Efficacy of Lafutidine Versus Famotidine in Patients with Reflux Esophagitis: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-inferiority Phase III Trial

Clinical features and therapeutic responses to proton pump inhibitor in patients with severe reflux esophagitis: A multicenter prospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In patients with severe erosive reflux disease (ERD; Los Angeles classification grade C/D) who do not undergo endoscopic examination, insufficient strength and duration of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy may lead to complications such as esophageal bleeding and stenosis. Therefore, to provide a safe and effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), we investigated the clinical features of patients with severe ERD and their responses to PPI therapy.

METHODS

Patients with GERD symptoms received PPI therapy for 4 weeks after endoscopic examination. The patients completed the Gastroesophageal reflux and dyspepsia therapeutic efficacy and satisfaction test questionnaire before and 2 or 4 weeks after PPI treatment. Patient characteristics, presence/absence of coexisting atrophic gastritis (AG) and hiatus hernia (HH), and responses to PPI therapy were compared in patients with GERD among three groups (nonerosive reflux disease, mild ERD [grade A/B], and severe ERD).

RESULTS

The severe ERD group had a significantly higher proportion of males, higher body mass index, and longer duration of GERD morbidity. Furthermore, the severe ERD group also had a significantly lower incidence of coexisting AG and higher incidence of HH. There was no difference in the severity of GERD before PPI treatment among the three groups. Unexpectedly, the response to PPI therapy was the best in the severe ERD group.

CONCLUSION

Sufficient strength and period of PPI therapy are required, even if the symptoms show early improvement, when treating GERD patients without performing endoscopy, considering the possibility of severe ERD.

Vonoprazan versus proton-pump inhibitors for healing gastroesophageal reflux disease: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease caused by reflux of gastric contents to the esophagus. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are recommended as a first-line therapy to treat GERD. Recently, a new potassium-competitive acid blocker, vonoprazan, was launched in Japan. We aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of vonoprazan and other PPIs in healing GERD.

METHODS

We used MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to search the literature. Double-blind randomized controlled trials for PPIs and/or vonoprazan that were published in English or Japanese and assessed healing effects in adult GERD patients were included. To estimate the comparative efficacy of treatments, we performed a Bayesian network meta-analysis to assess the consistency assumption.

RESULTS

Of 4001 articles identified in the database, 42 studies were eligible. One study was hand-searched and added to the analysis. For the main analysis of healing effects at 8 weeks, odds ratios (ORs) of vonoprazan (20 mg daily) to esomeprazole (20 mg), rabeprazole (20 mg), lansoprazole (30 mg), and omeprazole (20 mg) were 2.29 (95% credible interval, 0.79-7.06), 3.94 (1.15-14.03), 2.40 (0.90-6.77), and 2.71 (0.98-7.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis for patients with severe esophagitis at baseline showed significantly higher ORs for vonoprazan versus most of the comparator PPIs.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis shows that the GERD healing effect of vonoprazan is higher than that of rabeprazole (20 mg) but not higher than other PPIs. Subgroup analysis indicated that vonoprazan is more effective than most PPIs for patients with severe erosive esophagitis.

Proton pump inhibitor usage and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs-associated small intestinal injury: How to balance risks and benefits

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the treatment of acid-related diseases and can effectively prevent upper gastrointestinal damage associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, recent studies have shown that PPIs cannot protect from NSAIDs-associated small bowel injury, and may even aggravate intestinal injury by altering the intestinal flora. This article will discuss the risks associated with the combined use of NSAIDs and PPIs, as well as how to balance risks and benefits of PPIs treatment, and provide a brief review of strategies for the prevention of NSAIDs-associated small bowel injury.

