No association between serum adenosine deaminase activity and disease activity in Crohn's disease

Current noninvasive modalities in Crohn's disease monitoring

Crohn’s disease (CD) is characterized by a remitting and relapsing course. Longstanding active CD may result in accumulating intestinal damage and disease-related complications. In contrast, mucosal healing is associated with significant improvement in the health-related quality of life, longer periods of disease remission and lower risk of disease progression, complications, hospitalizations, intestinal surgeries, as well as a lower risk of developing colorectal cancer. Mucosal healing, the new treatment endpoint in CD, made necessary the development of noninvasive, accurate, objective and reliable tools for the evaluation of CD activity. Ileocolonoscopy with biopsies remains the reference standard method for the evaluation of the colonic and terminal ileal mucosa. However, it is an invasive procedure with a low risk of complications, allowing the investigation of only a small part of the small bowel mucosa without being able to assess transmural inflammation. These disadvantages limit its role in the frequent follow up of CD patients. In this review, we present the currently available biomarkers and imaging modalities for the noninvasive assessment of CD activity.

Biomarkers of Inflammation in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: How Long before Abandoning Single-Marker Approaches?

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronically relapsing disease with a continuous need for proactive monitoring to decide appropriate treatments and follow-up strategies. To date, gastrointestinal endoscopy with histologic examination of biopsies and contrast-enhanced imaging are mandatory techniques for the diagnosis and the activity assessment of IBD.

SUMMARY

In recent decades, many research efforts in the IBD field have been placed on finding non-invasive and reliable biomarkers of disease burden that can be easily tested in body fluids without impacting the quality of life of patients. Unfortunately, the ideal biomarker is yet to be discovered and recent studies have investigated the possibility to increase the accuracy of such measurements by combining different markers. In this review, we provide an update about the current knowledge on biomarkers of intestinal inflammation in IBD, focussing on disease diagnosis, correlation with endoscopic findings, and prediction of relapse. We also summarize composite scores of clinical and laboratory markers that have been recently proposed in various scenarios of disease activity. Key Messages: To date, only C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin can be considered reliable markers of disease activity with demonstrated utility in IBD management. The combination of different parameters has recently shown higher accuracy and might substitute single-marker approaches in the future of research and clinical practice.

Relationship between serum adenosine deaminase levels and liver histology in autoimmune hepatitis

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between serum adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels and histological features in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH).

METHODS

A total of 80 subjects (52 AIH cases and 28 healthy controls) were included in the study. Patients were diagnosed according to the simplified criteria suggested by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. All of the cases had been diagnosed with AIH between 2010-2015 at Hacettepe University, Department of Gastroenterology. Serum blood samples were collected and stored at -80 °C until the biochemical estimation of ADA activity. The diagnosis of patients was confirmed by liver biopsy. Serum ADA > 20 U/L was considered to be high level.

RESULTS

Mean serum ADA levels were significantly higher in AIH patients than those in healthy controls (25.4 ± 9.6 U/L vs 12.8 ± 2.2 U/L, P < 0.001). Serum ADA levels > 20 U/L were found in 63.5% AIH patients and in 0% healthy controls (P < 0.001). Mean serum ADA levels were significantly increased in each stage of histological activity: 15.2 ± 3.5 U/L for patients with mild interface hepatitis, 23.1 ± 10.0 U/L for patients with moderate interface hepatitis and 30.9 ± 7.0 U/L for patients with severe interface hepatitis (P < 0.001). Correlation analysis showed that there was a positive association between serum ADA levels and histological activity (r = 0.71, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis suggested that 24.5 U/L was the optimum cut-off point of ADA level for severe interface hepatitis (sensitivity 88%, specificity 85.2%, area under the curve: 0.88).

CONCLUSION

Because of the positive correlation with inflammatory activity, serum ADA level may be a potential biomarker for predicting or monitoring histological activity in patients with AIH.

Role of biomarkers in diagnosis and evaluation of disease activity of Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a group of chronic, relapsing inflammatory gastrointestinal diseases with unknown etiology. The goals of treatment are to induce the transition from active stage into inactive stage and to maintain remission. Therefore, it is important to diagnose and assess disease activity in patients with CD. Recently, noninvasive markers for intestinal inflammation have been wildly adopted in clinical practice in order to differentiate CD from other diseases, to grade inflammation, to assess the response to therapy, and to demonstrate recurrent inflammation after medical or surgically-induced remission. Fecal and serum calprotectins are among the best-studied noninvasive biomarkers of inflammation in CD which have attracted clinicians' attention. This paper gives an overview of the clinical implications of biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring disease activity of CD.

The Diagnostic Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography as a Complementary Test to Colonoscopy in Active Crohn's Disease

BACKGROUND

According to recent studies comparing magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) with ileocolonoscopy for assessing inflammation of small bowel and colonic segments in adults with active Crohn’s disease (CD), we aimed to compare the accuracy of these two diagnostic methods in Iranian population.

METHODS

During 2013-2014 a follow-up study was done on 30 patients with active CD in a gastroenterology clinic affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences. MRE and ileocolonoscopy were performed for all the patients. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 18) and p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients with active CD, 11(36.7%) were men and 19 (63.3%) were women with mean age of 37.30±13.66 years (range: 19-67 years). MRE had sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 90% with positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 71.43 and 78.26, respectively for localizing sigmoid lesions and ileum had sensitivity and specificity of 84.21 and 45.45 with PPV and NPV of 72.73 and 62.50, respectively.

CONCLUSION

While moderate sensitivity and high specificity of MRE in localizing colonic lesions makes it an appropriate confirmatory test after colonoscopy, the reported high sensitivity and moderate specificity of MRE versus colonoscopy in detecting ileal lesions makes it a suitable screening test for ileal lesions. Finally we can conclude that MRE can be an important complementary test to colonoscopy in detecting active disease.

Body Mass Index Is Associated with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Prior work suggested that patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have lower body mass index (BMI) than controls and patients with lower BMI have more serious complications.

Goal

The study was aimed to find relationship between BMI in patients with and without IBD, investigate effects of medicine therapy and disease stages on patients’ BMI.

Methods

Potentially eligible studies were identified through searching PubMed, Cochrane and Embase databases. Outcome measurements of mean BMI and the number of patients from each study were pooled by a random-effect model. Publication bias test, sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted.

Results

A total of 24 studies containing 1442 patients and 2059 controls were included. Main results were as follows: (1) BMI in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients was lower than that in health controls (-1.88, 95% CI -2.77 to -1.00, P< 0.001); (2) Medical therapy significantly improved BMI of CD patients (with therapy: -1.58, -3.33 to 0.16; without: -2.09, 95% CI -3.21 to -0.98) while on the contrary not significantly improving BMI of UC patients (with therapy: -0.24, 95% CI -3.68 to 3.20; without: -1.34, 95% CI -2.87 to 0.20, P = 0.57); (3) Both CD and UC patients in active phase showed significantly greater BMI difference compared with controls than those in remission (CD patients: remission: -2.25, 95% CI -3.38 to -1.11; active phase: -4.25, 95% CI -5.58 to -2.92, P = 0.03; UC patients: remission: 0.4, 95% CI -2.05 to 2.84; active phase: -5.38, -6.78 to -3.97, P = 0.001).

Conclusions

BMI is lower in CD patients; medical therapy couldn’t improve BMI of IBD patients; the state of disease affects BMI of CD patients and UC patients.