnaire, Social Desirability Scale, Single-Item Self-esteem Scale, and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised.

DISCUSSION

This protocol presents the first study to describe a randomized control trial of a mental health app focused on changing mental health literacy, stigmatizing attitudes, social distance and help-seeking intention associated with OCD. An app intervention of these characteristics is especially relevant nowadays as the COVID-19 pandemic has increased obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity. An improvement in general knowledge about OCD and a reduction in stigma could be associated with earlier OCD detection and an increase in help-seeking intention, which could result in greater wellbeing. Moreover, normalizing intrusions and knowledge about the cognitive OCD model could serve as a protective variable in vulnerable individuals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04777292. Registered February 23, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04777292.

Brooding Over the Closet: Differentiating Sexual Orientation Rumination and Sexual Orientation Obsessions

Two concepts that describe repetitive thoughts regarding an individual's sexual orientation-sexual orientation rumination and sexual orientation obsessions-have been introduced into the research literature. Despite the fact that these concepts have similarities, important distinctions exist with regard to their theoretical underpinnings, development, and catalyst of stress. As these concepts have never been teased apart in the research literature, understanding how these concepts are similar and different is particularly important. To this end, the present overview synthesizes the current literature regarding these concepts with the purpose of providing a decisional framework for differentiating sexual orientation rumination and sexual orientation obsessions and suggesting areas of future research.

Decision-making about intrusive thoughts: Relationships to attitudes towards them

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The present study investigated decision-making strategies about and evaluations of intrusive thoughts in OCD presented in hypothetical targets in vignettes in a non-clinical population. It was expected participants would be hastier in their decisions for violent and sexual thoughts than checking and contamination thoughts and find those thoughts more credible. In addition, it was expected that hastier decision-making would be related to poorer evaluation of the targets. It was further expected that higher OC traits would be related to collecting fewer data.

METHODS

Participants (N = 84) read four vignettes, two detailing a target with taboo intrusive thoughts and two detailing a target with non-taboo intrusive thoughts. Participants engaged in decision-making tasks about the targets before making decisions about the validity of the fears and rating their thoughts about the target.

RESULTS

There was a relationship between data gathering and evaluations of the targets, but only for targets with taboo thoughts - requesting fewer data was associated with believing that the violent and sexual thoughts were true and evaluating them more negatively. Participants with higher OC traits gathered fewer data before deciding on three of the four tasks.

LIMITATIONS

The sample was non-clinical and homogenous; stimuli may have been unbalanced across vignettes.

CONCLUSIONS

Reasoning about and attitudes about taboo intrusive thoughts appear to be considerably related.

The Skidmore Anxiety Stigma Scale (SASS): A covert and brief self-report measure

Shame and concerns about stigma are salient barriers to treatment for people with anxiety disorders, and yet very little stigma research has focused on this class of disorders. One explanation for this research gap is the absence of a brief, psychometrically sound measure for assessing public stigma for the anxiety disorders as a class. This (three-study) paper presents the psychometric properties of a 7-item scale that covertly assesses anxiety stigma by presenting as a test of knowledge. Items for the measure were derived from a mixed-methods project (Study 1) which assessed patient (N = 47) experiences with stigma. Subsequently, exploratory factor analysis (N = 270) demonstrated that the scale fit a one-factor solution (Study 2). Study 3 comprehensively evaluated the measure's psychometric properties, including confirming the one-factor solution. Results further demonstrated test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and internal consistency. This brief measure fills an important gap by providing means for covertly assessing public stigma encountered by individuals with anxiety disorders and thus subverts social desirability concerns that plague self-report measures of stigma. Thus, the SASS increases the feasibility of work capturing the nature and impact of anxiety stigma - a highly relevant barrier to treatment.

Serious negative consequences associated with exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A survey of therapist attitudes and experiences

OBJECTIVE

Many therapists are reluctant to conduct exposure and response prevention (ERP) for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Negative beliefs about the safety and tolerability of ERP are common, especially for harm-related OCD symptoms. The study examined the nature and frequency of ERP-related serious negative consequences (SNC) and therapist attitudes and experiences providing ERP for harm-related OCD.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was completed by 277 therapists with experience treating OCD using ERP. Questions assessed clinical experiences of harm-related exposures, the nature of SNC, and concerns and clinical considerations regarding ERP.

RESULTS

Therapist's willingness to treat harm-related OCD was high. SNCs were reported for 6 clients (per-client risk: adults 0.05%, youth 0.01%) and 13 therapists (per therapist risk 4.73%, therapist per-year risk 0.004%). Qualitative analysis identified themes relating to the conduct of treatment, specific exposure types, professional issues, and negative perceptions of ERP.

CONCLUSION

SNC associated with ERP for OCD are rare and primarily represent unintended secondary consequences of OCD or misunderstandings regarding the process and rationale behind ERP. Improving access to ERP will require good communication with clients, families, and other professionals regarding the rationale and safety of ERP.