1
|
Amoyel M, Belle A, Dhooge M, Ali EA, Hallit R, Prat F, Dohan A, Terris B, Chaussade S, Coriat R, Barret M. Endoscopic management of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E96-E108. [PMID: 35047339 PMCID: PMC8759941 DOI: 10.1055/a-1723-2847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Duodenal polyps are found in 0.1 % to 0.8 % of all upper endoscopies. Duodenal adenomas account for 10 % to 20 % of these lesions. They can be sporadic or occur in the setting of a hereditary predisposition syndrome, mainly familial adenomatous polyposis. Endoscopy is the cornerstone of management of duodenal adenomas, allowing for diagnosis and treatment, primarily by endoscopic mucosal resection. The endoscopic treatment of duodenal adenomas has a high morbidity, reaching 15 % in a prospective study, consisting of bleeding and perforations, and should therefore be performed in expert centers. The local recurrence rate ranges from 9 % to 37 %, and is maximal for piecemeal resections of lesions > 20 mm. Surgical resection of the duodenum is flawed with major morbidity and considered a rescue procedure in cases of endoscopic treatment failures or severe endoscopic complications such as duodenal perforations. In this paper, we review the existing evidence on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of non-ampullary duodenal adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Amoyel
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Arthur Belle
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Marion Dhooge
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Einas Abou Ali
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France,University of Paris, France.
| | - Rachel Hallit
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France,University of Paris, France.
| | - Frederic Prat
- Gastroenterology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France,University of Paris, France.
| | - Anthony Dohan
- University of Paris, France.,Radiology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Benoit Terris
- University of Paris, France.,Pathology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Stanislas Chaussade
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France,University of Paris, France.
| | - Romain Coriat
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France,Gastroenterology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | - Maximilien Barret
- Gastroenterology Department, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France,Gastroenterology Department, Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hwang KL, Kim GH, Lee BE, Lee MW, Baek DH, Song GA. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors: A single-center experience. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 31:49-57. [PMID: 32009614 DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The malignant potential of non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (NADETs) is lower compared to that of other gastrointestinal epithelial tumors, but it should not be overlooked. Recently, endoscopic resection (ER) has been proposed as an alternative treatment option for NADETs. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the clinical outcomes of ER of NADETs and determine the factors associated with an incomplete resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective observational study of 54 patients (56 lesions) with NADETs, who underwent ER in the period between October 2006 and March 2016, and analyzed the therapeutic outcomes and procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was performed on 41 lesions, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed on 15 lesions. The en bloc and complete resection rates were 82% (46/56) and 54% (30/56), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analyses determined that the resection method (EMR: odds ratio 4.356, 95% confidence interval 1.021-18.585, p=0.047) was independently associated with incomplete resection. The procedure-related bleeding and perforation rates were 4% and 5%, respectively. Recurrence of tumor occurred in one of 44 patients during the median follow-up period of 25 months (range: 6-89 months). CONCLUSION ER is an effective, safe, and feasible treatment option for NADETs. However, the incomplete resection rate increases when EMR is performed. Nevertheless, given the longer procedure time and the technical difficulty associated with ESD, and the excellent long-term outcomes associated with EMR, EMR of NADETs is appropriate, especially in patients with dysplastic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Lim Hwang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Gwang Ha Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Bong Eun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Moon Won Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Baek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Geun Am Song
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Outcomes of thermal ablation of the defect margin after duodenal endoscopic mucosal resection (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:1373-1380. [PMID: 33285144 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Laterally spreading lesions (LSLs) in the duodenum are conventionally treated by EMR. Recurrence is commonly encountered and can be difficult to treat safely due to the unique anatomic characteristics of the duodenum. Auxiliary techniques designed to prevent recurrence have not been described. METHODS We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of thermal ablation of the defect margin after EMR (EMR-T) in reducing recurrence at first surveillance endoscopy (SE1, scheduled at 6 months) in a single tertiary referral center. All duodenal LSLs ≥10 mm referred for EMR were eligible. After successful EMR, thermal ablation was performed using snare-tip soft coagulation around the entire circumference of the resection defect. The primary outcome was the frequency of recurrence at SE1. A previous, well-characterized, prospective cohort of duodenal LSLs ≥10 mm treated by conventional EMR was the comparator. RESULTS Over 43 months up to October 2019, 54 LSLs underwent EMR-T. One hundred twenty-five LSLs underwent conventional EMR in the comparator group. Patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. Recurrence was significantly lower in the EMR-T group compared with the conventional EMR group (1 of 49 [2.3%] vs 19 of 108 [17.6%]; P = .01). No difference in technical success, EMR-related adverse outcomes, or referral to surgery were identified between the groups. CONCLUSIONS EMR-T significantly reduces the frequency of recurrence for duodenal LSLs. This technique is safe in the duodenum and has the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of duodenal EMR. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02306603.).
