Proton pump inhibitors improve acid-related dyspepsia in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients

Beneficial Effect of Heat-Killed Lactic Acid Bacterium Lactobacillus johnsonii No. 1088 on Temporal Gastroesophageal Reflux-Related Symptoms in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group clinical study was conducted to examine the effects of ingesting a heat-killed lactic acid bacterium, Lactobacillus johnsonii No. 1088 (LJ88) on temporal gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms in healthy volunteers. A total of 120 healthy Japanese volunteers of both sexes, aged between 21 and 63 years, whose Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) total score was 8 or greater, but who were not diagnosed with functional dyspepsia according to the Rome IV classification, were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to either the LJ88 or placebo group and instructed to ingest the test food (1 billion heat-killed LJ88 or placebo) once a day for six weeks. Gastroesophageal reflux-related symptoms were evaluated using FSSG scores as a primary endpoint. The Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale (GSRS), stomach state questionnaire, and serum gastrin concentration were used as secondary endpoints. In the FSSG evaluation, the heartburn score was significantly improved at 6 weeks in the LJ88 group compared to the placebo group. No severe adverse events related to the test food were observed. In conclusion, daily ingestion of heat-killed LJ88 improved temporal heartburn symptoms in non-diseased individuals.

Rotating night shift work is associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms among workers in China: A cross-sectional study

AIMS OF THE STUDY

Increasing studies suggest a significant association between night shift work and an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, obesity and other metabolic disorders. However, the available evidence of the association of rotating night shift work with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is limited. Herein, we hypothesised a link between the GERD risk and rotating night shift work among workers in China.

METHODS USED TO CONDUCT THE STUDY

A total of 2027 workers who completed a comprehensive health checkup were included. Logistic regression was used to investigate the link between rotating night shift work and the risk of GERD symptoms. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the multivariable model's diagnostic value for identifying GERD symptoms among workers.

RESULTS OF THE STUDY

In total, 556 (27.4%) individuals had GERD symptoms among 2027 workers. Multivariate analysis showed five independent factors for GERD: rotating night shift work (OR = 3.66, 95% CI: 2.52-5.40), age (OR = 2.53, 95% CI: 1.67-3.78), smoking (OR = 3.70, 95% CI: 2.63-5.21), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.48-0.96) and obesity (OR = 3.04, 95% CI: 2.43-3.83). A five-variable model based on five independent factors provided an area under a ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.80 (95% CI: 0.78-0.81) for identifying GERD symptoms among workers.

CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM THE STUDY AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Rotating night shift work is independently associated with an increased risk of GERD symptoms. Moreover a five-variable model (rotating night shift work, age, smoking, H pyori infection and obesity) can help identify individuals at high risk for GERD symptoms among workers in China.

Efficacy of vonoprazan for initial and maintenance therapy in reflux esophagitis, nonerosive esophagitis, and proton pump inhibitor-resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the first line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vonoprazan (VPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker for reflux esophagitis (RE), nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), and PPI-resistant GERD patients.An open-label, single-center, observational study in our hospital was performed from August 2016 to August 2017. All patients diagnosed with GERD were asked to self-report a questionnaire of frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) and rate their degree of satisfaction with the treatment of GERD during outpatient visit. A total of 200 (RE 47, NERD 49, PPI-resistant GERD 104) patients were included in the present study. The primary endpoint was the change of FSSG and the proportion of degree of satisfaction with the treatment at the end of the initial therapy. A percentage of improvement (improvement rate) and resolution (resolution rate) at the end of the initial therapy were evaluated. Secondary endpoint included the proportion of patients with symptomatic relapse in the 24-week maintenance phase.FSSG and the degree of satisfaction were significantly improved after the initial therapy in every group. Improvement and resolution rate after the initial therapy were 83.0% and 67.0% in RE, 66.7% and 60.4% in NERD, and 76.0% and 60.4% in PPI-resistant group. There was no significance between after the initial therapy and 24 weeks in improvement and resolution rate. Thirty-two of the total 48 patients did not take VPZ at 24 weeks. Total FSSG score in each group was 1.67 ± 1.97, 2.71 ± 4.91, and 4.0 ± 4.93. The nonrelapse rate at 24 weeks in each group was 66.7%, 60.0%, and 50.0%. The resolution rate at 24 weeks in each group was 38.9%, 45.0%, and 30.0%.The VPZ therapy is effective for initial and maintenance therapy and improves heartburn and patient's satisfaction significantly in all 3 groups. Among patients who stopped taking VPZ during the maintenance period, 42.0% of RE and NERD group and 30% of PPI-resistant group experience complete remission from GERD at 24 weeks by introduction of VPZ.

Efficacy and safety of hangeshashinto for treatment of GERD refractory to proton pump inhibitors : Usual dose proton pump inhibitors plus hangeshashinto versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors: randomized, multicenter open label exploratory study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) leads to a clinical decline in the quality of life (QOL). Therefore, new treatment options are needed. We performed a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group exploratory trial to determine the efficacy of hangeshashinto (HST) in patients with PPI-refractory GERD.

METHODS

We enrolled 78 patients with PPI-refractory GERD for standard PPI regimens for at least 4 weeks and randomly assigned patients to receive either a combination of usual dose of rabeprazole (10 mg/day) + HST (7.5 g/day; HST group) or a double dose of rabeprazole (20 mg/day; double-dose PPI group). The primary end points were the extent of improvement in FSSG (Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD) score and the change over time in FSSG score.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in terms of the improvement degree of the FSSG score between the two groups. Although the total FSSG score and reflux syndrome score decreased significantly for both groups over time (p < 0.001), the acid-related dyspepsia (ARD) score decreased significantly in the HST group from 1 week after drug administration (p < 0.05), indicating an improvement in the condition earlier than in the double-dose PPI group. Moreover, in examinations concerning BMI and age, the HST group had a significantly higher improvement degree of ARD score in patients with BMI < 22 (p < 0.05) and aged < 65 years (p < 0.05) than the double-dose PPI group.

CONCLUSIONS

HST may be beneficial for patients with PPI-refractory GERD, particularly in non-obese and non-elderly patients with dyspepsia symptoms.

Proton pump inhibitor monotherapy is effective to attenuate dyspepsia symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a multicenter prospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and functional dyspepsia (FD) are frequently overlapped. However, no treatment strategies have been established yet for such patients. This study compared the effects of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment in patients with GERD-associated FD among three groups with varying severity levels of GERD symptoms.

METHODS

The patients with GERD and FD symptoms received PPI treatment for 4 weeks after endoscopy, and the severity of the symptoms and responses to treatment were evaluated at before and after 4 weeks of treatment using the Gastroesophageal Reflux and Dyspepsia Therapeutic Efficacy and Satisfaction Test (GERD-TEST). The patients were divided into three groups in accordance with the severity of the GERD symptoms as assessed by the GERD symptom subscale (SS) scores of pre-treatment.

RESULTS

Data from 233 cases of 40 mild, 151 moderate and 42 severe symptoms were analyzed. Analysis of the pre-treatment scores for each symptom revealed that a higher GERD-SS score was significantly associated with higher scores on any kind of FD score. Four weeks of PPI treatment significantly and markedly alleviated any of GERD/FD symptoms. Most importantly, change in the score for each symptom after 4 weeks of treatment relative to the pre-treatment score was significantly greater in the groups with more severe GERD-SS.

CONCLUSION

FD symptoms associated with more severe GERD symptoms are supposed to be acid-related dyspepsia, and PPI monotherapy is recommended as the treatment of first choice in such patients.

