Hematochezia in the young patient: a review of health-seeking behavior, physician attitudes, and controversies in management

Young patients with benign anal diseases and rectal bleeding: should a colonoscopy be performed?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

There is no consensus whether a colonoscopy should be recommended for patients under 50 years of age who present with both anal bleeding and benign anal diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of colonoscopy to detect neoplastic lesions in this specific group of patients.

METHODS

A prospective study analyzing the results of colonoscopies performed in patients younger than 50 years of age who reported a rectal bleeding and also had a diagnosis of benign anal disease at first clinical visit.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-seven consecutive patients were prospectively included in this study. In 35 patients (18.7%), adenomatous polyps were diagnosed. Thirty-seven percent of those lesions (13 cases) were further classified as either advanced adenomas or serrated adenomas. The prevalence of adenomas was 14.6% among patients under the age of 40 and 20% among those between 40 and 50 years of age. Thirty-one percent of the adenomas (11 cases) were located in the right colon, without any other concomitant lesion in the distal colon. In addition, an unsuspected case of sigmoid carcinoma was diagnosed.

CONCLUSION

The performance of colonoscopy in young patients with benign anal diseases and hematochezia resulted in a high rate of detection of neoplastic lesions. The method might be considered as a valid strategy of investigation in this frequent clinical situation.

Rectal bleeding and prolapse… not always benign diseases rather anal cancer. The importance of a correct decision making since primary care

Rectal bleeding is very common in general population with a prevalence of 10-20 %. Primary care physicians have to stratify patients basing on urgency and on the colo-rectal cancer risk and to conduct a decision making for the correct management. We report a case of a 61-years-old woman, complaining rectal bleeding and an anal mass attended to their family doctor who does a visit but without a digital rectal examination and diagnosed a hemorrhoidal prolapse suggesting medical therapy. For the persistence of symptoms she comes to our service from emergency attention. Inspection and digital rectal examination revealed an anal mass. CT scan was performed showing a large anal mass involving half anal circumference. Histologic samples showed an epithelial proliferation compatible with a squamous carcinoma. Oncological consult was requested and a chemo-radiotherapy treatment was proposed. This case report highlights the difficulty when physicians assess patients with anorectal complaints in differentiating anal cancer from benign disease, presumably because symptoms are similar. Primary care physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion of cancer in high-risk population. Sensitization of these colleagues is required since digital rectal examination is of inestimable value to verify the presence of a rectal or an anal mass.