Collapse
|
4
|
Vanbiervliet G, Moss A, Arvanitakis M, Arnelo U, Beyna T, Busch O, Deprez PH, Kunovsky L, Larghi A, Manes G, Napoleon B, Nalankilli K, Nayar M, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Seewald S, Strijker M, Barthet M, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of superficial nonampullary duodenal tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53:522-534. [PMID: 33822331 DOI: 10.1055/a-1442-2395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection as progression to invasive carcinoma is highly likely.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends performance of a colonoscopy, if that has not yet been done, in cases of duodenal adenoma.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends the use of the cap-assisted method when the location of the minor and/or major papilla and their relationship to a duodenal adenoma is not clearly established during forward-viewing endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends the routine use of a side-viewing endoscope when a laterally spreading adenoma with extension to the minor and/or major papilla is suspected.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests cold snare polypectomy for small (< 6 mm in size) nonmalignant duodenal adenomas.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as the first-line endoscopic resection technique for nonmalignant large nonampullary duodenal adenomas.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends that endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for duodenal adenomas is an effective resection technique only in expert hands.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends using techniques that minimize adverse events such as immediate or delayed bleeding or perforation. These may include piecemeal resection, defect closure techniques, noncontact hemostasis, and other emerging techniques, and these should be considered on a case-by-case basis.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 9: ESGE recommends endoscopic surveillance 3 months after the index treatment. In cases of no recurrence, a further follow-up endoscopy should be done 1 year later. Thereafter, surveillance intervals should be adapted to the lesion site, en bloc resection status, and initial histological result. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffroy Vanbiervliet
- Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine - Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Urban Arnelo
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Olivier Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lumir Kunovsky
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Aziende Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Rhodense, Gastroenterology, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy
| | - Bertrand Napoleon
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Kumanan Nalankilli
- Department of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Medicine - Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Manu Nayar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP Centre - Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stefan Seewald
- Center of Gastroenterology Centre, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marin Strijker
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang HJ. Endoscopic Treatment for Superficial Nonampullary Duodenal Tumors. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2021; 77:164-170. [PMID: 33896904 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2021.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Superficial nonampullary duodenal epithelial tumors are considered rare but have been increasingly recognized in recent years. Accordingly, the importance of endoscopic treatment for the lesions are also increasing. An endoscopic resection can be considered for duodenal adenoma and mucosal cancer. The choice of resection method should be made based on the size of the lesion, endoscopic findings, pathologic diagnosis, and risk of procedure-related complication. For small adenomas <10 mm in size, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cold snare polypectomy, and underwater EMR can be considered. An en bloc or piecemeal resection using EMR or underwater EMR can be selected for 10-20 mm sized adenomas. For lesions ≥20 mm in size or suspicious for mucosal cancer, an endoscopic submucosal dissection followed by closure of the mucosal defect conducted by an experienced endoscopist is appropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo-Joon Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Anliker O, Sieweke W, Töpfer A, Wülker I, Breidert M. [Full thickness resection of a pyloric adenoma in the proximal duodenum in a 67-year-old patient with attenuated polyposis coli]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE 2020; 58:767-772. [PMID: 32380553 DOI: 10.1055/a-1143-6640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pyloric gland adenomas (PGAs) are very rare and underdiagnosed, mostly be founded in the stomach. Similar to colorectal adenomas they have a high risk of malignant transformation to adenocarcinoma up to 12-47 %. Endoscopic resections in the duodenum harbor a significant risk of complications. EMR is the current standard technique for treatment of duodenal non-ampullary adenomas. Complete resection rates are considerably high at about 90 %. Adverse events as bleeding was reported up to 25 %. ESD is not recommended for resection of duodenal lesions since the perforation rate may be as high as 35 %. Use of EFTR in the duodenum are limited to a single case study of 20 patients. CASE A 67 year old patient with attenuated polyposis coli presented for screening. Gastroscopy showed a 20 mm large, non-ampullary lesions in the proximal duodenum (pars I). The margins of the duodenal lesions were marked with a high-frequency (HF) probe. An integrated balloon dilatation (20 mm) of the upper esophageal sphincter and the pylorus was performed to facilitate advancing of the gastroduodenal FTRD® (Ovesco Endoscopy AG). After pulling the duodenal lesion into the cap with a grasper the FTRD clip was deployed and the lesion immediately resected with the preloaded snare. A single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis with 2 g ceftriaxone i. v. was administered during the intervention. Second-look endoscopy was scheduled 24 h after resection. The resectat showed histologically a gastric type adenoma of 18 mm in the proximal duodenum (immunohistochemistry positive for Mucin-1, Mucin-5, Mib 1). CONCLUSION Herein we present the first case of duodenal EFTR in a patient with attenuated FAP and a PGA. There are currently no specific guidelines for the removal and surveillance. ASGE recommends resection and surveillance endoscopy at 3-5 years interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Anliker