Decline in perception of acid regurgitation symptoms from gastroesophageal reflux disease in diabetes mellitus patients

Objectives

To determine if a discrepancy exists between subjective symptoms and the grade of endoscopic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients.

Methods

All 2,884 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy completed the modified Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), an interview-based rating scale consisting of 16 items including a question on acid regurgitation. Patients were divided into DM and non-DM groups (1,135 and 1,749 patients, respectively). GERD was diagnosed endoscopically and graded according to the Los Angeles classification. Grade B or more severe GERD was defined as severe endoscopic GERD. The intergroup GSRS score was compared statistically.

Results

In severe endoscopic GERD patients, the prevalence of patients with a positive GSRS score in the acid regurgitation question was statistically lower in DM patients than non-DM patients. Of the 60 non-DM patients with severe endoscopic GERD, 40 patients (67%) had a positive GSRS score for acid regurgitation; however, of the 51 DM patients with severe endoscopic GERD, 23 patients (45%) had a positive GSRS score. Multivariate analysis showed that severe endoscopic GERD (OR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.21–3.33; p = 0.0066), non-DM (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.54–0.94; p = 0.0157), younger age (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97–0.99; p = 0.0125), and hiatal hernia (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.12–1.90; p = 0.0042) were associated with acid regurgitation symptoms.

Conclusions

There is a discrepancy between subjective symptoms and endoscopic GERD grade in DM patients. The ability of DM patients to feel acid regurgitation may be decreased.

Therapeutic Response to Twice-daily Rabeprazole on Health-related Quality of Life and Symptoms in Patients with Refractory Reflux Esophagitis: A Multicenter Observational Study

Objective To investigate the effect of twice-daily rabeprazole doses on health-related quality of life in refractory patients. Methods and Patients Reflux esophagitis patients with an insufficient response to once-daily proton pump inhibitor therapy (Los Angeles Classification grade A-D) received rabeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. The health-related quality of life (SF-8™) and symptoms, using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal reflux disease, were evaluated before treatment and at weeks 4 and 8. Endoscopy was performed at baseline and at weeks 8 and 32 where possible. The rabeprazole dose was determined by the attending physician. Results There were 1,796 patients analyzed for the efficacy of the twice-daily treatment. Of these cases, 1,462 were treated with rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily, and 334 were treated with rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily. The factors that affected the selection of the twice-daily rabeprazole dose by physicians were evaluated, and as expected, "endoscopic findings when treatment was started" had a strong effect on the selection of the rabeprazole dose. With both regimens, health-related quality of life and subjective symptoms were significantly improved at weeks 4 and 8 compared to baseline (p<0.001). The recurrence rate of erosive esophagitis at week 32 was 9.7% in rabeprazole twice daily-treated patients and 28.4% in proton pump inhibitor (PPI) once daily-treated patients. Both regimens were well tolerated. Conclusion Twice-daily treatment with rabeprazole improved the subjective symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with refractory reflux esophagitis more effectively than the standard once-daily dose.

Proton pump inhibitor after endoscopic resection for esophageal squamous cell cancer: multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Whether proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) relieve heartburn or precordial pain after endoscopic resection (ER) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of PPI therapy for these symptoms after ER for ESCC.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial among 15 hospitals in Japan. In total, 229 patients with cT1a ESCC were randomly assigned to receive PPI therapy for 5 weeks after ER (the PPI group, n = 115) or follow-up without PPI therapy (the non-PPI group, n = 114). The primary end point was the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-like symptoms after ER from a self-reported questionnaire (Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD). Secondary end points were ulcer healing rate at 5 weeks, incidence of pain, improvement rate of symptoms in those who started PPI therapy because of GERD-like symptoms in the non-PPI group, and adverse events.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the incidence of GERD-like symptoms after ER between the non-PPI and PPI groups (30 % vs 34 %, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the ulcer healing rate at 5 weeks (84 % vs 85 %) and incidence of pain within 1 week (36 % vs 45 %). In nine of ten patients (90 %) who started PPI therapy because of GERD-like symptoms in the non-PPI group, PPI administration relieved GERD-like symptoms. No adverse events related to PPI administration were observed.

CONCLUSION

PPI therapy is not efficacious in reducing symptoms and did not promote healing of ulcers in patients undergoing ER for ESCC.

Characteristics of symptomatic reflux episodes in Japanese proton pump inhibitor-refractory non-erosive reflux disease patients

AIM: To clarify the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients.

METHODS: Thirty-five NERD patients with persistent symptoms, despite taking rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 wk, were included in this study. All patients underwent 24 h combined impedance - pH on rabeprazole. The symptom index (SI) was considered to be positive if ≥ 50%, and proximal reflux episodes were determined when reflux reached 15 cm above the proximal margin of the lower esophageal sphincter.

RESULTS: In 14 (40%) SI-positive patients, with liquid weakly acid reflux, the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms was significantly more frequent in proximal reflux episodes (46.7%) than in distal ones (5.7%) (P < 0.001). With liquid acid reflux, there were no significant differences in the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms between proximal reflux episodes (38.5%) and distal ones (20.5%) (NS). With mixed liquid-gas weakly acid reflux, the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms in proximal reflux episodes was significantly more frequent (31.0%) than in distal reflux ones (3.3%) (P < 0.001). With mixed liquid-gas acid reflux, there were no significant differences in the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms between proximal reflux episodes (29.4%) and distal ones (14.3%) (NS).

CONCLUSION: The proximal extent of weakly acidic liquid and mixed liquid-gas reflux is a major factor associated with reflux perception in SI-positive patients on proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of mosapride plus omeprazole combination therapy to omeprazole monotherapy in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE

We investigated whether the prokinetic activity of mosapride, a 5-hydroxytryptamine 4 receptor agonist, in combination with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) would ameliorate symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Patients who experienced reflux symptoms more than twice weekly were eligible for this study. In all, 60 patients were randomized to receive mosapride 5 mg thrice daily combined with omeprazole 10 mg once daily (GO group), or omeprazole alone (O group) for 4 weeks. The patients completed the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) at the beginning and the end of the study. The primary outcome compared changes in the FSSG reflux-related symptom (RS) score between treatment groups during the study period.

RESULTS

The FSSG RS scores significantly decreased both in the GO group and the O group, with no differences in improvement between the groups (-5.86 for the GO group vs -4.89 for the O group, P = 0.49). In non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients the improvement was significantly lower than that in erosive GERD patients (-4.00 vs -7.67, P = 0.02). However, the addition of mosapride was effective in subgroup analyses of specific symptoms, such as burping.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining mosapride with PPI provided no additional amelioration of reflux symptoms compared to PPI alone. Both regimens provided less relief from reflux symptoms in NERD than in erosive GERD patients. The addition of mosapride ameliorated reflux in patients with symptoms like burping.

Clinical characteristics and effectiveness of lansoprazole in Japanese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) frequently have symptoms of dyspepsia in addition to reflux symptoms. Treatment options for dyspepsia are not standardized. The aim of this study was to clarify the therapeutic effect of lansoprazole on dyspepsia in Japanese patients with GERD.

METHODS

GERD patients with dyspepsia were enrolled and treated with lansoprazole 15 or 30 mg once daily for 4 weeks. Reflux and dyspeptic symptoms were assessed by questionnaires before treatment, and 2 and 4 weeks after the start of lansoprazole treatment.