Recent Advances in the Pharmacological Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

The management of proton pump inhibitor-refractory GERD (rGERD) is a challenge in clinical practice. Since up to one-third of patients with typical GERD symptoms (heartburn and/or acid regurgitation) are not satisfied with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, new drug development targeting different pathophysiologies of GERD is imperative. At present, no other drugs serve as a more potent acid suppression agent than PPIs. As an add-on therapy, histamine type-2 receptor antagonists, alginates, prokinetics and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation inhibitors have some impact on the subgroups of rGERD, but greater effectiveness and fewer adverse effects for widespread use are required. Visceral hypersensitivity also contributes to the perception of GERD symptoms, and neuromodulators including antidepressants play a role in this category. Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring helps to distinguish functional heartburn from true GERD, and psychologic medication and cognitive behavior therapy are further therapy options instead of PPIs.

Comparison of effect of an increased dosage of vonoprazan versus vonoprazan plus lafutidine on gastric acid inhibition and serum gastrin

BACKGROUND

Vonoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, elicits potent acid inhibition and hypergastrinemia at a dose of 20 mg. Its recommended maintenance dose for gastro-esophageal reflux disease is 10 mg, which is sometimes insufficient for preventing nocturnal acid breakthrough (NAB). Concomitant use of a histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H₂RA) is effective for NAB. However, further acid inhibition by addition of H2RA has concern of hypergastrinemia again. Lafutidine (H2RA) is known to stimulate somatostatin release.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to compare the levels of acid inhibition and serum gastrin attained by addition of lafutidine to vonoprazan 10 mg with levels after a dose increase of vonoprazan from 10 to 20 mg.

METHODS

Thirteen healthy volunteers underwent 24-h intragastric pH monitoring and serum gastrin measurements on day 7 of three different regimens: vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg plus lafutidine 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg.

RESULTS

Median pH 4 holding time ratios (range) by vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan 10 mg plus lafutidine 10 mg, and vonoprazan 20 mg were 82% (47-88%), 88% (76-93%), and 99% (95-100%) while those at nighttime from 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. were 94% (29-100%), 100% (95-100%), and 100%, respectively. The incidences of NAB with vonoprazan 10 mg, vonoprazan plus lafutidine, and vonoprazan 20 mg were 38, 8, and 0%, respectively. Respective serum gastrin levels were 420 (173-508), 323 (196-521), and 504 (400-812) pg/ml.

CONCLUSION

Addition of lafutidine 10 mg to vonoprazan 10 mg achieved sufficient acid inhibition, especially at nighttime, without further increase of serum gastrin levels.

Pharmacokinetic Properties of Oral Lafutidine Tablets and the Effect of Food on its Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Chinese Subjects

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of single and multiple doses of oral lafutidine tablets and the effect of food on the PK properties in healthy Chinese subjects. The tolerability and the effect of gender on the PK properties were also evaluated to acquire more PK information.

METHODS

Three PK studies were conducted in 12 healthy Chinese subjects (6 male, 6 female). Study 1 was a single-dose, three-period, three-dose level (10, 20, and 40 mg), three-sequence cross-over study under fasting conditions. Study 2 was a repeat-dose study (10 mg twice daily over 6 days; all 12 subjects). Study 3 was a two-period, two-sequence cross-over single-dose (10 mg) food interaction study. All randomizations (study 1, study 3) were done to ascertain 1:1 gender ratio per sequence. A validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method was used to determine plasma lafutidine concentrations. PK parameters were calculated by the non-compartmental method.

RESULTS

The area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (C _max) of lafutidine tablets were dose-independent in the single-dose study among these healthy volunteers. The PK parameters of the multiple-dose study were inconsistent with the single study. After administration of a single dose of 10 mg under either fed or fasting conditions, we found that food may not affect the degree of absorption of the lafutidine tablets, but it may slow down the absorption rate. This is shown by the fact that the AUC showed no significant difference while the peak time was significantly delayed under fed conditions.

CONCLUSION

The PK of lafutidine showed dose proportionality. There was no significant accumulation of lafutidine tablets with multiple dosing. Food did not affect the degree of lafutidine absorption, but it did reduce the rate of absorption. Further study is needed regarding the effect of gender on lafutidine. Lafutidine was well tolerated within the dose range 10-40 mg, and no serious adverse events were observed.