1
|
Chen Y, Wu G, Qu C, Ye Z, Kang Y, Tian X. A multifaceted comparative analysis of image and video technologies in gastrointestinal endoscope and their clinical applications. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1226748. [PMID: 37881626 PMCID: PMC10595015 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1226748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive exploration of endoscopic technologies in clinical applications across seven tables, each focusing on a unique facet of the medical field. The discourse begins with a detailed analysis of pediatric endoscopes, highlighting their diagnostic capabilities in various conditions. It then delves into the specifications and applications of globally recognized capsule endoscopy devices. Additionally, the paper incorporates an analysis of advanced imaging techniques, such as Narrow Band Imaging (NBI), Flexible Spectral Imaging Color Enhancement (FICE), and i-scan, which are increasingly being integrated into ultrathin gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes. Factors like technological capabilities, light source, camera technology, and computational constraints are evaluated to understand their compatibility with these advanced imaging techniques, each offering unique advantages and challenges in clinical settings. NBI, for instance, is lauded for its user-friendly, real-time enhanced imaging capabilities, making it effective for early detection of conditions like colorectal cancer and Barrett's esophagus. Conversely, FICE and i-scan offer high customizability and are compatible with a broader range of endoscope models. The paper further delves into innovative advances in movement control for Nasojejunal (NJ) feeding tube endoscopy, elucidating the potential of AI and other novel strategies. A review of the technologies and methodologies enhancing endoscopic procedure control and diagnostic precision follows, emphasizing image and video technologies in pediatric endoscopy, capsule endoscopes, ultrathin endoscopes, and their clinical applications. Finally, a comparative analysis of leading real-time video monitoring endoscopes in clinical practices underscores the continuous advancements in the field of endoscopy, ensuring improved diagnostics and precision in surgical procedures. Collectively, the comparative analysis presented in this paper highlights the remarkable diversity and continuous evolution of endoscopic technologies, underlining their crucial role in diagnosing and treating an array of medical conditions, thereby fostering advancements in patient care and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Xin Tian
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Lishui Municipal Central Hospital, Lishui, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bourgeois A, Gkolfakis P, Fry L, Arvanitakis M. Jejunal access for enteral nutrition: A practical guide for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension and direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 64-65:101849. [PMID: 37652649 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
For patients requiring long-term (>4 weeks) jejunal nutrition, jejunal medication delivery, or decompression, a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension (PEG-J) or a direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) may be indicated. PEG-J is the preferred option if a PEG tube is already in place or if simultaneous gastric decompression and jejunal nutrition are needed. DPEJ is recommended for patients with altered anatomy due to foregut surgery, high risk of jejunal extension migration, and whenever PEG-J fails. Successful placement rates are lower for DPEJ but recent publications have reported improvements, partly due to the use of balloon-assisted enteroscopy. Both techniques are contraindicated in cases of active peritonitis, uncorrectable coagulopathy, and ongoing bowel ischaemia, and relative contraindications include, among other, peptic ulcer disease and haemodynamic or respiratory instability. In this narrative review, we present the most recent evidence on indications, contraindications, technical considerations, adverse events, and outcomes of PEG-J and DPEJ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Bourgeois
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lucia Fry
- Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Geriatrics, Frankenwaldklinikum Kronach, Germany
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamamoto H, Despott EJ, González-Suárez B, Pennazio M, Mönkemüller K. The evolving role of device-assisted enteroscopy: The state of the art as of August 2023. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 64-65:101858. [PMID: 37652651 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2023.101858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in particular, has become a routine endoscopic procedure which has revolutionized our approach to small-bowel disease. Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of BAE spans over 22-years of experience, making it an established pillar of minimally invasive care. The robust evidence for BAE's safety and efficacy has now been incorporated into international clinical guidelines, technical reviews, benchmarking performance measures and curricula. The more recently introduced motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) which had replaced the previous manual version, abruptly ended its 7-year stint in clinical practice, when it was withdrawn and recalled from the market by its manufacturing company in July 2023, due to several associated serious adverse events (including fatalities). This article, written by the original developer of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and other recognized international experts and pioneers in this field, focuses mainly on the technical aspects, evolving indications, and equipment-related technological advances. Despite the very recent withdrawal of MSE from clinical practice, for completeness, this technology and its technique is still briefly covered here, albeit importantly, along with a short description of reported, associated, serious adverse events which have contributed to its withdrawal/recall from the market and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hironori Yamamoto
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London (UCL) Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | - Begoña González-Suárez
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, City of Health and Science University Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Klaus Mönkemüller