- Abteilung Gastroenterologie/Hepatologie der Medizinischen Klinik, Stadtspital Waid, Zürich
| | - Wolfram Sieweke
- Abteilung Gastroenterologie/Hepatologie der Medizinischen Klinik, Stadtspital Waid, Zürich
| | - Antonia Töpfer
- Institut für Pathologie und Molekularpathologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich
| | | | - Matthias Breidert
- Abteilung Gastroenterologie/Hepatologie der Medizinischen Klinik, Stadtspital Waid, Zürich
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Andrisani G, Di Matteo FM. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of duodenal lesions (with video). Surg Endosc 2019; 34:1876-1881. [PMID: 31768725 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07269-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM The endoscopic treatment of non-lifting or submucosal duodenal lesions is associated with a high risk of incomplete resection and adverse events. Clip-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is a new approach for en bloc removal of neoplastic lesions in the GI tract. The aim of this study was to investigate its efficacy and safety in the duodenum. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively collected all consecutive patients with duodenal lesions who underwent EFTR with OTSC (Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) or the new full-thickness resection device (FTRD; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany). Complete resection rate was defined as histologically-verified R0 resection. Main endoscopic and clinical outcomes (technical success, rate of EFTR, adverse events) were systematically assessed at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS Between May 2017 and January 2019, 10 patients with duodenal lesions underwent EFTR (5 non-lifting adenomas, 2 adenomas recurrence/relapse and 3 subepithelial tumours). Technical success was overall achieved in 8/10 cases (80%). The two FTRD failed cases were completed with snare resection. The complete full-thickness resection rate was achieved in 8/10 (80%), while in two cases it was limited to mucosal or submucosal layer. R0 resection rate was achieved in 8/10 (80%) patients. The mean procedure time was 75 min (range 53-120 min). There were no major adverse events. At 3 and 6-month follow-up, no recurrence was observed. CONCLUSIONS Clip-assisted EFTR is a feasible and effective technique for en bloc resection of "difficult" superficial neoplasia and submucosal lesions in the duodenum, representing another technique that must be part of the endoscopist's armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Andrisani
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy.
| | - Francesco Maria Di Matteo
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Campus Bio-Medico, University of Rome, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Rossi RE, Rausa E, Cavalcoli F, Conte D, Massironi S. Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms: a still poorly recognized clinical entity. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018; 53:835-842. [PMID: 29726295 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1468479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNENs) are rare tumors, which usually show good prognosis. The optimal management of these tumors is still far from being clearly understood because of their rarity and the poor level of knowledge about their natural history. Herein, we have reviewed the literature on dNENs to collect and analyze the current data on epidemiology, diagnosis and management of these rare tumors. METHODS Bibliographical searches were performed in PubMed, using the following keywords: duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasm; duodenum; gastrinoma; diagnosis; therapy; guidelines. We searched for all relevant articles published over the last 15 years. Non-English language papers were excluded. RESULTS We reviewed the pertinent articles about dNENs. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with biopsy is the cornerstone of the dNENs diagnostic process. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration/biopsy should be performed in order to locally stage the disease and in all cases of non-diagnostic endoscopy. Endoscopic or complete surgical removal of the primary lesion is the recommended treatment and is generally achievable for the majority of the patients. A less aggressive approach may be suggested for well-differentiated low-stage tumors. After NEN removal, patients should be closely followed-up especially during the first 3 years by endoscopic examination, imaging tests and CgA measurements. CONCLUSIONS The multi-disciplinary approach and the preservation of the quality of life of the patients play a key role in the therapeutic process for dNENs. Further studies are needed to better define standardized guidelines specific to dNENs, including optimal management approaches and follow-up intervals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Elisa Rossi
- a Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy , Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan , Italy.,b Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplant , Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Emanuele Rausa
- c General and Emergency Surgery Department , ASST Trauma Center "Papa Giovanni XXIII" Hospital , Bergamo , Italy
| | - Federica Cavalcoli
- a Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy , Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan , Italy.,b Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplant , Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Dario Conte
- a Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy , Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan , Italy.,b Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplant , Università degli Studi di Milano , Milan , Italy
| | - Sara Massironi