RESULTS

In the effectiveness analysis set (n = 12,653), heartburn was reported by 91.6 % of patients at study enrollment. Postprandial fullness was the most frequently reported dyspepsia symptom at the start of the study, reported by 79.0 % of enrolled patients. After 4 weeks of lansoprazole treatment, heartburn symptoms were improved in 75.7 % of patients and symptoms of postprandial fullness were improved in 68.7 % of patients. The therapeutic effect of low and high doses of lansoprazole on dyspepsia, as well as on reflux symptoms, was approximately 10 % higher in patients with endoscopy-confirmed erosive esophagitis (60.1-82.2 %), than in patients with non-erosive reflux diseases (53.0-73.3 %). Lansoprazole was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

In this large-scale clinical study, lansoprazole effectively relieved dyspepsia in addition to reflux symptoms in patients with GERD.

Association of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux with metabolic syndrome parameters in patients with endocrine disease

Background. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) and obesity are known risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which is often found in patients with endocrine disorders, such as thyroid dysfunction and hypopituitarism. To clarify the relationship of endocrine disease with GERD, we investigated the symptoms of GERD in patients with various endocrine diseases. Methods. Patients with various endocrine disorders who visited Kyushu University Hospital were included. GERD symptoms were examined using a self-administered questionnaire, the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG). Metabolic parameters, including body-mass index (BMI), waist circumference, blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides, and values of endocrine function, including thyroid stimulating hormone, free thyroxin, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1, were assessed. Results. A total of 111 consecutive patients were recruited for the study. Among these, 18 (16.2%) patients were considered to have GERD. Among the parameters, BMI (P = 0.03) and triglycerides (P = 0.001) showed a positive association and HDL-C (P = 0.0007) showed an inverse association with the FSSG score. However, none of the endocrine values were associated with the FSSG score. Conclusion. Symptoms of GERD in patients with endocrine disorders might be attributed to MetS as comorbidity.

High prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Parkinson's disease: a questionnaire-based study

The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and clinical features of gastroesophageal reflex disease (GERD) in Parkinson's disease (PD). Consecutively recruited PD patients and controls were questioned about heartburn and GERD with a questionnaire. In PD patients, disease duration and severity, quality of life, and nonmotor symptoms were also examined and then the clinical features of GERD were analyzed. A total of 102 patients and 49 controls were enrolled and 21 patients and 4 controls had heartburn, significantly frequent in PD. The prevalence rate of GERD was 26.5% in PD and the odds ratio was 4.05. Heartburn, bent forward flexion, and wearing-off phenomenon were frequent, and scores of UPDRS, total and part II, PD questionnaire-39, and nonmotor symptom scale were significantly higher in PD patients with GERD than without GERD. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed statistical significance in UPDRS part II and nonmotor symptom scale. This study suggests that GERD is prevalent in PD. Deterioration of daily living activities and other nonmotor symptoms can imply the presence of GERD. Because clinical symptoms of GERD are usually treatable, the management can improve the patient's quality of life. Increased attention should be given to detect GERD in PD.

Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and related factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients with many chronic diseases, but has not been well recognized in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated the prevalence of GERD symptoms in 278 outpatients with RA and their association with such clinical factors as age, sex, height, weight, body mass index, medications drugs, and functional status evaluated by the Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ). GERD symptoms were evaluated by Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG). The mean FSSG score for all patients was 5.6, and 82 patients were considered to have GERD symptoms (FSSG score ≥8), thus the overall prevalence of GERD symptoms was 29.5%. MHAQ score and height were significantly higher and lower, respectively, and prednisolone usage was significantly more in the patients with GERD symptoms than those without. These three clinical factors were also significantly associated with GERD symptoms by univariate logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that MHAQ was the only clinical factor related to GERD symptoms. In conclusion, the prevalence of GERD symptoms in RA patients was high and strongly associated with decreased functional status, suggesting that physicians should pay attention to GERD symptoms in RA management, especially for patients with low functional status.

Response to gastroesophageal reflux disease therapy: assessment at 4 weeks predicts response/non-response at 8 weeks

BACKGROUND

Many questionnaires that assess subjective symptoms or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) have been developed to confirm the efficacy of treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, few reports have correlated early improvements in scale scores with predictions of subsequent therapeutic responses. Our aim was to investigate the appropriate timing for evaluating therapeutic response and subsequent changes in symptoms and HRQOL.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study. A total of 5,279 GERD patients with Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) scores ≥ 8 points at baseline were analyzed. Correlations between HRQOL and FSSG were investigated and logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The FSSG scores and HRQOL improvements in responders were significantly greater than in non-responders. Positive correlation between FSSG and HRQOL was observed. Based on the analysis, severity of esophagitis at baseline, complications of hypertension, higher HRQOL mental score at baseline, and higher FSSG score at baseline were predictors of responders. Gastrectomy, complication of insomnia, and prior medication with proton pump inhibitors were predictors of non-responders.

CONCLUSION

Evaluating patients' symptoms during the fourth week of rabeprazole therapy allows predictions of subsequent changes in subjective symptoms and HRQOL.

The daily response for proton pump inhibitor treatment in Japanese reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease

We investigated comparison according to reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease about “daily” symptom improvement for proton pump inhibitor treatment. We enrolled 57 reflux esophagitis and 90 non-erosive reflux disease patients. They took rabeprazole 10 mg/day for 28 days and completed “daily” in the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD from baseline until day 14, and after 28 days of treatment. The efficacy endpoint was the improvement rates in Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD, based on baseline. Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD was decreased in reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease (p<0.001) and was significantly lower in reflux esophagitis than in non-erosive reflux disease from the first day of treatment (p<0.05). Symptomatic improvement rates were also significantly higher in reflux esophagitis (50.3 ± 44.9%) than in non-erosive reflux disease (31.7 ± 43.2%) from the first day of treatment (p<0.0001). The symptomatic improvement rates in reflux esophagitis were significant increased from the second day of treatment until after 28 days of treatment (p = 0.0006), however, these in non-erosive reflux disease were significant increased from third days until after 28 days of treatment (p = 0.0002). In non-erosive reflux disease, the improvement of dysmotility symptom was particularly gradual as well as of reflux symptom, too. As for results of prediction of proton pump inhibitor response (completed symptom resolution) form early symptom improvement within 1 week, it was able to predict proton pump inhibitor response from the symptom improvement rate on 3 days in reflux esophagitis and on day 7 in non-erosive reflux disease. In conclusion, the prediction of the proton pump inhibitor response in non-erosive reflux disease was slow in comparison with reflux esophagitis. The cause was gradual improvement of dysmotility symptom.

Clinical symptoms of FSSG in gastroesophageal reflux disease are critical for PPI treatment: Japanese multi-centers with 185 patients

AIM

The main aim of this study was to determine whether questionnaire evaluations of clinical symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease were useful to assess proton pump inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

A total of 185 Japanese patients (men, 88; women, 97; age: 55.7 ± 16.1 years) with gastroesophageal reflux disease were enrolled. The patients were divided based on the frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: severe symptoms with scores ≥8 and mild symptoms with scores ≤7. Quality of life was evaluated with the Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey. All patients were treated with a proton pump inhibitor, rabeprazole (10 mg/day), for 8 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into four groups: reflux esophagitis with severe symptoms (n = 92, 49.7%); reflux esophagitis with mild symptoms (n = 17, 9.2%); non-erosive reflux disease with severe symptoms (n = 66, 35.7%); and non-erosive reflux disease with mild symptoms (n = 10, 5.4%). The dysmotility score was high in non-erosive reflux disease with severe symptoms compared with reflux esophagitis with severe symptoms (9.1 ± 0.5 vs 6.8 ± 0.5, P < 0.05). The symptom score and quality of life in the severe symptoms groups for both reflux esophagitis and non-erosive reflux disease were significantly improved by rabeprazole treatment. Only the reflux score was improved by rabeprazole in the reflux esophagitis with mild symptoms group; no therapeutic effect was observed for the non-erosive reflux disease with mild symptoms group.

