Prevalence of Psychiatric Comorbidity in Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Subgroups

Psychological symptoms do not discriminate between reflux phenotypes along the organic-functional refractory GERD spectrum

OBJECTIVE

Historically, psychological processes are associated with disorders at the functional end of the gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) spectrum. However, recent research suggests that psychological symptoms are relevant across the entire GERD spectrum. We aim to investigate whether psychological symptoms are associated with reflux phenotype (True GERD, Borderline GERD, reflux hypersensitivity, functional heartburn) along the GERD spectrum in a cohort of refractory reflux patients.

DESIGN

Consecutive adult patients with refractory reflux symptoms underwent standard 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring and completed questionnaires assessing demographic, clinical and psychological information. Bayesian one-way analysis of variance assessed whether psychological variables differed across reflux phenotypes. Next, we applied multinomial and ordinal logistic regressions with clinical, demographic and psychological variables set as independent variables and reflux phenotype as the outcome variable. The complementary machine-learning approach entered all demographic, clinical and psychological variables into models, with reflux phenotype set nominally and ordinally. Cross-validated model performance was used to select the best model.

RESULTS

393 participants (mean (SD) age=48.5 (14.1); 60% female) were included. The Bayesian analyses found no difference in psychological variables across reflux phenotypes. Similarly, age, gender and proton pump inhibitor use were the only significant variables in the multinomial logistic regression and body mass index was significant in both regressions. Machine-learning analyses revealed poorly performing models with high misclassification rates (67-68%) in both models.

CONCLUSION

Psychological symptoms do not differ between nor predict reflux phenotype membership in refractory reflux patients. Findings suggest that psychological symptoms are relevant across the spectrum of GERD, rather than specific to functional oesophageal disorders.

A Mendelian randomization study to assess the genetic liability of gastroesophageal reflux disease for cardiovascular diseases and risk factors

Observational studies have reported that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD); however, the causal inferences between them remain unknown. We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study to estimate the causal associations between GERD and 10 CVD outcomes, as well as 14 cardiovascular risk factors. We used summary statistics from genome-wide association studies for GERD and the FinnGen consortium for CVD. We further investigated whether GERD correlated with cardiovascular risk factors and performed multivariable MR and mediation analyses to estimate the mediating effects of these risk factors on GERD-CVD progression. Sensitivity analyses and replication analyses were also performed. Our results indicated that GERD was positively associated with seven CVD outcomes with odds ratios of 1.26 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15, 1.37] for coronary artery disease, 1.41 (95% CI, 1.28, 1.57) for myocardial infarction, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.19, 1.51) for atrial fibrillation, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.21, 1.50) for heart failure, 1.30 (95% CI, 1.18, 1.43) for any stroke, 1.19 (95% CI, 1.06, 1.34) for ischemic stroke and 1.29 (95% CI, 1.16, 1.44) for venous thromboembolism. Furthermore, GERD was associated with nine cardiovascular risk factors and major depressive disorder demonstrated significant mediation effects on the causal pathway linking GERD and any stroke. This study demonstrates that GERD is associated with seven CVD outcomes and nine cardiovascular risk factors. Importantly, GERD treatment may help prevent common CVD events.

Herbal Medicine Hewei Jiangni Decoction Is Noninferior to Oral Omeprazole for the Treatment of Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, and Double-Dummy Controlled Trail