- a Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy , Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bauder M, Schmidt A, Caca K. Endoscopic full-thickness resection of duodenal lesions-a retrospective analysis of 20 FTRD cases. United European Gastroenterol J 2018; 6:1015-1021. [PMID: 30228889 PMCID: PMC6137579 DOI: 10.1177/2050640618773517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic resections in the duodenum harbor a significant risk of complications. The full-thickness resection device (FTRD) has shown favorable results concerning efficacy and safety in the resection of colorectal lesions. Data of its use in the duodenum are limited to a single, small case series (n = 4). METHODS Data of all consecutive patients scheduled for endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of duodenal lesions by FTRD in our institution were collected and analyzed retrospectively. Primary endpoint was technical success. RESULTS Between March 2014 and June 2017 EFTR of a duodenal lesion was planned in a total of 20 patients. Overall technical success was 17/20 (85.0%). Indication for EFTR was: adenomas (n = 13, seven treatment naïve, six pretreated), subepithelial tumors (n = 5) and T1 adenocarcinoma (n = 1). The FTRD could be advanced to the lesion in 19/20 cases (95.0%). R0-resection rate was 12/19 (63.2%). During follow-up after 3 and 12 months there were two recurrent adenomas that were successfully re-resected by FTRD. Minor bleedings occurred at the first postinterventional day in 3/19 (15.8%). There were no major bleedings and perforations. CONCLUSION This study confirmed the feasibility of duodenal EFTR and indicates good efficacy and safety. Larger studies are needed to further investigate this novel technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Bauder
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Valli PV, Mertens JC, Sonnenberg A, Bauerfeind P. Nonampullary Duodenal Adenomas Rarely Recur after Complete Endoscopic Resection: A Swiss Experience Including a Literature Review. Digestion 2018; 96:149-157. [PMID: 28854423 DOI: 10.1159/000479625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/17/2017] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Duodenal polyps and especially duodenal adenomas are a rare and mostly coincidental finding in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Due to their malignant potential, duodenal adenomas should be removed upon diagnosis. So far, the limited available data on the performance of endoscopic polypectomy show conflicting results with regard to adverse events and the adenoma recurrence rate. PATIENTS AND METHODS After summarizing the currently available data, we retrospectively analyzed all patients undergoing endoscopic resection of nonampullary duodenal adenomas (NAD) at our institution between 2006 and 2016. RESULTS A total of 78 patients underwent endoscopic polypectomy for NAD adenoma. End-of-treatment success with complete resection requiring a mean of 1.2 interventions was achieved in 91% (n = 71). Procedural hemorrhage occurred in 12.8% (n = 10), whereas delayed bleeding was noted in 9% (n = 7). Duodenal perforation was registered and successfully treated in 2 cases (2.6%). No adenoma recurrence was noted following primary complete adenoma resection after a mean follow-up time of 33 months. Acute post-polypectomy bleeding was statistically significantly associated with large polyp size (p = 0.003) and lack of endoscopic prophylaxis (p = 0.0008). Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding showed a trend in the occurrence of large polyps (p = 0.064), and was statistically significantly associated with familial cancer syndrome (p = 0.019) and advanced histopathology (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION Our data suggest that endoscopic polypectomy of NAD is well feasible with high success rates. Procedural and delayed hemorrhage seems to be the primary issue rather than adenoma recurrence. We therefore advocate referral of patients with large NAD to experienced centers for endoscopic resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero V Valli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Endoscopic and surgical management of nonampullary duodenal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:2859-2869. [PMID: 29392469 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5994-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 12/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sporadic nonampullary duodenal neoplasms (SNADN) can have malignant potential for which endoscopic and surgical resections are offered. We report combined gastroenterologic and surgical experience for treatment of SNADN, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and pancreas-preserving partial duodenectomy (PPPD). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 121 consecutive patients, who underwent 30 PPPDs and 91 EMRs for mucosal and submucosal SNADN. Decision to undergo EMR or surgical resection was based on expert endoscopist and surgeon discretion including multidisciplinary tumor board review. Main outcomes were recurrence rate of neoplasia and adverse events requiring hospital admission or prolonged care. EMRs were performed with submucosal lifting followed by snare resection. PPPD included total duodenectomy, supra-ampullary PPPD for neoplasms proximal to the ampulla, and infra-ampullary PPPD for lesions distal to the ampulla. Follow-up data were available for 65% of EMR and 73% of surgical patients. RESULTS Surgically resected neoplasia was larger with more advanced neoplasia and submucosal lesions. En bloc resection was achieved in all surgical resections and in 53% of EMRs. Post-EMR, mucosal and submucosal neoplasia recurred in 32 and 0%, respectively, including five neoplasms (26%) after an initial negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy. All recurrences were treated endoscopically. Complications occurred in 14 endoscopically and eight surgically treated patients, none requiring surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS Post-EMR patients had higher recurrence of mucosal neoplasia, whereas submucosal neoplasms, mainly carcinoid, did not recur. Polyp size and positive resection margin were not associated with neoplasia recurrence. Patients with SNADN could benefit from a multidisciplinary approach to stratify the optimal treatment based on local expertise.