CONCLUSIONS

Low scores on the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease indicate poor responsiveness to proton pump inhibitor treatment, and high scores indicate good responsiveness.

Relationship between vomiting reflex during esophagogastroduodenoscopy and dyspepsia symptoms

AIM

Although frequent vomiting reflexes during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) causes suffering in patients, very few studies have investigated the characteristics of subjects who frequently develop vomiting reflexes. This study examined the incidence of the vomiting reflex and related factors, especially upper gastrointestinal symptoms, among individuals undergoing transoral EGD.

METHODS

Subjects included 488 consecutive adults (mean age, 56.1 ± 8.9 years) who underwent transoral EGD for gastric cancer screening between February 2010 and March 2011. All procedures were performed by an endoscopist with 15 years of experience. Based on a questionnaire survey using the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG), symptoms (dyspepsia and acid reflux symptoms) and the number of vomiting reflexes during EGD were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the 488 subjects, 271 (56%) developed vomiting reflexes (mean, 4.2 times). This reflex-positive group was younger (54.3 ± 9.5 years) than the reflex-negative group (58.3 ± 7.7 years, P < 0.001). The number of subjects in the reflex-positive group with a high FSSG dyspepsia score (2.27 ± 2.57 vs 1.23 ± 1.84; P < 0.001), acid reflux symptom score (1.96 ± 2.22 vs 1.34 ± 2.14; P < 0.01) or an esophageal hiatal hernia (14.8% vs 4.6%; P < 0.001) was significantly higher than in the reflex-negative group. Multivariate analysis also showed a significant correlation between these four factors and the occurrence of vomiting reflexes. Using an FSSG dyspepsia score of 1 as the cut-off offered 68% sensitivity and 57% specificity for predicting the occurrence of vomiting reflexes.

CONCLUSION

Based on FSSG questionnaire responses on upper gastrointestinal symptoms, dyspepsia symptoms, in particular, are related to presence of vomiting reflexes during EGD.

Development and evaluation of a modified Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease to distinguish functional dyspepsia from non-erosive reflux disease

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) is the standard questionnaire used in Japan for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and assessment of the response to treatment. We modified the FSSG in order to assess dyspepsia symptoms, and evaluated the modified questionnaire.

METHODS

We modified the FSSG by adding two questions on interdigestive and postprandial epigastric pain. We then assessed the modified FSSG with 100 new untreated symptomatic patients presenting to hospital and in 200 subjects undergoing health checks. Endoscopic assessment of the esophagogastric junction was performed according to the modified Los Angeles classification with addition of Grade N (normal appearance) and Grade M (minimal change). Endoscopic images were assessed by five experienced endoscopists blinded to the questionnaire results.

RESULTS

The 100 new patients included 16 with erosive GERD (>Grade A), 12 with peptic ulcer, and two with gastric cancer. Among the 70 patients with no evidence of organic disease, the modified FSSG diagnosed functional dyspepsia (FD) in 41 and non-erosive gastric disease (NERD) in 29. A significant difference was seen in the dyspepsia score between patients with FD and NERD. Subjects with endoscopic GERD undergoing health checks had significantly higher scores for all symptoms, reflux symptoms, and dyspeptic symptoms on the modified FSSG.

CONCLUSION

The modified FSSG can clearly distinguish FD from NERD, and is useful for the assessment of dyspeptic symptoms.

Patient satisfaction with medication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction is increasingly regarded as an important aspect of measuring treatment success in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

OBJECTIVE

To review how satisfied patients with GERD are with their medication, and to analyze the usefulness of patient satisfaction as a clinical end point by comparing it with symptom improvement.

METHODS

Systematic searches of the PubMed and EMBASE databases identified clinical trials and patient surveys published between 1966 and 2009.

RESULTS

Twelve trials reported that 56% to 100% of patients were 'satisfied' or 'very satisfied' with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment for GERD. Patient satisfaction levels were higher for PPIs than other GERD medications in two trials. The sample-size-weighted average proportion of patients 'satisfied' with their PPI after four weeks of treatment in trials was 93% (95% CI 87% to 99%), with 73% (95% CI 62% to 83%) being 'very satisfied'. In four surveys, the average proportion of patients 'satisfied' with their PPI treatment was 82% (95% CI 73% to 90%) and 62% (95% CI 48% to 75%) were 'very satisfied'. Seven trials found a positive association between patient satisfaction and symptom improvement, and two surveys between satisfaction and improved health-related quality of life. Three trials found that continuous treatment yielded higher rates of satisfaction than on-demand therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

More than one-half of patients were satisfied with their PPI medication in trials, and more patients were satisfied with PPIs than other medication types. An association between patient satisfaction and symptom resolution was found, suggesting that patient satisfaction is a useful end point for evaluating GERD treatment success.

Symptoms and quality of life in underweight gastroesophageal reflux disease patients and therapeutic responses to proton pump inhibitors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

A correlation to obesity has been reported in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, insufficient data have been obtained regarding underweight GERD patients. Post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate subjective symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in underweight GERD patients (body mass index [BMI] < 18.5) and to evaluate therapeutic response to proton pump inhibitors.

METHODS

A total of 2646 patients who underwent endoscopy were classified by BMI and analyzed. Rabeprazole was administered for 8 weeks. Subjective symptoms and HRQOL were assessed using questionnaires (F-Scale and SF-8™).

RESULTS

Baseline endoscopy revealed 29.2% of patients had non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Underweight status was identified in 5.8% of GERD patients, and mean baseline symptoms score and SF-8 physical component summary (PCS) score were 18.6 and 42.4, respectively, reflecting greater impairment compared with the values of 15.4 and 45.6 in normal-weight patients (BMI ≥ 22 but < 25). Treatment with rabeprazole resulted in a decrease from 18.6 at baseline to 6.7 at week 8 in underweight reflux esophagitis subjects, and from 15.0 to 6.3 in underweight NERD patients. PCS score improved in underweight patients. These changes were about the same as in normal-weight or obese patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese GERD patients are often obese, as reported previously, but some GERD patients are underweight. Baseline symptoms and QOL in underweight GERD patients tended to be more severe than in normal-weight patients, but therapeutic response with proton pump inhibitors was about the same as in normal-weight or obese patients.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and tympanoplasty surgical outcome: is there a relationship?

Objective:

To investigate the possible clinical relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and the type one tympanoplasty surgical outcomes of adults with chronic otitis media, by using a simple, cost-effective, reliable questionnaire and physical findings.

Methods:

Fifty-two of 147 patients undergoing type one tympanoplasty were studied. Gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms were evaluated using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease questionnaire. Laryngoscopic physical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux were evaluated using the Reflux Finding Score. A successful outcome was defined as an intact tympanic membrane. Correlations between the two assessment tool results and the patient's surgical success were calculated.

Results:

The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score was significantly higher in patients with unsuccessful tympanic membrane closure (group one) than in patients with successful closure (group two) (p < 0.05). The Reflux Finding Score was also significantly higher in group one than group two (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive relationship between the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire score and the Reflux Finding Score (p < 0.01).