Objectives. Conventional approaches for patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) were not satisfactory. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and mechanisms of Chinese herbal medicine Hewei Jiangni Decoction (HWJND) as a novel and promising regimen for NERD. Methods. A total of 128 patients with NERD were randomly assigned to the Treatment group and Control group. The patients from the Treatment group were administered HWJND (81 g) plus dummy omeprazole (20 mg) daily for 8 weeks, and the others were given dummy HWJND granules (81 g) plus omeprazole (20 mg). The clinical efficacy was assessed using the gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) scale, patient reported outcomes (PRO) scale, and short form health survey 36 (SF-36) scale at week 4. Moreover, its pharmacological and molecular mechanisms were elucidated based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. Results. Due to case shedding and other reasons, 109 patients, including 56 in the Treatment group and 53 in the Control group completed this study. Our results showed that HWJND significantly improved heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric pain, nausea, and sleep disturbance, which led to a significant reduction of GERD-Q scores in NERD patients. In addition, PRO scores of NERD patients with HWJND administration were improved, and sufficient relief of physical role, body pain, general health, social function, and mental health on the SF-36 scale was also observed in patients after HWJND treatment. We further showed that the curative effect of HWJND was close to that of omeprazole, except for the better improvement of general health and social function. What’s more, the main active ingredients of HWJND included quercetin, beta-sitosterol, naringenin, baicalein, and kaempferol were retrieved, and the protective effects of HWJND against NERD may be closely related to targets such as TNF, IL6, IL1B, MMP9, CXCL8, and EGFR, which were mainly enriched in IL-17 signaling pathway and TNF signaling pathway. Conclusion. Our findings demonstrate that HWJND is noninferior to oral omeprazole for the treatment of patients with NERD, plays a therapeutic role through multiple targets and diverse pathways, and holds promise for complementary and alternative therapy for the treatment of NERD. This trial is registered with http://www.chictr.org.cn, Chinese Clinical Trials Registry [ChiCTR2200055960].

Pepsin and pH of Gastric Juice in Patients With Gastrointestinal Reflux Disease and Subgroups

GOAL

The aim of this study was to investigate the pepsin values and pH results of gastric juice among the subtypes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and functional heartburn.

BACKGROUND

The major destructive agents of GERD on the esophageal epithelium are gastric acid and pepsin. No precise information about pepsin concentration in gastric juice exists.

STUDY

Ninety patients with GERD, 39 erosive reflux disease (ERD) Los Angeles (LA) grade A/B, 13 ERD LA grade C/D, 19 nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), 8 esophageal hypersensitivity, 11 functional heartburn, and 24 healthy controls were included in the study. During endoscopy gastric juices from the patients were aspirated and their pH readings immediately recorded. Gastric juice samples were analyzed using Peptest, a lateral flow device containing 2 unique human monoclonal antibodies to detect any pepsin present in the gastric juice sample.

RESULTS

The highest mean gastric pepsin concentration (0.865 mg/mL) and the lowest median gastric pH (1.4) was observed in the LA grade C/D group compared with the lowest mean gastric pepsin concentration (0.576 mg/mL) and the highest median gastric pH (2.5) seen in the NERD group. Comparing pH, the NERD patient group was significantly higher (P=0.0018 to P=0.0233) when compared with all other GERD patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The basal gastric pepsin level in the healthy control group was comparable to literature values. There was good correlation and a significant linear relationship between the gastric pepsin level and gastric pH within the patient groups. The severity of the GERD disease is related to the lowest pH and the highest pepsin concentration in gastric juice.

Association of Incidence of Acid-related Upper Gastrointestinal Disorders With Glycated Hemoglobin Level

CONTEXT

Previous cross-sectional studies show diabetes and higher levels of plasma hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are associated with a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) complications. However, whether the glycemic status is associated with incident acid-related upper GI disorders remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the effect of hyperglycemia per se, in terms of HbA1c, on the incidence of acid-related disorders.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive subjects who had undergone repeated upper endoscopies as part of the health examinations at the National Taiwan University Hospital from 2005 to 2011. Acid-related endoscopic abnormalities were defined as erosive esophagitis (EE), Barrett's esophagus (BE), and peptic ulcer disease (PUD), which included gastric ulcers (GUs) and duodenal ulcers (DUs). All subjects were categorized by 3 tertiles of HbA1c levels. We analyzed the occurrence of respective acid-related disorders during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 11 391 participants (mean HbA1c level 5.6 ± 0.7%) were enrolled in this longitudinal study. During the 38 426.3 person-years of follow-up (mean duration 3.37 ± 1.59 years), the incidence of EE, BE, GU, DU, PUD, and any acid-related disorders were 22.1%, 0.5%, 4.5%, 8.6%, 12.3%, and 30.3%, respectively. The higher HbA1c level was associated with higher risk of disease incidents, except BE, during the follow-up (all log-rank P < .001). In the Cox regression analyses with confounding factors fully adjusted, the hazard ratios for EE, GU, DU, PUD, and acid-related disorders were 1.174, 1.339, 1.24, 1.24, and 1.186, respectively, for the third tertile of HbA1c (all P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Higher HbA1c level was associated with a higher risk of acid-related upper GI endoscopic abnormalities. Efforts toward better glycemic control may help to prevent the development of late GI complications.