Collapse
|
13
|
Rajkomar K, Kweon M, Khan I, Frankish P, Rodgers M, Koea JB. Endoscopic assessment and management of sporadic duodenal adenomas: The results of single centre multidisciplinary management. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9:196-203. [PMID: 28465787 PMCID: PMC5394727 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i4.196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2016] [Revised: 01/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To review the role of multidisciplinary management in treating sporadic duodenal adenomas (SDA).
METHODS SDA managed at North Shore Hospital between 2009-2014 were entered into a prospective database. Pathology, endoscopic and surgical management as well as follow up were reviewed.
RESULTS Twenty-eight patients (14 male: Median age 68 years) presented with SDA [18 were classified as non ampullary location (NA), 10 as ampullary location (A)]. All SDA were diagnosed on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and were imaged with a contrast enhanced CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Of the NA adenomas 14 were located in the second part, 2 in the first part and 2 in the third part of the duodenum. Two patients declined treatment, 3 patients underwent surgical resection (2 transduodenal resections and 1 pancreaticoduodenectomy), and 23 patients were treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The only complication with endoscopic resection was mild pancreatitis post procedure. Patients were followed with gastroduodenoscopy for a median of 22 mo (range: 2-69 mo). There were 8 recurrences treated with EMR with one patient proceeding to pancreaticodeuodenectomy because of high grade dysplasia in the resected specimen and 2 NA recurrences were managed with surgical resection (distal gastrectomy for a lesion in the first part of the duodenum and a transduodenal resection of a lesion in the third part of the duodenum).
CONCLUSION SDA can be treated endoscopically with minimal morbidity and piecemeal resection results in eradication in nearly three quarters of patients. Recurrent SDA can be treated with endoscopic reresection with surgical resection indicated when the lesions are large (> 4 cm in diameter) or demonstrate severe dysplasia or invasive cancer.
Collapse
|
14
|
Klein A, Nayyar D, Bahin FF, Qi Z, Lee E, Williams SJ, Byth K, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic mucosal resection of large and giant lateral spreading lesions of the duodenum: success, adverse events, and long-term outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84:688-96. [PMID: 26975231 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 02/26/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Large sporadic duodenal adenomas are uncommon but they harbor malignant potential, which requires consideration of definitive treatment. EMR is gaining acceptance as an effective and safe alternative to high-risk surgical procedures, but data on long-term outcomes are limited. Herein we describe the short- and long-term outcomes of these lesions in a tertiary referral center. METHODS Prospectively collected data were analyzed to identify risk factors for adverse events and outcomes. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, and procedural technical data were collected. RESULTS From 2007 to 2015, 106 adenomas ≥10 mm were resected (mean patient age, 69 years; 54% male; median size, 25 mm; interquartile range [IQR], 19-40). Complete endoscopic resection was achieved in 96%. Intraprocedural bleeding occurred in 43% of cases and was associated with lesion size (P < .001), number of resected specimens (P = .003), and longer procedures (P = .001). Delayed bleeding occurred in 15% (56% did not require active intervention) and was associated with lesion size (P = .03). Perforation occurred in 3 patients. The 30-day mortality was 0%. Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR, 7-45). Histologically proven adenoma recurrence was identified and treated in 12 of 83 patients (14.4%) on first surveillance endoscopy. For the 53 patients for whom follow-up ≥12 months was available (median follow-up, 36 months; IQR, 24-51), 48 patients (90.6%) were free of adenoma and considered cured. CONCLUSIONS In a tertiary referral center, endoscopic resection of duodenal adenomas is a safe and effective alternative to surgery. Lesion size is strongly associated with adverse events, particularly intraprocedural bleeding and delayed bleeding. Good long-term outcomes are demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Klein
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dhruv Nayyar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Farzan F Bahin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Zhengyan Qi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Eric Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen J Williams
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Byth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Singh A, Siddiqui UD, Konda VJ, Whitcomb E, Hart J, Xiao SY, Ruiz MG, Koons A, Waxman I. Safety and efficacy of EMR for sporadic, nonampullary duodenal adenomas: a single U.S. center experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84:700-8. [PMID: 27063918 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2015] [Accepted: 03/17/2016] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS EMR is increasingly used for resection of sporadic, nonampullary duodenal adenomas (SNDAs), but there are no guidelines for the management of these lesions. The aims of this study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EMR exclusively for SNDAs and to determine the factors predictive of outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of patients with SNDAs referred for endoscopic therapy from 2006 to 2013. The outcomes studied were successful endoscopic resection, major adverse events, early and late recurrences, and clinical remission. RESULTS Sixty-eight patients with SNDAs were included and 51 (75%) underwent EMR. The mean adenoma size was 22.0 ± 8.9 mm. Successful resection was achieved