Conclusion:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease may be a significant prognostic factor for tympanoplasty failure. Therefore, reflux investigation may be important during the treatment of chronic otitis media, and positive cases may need reflux treatment as well as ear disease treatment.

A randomized controlled trial of adding intravenous pantoprazole to conventional treatment for the immediate relief of dyspeptic pain

INTRODUCTION

Acute, severe dyspeptic pain is a common condition in the emergency department. Despite the traditional "GI cocktail" (GI indicates gastrointestinal), an intravenous (IV) proton pump inhibitor (PPI), a novel acid-lowering drug, has recently been used to treat this condition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate effect of IV pantoprazole in addition to the conventional GI cocktail in the relief of severe dyspeptic pain.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, controlled study was conducted in the emergency department of an urban tertiary-care hospital from January 2011 to October 2011. Selected patients with severe dyspeptic pain were randomized to treatment with a placebo, antacid, and antispasmodic (conventional group) or IV pantoprazole, antacid, and antispasmodic (pantoprazole group). The self-reported 100-mm visual analog scale score, adverse effects, and overall satisfaction were evaluated in 15-minute intervals for 60 minutes.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven eligible cases were enrolled in the study. Forty-four and 43 patients were randomized in the conventional group and pantoprazole group, respectively. There was no difference in the mean 60-minute visual analog scale scores between the treatment groups. The rate of "responders," additional drug use, adverse effects, and patient satisfaction were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Intravenous PPI provides no additional benefit over the conventional GI cocktail in the relief of acute, severe dyspeptic pain. Because of its neutral effect and higher cost, the use of IV PPI to treat such conditions should be discouraged in general clinical practice.

Combination of angiotensin II receptor blockers promotes proton pump inhibitor-based healing of reflux esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have described factors associated with the failure of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to effect endoscopic healing of reflux esophagitis (RE), but few studies have addressed factors promoting PPI-based endoscopic healing. We performed post hoc analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort of RE patients to identify factors encouraging endoscopic healing of this disorder.

METHODS

Patients with RE received 10 or 20 mg rabeprazole for 8 weeks, and endoscopic findings before and after treatment were studied. To evaluate the effects of patient background factors on endoscopic healing, we performed multiple logistic regression analysis and determined the respective odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 454 patients who underwent endoscopy at baseline and again at week 8 were included in the analysis. After 8 weeks of treatment, improvement in endoscopic findings was observed in 94.1% (427/454) of patients, and endoscopic healing was seen in 76.7% (348/454). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that a combination of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) had a significant positive impact on endoscopic healing (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.411-10.903), but no significant positive relationship was seen for other concomitant drugs such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and calcium channel blockers. Severe RE at baseline (OR 0.365, 95% CI 0.281-0.475) and PPI therapy prior to enrollment (OR 0.154, 95% CI 0.052-0.453) were found to have significant negative effects on endoscopic healing.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of ARBs may promote endoscopic healing of RE treated with PPIs.

Rikkunshito improves symptoms in PPI-refractory GERD patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial in Japan

BACKGROUND

To seek a promising therapeutic regimen for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the standard PPI treatment, we compared the efficacies of rikkunshito (a Japanese traditional medication) combined with rabeprazole (RPZ) and a double dose of RPZ in a prospective randomized multicenter trial in Japanese PPI-refractory GERD patients.

METHODS

One hundred and four patients with GERD symptoms remaining after 4-week treatment with RPZ (10 mg/day) were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of either combination therapy [rikkunshito (7.5 g/day) with a standard dose of RPZ (10 mg/day)] or a double dose of RPZ (20 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the improvement rate, calculated based on the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) before and after treatment. Subgroup analysis was also performed with respect to each subject's background factors such as reflux esophagitis (RE)/non-erosive GERD (NERD), age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Four-week treatment with rikkunshito combined with RPZ significantly decreased the FSSG score from 17.6 ± 6.5 to 12.0 ± 6.9, similar to the decrease seen on treatment with a double dose of RPZ. Regarding the therapeutic improvement rate, there were also significant effects in both groups. However, in the subgroup analysis based on RE/NERD, the improvement rate of male NERD patients in the rikkunshito group was significantly greater than that of such patients in the other group (P < 0.05). In the rikkunshito group, the treatment was more effective in NERD patients with a low BMI than in those with a high BMI (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rikkunshito combined with standard-dose RPZ therapy may be a useful new strategy for PPI-refractory GERD patients.

Influence of lumbar kyphosis and back muscle strength on the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease in middle-aged and elderly people

Objective

The objectives of this study was to clarify the relationship between kyphosis and Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by evaluation of spinal alignment, obesity, osteoporosis, back muscle strength, intake of oral drugs, and smoking and alcohol history in screening of a community population to determine the factors related to GERD symptoms.

Summary of background data

GERD increases with age and is estimated to occur in about 30% of people. Risk factors for GERD include aging, male gender, obesity, oral medicines, smoking, and alcohol intake. It has also been suggested that kyphosis may influence the frequency of GERD, but the relationship between kyphosis and GERD is unclear.

Subjects and methods

We examined 245 subjects (100 males and 145 females; average age 66.7 years old) in a health checkup that included evaluation of sagittal balance and spinal mobility with SpinalMouse^®, GERD symptoms using the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaire, body mass index, osteoporosis, back muscle strength, number of oral drugs taken per day, intake of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intake of bisphosphonates, and smoking and alcohol intake.

Results

Multivariate logistic regression analysis including all the variables showed that lumbar lordosis angle, sagittal balance, number of oral drugs taken per day, and back muscle strength had significant effects on the presence of GERD (OR, 1.10, 1.11, 1.09 and 1.03; 95%CI, 1.03–1.17, 1.02–1.20, 1.01–1.18 and 1.01–1.04; p = 0.003, 0.015, 0.031 and 0.038, respectively). The other factors showed no association with GERD.

Conclusion

This study is the first to show that lumbar kyphosis, poor sagittal balance; increased number of oral drugs taken per day, and decreased back muscle strength are important risk factors for the development of GERD symptoms. Thus, orthopedic surgeons and physicians should pay attention to GERD in elderly patients with spinal deformity.

Correlation between symptomatic improvement and quality of life in patients with reflux and dyspeptic symptoms

We investigated the correlation between symptomatic improvement and quality of life in Japanese gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with PPI. Eighty one patients with reflux and dyspeptic symptom were enrolled. The evaluation of the symptom was used he Frequency Scale for the Symptom of GERD in 3 categories: total score of 12 questions, score related to reflux symptoms, and score related to dyspeptic symptoms and the evaluation of the quality of life was use the 8-item Short Form Health Survey in 2 categories, the physical component summary score and mental component summary score. All patients administered rabeprazole 10 mg/day for 8 weeks. We investigated the correlation between symptomatic improvement with proton pump inhibitor and quality of life. Significant symptomatic improvement was seen in the total score of 12 questions (26.7 ± 8.8 → 17.5 ± 5.9, p<0.0001), score related to reflux symptoms (14.9 ± 5.4 → 9.6 ± 3.6, p<0.0001), and score related to dyspeptic symptoms (11.8 ± 4.3 → 8.0 ± 2.9, p<0.0001). Significant improvement in quality of life was seen in the physical component summary score (47.8 ± 6.6 → 50.0 ± 5.9, p = 0.0209) and mental component summary score (47.4 ± 8.5 → 50.4 ± 5.3, p = 0.0133) with proton pump inhibitor. With proton pump inhibitor, a significant positive correlation was seen between the improvement rates in total score of 12 questions, score related to dyspeptic symptoms and in mental component summary score at 8 weeks (total score of 12 questions: r = 0.275, p = 0.0265, score related to dyspeptic symptoms: r = 0.367, p = 0.0027). In conclusion, quality of life was associated with improvement in dyspeptic symptoms with proton pump inhibitor treatment.