- Division of Gastroenterology "Prof. Carolina Olano", Universidad de La República, Montevideo, Uruguay; Division of Endoscopy, Ameos Teaching University Hospital, Halberstadt, Germany; Department of Gastroenterology, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aryan M, Colvin T, Mulki R, Daley L, Patel P, Locke J, Ahmed AM, Kyanam Kabir Baig KR, Mönkemüller K, Peter S. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube placement in patients post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, a single tertiary care center experience. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1282-E1290. [PMID: 36118633 PMCID: PMC9473825 DOI: 10.1055/a-1905-0339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Obesity prevalence continues to rise in the United States with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery being one of the most common bariatric procedures. With this trend, more patients with altered upper gastrointestinal (UGI) anatomy have required endoscopic intervention including direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) placement. We aimed to assess the safety and success rates of DPEJ in RYGB patients. Patients and methods All patients at a tertiary care referral center who underwent DPEJ during an 8-year period were queried from a prospectively maintained registry of all enteroscopy procedures. Duplicate cases and altered upper UGI anatomy subtypes other than RYGB were excluded. The final cohort consisted of two groups: RYGB vs native anatomy (NA). Demographic, procedural, readmission, follow-up, and complication data were recorded. Comparative analysis was performed. Results Seventy-two patients were included where 28 had RYGB and 44 had NA. Both groups had similar baseline and pre-procedure data. Procedure success rate was 89 % in RYGB patients and 98 % in NA patients ( P = 0.13). There were no intraprocedural complications. Early and late postprocedural complication rates were similar between the groups (both 4 % vs 7 %). Average follow-up times in the RYGB and NA groups were 12.97 ± 9.35 and 13.44 ± 9.21 months, respectively. Although readmission rates at 1 and 6 months were higher in the NA versus the RYGB group (21 % vs 7 % and 25 % vs 15 %), these differences were not significant. Conclusions DPEJ can be successful and safely placed in RYGB patients with no significant difference in procedure success, complication, or readmission rates when compared to control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Aryan
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Tyler Colvin
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Ramzi Mulki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Lauren Daley
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Parth Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - John Locke
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | - Ali M. Ahmed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| | | | | | - Shajan Peter
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: when, how, and when to avoid it. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2022; 38:285-291. [PMID: 35645021 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current review summarizes current evidence regarding the indications, contraindications, and technical aspects of placing a direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ), as well as procedure-related and patient-related outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS DPEJ is indicated for patients who require long-term (>4 weeks) jejunal nutrition due to existing altered foregut anatomy (e.g., previous gastrectomy) or because the gastric route is not an option (e.g., due to high risk of aspiration, intolerance, gastroparesis). DPEJ may also offer decompression of the gastrointestinal tract in cases of small bowel obstruction (e.g., peritoneal carcinomatosis). Absolute contraindications include active peritonitis, uncorrectable coagulopathy, and ongoing bowel ischemia. Technically, the 'pull' technique using a paediatric colonoscope will be sufficient for most cases. Recent publications demonstrate high rates of technical success (>85%), while patient outcomes do not differ among patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and those undergoing DPEJ. Obesity is a risk factor for technical failure, while age more than 80 years, diabetes mellitus, and ongoing inflammatory status may be considered risk factors for DPEJ-associated mortality. SUMMARY DPEJ is a safe and efficacious modality for long-term jejunal nutrition with an acceptable risk of mild complications. Careful patient selection and respect of preprocedural, periprocedural, and postprocedural precautions are of the utmost importance to ensuring a favourable outcome.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gkolfakis P, Arvanitakis M, Despott EJ, Ballarin A, Beyna T, Boeykens K, Elbe P, Gisbertz I, Hoyois A, Mosteanu O, Sanders DS, Schmidt PT, Schneider SM, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 2: Peri- and post-procedural management. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53:178-195. [PMID: 33348410 DOI: 10.1055/a-1331-8080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
ESGE recommends the "pull" technique as the standard method for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the direct percutaneous introducer ("push") technique for PEG placement in cases where the "pull" method is contraindicated, for example in severe esophageal stenosis or in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) or esophageal cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the intravenous administration of a prophylactic single dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (or appropriate alternative antibiotic, in the case of allergy) to decrease the risk of post-procedural wound infection.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE recommends that inadvertent insertion of a nasogastric tube (NGT) into the respiratory tract should be considered a serious but avoidable adverse event (AE).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that each institution should have a dedicated protocol to confirm correct positioning of NGTs placed "blindly" at the patient's bedside; this should include: radiography, pH testing of the aspirate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring, but not auscultation alone.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends confirmation of correct NGT placement by radiography in high-risk patients (intensive care unit [ICU] patients or those with altered consciousness or absent gag/cough reflex).Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that EN may be started within 3 - 4 hours after uncomplicated placement of a PEG or PEG-J.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence.ESGE recommends that daily tube mobilization (pushing inward) along with a loose position of the external PEG bumper (1 - 2 cm from the abdominal wall) could mitigate the risk of development of buried bumper syndrome.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy and Centre for Gastroenterology, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asuncion Ballarin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of Gastroenterology and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kurt Boeykens