in 49 of 51 patients (96.1%), and major adverse events were noted in 8 of 51 patients (15.7%). Early and late recurrences were noted in 25.6% and 5.2% of patients, respectively, and were treated endoscopically. Clinical remission was achieved in 89.7% of patients after a median follow-up of 15 months. Presence of villous histology was associated with increased recurrence (P = .019), but no association of recurrence was noted with other endoscopic features or resection technique. Large adenoma size (P = .0057) and need for intraprocedural hemostasis (P = .006) were associated with increased adverse events, but no association of adverse events was noted with location or resection technique. CONCLUSIONS Large duodenal adenomas can be effectively managed with EMR at a referral center with experienced endoscopists. However, EMR has a significant recurrence rate, especially early recurrence, and the risk of adverse events is not negligible. Endoscopic therapy is successful in managing recurrent adenomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajaypal Singh
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Uzma D Siddiqui
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vani J Konda
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emma Whitcomb
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John Hart
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shu-Yuan Xiao
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mariano G Ruiz
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ann Koons
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Irving Waxman
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bisschops R, Areia M, Coron E, Dobru D, Kaskas B, Kuvaev R, Pech O, Ragunath K, Weusten B, Familiari P, Domagk D, Valori R, Kaminski MF, Spada C, Bretthauer M, Bennett C, Senore C, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Rutter MD. Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J 2016; 4:629-656. [PMID: 27733906 DOI: 10.1177/2050640616664843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Miguel Areia
- Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Oncology Institute, Coimbra, Portugal; Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Emmanuel Coron
- Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Daniela Dobru
- Gastroenterology Department, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Bernd Kaskas
- Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Roman Kuvaev
- Endoscopy, Yaroslavl Regional Cancer Hospital, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation
| | - Oliver Pech
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie und interventionelle Endoskopie, Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Krish Ragunath
- NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Unit, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham, UK
| | - Bas Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Pietro Familiari
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Dirk Domagk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Joseph's Hospital, Warendorf, Germany
| | - Roland Valori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Michal F Kaminski
- Department of Health Management and Health Economy and KG Jebsen Centre for Colorectal Cancer, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, and Medical Center for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Agostino Gemelli University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Department of Health Management and Health Economy and KG Jebsen Centre for Colorectal Cancer, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathy Bennett
- Centre for Technology Enabled Research, Coventry University, Coventry, UK
| | - Carlo Senore
- CPO Piemonte, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Servicio de Gastroenterologia, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
| | - Matthew D Rutter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK; School of Medicine, Durham University, Durham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fujihara S, Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N, Matsunaga T, Ayaki M, Yachida T, Masaki T. Management of a large mucosal defect after duodenal endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:6595-6609. [PMID: 27547003 PMCID: PMC4970484 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i29.6595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2016] [Revised: 05/23/2016] [Accepted: 06/15/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Duodenal endoscopic resection is the most difficult type of endoscopic treatment in the gastrointestinal tract (GI) and is technically challenging because of anatomical specificities. In addition to these technical difficulties, this procedure is associated with a significantly higher rate of complication than endoscopic treatment in other parts of the GI tract. Postoperative delayed perforation and bleeding are hazardous complications, and emergency surgical intervention is sometimes required. Therefore, it is urgently necessary to establish a management protocol for preventing serious complications. For instance, the prophylactic closure of large mucosal defects after endoscopic resection may reduce the risk of hazardous complications. However, the size of mucosal defects after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is relatively large compared with the size after endoscopic mucosal resection, making it impossible to achieve complete closure using only conventional clips. The over-the-scope clip and polyglycolic acid sheets with fibrin gel make it possible to close large mucosal defects after duodenal ESD. In addition to the combination of laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic resection, endoscopic full-thickness resection holds therapeutic potential for difficult duodenal lesions and may overcome the disadvantages of endoscopic resection in the near future. This review aims to summarize the complications and closure techniques of large mucosal defects and to highlight some directions for management after duodenal endoscopic treatment.