Rikkunshito improves symptoms in PPI-refractory GERD patients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial in Japan

BACKGROUND

To seek a promising therapeutic regimen for proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-refractory patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the standard PPI treatment, we compared the efficacies of rikkunshito (a Japanese traditional medication) combined with rabeprazole (RPZ) and a double dose of RPZ in a prospective randomized multicenter trial in Japanese PPI-refractory GERD patients.

METHODS

One hundred and four patients with GERD symptoms remaining after 4-week treatment with RPZ (10 mg/day) were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of either combination therapy [rikkunshito (7.5 g/day) with a standard dose of RPZ (10 mg/day)] or a double dose of RPZ (20 mg/day). The primary endpoint was the improvement rate, calculated based on the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) before and after treatment. Subgroup analysis was also performed with respect to each subject's background factors such as reflux esophagitis (RE)/non-erosive GERD (NERD), age, gender, and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Four-week treatment with rikkunshito combined with RPZ significantly decreased the FSSG score from 17.6 ± 6.5 to 12.0 ± 6.9, similar to the decrease seen on treatment with a double dose of RPZ. Regarding the therapeutic improvement rate, there were also significant effects in both groups. However, in the subgroup analysis based on RE/NERD, the improvement rate of male NERD patients in the rikkunshito group was significantly greater than that of such patients in the other group (P < 0.05). In the rikkunshito group, the treatment was more effective in NERD patients with a low BMI than in those with a high BMI (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Rikkunshito combined with standard-dose RPZ therapy may be a useful new strategy for PPI-refractory GERD patients.

Investigation of pretreatment prediction of proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-resistant patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and the dose escalation challenge of PPIs-TORNADO study: a multicenter prospective study by the Acid-Related Symptom Research Group in Japan

BACKGROUNDS

Some non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and reflux esophagitis (RE) patients are unresponsive to a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) at standard dose. We investigated the predictive marker of the efficacy of PPI for GERD patients including NERD and RE treated with standard and increased doses of a PPI.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (NERD and RE) were treated with rabeprazole (RPZ) 10 mg once daily for 4 weeks. The RPZ dosage was increased to 10 mg twice daily for an additional 2 weeks and again to 20 mg twice daily for another 2 weeks if heartburn was not relieved. Baseline characteristics and efficacy of RPZ were assessed on the basis of a heartburn diary and frequency scale for symptoms of GERD (FSSG).

RESULTS

Complete heartburn relief rates after 4 weeks were 42.5% (31/73) and 67.9% (19/28) in NERD and RE groups, respectively, which rose to 68.9 and 91.7% after dose escalation. Multivariate analysis revealed that parameters associated with resistance to RPZ 10 mg once daily were female, non-smoking, frequent heartburn, low score for question 4 (Q4) of the FSSG (subconsciously rubbing the chest), and high scores for Q3 (heavy stomach after meal) and Q7 (unusual sensation in the throat). Frequent heartburn and a high score for Q7 were associated with resistance to RPZ 20 mg twice daily. FSSG scores of patients resistant to RPZ were significantly higher in comparison with responders before and during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

FSSG could predict response to a PPI for symptomatic GERD. Increase of RPZ dose is useful for treatment of GERD refractory to the standard dose of RPZ.

Endoscopic and symptoms analysis in Mexican patients with irritable Bowel syndrome, dyspepsia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease

The aim of this study was to analyze the data of endoscopy and symptoms in 118 Mexican patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), dyspepsia, non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and erosive esophagitis (EE). IBS criteria were fulfilling for dyspepsia patients in 47%, for NERD in 48%, and for EE patients in 48% of cases. Esophagitis was present in 42% of patients with IBS and in 45% of patients with dyspepsia. A higher prevalence of hiatus hernia was found in EE vs. NERD. Heartburn and acid eructation were associated with the presence of esophagitis; acid eructation, regurgitation and nocturnal pain with duodenitis; and heartburn and regurgitation with hiatus hernia. Males more frequently reported: mucus in feces, abdominal distension, nausea and gastritis; and women more frequently reported esophagitis and duodenitis. Patients with NERD (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.08 to 5.99, p=0.04), tenesmus and early satiety, and men had an increase risk for reporting hard or lumpy stools. In conclusion, nearly half of the Mexican patients with NERD, EE and dyspepsia fulfill criteria for IBS. A large number of symptoms were correlated with endoscopy, which can be used to improve the indication of the endoscopy and its implementation in clinical studies.

Assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease by serodiagnosis of Helicobacter pylori-related chronic gastritis stage

AIM: To evaluate the association of Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori)-related chronic gastritis stage with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS: Subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, a questionnaire using a frequency scale for symptoms of GERD (FSSG), and measurements of serum H.pylori-antibody and pepsinogen (PG) levels. They were classified into the following 4 groups in terms of H.pylori-related chronic gastritis stage: Group A (n = 219), H.pylori(-)PG(-); Group B (n = 310), H.pylori(+)PG(-); Group C (n = 279), H.pylori(+)PG(+); and Group D (n = 17), H.pylori(-)PG(+).

RESULTS: Reflux esophagitis occurred in 30.6% of Group A, 14.5% of Group B, 6.8% of Group C, and 0% of Group D (P < 0.001). Scores for acid reflux symptoms decreased significantly with chronic gastritis stage (from Group A to D) (P < 0.05), while scores for dysmotility symptoms did not differ significantly. The prevalence of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) did not differ among groups. However, in subjects with GERD, the prevalence of NERD tended to increase with chronic gastritis stage (P = 0.081).

CONCLUSION: Acid reflux symptoms and the prevalence of reflux esophagitis can be assessed by measuring both serum H.pylori-antibody and PG levels.

Characteristics of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy

AIM: To investigate whether potent acid inhibition is effective in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) refractory to standard rabeprazole (RPZ) treatment.

METHODS: We treated 10 Japanese patients with NERD resistant to standard dosages of RPZ: 10 mg or 20 mg od, 20 mg bid, or 10 mg qid for 14 d. All patients completed a frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG); and underwent 24 h pH monitoring on day 14.

RESULTS: With increased dosages and frequency of administration of RPZ, median intragastric pH significantly increased, and FSSG scores significantly decreased. With RPZ 10 mg qid, potent acid inhibition was attained throughout 24 h. However, five subjects were refractory to RPZ 10 mg qid, although the median intragastric pH in these subjects (6.6, range: 6.2-7.1) was similar to that in the remaining five responsive subjects (6.5, range: 5.3-7.3). With baseline RPZ 10 mg od, FSSG scores in responsive patients improved by > 30%, whereas there was no significant decrease in the resistant group.

CONCLUSION: NERD patients whose FSSG score fails to decrease by > 30% after treatment with RPZ 10 mg od for 14 d are refractory to higher dosage.

Proton pump inhibitor step-down therapy for GERD: A multi-center study in Japan

AIM: To investigate the predictors of success in step-down of proton pump inhibitor and to assess the quality of life (QOL).

