Total pancreatectomy for the management of refractory post-gastric bypass hypoglycemia

Surgical Treatment for Postprandial Hypoglycemia After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Literature Review

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is an effective treatment for severe obesity and obesity-related comorbidities. Postprandial hypoglycemia may occur as a long-term complication after RYGB. This study reviews the literature on surgical treatment for intractable post-RYGB hypoglycemia to provide updated information. A search was performed in Embase and PubMed, and 25 papers were identified. Thirteen papers on reversal were included. Resolution of postprandial hypoglycemic symptoms occurred in 42/48 (88%) patients after reversal. Twelve papers on pancreatectomy were included. Resolution occurred in 27/50 (54%) patients after pancreatectomy. The optimal surgical treatment for intractable post-RYGB hypoglycemia has not been defined, but reversal of RYGB seems to be more effective than other treatments. Further research on etiology and long-term evaluation of surgical outcomes may refine treatment options.

Guidelines for gastrostomy tube placement and enteral nutrition in patients with severe, refractory hypoglycemia after gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Postbariatric hypoglycemia (PBH) affects up to 38% of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. Severe cases are refractory to diet and medications. Surgical treatments including bypass reversal and pancreatectomy are highly morbid and hypoglycemia often recurs. We have developed a highly effective method of treatment by which enteral nutrition administered through a gastrostomy (G) tube placed in the remnant stomach replaces oral diet: if done correctly this reverses hyperinsulinemia and hypoglycemia, yielding substantial health and quality of life benefits for severely affected patients.

OBJECTIVES

To provide clinical guidelines for placement of a G-tube to treat postRYGB hypoglycemia, including candidate selection, preoperative evaluation, surgical considerations, and post-RYGB management.

SETTING

Stanford University Hospital and Clinics.

METHODS

Based on our relatively large experience with placing and managing G-tubes for PBH treatment, an interdisciplinary task force developed guidelines for practitioners.

RESULTS

A team approach (endocrinologist, dietitian, surgeon, psychologist) is recommended. Appropriate candidates have a history of RYGB, severe hypoglycemia refractory to medical-nutrition therapy, and significantly affected quality of life. Preoperative requirements include education and expectation setting, determination of initial enteral feeding program, and establishing service with a home enteral provider. Close postoperative follow-up is needed to ensure success and may require adjustments in formula and mode/rate of delivery to optimize tolerance and meet nutritional goals. G-tube nutrition must fully replace oral nutrition to prevent hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

G-tube placement in the remnant stomach represents a relatively well-tolerated and effective treatment for severe, refractory hypoglycemia after RYGB.

Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of repeat subcutaneous dosing of avexitide (exendin 9-39) for treatment of post-bariatric hypoglycaemia

AIM

To evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of repeat dosing of two formulations of subcutaneous (SC) avexitide (exendin 9-39) in patients with post-bariatric hypoglycaemia (PBH).

METHODS

In this phase 2, multiple-ascending-dose study conducted at Stanford University, 19 women with PBH underwent a baseline oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), with metabolic and symptomatic assessments. Fourteen were then sequentially assigned to receive one of four ascending-dose levels of twice-daily lyophilized (Lyo) avexitide by SC injection for 3 days. On the basis of safety, efficacy and tolerability, five additional participants then received a novel liquid formulation (Liq) of avexitide by SC injection at a fixed dose of 30 mg twice daily for 3 days. All 19 participants underwent a repeat OGTT on day 3 of dosing to quantify metabolic, symptomatic and pharmacokinetic responses.

RESULTS

Treatment with Lyo avexitide reduced the magnitude of symptomatic hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia at all dose levels, with dose-dependent improvements in glucose nadir, insulin peak and symptom score; doses ≥20 mg twice daily did not require glycaemic rescue (administered at glucose <2.8 mmol/L). Participants receiving Liq avexitide 30 mg twice daily did not require any glycaemic rescue, and on average achieved a 47% increase in glucose nadir, a 67% reduction in peak insulin, and a 47% reduction in overall symptom score. Equivalent doses of Liq versus Lyo avexitide yielded higher and more sustained plasma concentrations. Both formulations were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PBH, twice-daily administration of SC avexitide effectively raised the glucose nadir and prevented severe hypoglycaemia requiring rescue intervention. Avexitide may represent a viable therapy for PBH.

Examples of dramatic failures and their effectiveness in modern surgical disciplines: can we learn from our mistakes?

Innovation can be variably defined, but when applied to healthcare is often considered to be the introduction of something new, whether an idea, method or device, into an unfilled void or needy environment. Despite the introduction of many positive surgical subspecialty altering concepts/devices however, epic failures are not uncommon. These failures can be dramatic in regards to both their human and economic costs. They can also be very public or more quiet in nature. As surgical leaders in our communities and advocates for patient safety and outcomes, it remains crucial that we meet new introductions in technology and patient care with a measured level of curiosity, skepticism and science-based conclusions. The aim of an expert committee was to identify the most dominant failures in technological innovation and/or dogmatic clinical beliefs within each major surgical subspecialty. In summary, this effort was pursued to highlight the past failures and remind surgeons to remain vigilant and appropriately skeptical with regard to the introduction of new innovations and clinical beliefs within our craft.

Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia after gastric bypass surgery: what's up and what's down?

Obesity is a global public health problem and attempts to treat this condition using life style with and without pharmacological interventions have not been successful in majority of obese individuals. To date, the most effective treatment for obesity is weight loss surgery. One of the most widely used procedures to treat obesity worldwide, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB), has shown to induce diabetes remission in addition to significant and sustainable weight loss. As the number of this procedure performed over the last two decades increased, it has become clear that a subgroup of individuals develop postprandial hypoglycemia several years after surgery. This debilitating late complication of RYGB is often associated with loss of consciousness or seizures, and in severe cases, it is only partially responsive to diet modification or other available therapeutic options. The diagnosis is often a challenge resulting in delays in receiving care in the affected individuals. Although the underlying mechanisms are under current investigations, growing evidence suggest that a combination of exaggerated meal-derived nutrient appearance to systemic circulation and altered islet and gut hormone response after eating have a role in pathogenesis of this condition. The goal of this review is to highlight new perspectives regarding this life-threatening complication of RYGB. The etiology, diagnosis, recommendation on how to distinguish from classic dumping and current available treatment based on literature review will be discussed. In addition, physiologic changes after gastric bypass predisposing to hypoglycemia syndrome will be highlighted.International Journal of Obesity advance online publication, 31 October 2017; doi:10.1038/ijo.2017.257.