A Long Duration of Reflux Symptoms is the Predominant Risk Factor for Depression in Vietnamese Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

PURPOSE

Depression is more prevalent in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) than in controls. The disorder can worsen the quality of life of GERD patients and is also associated with poor treatment response. However, there are limited data on its prevalence and risk factors in GERD patients in Southeast Asia. We aimed to assess the prevalence and severity of depression and its associated factors in Vietnamese patients with GERD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted on GERD patients. GERD was defined as troublesome typical reflux symptoms at least twice a week or having endoscopic erosive reflux disease. The revised Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI-IA), which has been locally validated, was used to evaluate depression (BDI-IA < 10: none, 10-18: mild to moderate, 19-29: moderate to severe, and ≥ 30: severe depression). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with depression.

RESULTS

A total of 194 patients were recruited. The mean age was 44.1 ± 12.0 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.2. The depression rate was 47.9% (mild to moderate: 30.9%, moderate to severe: 16.0%, and severe: 1.0%). In multivariate analysis, sex and duration of reflux symptoms were the only two risk factors for depression. Compared to males, females were more likely to suffer from depression: odds ratio (OR) = 3.941 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.386-11.205), p = 0.010. Compared to patients with a duration of reflux symptoms < 1 year, those with a duration of 1-10 years and > 10 years were more likely to suffer from depression with a dose‒response: OR = 3.520 (95% CI, 1.057-11.717), p = 0.040; and OR = 5.605 (1.046-30.019), p = 0.044, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Depression was prevalent, and a long duration of reflux symptoms was its predominant risk factor in Vietnamese patients with GERD.

Determining the potential clinical value of panel-based pharmacogenetic testing in patients with chronic pain or gastroesophageal reflux disease

We aimed to determine the potential value of panel-based pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing in patients with chronic pain or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who underwent single-gene PGx testing to guide opioid or proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, respectively. Of 448 patients included (chronic pain, n = 337; GERD, n = 111), mean age was 57 years, 68% were female, and 73% were white. Excluding opiates for the pain cohort and PPIs for the GERD cohort, 76.6% of patients with pain and 71.2% with GERD were prescribed at least one additional medication with a high level of PGx evidence, most commonly ondansetron or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The most common genes that could inform PGx drug prescribing were CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and SLCO1B1. Our findings suggest that patients with chronic pain or GERD are commonly prescribed drugs with a high level of evidence for a PGx-guided approach, supporting panel-based testing in these populations.