Collapse
|
18
|
Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V, Zhu X, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4:E699-708. [PMID: 27556081 PMCID: PMC4993908 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-107069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Data on the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps are limited. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of sporadic non-ampullary duodenal polyps. METHODS Relevant studies for the meta-analysis were identified through search of PUBMED and EMBASE databases. Studies employing EMR for the management of sporadic duodenal polyps in the non-ampullary region were included. The primary outcome was the surgical intervention rates due to non-curative endoscopic resection (incomplete removal/recurrence necessitating surgery) and/or management of procedural adverse events. RESULTS A total of 440 patients (485 duodenal polyps) from 14 studies were included. The mean size of the polyps was 13 mm to 35 mm. Surgical intervention due to non-curative EMR and adverse events was required in 2 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 0 - 4 %). EMR was successfully accomplished in 93 % (95 %CI 89 - 97 %). The overall bleeding rate after EMR was 16 % (95 %CI 10 - 23 %), and the pooled delayed bleeding rate was 5 % (95 %CI 2 - 7 %). The overall incidence of perforation was 1 % (95 %CI 1 - 3 %). Over a median follow-up period of 6 - 72 months, the recurrence rate after EMR was 15 % (95 %CI 7 - 23 %). Six studies (pooled recurrence 20 %, 95 %CI 14 - 27 %) reported on the outcomes of managing recurrent polyps, for which endoscopic removal was successful in 62 % (95 %CI 37 - 87 %). There was no procedure related mortality. CONCLUSION EMR appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic option for management of sporadic non-ampullary duodenal polyps. Long-term endoscopic surveillance is required to manage and treat recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Udayakumar Navaneethan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA,Corresponding author Udayakumar Navaneethan, MD Center for Interventional EndoscopyUniversity of Central Florida College of MedicineFlorida Hospital601 E Rollins StreetOrlandoFL 32814USA+1-407-303-2585
| | | | - Vennisvasanth Lourdusamy
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA,Department of Internal Medicine, Brandon Regional Hospital, Brandon, FL, USA
| | - Xiang Zhu
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Orlando, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lim CH, Cho YS. Nonampullary duodenal adenoma: Current understanding of its diagnosis, pathogenesis, and clinical management. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:853-861. [PMID: 26811631 PMCID: PMC4716083 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2015] [Revised: 08/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Nonampullary duodenal adenomas are relatively common in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), but nonampullary sporadic duodenal adenomas (SDAs) are rare. Emerging evidence shows that duodenal adenomas, regardless of their anatomic location and whether they are sporadic or FAP-related, share morphologic and molecular features with colorectal adenomas. The available data suggest that duodenal adenomas develop to duodenal adenocarcinomas via similar mechanisms. The optimal approach for management of duodenal adenomas remains to be determined. The techniques for endoscopic resection of duodenal adenoma include snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and argon plasma coagulation ablation. EMR may facilitate removal of large duodenal polyps. Although several studies have reported cases of successful ESD for duodenal adenomas, the procedure is technically difficult to perform safely because of the anatomical properties of the duodenum. Although current clinical practice recommends endoscopic resection of all large duodenal adenomas in patients with FAP, endoscopic treatment is usually insufficient to guarantee a polyp-free duodenum. Surgery is indicated for FAP patients with severe polyposis or nonampullary SDAs or FAP-related polyps not amenable to endoscopic resection. Further studies are needed to develop newer endoscopic techniques to guide diagnostic and therapeutic decisions for future management of nonampullary duodenal adenomas.