- Nutrition Support Team, AZ Nikolaas Hospital, Moerlandstraat 1, 9100, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Peter Elbe
- Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, the Netherlands
| | - Alice Hoyois
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ofelia Mosteanu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital & University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Peter T Schmidt
- Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stéphane M Schneider
- Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Gastroentérologie et Nutrition, Nice, France
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Parsi MA, Jirapinyo P, Abu Dayyeh BK, Bhutani MS, Chandrasekhara V, Krishnan K, Kumta NA, Melson J, Pannala R, Trikudanathan G, Trindade AJ, Sethi A, Watson RR, Maple JT, Lichtenstein DR. Techniques and devices for the endoscopic treatment of gastroparesis (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92:483-491. [PMID: 32684298 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.3857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Gastroparesis is a symptomatic chronic disorder of the stomach characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Several endoscopic treatment modalities have been described that aim to improve gastric emptying and/or symptoms associated with gastroparesis refractory to dietary and pharmacologic management. METHODS In this report we review devices and techniques for endoscopic treatment of gastroparesis, the evidence regarding their efficacy and safety, and the financial considerations for their use. RESULTS Endoscopic modalities for treatment of gastroparesis can be broadly categorized into pyloric, nonpyloric, and nutritional therapies. Pyloric therapies such as botulinum toxin injection, stent placement, pyloroplasty, and pyloromyotomy specifically focus on pylorospasm as a therapeutic target. These interventions aim to reduce the pressure gradient across the pyloric sphincter, with a resultant improvement in gastric emptying. Nonpyloric therapies, such as venting gastrostomy and gastric electrical stimulation, are intended to improve symptoms. Nutritional therapies, such as feeding tube placement, aim to provide nutritional support. CONCLUSIONS Several endoscopic interventions have shown utility in improving the quality of life and symptoms of select patients with refractory gastroparesis. Methods to identify which patients are best suited for a specific treatment are not well established. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy is a relatively recent development that may prove to be the preferred pyloric-directed intervention, although additional and longer-term outcomes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansour A Parsi
- Section for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Pichamol Jirapinyo
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Barham K Abu Dayyeh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Vinay Chandrasekhara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Kumar Krishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nikhil A Kumta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Joshua Melson
- Division of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Guru Trikudanathan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Arvind J Trindade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, New York, USA
| | - Rabindra R Watson
- New York-Presbyterian Medical Center/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - John T Maple
- Department of Gastroenterology, Interventional Endoscopy Services, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - David R Lichtenstein
- Division of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pennazio M, Venezia L, Cortegoso Valdivia P, Rondonotti E. Device-assisted enteroscopy: An update on techniques, clinical indications and safety. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51:934-943. [PMID: 31138509 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
After more than 15 years since its introduction into clinical practice, indications for device-assisted enteroscopy have greatly expanded. Alongside the consolidated indications such as the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel bleeding, Crohn's disease, hereditary polyposis, small-bowel tumors and complicated celiac disease, device-assisted enteroscopy is nowadays largely used to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with altered anatomy, stent placement, retrieval of foreign bodies, direct insertion of jejunal feeding tubes, and in selected cases of incomplete colonoscopy. This has been made possible by the technical improvements of the enteroscopes and accessories and by the widespread use of the method. Device-assisted enteroscopy endotherapy currently offers a safe and effective alternative to major surgery and often represents the preferred option for treatment of small-bowel pathology. Its safety profile is favourable even in the elderly patient, provided that it is performed in high-volume and experienced centers. The evolution of the enteroscopy technique is a challenge for the future and could be facilitated by the new enteroscopes models. These prototypes need a thorough clinical and safety assessment especially for the complex therapeutic procedures. Large prospective, multicenter studies should be performed to assess whether the use of device-assisted enteroscopy leads to improved patients' long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Pennazio
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, City of Health and Science, Italy.