METHODS: Patients who had heartburn twice a week or more were treated with 20 mg omeprazole (OPZ) once daily for 8 wk as an initial therapy (study 1). Patients whose heartburn decreased to once a week or less at the end of the initial therapy were enrolled in study 2 and treated with 10 mg OPZ as maintenance therapy for an additional 6 mo (study 2). QOL was investigated using the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) before initial therapy, after both 4 and 8 wk of initial therapy, and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 mo after starting maintenance therapy.

RESULTS: In study 1, 108 patients were analyzed. Their characteristics were as follows; median age: 63 (range: 20-88) years, sex: 46 women and 62 men. The success rate of the initial therapy was 76%. In the patients with successful initial therapy, abdominal pain, indigestion and reflux GSRS scores were improved. In study 2, 83 patients were analyzed. Seventy of 83 patients completed the study 2 protocol. In the per-protocol analysis, 80% of 70 patients were successful for step-down. On multivariate analysis of baseline demographic data and clinical information, no previous treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) [odds ratio (OR) 0.255, 95% CI: 0.06-0.98] and a lower indigestion score in GSRS at the beginning of step-down therapy (OR 0.214, 95% CI: 0.06-0.73) were found to be the predictors of successful step-down therapy. The improved GSRS scores by initial therapy were maintained through the step-down therapy.

CONCLUSION: OPZ was effective for most GERD patients. However, those who have had previous treatment for GERD and experience dyspepsia before step-down require particular monitoring for relapse.

Effect of rabeprazole treatment on health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with reflux esophagitis: a prospective multicenter observational study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Despite many reports from Western nations describing endoscopic and symptomatic improvements in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE) using proton pump inhibitors (PPI), PPI effects on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL), particularly for a dose duration of less than 8 weeks, have not been sufficiently clarified in Japanese RE patients.

METHODS

RE patients (n = 9,029) in general practice settings took rabeprazole once daily for 8 weeks. HRQOL, using the 8-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8™), and symptoms, using a frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), were evaluated at the initiation of therapy (0 W), week 4 (4 W), and week 8 (8 W). Endoscopy was performed at 0 and 8 W where possible.

RESULTS

In efficacy analysis (n = 6,839), the mean ± SD values for the physical component summary of the SF-8™ at 0, 4, and 8 W were 45.005 ± 7.534, 48.517 ± 6.336, and 49.328 ± 6.207, respectively, while those for the mental component summary were 46.465 ± 7.743, 49.460 ± 6.470, and 50.388 ± 6.049, respectively. Significant improvements, compared to 0 W, were observed in eight domains and two summary scores at 4 W (P < 0.001), and further QOL score elevations were seen by 8 W. Regarding symptoms, the mean total frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) scores at 0, 4, and 8 W were 16.4 ± 9.8, 7.8 ± 7.4, and 6.0 ± 6.8, respectively. Significant improvements, compared to 0 W, were seen in the total, reflux, and dysmotility scores and in the scores for all 12 items at 4 W (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The score for the HRQOL of RE patients before rabeprazole therapy was below 50 points (the national mean for the general Japanese population), indicating harmed QOL. Rabeprazole markedly improved the HRQOL at 4 W, with recovery to the national mean by 8 W. Symptoms had also improved significantly at 4 W, with further improvements observed at 8 W.

Proton-pump inhibitor as palliative care for chemotherapy-induced gastroesophageal reflux disease in pancreatic cancer patients

Relief of adverse events induced by chemotherapy is an important issue for patients, especially those with a poor prognosis, such as with pancreatic cancer. There are no reports of the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chemotherapy, so we investigated the incidence of chemotherapy-induced GERD in patients undergoing treatment with gemcitabine or S-1 for pancreatic cancer and the effect of sodium rabeprazole (RPZ), a proton-pump inhibitor. GERD was diagnosed in 40% of the patients according to the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD score, and RBZ therapy significantly improved their symptoms.

Efficacy of the addition of prokinetics for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) resistant non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients: significance of frequency scale for the symptom of GERD (FSSG) on decision of treatment strategy

BACKGROUND

Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is a more difficult to treat than reflux esophagitis (RE) due to the high prevalence of PPI resistance. Consequently, the treatment strategy for NERD is yet to be established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Subjects were 467 GERD patients (NERD 349, RE 118, 47.4 +/- 16.7 years) with reflux symptoms such as heartburn. PPI was administered for 2 weeks, and total score (TS) of symptoms, seven items of reflux symptoms e.g. heartburn (reflux score: RS), and five items of dyspeptic symptoms e.g. heavy stomach (dyspeptic score: DS) were assessed using the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG), a GERD-specific questionnaire developed in Japan. Improvement <50% in TS was defined as non-responder. Patients' background, and pretreatment TS, RS, DS, and 12 items of FSSG were assessed. Furthermore, the effect of additional prokinetics (4 weeks) for 117 PPI non-response NERD patients was also examined.

RESULTS

Younger age, constipation, higher TS, DS, F2 (bloated stomach), 3 (heavy stomach), 5 (sick feeling after meal), 8 (satiety during meal) in FSSG were factors to be PPI non-responders in NERD. Significant improvement in TS were observed (pretreatment: 17.4 +/- 7.7 vs. 2 weeks 14.6 +/- 6.0 vs. 6 weeks 7.7 +/- 5.2, p<0.0001) after the addition of prokinetics in PPI non-response NERD.

CONCLUSION

Younger age, constipation, dysmotility were factors of PPI non-response in NERD. As high DS is correlated with PPI non-response, it is indicated that patients with strong dysmotility and functional dyspepsia complication might be PPI resistant. The efficacy of additional prokinetics for PPI non-response NERD was observed.

Evaluation of esophageal function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using transnasal endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To investigate the utility of a new method of carrying out esophageal manometry using a narrow gauge manometry catheter via a transnasal endoscope.

METHODS

The Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (FSSG), a GERD-specific questionnaire, was given to 45 subjects. Subjects underwent transnasal endoscopy with three dry and three wet (3 mL water) swallows. Direct observations of the primary peristaltic wave and peristaltic pressure measurement were conducted simultaneously.

RESULTS

Endoscopic observation of lower esophageal motility associated with swallowing revealed dilatation of the esophageal lumen after swallowing, followed by contraction in association with the primary peristaltic wave. The peristaltic pressure was significantly lower with increased FSSG scores for dry swallows (r = -0.347, P = 0.0212), but no significant correlation was seen for wet swallows.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant negative correlation between reflux symptoms and peristaltic pressure in dry swallows was thought to be that reduced pressure immediately rostral to the lower esophageal sphincter leads to decreased clearance following gastric acid reflux, playing a large part in the onset of symptoms.

Abnormal swallowing reflex and COPD exacerbations

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether an abnormal swallowing reflex affects COPD exacerbations. This study investigated the prevalence of abnormal swallowing reflexes and its relationship with COPD exacerbation prospectively. We also clarified its association with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and airway bacterial colonization.

METHODS

Swallowing reflex and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were examined in subjects with stable COPD and in control subjects. Concurrently, GERD symptoms were assessed using a self-reported questionnaire, and sputum bacterial cultures were investigated in the same subjects. Exacerbations were counted prospectively during the following 12 months.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 67 subjects with COPD and 19 controls. The prevalence of abnormal swallowing reflex was significantly higher in subjects with COPD (22/67) than controls (1/19; P = .02). Among subjects with COPD, the serum CRP level, GERD symptoms, isolation of sputum bacteria, and the frequency of exacerbations were significantly increased in those with abnormal swallowing reflexes compared with controls (2.72 vs 1.04 mg/L, P = .04, for serum CRP level; 6.75 vs 4.10 points, P = .04, for GERD symptoms; 5/11 vs 3/22, P = .04, for the isolation of sputum bacteria; and 2.82 vs 1.56/y, P = .007, for the annual frequency of exacerbations). Multivariable analysis confirmed that abnormal swallowing reflex was significantly associated with frequent exacerbations (>or= 3/y; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal swallowing reflexes frequently occurred in subjects with COPD and predisposed them to exacerbations. Abnormal swallowing reflexes in COPD might be affected by the comorbidity of GERD, and cause bacterial colonization.