Response of Esophageal Epithelium to Acute and Chronic Stress in Rabbits

We studied electrophysiological changes in rabbit esophageal epithelium following acute (AS) and chronic stress (CS). Esophageal tissue was placed in Ussing chamber and the potential difference U between the luminal and abluminal sides, the short-circuit current I_sc, as well as the tissue resistance R were measured. The initial values of these parameters for each sample were determined after the samples were stabilized in Ringer solution. Then, the tissues were exposed for 1 h to normal Ringer solution or Ringer solution with pH 4.0 and pH 1.7 with or without pepsin (0.25 mg/ml). Fluorescein was added to the luminal side of the sample to measure its permeability. In the AS group, U at Ringer solution (pH 1.7)+pepsin was significantly decreased in comparison with the baseline and control values (by 46 and 22%, respectively, p<0.05). R decreased by 74% in comparison with baseline, which little differed from the decrease in control samples exposed to Ringer solution (pH 1.7)+pepsin (by 62%). CS did not change U relative to baseline values, while changes in R were similar to those in the AS group. In the AS group, the permeability of the esophageal tissue perfused with Ringer solution (pH 1.7)+pepsin was significantly higher than in both the control and CS groups. AS, but not CS, made the esophageal epithelium more sensitive to the effects of noxious agents, disrupted barrier properties, and increased permeability. The effects of stress on gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms can be related to severe exposure to acid and/or pepsin; however, the mechanisms other than epithelial defense should be evaluated.

Profile of the Change in Depression during Proton-Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Influence of the Mucosal Break

Given the frequent concomitance between depression and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), it is important to evaluate the change of depression in patients with GERD, especially considering the presence of esophageal mucosal breaks (MB). This study aimed to examine the change in the levels of depression in patients with GERD during proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) therapy. We designed a prospective cohort study to explore the profile of the alteration in depression with respect to the impact of esophageal MB. This study recruited 172 eligible patients with GERD between February 2016 and May 2018. The change in depression was defined as the difference between the respective Taiwanese Depression Questionnaire (TDQ) scores obtained at baseline and after PPI therapy. Multivariate linear regression models were used to estimate the factors associated with the change in depression. The results revealed statistically significant improvements in the TDQ score (mean score: baseline = 13.2, after PPI therapy = 10.9, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.30) during PPI therapy for GERD. Moreover, the MB was an independent variable associated with changes in the TDQ score [B = 3.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.12, 5.51), p < 0.01] and the improvement in depression [odds ratio = 0.38, 95% CI: (0.17, 0.86), p = 0.02]. Our findings revealed that depressive symptoms improved slightly following PPI therapy. Moreover, MB was an unfavorable prognostic factor for the improvement in depression.

Heartburn in children and adolescents in the presence of functional dyspepsia and/or irritable bowel syndrome correlates with the presence of sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship of heartburn in pediatric patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep disturbances, and psychologic distress.The overlap in symptoms of FD, IBS, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) predicts greater symptom severity and decreased quality of life and presents opportunities for improved diagnostic classification and personalized therapeutics.A cross-sectional observational study of 260 pediatric patients with abdominal pain was conducted. Patients completed standardized questionnaires assessing clinical symptoms, sleep quality, and psychologic symptoms during routine clinical care. Questionnaire data were compared for patients reporting heartburn and not reporting heartburn using χ2 and t tests where appropriate.Gastrointestinal symptoms were significantly more prevalent among patients with a positive report of heartburn (vs a negative report of heartburn): pain with eating (83% vs 67%, P = .007), bloating (63% vs 44%, P = .005), acid regurgitation (47% vs 24%, P ≤ .001), and chest pain (45% vs 20%, P ≤ .001). Likewise, initiating and maintaining sleep (P = .007), arousal/nightmares (P = .046), sleep-wake transition (P = .001), hyperhidrosis during sleep (P = .016), and anxiety (P = .001) and depression (P = .0018) were also significantly increased in patients who reported heartburn versus patients who did not report heartburn.Patients with a positive report of heartburn, whether classified as having FD and/or IBS, had increased gastrointestinal symptoms, sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression than patients with a negative report of heartburn. A better understanding of these associations may allow for personalized treatment for youth with abdominal pain and heartburn as a primary symptom.

Salivary Pepsin as an Intrinsic Marker for Diagnosis of Sub-types of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-related Disorders

Background/Aims

To determine the value of salivary pepsin in discriminating sub-types of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and GERD-related disorders.

Methods

Overall, 322 patients with different sub-types of GERD and 45 healthy controls (HC) were studied. All patients took Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ) and underwent endoscopy and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and manometry. Salivary pepsin concentration (SPC) was detected by using colloidal gold double-antibody immunological sandwich assay. Oral esomeprazole treatment was administrated in the patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and extra-esophageal symptoms (EES).

