D-dimer levels in the prediction of the degree of intestinal necrosis of etrangulated hernias in rats

The Diagnostic Value of Coagulation Indicators and Inflammatory Markers in Distinguishing Between Strangulated and Simple Intestinal Obstruction

BACKGROUND

Intestinal obstruction with strangulation can be life-threating, and it is critical to make an accurate and timely diagnosis for emergency surgery.

OBJECTIVE

This was aimed to investigate the value of coagulation indicators and inflammatory markers in distinguishing between strangulated and simple intestinal obstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients with intestinal obstruction were retrospectively studied. The correlation between coagulation indicators and inflammatory markers with intestinal obstruction was analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created to assess their ability in discriminative diagnosis.

RESULTS

Levels of fibrinogen (Fib), C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil ratio, and D-Dimer were significantly greater, while thrombin time was significantly shorter in strangulated intestinal obstruction compared with simple intestinal obstruction. Furthermore, Fib levels in the necrosis subgroup of strangulated intestinal obstruction were significantly higher than those in the ischemia subgroup and simple intestinal obstruction group. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.58 for white blood cells, 0.78 for CRP, and 0.80 for Fib. Using the optimal cutoff values of Fib (3.71 g/L) and CRP (14.54 mg/L), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in discriminating between strangulated intestinal obstruction and simple intestinal obstruction were 51.43%, 100%, 100%, and 52.78% for Fib, and 56.25%, 94.44%, 94.74%, and 54.84% for CRP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Fib and CRP demonstrate good performance in predicting strangulation and are indicative of intestinal necrosis and ischemia. The combination of this coagulation indicator and inflammatory marker holds potential for better discrimination between strangulated and simple intestinal obstruction.

The Combination of D-Dimer and Peritoneal Irritation Signs as a Potential Indicator to Exclude the Diagnosis of Intestinal Necrosis

Intestinal necrosis is a life-threatening disease, and its prompt and accurate diagnosis is very important. This study aimed to evaluate the value of D-dimer as a marker for early diagnosis of bowel necrosis. From 2009 to 2013, patients undergoing operation due to acute intestinal obstruction were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathologic characteristics were compared among no ischemia group, reversible ischemia group, and bowel necrosis group. There were totally 274 patients being included for analyses. Patients with bowel necrosis had a significant highest level of D-dimer compared with other 2 groups (P =  .007) when FEU unit was applied. The optimal cutoff value of D-dimer levels as an indicator in diagnosing bowel necrosis was projected to be 1.965 mg/L, which yielded a sensitivity of 84.0%, a specificity of 45.6%, a positive predictive value of 60.7%, and a negative predictive value of 74.0%. And the sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 70.0% were detected, when 1.65 mg/L of D-dimer was set as the cutoff value to distinguish the reversible ischemia and bowel necrosis. The corresponding results in patients with no or slight peritoneal irritation signs were 85.2%, 44.7%, 35.4% and 89.5% respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were 96.0% and 91.7%, respectively, when D-dimer and peritoneal irritation signs were combined to perform the parallel analysis. The combination of D-dimer and peritoneal irritation signs could generate a reliable negative predictive value, which is helpful to exclude the diagnosis of intestinal necrosis. However, it should also be proved in well-designed large-scale prospective study.