| | - Ludovica Venezia
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, City of Health and Science, Italy
| | - Pablo Cortegoso Valdivia
- University Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, City of Health and Science, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bernardes C, Pinho R, Rodrigues A, Proença L, Carvalho J. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy using single-balloon enteroscopy without fluoroscopy: a case series. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2018; 109:679-683. [PMID: 28724303 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.4717/2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) is a useful method to provide enteral nutrition to individuals when gastric feeding is not possible or contraindicated. The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of DPEJ tube placement with the Gauderer-Ponsky technique by the pull method, using single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) without fluoroscopy. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing SBE for DPEJ placement in a referral hospital between January 2010 and March 2016. Technical success, clinical success and procedure related complications were recorded. RESULTS Twenty-three patients were included (17 males, median age 71 years, range 37-93 years). The most frequent indications for DPEJ were gastroesophageal cancer (n = 10) and neurological disease (n = 8). Eighty-seven percent of the patients had a contraindication to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and PEG was unsuccessful in the remaining patients. The technical success rate was 83% (19/23), transillumination was not possible in three patients and an accidental exteriorization of the bumper resulting in a jejunal perforation occurred in one patient. The clinical success was 100% (19/19). The median follow-up was five months (range 1-35 months). Apart from the case of jejunal perforation and the two cases of accidental exteriorization, there were no other complications during follow-up. The 6-month survival was 65.8% and the 1-year survival was 49.3%. CONCLUSION DPEJ can be carried out successfully via SBE without fluoroscopy with a low rate of significant adverse events. Although, leaving the overtube in place during the bumper pulling can be useful for distal jejunal loops, it can be safely removed in proximal loops to minimize complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Bernardes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Portugal
| | - Rolando Pinho
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - Adélia Rodrigues
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - Luísa Proença
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
| | - João Carvalho
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Enteral access is the foundation for feeding in patients unable to meet their nutrition needs orally and have a functional gastrointestinal tract. Enteral feeding requires placement of a feeding tube. Tubes can be placed through an orifice or percutaneously into the stomach or proximal small intestine at the bedside or in specialized areas of the hospital. Bedside tubes can be placed by the nurse or the physician, such as in the intensive care unit. Percutaneous feeding tubes are placed by the gastroenterologist, surgeon, or radiologist. This article reviews the types of enteral access and the associated complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark H DeLegge
- Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 25 Courtenay Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; DeLegge Medical, 4057 Longmarsh Road, Awendaw, SC 29429, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mönkemüller K, Olano C, Rickes S. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy - Should we move on to single- and double-balloon enteroscopy techniques? REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2017; 109:677-678. [PMID: 28929778 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2017.5182/2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) is a useful technique to access the jejunum in order to: a) provide enteral nutrition to individuals when the gastric route is absent or contraindicated; and b) to decompress the jejunum in patients with malignant small bowel obstruction. Traditionally, DPEJ is performed using a colonoscope or enteroscope, which is advanced as deep as possible into the jejunum. The insertion technique of the feeding tube is identical to the one used for a gastrostomy tube (Ponsky-Gauderer method).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carolina Olano
- Gastroenterology, Hospital de Clinicas, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murino A, Despott EJ. Small bowel endoluminal imaging (capsule and enteroscopy). Frontline Gastroenterol 2017; 8:148-151. [PMID: 28839900 PMCID: PMC5369435 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2016-100765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2016] [Accepted: 12/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the last 16 years, the disruptive technologies of small bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy have revolutionised endoluminal imaging and minimally invasive therapy of the small bowel. Further technological developments continue to expand their indications and use. This brief review highlights the state-of-the-art in this arena and aims to summarise the current and potential future role of these technologies in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Murino