Collapse
|
20
|
Marques J, Baldaque-Silva F, Pereira P, Arnelo U, Yahagi N, Macedo G. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomatous polyps. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7:720-727. [PMID: 26140099 PMCID: PMC4482831 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i7.720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Revised: 03/10/2015] [Accepted: 05/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Although uncommon, sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomas have a growing detection due to the widespread of endoscopy. Endoscopic therapy is being increasingly used for these lesions, since surgery, considered the standard treatment, carries significant morbidity and mortality. However, the knowledge about its risks and benefits is limited, which contributes to the current absence of standardized recommendations. This review aims to discuss the efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of these lesions. A literature review was performed, using the Pubmed database with the query: “(duodenum or duodenal) (endoscopy or endoscopic) adenoma resection”, in the human species and in English. Of the 189 retrieved articles, and after reading their abstracts, 19 were selected due to their scientific interest. The analysis of their references, led to the inclusion of 23 more articles for their relevance in this subject. The increased use of EMR in the duodenum has shown good results with complete resection rates exceeding 80% and low complication risk (delayed bleeding in less than 12% of the procedures). Although rarely used in the duodenum, ESD achieves close to 100% complete resection rates, but is associated with perforation and bleeding risk in up to one third of the cases. Even though literature is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions, studies suggest that EMR and ESD are valid options for the treatment of nonampullary adenomas. Thus, strategies to improve these techniques, and consequently increase the effectiveness and safety of the resection of these lesions, should be developed.
Collapse
|
21
|
Feasibility of endoscopic resection for sessile nonampullary duodenal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015:692492. [PMID: 25810715 PMCID: PMC4355118 DOI: 10.1155/2015/692492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2014] [Revised: 02/09/2015] [Accepted: 02/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives. Sessile nonampullary duodenal tumors (SNADTs) are relatively rare and endoscopic resection of these lesions is considered more challenging than in other parts of the gastrointestinal tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic resection for SNADT. Methods. Medical records including endoscopic resection for SNADT from July 2002 to July 2013 from 5 centers affiliated to The Catholic University of Korea were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic features and clinical outcomes such as complete resection and complications were analyzed. Results. A total of 56 lesions from 54 patients were enrolled in this study. Forty-five lesions were resected by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), 6 lesions by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and 5 lesions by simple polypectomy. Histologic examination after endoscopic resection revealed adenocarcinoma in 2, low grade adenoma in 25, high grade adenoma in 11, and carcinoid tumor in 18 lesions. En bloc resection rates and histological complete resection rates were 78.6% (44/56) and 80.0% (28/35), respectively. Bleeding which required additional endoscopic intervention occurred in 1.8% (1/56) and perforation in 7.1% (4/56). There was no procedure-related mortality. Conclusions. Endoscopic resection techniques including ESD might be safe and effective modalities for the management of SNADT.
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Benign duodenal and periampullary tumors are uncommon lesions requiring careful attention to their complex anatomic relationships with the major and minor papillae as well as the gastric outlet during surgical intervention. While endoscopy is less morbid than open resection, many lesions are not amenable to endoscopic removal. Robotic surgery offers technical advantages above traditional laparoscopy, and we demonstrate the safety and feasibility of this approach for a variety of duodenal lesions. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of all robotic duodenal resections between April 2010 and December 2013 from two institutions. Demographic, clinicopathologic, and operative details were recorded with special attention to the post-operative course. RESULTS Twenty-six patients underwent robotic duodenal resection for a variety of diagnoses. The majority (88 %) were symptomatic at presentation. Nine patients underwent transduodenal ampullectomy, seven patients underwent duodenal resection, six patients underwent transduodenal resection of a mass, and four patients underwent segmental duodenal resection. Median operative time was 4 h with a median estimated blood loss of 50 cm(3) and no conversions to an open operation. The rate of major Clavien-Dindo grades 3-4 complications was 15 % at post-operative days 30 and 90 without mortality. Final pathology demonstrated a median tumor size of 2.9 cm with a final histologic diagnoses of adenoma (n = 13), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 6), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) (n = 2), lipoma (n = 2), Brunner's gland hamartoma (n = 1), leiomyoma (n = 1), and gangliocytic paraganglioma (n = 1). CONCLUSION Robotic duodenal resection is safe and feasible for benign and premalignant duodenal tumors not amenable to endoscopic resection.
Collapse
|
23
|
Perumpail R, Friedland S. Treatment of nonampullary sporadic duodenal adenomas with endoscopic mucosal resection or ablation. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58:2751-2. [PMID: 23884756 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-013-2787-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Perumpail
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|