Gastrointestinal complications in renal transplant patients: a large, single-center experience

Cryptosporidium infection after renal transplantation in an endemic area

BACKGROUND

Cryptosporidium is one of the common causes of infective diarrhea in post-transplant patients in endemic areas. However, data are limited on Cryptosporidium infection in recipients of solid organ transplantation. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence, disease manifestation, management, and outcome of Cryptosporidium infection in living-donor renal transplant recipients (RTR).

METHODS

We performed a detailed retrospective review of the data on all RTR who had diarrheal illness requiring evaluation and hospitalization, and Cryptosporidium infection.

RESULTS

During the study period, 119/1235 (8.98%) RTR developed diarrhea, and Cryptosporidium was found in 34/119 (28.5%). Nine of 680 (1.3%) patients were on a cyclosporine (CSA)-based regimen, and 25/643 (3.8%) patients were on a tacrolimus (Tac)-based regimen. The relative risk of developing Cryptosporidium infection was lower on the CSA-based regimen, compared with the Tac-based regimen (odds ratio [OR]: 0.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.72, P = 0.003). Twelve of the 34 patients had acute graft dysfunction, mainly caused by combined Tac toxicity and dehydration. Mean serum creatinine and trough Tac level were 2.04 ± 0.65 mg/dL and 8.24 ± 1.19 ng/dL, respectively. Nitazoxanide alone was used in 13 patients, and nitazoxanide in combination with fluoroquinolone in 21 patients, with duration of treatment ranging from 16 to 60 days. Tac was changed to CSA in 8/11 patients. The clearance of cysts and response to nitazoxanide alone were significantly lower, compared with combination therapy (61.53% vs. 95.23%, P = 0.01, 38.46 vs. 85.71%, P = 0.004, respectively). The OR for cyst clearance and response was also significantly lower with nitazoxanide alone, in comparison with combination therapy (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.34-0.92, P = 0.01, OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.21-0.81, respectively). Four (16%) of 24 patients with response had relapse.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Tac and mycophenolate mofetil combination therapy had a significantly high risk of Cryptosporidium infection. Cryptosporidial infection may require prolonged nitazoxanide therapy, either alone or in combination, with or without reduction in immunosuppression.

Diagnostic yields in solid organ transplant recipients admitted with diarrhea

BACKGROUND

Although diarrhea is a frequent complaint among solid organ transplant recipients, the contribution of infectious etiologies remains incompletely defined. We sought to define the etiologies of diarrhea and the yields of testing at our institution.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis over an 18-month period of hospitalized solid organ transplant recipients. We stratified diarrhea by community onset vs hospital onset of diarrhea.

RESULTS

We identified 422 admissions (representing 314 unique patients) with community-onset diarrhea, and 112 admissions (representing 102 unique patients) with hospital-onset diarrhea. The majority of community- and hospital-onset diarrheal episodes had no identified etiology (60.9% and 75.9%, respectively; P = .03), yet were also self-limited (91% and 91%, respectively; P = .894). Thereafter, the most frequently encountered infectious etiologies were Clostridium difficile infection (13.3% and 11.8%, respectively), norovirus enteritis (8.2% and 3%), cytomegalovirus disease or colitis (6.3% and 2.7%), and bacterial enterocolitis (0.9% and 0%) (P = .03). In aggregate, these entities represented 93.7% and 90.5% of the identified infectious etiologies, respectively. Protozoan causes were rarely seen. Coinfection, or the simultaneous detection of ≥2 pathogens, occurred in 8 (1.9%) and 2 (1.8%) community- and hospital-onset diarrheal admissions, respectively (P = .99).

CONCLUSIONS

In solid organ transplant recipients who presented at our institution with diarrhea, approximately one-third had infectious etiologies identified, consisting predominantly of C. difficile, norovirus, cytomegalovirus, and bacterial enterocolitis. Other infectious etiologies were rare.

Diarrhea in solid-organ transplant recipients: a review of the evidence

OBJECTIVE

To provide a comprehensive review of the literature as it relates to diarrhea in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. In this article, we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis and management of diarrhea in SOT recipients and discuss recent advances and challenges.

METHODS

Two investigators conducted independent literature searches using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus until January 1st, 2013. All databases were searched using a combination of the terms diarrhea, solid organ transplant, SOT, transplant associated diarrhea, and transplant recipients. Articles that discussed diarrhea in SOT recipients were reviewed and relevant cross-references also read and evaluated for inclusion. Selection bias could be a possible limitation of the approach used in selecting or finding articles for this article.

FINDINGS

Post-transplant diarrhea is a common and distressing occurrence in patients, which can have significant deleterious effects on the clinical course and well-being of the organ recipient. A majority of cases are due to infectious and drug-related etiologies. However, various other etiologies including inflammatory bowel disease must be considered in the differential diagnosis. A step-wise, informed approach to post-transplant diarrhea will help the clinician achieve the best diagnostic yield. The use of diagnostic endoscopy should be preceded by exclusion of an infectious or drug-related cause of diarrhea. Empiric management with antidiarrheal agents, probiotics, and lactose-free diets may have a role in managing patients for whom no cause can be determined even after an extensive investigation.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians should be familiar with the common etiologies that result in post-transplant diarrhea. A directed approach to diagnosis and treatment will not only help to resolve the diarrhea but also prevent potentially life-threatening consequences including loss of the graft as well. Prospective studies are required to determine the etiology of post-transplant diarrhea in different clinical and geographic settings.

Increased incidence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis in solid organ transplant recipients

Background/Aims

Solid organ transplant recipients frequently report gastrointestinal symptoms, especially heartburn or dyspepsia. However, the prevalence of endoscopic erosive esophagitis (EE) and associated risk factors after transplantation are unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether there was a high incidence of endoscopic findings of EE in solid organ transplant recipients.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study included 256 of 3,152 solid organ transplant recipients who underwent sequential screening upper endoscopic examinations and an equal number of controls.

Results

Forty-four (17.2%) and 16 (6.2%) cases of EE were detected in the solid organ transplant and control groups, respectively (p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, transplantation was significantly associated with EE (odds ratio [OR], 6.48; 95% confidence interval, 2.74 to 15.35). Factors such as old age (OR, 1.17), the presence of a hiatal hernia (OR, 5.84), an increased duration of immunosuppression (OR, 1.07), and the maintenance administration of mycophenolate mofetil (OR, 4.13) were independently associated with the occurrence of EE in the solid organ transplant recipients.

Conclusions

A significant increase in the incidence of endoscopically detected EE was observed in solid organ transplant recipients. This increased incidence was associated with the type and duration of the immunosuppressive therapy.