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London (UCL) Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London (UCL) Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Strong AT, Sharma G, Davis M, Mulcahy M, Punchai S, O'Rourke CP, Brethauer SA, Rodriguez J, Ponsky JL, Kroh MD. Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy (DPEJ) Tube Placement: A Single Institution Experience and Outcomes to 30 Days and Beyond. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21:446-452. [PMID: 27995433 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3337-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with prior foregut surgery requiring long-term enteral access typically undergo operative jejunostomy tube placement; however, direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) is a viable alternative. METHODS All de novo DPEJ procedures performed by surgical and advanced endoscopists from May 2003 to June 2015 were retrospectively reviewed following approval by the Institutional Review Board. There were 59 cases identified. RESULTS Our cohort had a mean age of 50.3 ± 16.9 years and 35 (59.3%) were female. All but two patients previously had foregut surgery including 19 patients (34.5%) with prior bariatric surgery. The composite of malnutrition and dehydration was the indication for DPEJ in 29 patients (49.1%) and was the initial enteral access placed in 47 patients (79.7%). Moderate sedation was used in 32 cases (54.2%), and 29 procedures (49.2%) were performed in the operating room. Within 30 days, there were six complications in five patients, giving a peri-procedural complication rate of 12.5%. Beyond 30 days, the most common complications were peri-tube leakage and dislodgement (each 16.9%). The median time to complication was 197 days. CONCLUSIONS In patients with surgically altered foregut anatomy, DPEJ offers a less invasive alternative to operative jejunostomy tube placement. DPEJ can be placed in the endoscopy suite or operating room with an acceptable risk of perioperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T Strong
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A100, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| | - Gautam Sharma
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew Davis
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael Mulcahy
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- US Army Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Suriya Punchai
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Colin P O'Rourke
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Statistical Center for HIV/AIDS Research and Prevention, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Stacy A Brethauer
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John Rodriguez
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey L Ponsky
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Matthew D Kroh
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
Since the introduction of double-balloon enteroscopy 15 years ago, flexible enteroscopy has become an established method in the diagnostic and therapeutic work-up of small bowel disorders. With appropriate patient selection, diagnostic and therapeutic yields of 70% to 85% can be expected. The complication rates with diagnostic and therapeutic DBE are estimated at approximately 1% and 3% to 4%, respectively. Appropriate patient selection and device selection, as well as skill, are the key issues for successful enteroscopy. However, technical developments and improvements mean that carrying out enteroscopy is likely to become easier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea May
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, Starkenburgring 66, Offenbach am Main 63069, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Endoscopic technology has evolved such that device-assisted enteroscopes (DAEs) are readily available and utilized to diagnose and treat patients with small bowel disease. In this review, we briefly discuss the DAE platforms and the expanding role for small bowel enteroscopy. RECENT FINDINGS The indications for small bowel endoscopy are rapidly increasing with new diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers that are allowing patients to obtain treatments that would have otherwise required more invasive or higher risk procedures. The evolving utilization of DAE tools in patients with altered gastrointestinal anatomy and otherwise palliative conditions is allowing for more aggressive and therapeutic choices for patients who would otherwise have limited options. SUMMARY There are currently four different platforms for small bowel endoscopy each with different operational characteristics. The literature comparing double-balloon and single-balloon enteroscopy is relatively established, but there are still limited data evaluating the role of the two newer platforms (spiral and on-demand enteroscopy) in diagnostic and therapeutic small bowel endoscopy - a reflection of the potential and vast opportunities that are available in the field of small bowel enteroscopy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lim AH, Schoeman MN, Nguyen NQ. Long-term outcomes of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: a 10-year cohort. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3:E610-4. [PMID: 26716121 PMCID: PMC4683153 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 07/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY AIM To assess the clinical outcomes of patients who received direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) for enteral feeding. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a 10-year cohort study in a single tertiary center. Main outcome measurements were technical success, and short- and long-term outcomes. DPEJ was attempted in 83 patients (51 men; 55 ± 2 years) for dysphagia (n = 35), gastroparesis with recurrent aspiration (n = 30), and levodopa drug infusion for severe Parkinson's disease (n = 18). RESULTS DPEJ was successful in 75 (90 %) patients. All technical failures were related to the inability to find adequate trans-illumination, and were not influenced by BMI, age, gender, or indication. Peri-operative (30-day) adverse events occurred in 11 (13 %) patients, including wound infection (3), leakage around the stoma (4), minor bleeding requiring no intervention (2), and aspiration (1). There was one case (1.2 %) of gastric perforation after PEJ insertion for levodopa drug infusion trial. This 60-year-old woman required an emergency laparotomy with nil complications, and levodopa drug infusion recommenced successfully. One case of intestinal perforation (1.2 %) occurred after jejunostomy tube replacement at 6 months of insertion, which was successfully managed with surgery. There were no peri-operative deaths. Adequate delivery of enteral feeding or Duodopa drug was achieved in 66/73 (90 %) patients, with evidence of weight gain or improvement in Parkinson's disease. Seven (8 %) continued to have clinical regurgitation but not aspiration. After a median follow-up of 84 months, 27 (33 %) patients died of their underlying diseases. Seven (8 %) had marked improvement in their underlying disease and had PEJ removed after 5 months (range 1 - 8 months). LIMITATIONS Single center study. CONCLUSIONS DPEJ is associated with a high technical success rate (90 %), a relatively low rate of peri-operative adverse events (13 %) and an improvement in long-term nutritional support in the majority of patients (90 %). DPEJ should be the procedure of choice to gain enteral access for feeding or drug delivery prior to considering surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda H. Lim