Results

Compared to HC, patients with erosive esophagitis, NERD, EES, EES plus typical GERD symptoms, or Barrett’s esophagus had a higher prevalence of saliva and SPC (all P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the positive rate for pepsin in patients with functional heartburn or GERD with anxiety and depression, compared to HC. After esomeprazole treatment, the positive rate and SPC were significantly reduced in NERD (both P < 0.001) and in EES (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). Of the 64 NERD patients, 71.9% (n = 46) were positive for salivary pepsin, which was significantly higher than the rate (43.8%, n = 28) of pathological acid reflux as detected by 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

Salivary pepsin has an important significance for the diagnosis of GERD and GERD-related disorders. Salivary pepsin and 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring may complement with each other to improve the diagnostic efficiency.

Prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation

OBJECTIVE

Heartburn and regurgitation are the most common gastroesophageal reflux symptoms, and dysphagia could be a possible symptom. This investigation aimed to evaluate the prevalence of non-obstructive dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation.

METHODS

A total of 147 patients (age, 20-70 years; women, 72%) complaining of heartburn and regurgitation, without esophageal stricture, previous esophageal surgery, or other diseases, were evaluated. Twenty-seven patients had esophagitis. The Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) was employed to screen for dysphagia; EAT-10 is composed of 10 items, and the patients rate each item from 0 to 4 (0, no problems; 4, most severe symptom). Results of the 147 patients were compared with those of 417 healthy volunteers (women, 62%; control group) aged 20-68 years.

RESULTS

In the control group, only two (0.5%) had an EAT-10 score ≥5, which was chosen as the threshold to define dysphagia. EAT-10 scores ≥5 were found in 71 (48.3%) patients and in 55% of the patients with esophagitis and 47% of the patients without esophagitis. This finding indicates a relatively higher prevalence of perceived dysphagia in patients with heartburn and regurgitation and in patients with esophagitis. We also found a positive correlation between EAT-10 scores and the severity of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms based on the Velanovich scale.

CONCLUSION

In patients with heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, the prevalence of dysphagia was at least 48%, and has a positive correlation with the overall symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux.

Reflux esophagitis, functional and non-functional

The pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease has been explained by acid-peptic model. However, related with the progress of the diagnostic modalities, another phenotypical group of patients were defined and called "functional disorders of the esophagus". These patients are important because diagnosis is particularly difficult, co-morbid disorders especially psychiatric diseases are common, proton pump inhibitor response is low, and surgical results are very poor. Simpler and translational science studies are required in functional groups in order to differentiate from acid-peptic disorders. New and more accurate diagnostic modalities as well as therapeutic approaches are strongly needed in this particularly new and exciting era, especially in the effect of neuromodulators. Current diagnostic modalities should also be evaluated and in fact, normal values should be established. New medications, especially acting at the level of esophageal epithelium and intercellular spaces, might shift the paradigm.

Validity and reliability of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QoLRAD) questionnaire in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease for the Turkish population

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease negatively affects quality of life. The aim is to improve quality of life because of high recurrence rate. There is a strong need for patient-reported outcome measures. The present study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire (QoLRAD) to adopt it into Turkish.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 142 patients with complaints of heartburn or regurgitation once a week or commonly diagnosed with 24-hour intraesophageal impedance-pH monitoring and/or upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were included in this study. Sociodemographic Data Collection Form, QoLRAD-TR, and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were applied to patients who were off proton pump inhibitors.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficient value of the questionnaire was 0.97, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) value of the result of test-retest method was between 0.97 (Vitality) and 0.99 (Eating/Drinking Disorders). There was a positive correlation between all subdomains of QoLRAD-TR and SF-36 scales. The lowest correlation (0.10) was between Emotional Distress and Role-emotional Limitations, and the highest (0.34) was between Energy and Vitality.