Impact of spinal kyphosis on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in patients with osteoporosis

SUMMARY

Spinal kyphosis has been speculated to participate in the increased frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with osteoporosis. The present study provides further evidence that increases in lumbar kyphosis and number of vertebral fractures represent very important risk factors for GERD in patients with osteoporosis.

INTRODUCTION

Osteoporosis and spinal kyphosis have been speculated to participate in the increased frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The present study examined whether GERD in patients with osteoporosis is affected by spinal factors including spinal kyphosis in the presence of oral pharmacotherapies.

METHODS

Subjects comprised 112 patients with osteoporosis (mean age, 78 years) who responded to the Frequency Scale for Symptoms of GERD (FSSG) questionnaire, regardless of complaints. Relationships between total FSSG score and number of vertebral fractures, angles of kyphosis, use of bisphosphonates and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and total number of oral medicines per day were evaluated. Logistic regression identified factors associated with GERD.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonates and NSAIDs did not affect total FSSG score. Total FSSG score showed significant positive correlations with total number of medicines (r = 0.283, p = 0.0025), angle of lumbar kyphosis (r = 0.576, p = 0.0001), and numbers of thoracic vertebral fractures (r = 0.214, p = 0.0232) and lumbar vertebral fractures (r = 0.471, p < 0.0001). Angle of lumbar kyphosis and number of lumbar vertebral fractures were identified by multivariate analysis as indices affecting the presence of GERD.

CONCLUSION

Increases in angle of lumbar kyphosis and number of lumbar vertebral fractures may represent very important risk factors for GERD in osteoporotic patients.

Comparison of endoscopic findings with symptom assessment systems (FSSG and QUEST) for gastroesophageal reflux disease in Japanese centres

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We compared endoscopic findings of the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG), a written questionnaire developed in Japan, to that for the questionnaire for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis (QUEST) for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis.

METHODS

We registered 475 patients with untreated symptoms of upper abdominal pain (male/female: 252/223, average age 52.4 +/- 17.8 years). Subjects were assessed first with the FSSG and QUEST questionnaires, then by endoscopy, before allocation to a gastric ulcer (GU), duodenal ulcer (DU), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or functional dyspepsia (FD) group.

RESULTS

On the basis of the endoscopic findings the diagnoses for the 475 subjects were as follows: FD 52.2%, DU 7.6%, GU 7.8%, and GERD 32.4% (Grade M 10.1%, Grade A + B 20.2%, Grade C + D 2.3%). There was no difference between the FSSG and QUEST in sensitivity, specificity or accuracy for any condition. The FSSG score rose with increasing endoscopic severity of GERD, but there was no correlation between the QUEST score and endoscopic severity. The FSSG total score was inferior to QUEST in terms of distinguishing GERD from other conditions, but when only the questions relating to reflux symptoms were used, the FSSG was able to distinguish GERD from other conditions as well as QUEST.

CONCLUSIONS

The FSSG score reflects the severity of the endoscopic findings of GERD.

Evaluation of upper abdominal symptoms using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate upper abdominal symptoms in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients and changes in both upper abdominal and LPR symptoms before and after acid-suppression therapy.

METHODS

In 100 patients with LPR symptoms, upper abdominal and LPR symptoms were evaluated by using the Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (FSSG) and the LPR symptom scoring system, respectively. In the 52 assessable patients, changes in these symptoms before and after acid-suppression therapy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Upper abdominal symptoms were reported by 96/100 LPR patients: 89 responded positively to at least one of the questions about acid reflux-related symptoms and 89 to at least one of those about dysmotility-like symptoms. There was poor correlation between positive rates to FSSG upper abdominal symptom questions and the frequency of reported laryngopharyngeal symptoms. There were significant reductions in the frequency of acid reflux-related symptoms, dysmotility-like symptoms, and laryngopharyngeal symptoms after acidsuppression therapy. The LPR symptom score decreased to less than half the pretreatment score in 25 subjects (therapeutic response group). The pretreatment frequency of dysmotility-like symptoms seemed to be higher in the nonresponse group than in the response group, although the difference was not significant. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the pretreatment frequency of acid reflux-related symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of these Japanese LPR patients experienced some form of upper abdominal symptoms. The frequency of dysmotility-like symptoms was similar to that of acid reflux-related symptoms. The pretreatment frequency of dysmotility-like symptoms, but not of acid reflux-related symptoms, might be a predictor of patient response to acid-suppression therapy.

Frequency scale for symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease predicts the need for addition of prokinetics to proton pump inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy cannot cure all cases of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and combination therapy with prokinetics and PPI achieves symptomatic improvement for some GERD patients. Few studies have been performed to predict the need for prokinetics.

METHODS

Subjects were 163 patients (64 male, mean age 53.1 +/- 16.6 years) with GERD symptoms. They were evaluated using the frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG), a GERD-specific questionnaire developed in Japan(1) and endoscopy. They were administered with rabeprazole 10 mg daily. At 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, subjects were offered a choice of four treatment regimens according to their degree of satisfaction (1, no need for further treatment; 2, opt for continued PPI treatment; 3, step-down to H2RA; 4, dissatisfied with present treatment, so opt for combination treatment with prokinetics, mosapride 5 mg tid).

RESULTS

The choice of treatment after 12 weeks of treatment placed 79.1% of subjects in the satisfied group (1, 21; 2, 98; 3, 10). After 24 weeks, 98.2% of subjects were in the satisfied group. Pretreatment FSSG scores were significantly higher in the dissatisfied group (4, 17.4 +/- 1.4) than in the satisfied group (1, 12.3 +/- 1.3; 2, 12.8 +/- 0.8; 3, 10.2 +/- 1.8) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The satisfaction rate with these treatment regimens was 98.2% at 24 weeks, suggesting that combination therapy with prokinetics was effective for patients dissatisfied with PPI monotherapy. The FSSG is a useful predictor of the necessity for combination therapy.

Efficacy of esomeprazole, mosapride and lifestyle enhancement in the treatment of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease: an analysis of 58 cases and comparative study

AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of lifestyle enhancement on patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) based on the combined treatment of esomeprazole and mosapride.

METHODS: A total of 112 NERD patients were divided into control group (n = 54) and test group (n = 58). All the patients were given esomeprazole (40 mg, qd) and mosapride (5 mg, tid) for 8 wk. Besides, the lifestyle in test group was enhanced (adjusting lifestyle, diet, mental status and movement intensity). Chi-square test was conducted to compare the efficacy between the two groups.

RESULTS: In the test group, notable efficacy was found in 42 cases, effectivity in 12 cases, and inefficacy in 4 cases and the total effective rate was 93.10% (54/58). In the control group, notable efficacy was observed in 26 cases, effectivity in 18 cases, and inefficacy in 10 cases are ineffective, and the total effective rate was 81.84% (44/54). There was significant difference between the two groups (χ² = 7.39, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION: On the basis of treatment by esomeprazole and mosapride, lifestyle enhancement can improve the compliance and clinical symptoms of NERD patients.