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Mark N. Schoeman
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Nam Q. Nguyen
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,University Department of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia,Corresponding author Nam Q. Nguyen, PhD Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRoyal Adelaide HospitalNorth TerraceAdelaideSouth Australia 5000Australia+61-8-82235885
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McCarty TR, Rustagi T. Endoscopic treatment of gastroparesis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21:6842-6849. [PMID: 26078560 PMCID: PMC4462724 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i22.6842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Revised: 03/05/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroparesis has traditionally been a largely medically managed disease with refractory symptoms typically falling under the umbrella of the surgical domain. Surgical options include, but are not limited to, gastrostomy, jejunostomy, pyloromyotomy, or pyloroplasty, and the Food and Drug Administration approved gastric electrical stimulation implantation. Endoscopic management of gastroparesis most commonly involves intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection; however, there exists a variety of endoscopic approaches on the horizon that have the potential to radically shift standard of care. Endoscopic management of gastroparesis seeks to treat delayed gastric emptying with a less invasive approach compared to the surgical approach. This review will serve to highlight such innovative and potentially transformative, endoscopic interventions available to gastroenterologists in the management of gastroparesis.
Collapse
|
18
|
Velázquez-Aviña J, Beyer R, Díaz-Tobar CP, Peter S, Kyanam Kabir Baig KR, Wilcox CM, Mönkemüller K. New method of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube placement using balloon-assisted enteroscopy with fluoroscopy. Dig Endosc 2015; 27:317-22. [PMID: 25211635 DOI: 10.1111/den.12352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/20/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) is a useful method to provide nutrition to patients with a variety of gastrointestinal (GI) problems. The present study describes a new method of DPEJ using balloon-assisted-enteroscopy. METHODS This observational, retrospective, single-arm case study conducted at a tertiary care hospital during a 15-month period included 25 patients (12 females, 13 males, mean age 54 years, age range 31-79 years) with necrotizing pancreatitis, n = 7; complex upper GI surgery, n = 6; complex fistula, n = 6; impossibility to place a gastrostomy tube, n = 5; and bowel obstruction, n = 1. The new DPEJ technique focused on three key components: (i) use of balloon-assisted overtube; (ii) use of fluoroscopy; (iii) leaving the overtube in place during the entire procedure (and also for DPEJ removal). RESULTS Technical success was 96%. Mean time of the procedure was 30.5 min (range 24 to 45 min). Clinical success was 100% (24/24); all DPEJ could be used for their intended purpose. CONCLUSIONS This new method of inserting a DPEJ using balloon enteroscopy and fluoroscopy was safe and successful. Future comparative studies are now warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacobo Velázquez-Aviña
- Basil I. Hirschowitz Endoscopic Center of Excellence, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gutkin E, Hussain SA, Kim SH. Changing angles: successful treatment of superior mesenteric artery syndrome with double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted direct feeding jejunostomy. Dig Endosc 2012; 24:482. [PMID: 23078451 DOI: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2012.01343.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Gutkin
- New York Hospital Queens, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Enteral nutrition support is often required in patients who are unable to meet their own nutritional requirements. Endoscopists play a key role in the placement of enteral feeding catheters. This review focuses on the recently published solutions to common problems encountered during endoscopic placement of enteral feeding devices. RECENT FINDINGS Case reports and case series describe solutions for overcoming common problems encountered during the placement of enteral feeding devices. Transnasal techniques can simplify nasojejunal tube placement, whereas deep enteroscopy techniques provide more reliable jejunostomy placement. Endoscopic ultrasound can help when transillumination is not possible or in the setting of postsurgical anatomy like Roux-en-Y. Laparoscopic-assisted procedures are useful when endoscopic techniques have failed in adults or in select high-risk pediatric patients. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and the American Gastroenterology Association both published comprehensive guidelines that outline the indications, contraindications, technical aspects of feeding catheter placement, and complications. SUMMARY Advances in endoscopic techniques, including deep enteroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, ultra-slim transnasal endoscopes and laparoscopic-assisted procedures, have enabled endoscopists to successfully place enteral feeding tubes in patients who previously required open procedures.