CONCLUSION

The QoLRAD test measuring quality of life, except some subdomains in our study that we performed on patients diagnosed with GERD, was found to be valid and reliable.

The Proton Pump Inhibitor Nonresponder: a Behavioral Approach to Improvement and Wellness

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a difficult to treat medical condition, where nearly 40% of patients are refractory to standard medical intervention, which typically begins with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). These PPI nonresponders represent a population of patients, where treatment planning must be individualized; multidisciplinary and psychiatric comorbidities should be considered. This review highlights treatment options that include neuromodulators, lifestyle, and psychological interventions for the PPI nonresponder.

RECENT FINDINGS

Mental health specialists in the field of psychogastroenterology can aid in the management of esophageal hypersensitivity, which can drive the symptom experience of a PPI nonresponder. Considerations for comorbid anxiety and depression in this population require careful assessment and treatment. Physicians are encouraged to create realistic expectations for symptom management and offer multidisciplinary options for treatment early in care. Patients will frequently benefit from working with a GI psychologist and find value in behavioral interventions.

Reflux hypersensitivity

Reflux hypersensitivity (RH) is a condition characterized typically by heart burn, normal gastroscopy and esophageal biopsy, normal esophageal pH-impedance test, and a close correlation between heart burn and reflux events. Recently, Rome Ⅳ criteria suggests that reflux hypersensitivity is a new type of esophageal functional disease. It is very common in clinical practice and often coexists with functional heartburn. Diagnosis is based on heartburn symptoms, gastroscopy, esophageal biopsy, esophageal pH-impedance, and high resolution esophageal pressure. RH patients have normal acid exposure, and there is no dynamic disease in esophageal dynamic test. However, there are still some difficulties in the differential diagnosis of esophageal functional diseases. Symptom associated probability cannot reliably distinguish reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn. The pathogenesis of RH is not entirely clear. Recent studies have shown that esophageal sensitivity to acid and mucosal integrity can lead to RH. Because more than 90% of patients do not respond to proton pump inhibitors, esophageal neuromodulators, such as tricyclic antidepressants, are the main treatment, but the efficacy is uncertain. Surgery is a desirable method, but the indications should be strictly selected. In the future, it is important to strengthen the research of RH pathogenesis and seek new therapeutic targets.

Deanxit relieves symptoms in a patient with jackhammer esophagus: A case report

Jackhammer (hypercontractile) esophagus presents with dysphagia and chest pain. Current treatments are limited. We describe a 60-year-old man who presented with dysphagia, chest pain and heartburn for a period of 1 year. His workup showed Barrett’s esophagus on endoscopy and high-resolution manometry demonstrated jackhammer esophagus with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. The patient was treated with proton pump inhibitor and nifedipine but without resolution of his symptoms. He was followed up to assess the efficacy of treatment with deanxit (flupentixol + melitracen). Dysphagia and chest pain resolved during the therapeutic trial and efficacy was maintained on maintenance treatment without troublesome side effects.

Reflux Hypersensitivity: A New Functional Esophageal Disorder

Reflux hypersensitivity, recently introduced by Rome IV as a new functional esophageal disorder, is currently considered as the presence of typical heartburn symptoms in patients with normal upper endoscopy and esophageal biopsies, normal esophageal pH test and with evidence of a close correlation between patients’ heartburn and reflux events. Reflux hypersensitivity is very common and together with functional heartburn accounts for more than 90% of the heartburn patients who failed treatment with proton pump inhibitor twice daily. In addition, reflux hypersensitivity affects primarily young to middle aged women, commonly overlaps with another functional gastrointestinal disorders, and is often associated with some type of psychological comorbidity. Diagnosis is made by using endoscopy with esophageal biopsies, pH-impedance, and high-resolution esophageal manometry. Reflux hypersensitivity is primarily treated with esophageal neuromodulators, such as tricyclic anti-depressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors among others. Surgical anti-reflux management may also play an important role in the treatment of reflux hypersensitivity.