Collapse
|
21
|
Double-balloon enteroscopy as a rescue technique for failed direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy when using conventional push enteroscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:675-9. [PMID: 22728146 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.04.448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2012] [Accepted: 04/12/2012] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
22
|
Kaffes AJ. Advances in modern enteroscopy therapeutics. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 26:235-46. [PMID: 22704567 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2012.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2011] [Revised: 02/24/2012] [Accepted: 03/08/2012] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Advances in modern enteroscopy have been largely due to endoscope development but also through the improved availability of endoscopic accessories along with improved understanding in their application. Device assisted enteroscopy began with the double balloon system in 2001 and was quickly followed by single balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy. These tools revolutionised deep small bowel endoscopy and allowed for the delivery of virtually all known therapeutic endoscopy intervention to almost all segments of the small bowel. This review covers the types of interventions in regards to indications, methods and their safety profiles as well as reviewing the various device assisted endoscopes available and their attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur John Kaffes
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Gastroenterologist, Missenden Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jovanovic I, Vormbrock K, Zimmermann L, Djuranovic S, Ugljesic M, Malfertheiner P, Fry LC, Mönkemüller K. Therapeutic double-balloon enteroscopy: a binational, three-center experience. Dig Dis 2011; 29 Suppl 1:27-31. [PMID: 22104749 DOI: 10.1159/000331125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS There are few reports focusing on therapeutic small bowel endoscopy. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of therapeutic small bowel endoscopy in a large cohort of patients. METHODS A retrospective study of a prospectively collected database comprising all patients undergoing diagnostic and therapeutic small bowel endoscopy in three centers. RESULTS A total of 614 double-balloon enteroscopies were performed in 534 patients. The most common pathological findings were angiodysplasias and vascular lesions (n = 98, 18%), mucosal ulcers and erosions (n = 95, 17.8%), polyps and tumors (including patients with familiar polyposis syndrome such as Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familiar adenomatous polyps syndrome, neurofibromatosis, adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors and gastrointestinal stromal tumors) (n = 52, 9.7%), and strictures (Crohn's disease, ischemia, tumors) (n = 12, 2.2%). The mean duration of therapeutic small bowel enteroscopy was 67 min (range 30-115) compared to 50 min (range 25-105) for diagnostic procedures (p < 0.05). A therapeutic small bowel endoscopy was performed in 121 patients (22%). Therapeutic procedures included argon plasma coagulation of vascular lesions (n = 73), polypectomy (n = 49), mucosectomy (n = 5), stricture dilation (n = 7), foreign body extraction (n = 7), injection of fibrin glue (n = 10), and clip placement (n = 5). There were a total of 5 complications (0.9%; paralytic ileus, n = 2, pancreatitis, n = 1, bleeding n = 2). No perforations or deaths occurred. CONCLUSION Endoscopists performing double-balloon enteroscopy should be trained and prepared to provide therapeutic interventions for small bowel disorders including argon plasma coagulation, injection, hemoclipping, polypectomy, mucosectomy and foreign body extraction. Therapeutic small bowel endoscopy, albeit associated with complications in about 1% of cases, can be considered a relatively safe procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Jovanovic
- Clinic for Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|