1
|
Gotanda H, Ikesu R, Walling AM, Zhang JJ, Xu H, Reuben DB, Wenger NS, Damberg CL, Zingmond DS, Jena AB, Gross N, Tsugawa Y. Association between physician age and patterns of end-of-life care among older Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc 2024; 72:2070-2081. [PMID: 38721884 PMCID: PMC11226372 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND End-of-life (EOL) care patterns may differ by physician age given differences in how physicians are trained or changes associated with aging. We sought to compare patterns of EOL care delivered to older Americans according to physician age. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study of a 20% sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥66 years who died in 2016-2019 (n = 487,293). We attributed beneficiaries to the physician who had >50% of primary care visits during the last 6 months of life. We compared beneficiary-level outcomes by physician age (<40, 40-49, 50-59, or ≥60) in two areas: (1) advance care planning (ACP) and palliative care; and (2) high-intensity care at the EOL. RESULTS Beneficiaries attributed to younger physicians had slightly higher proportions of billed ACP (adjusted proportions, 17.1%, 16.1%, 15.5%, and 14.0% for physicians aged <40, 40-49, 50-59, and ≥60, respectively; p-for-trend adjusted for multiple comparisons <0.001) and palliative care counseling or hospice use in the last 180 days of life (64.5%, 63.6%, 61.9%, and 60.8%; p-for-trend <0.001). Similarly, physicians' younger age was associated with slightly lower proportions of emergency department visits (57.4%, 57.0%, 57.4%, and 58.1%; p-for-trend <0.001), hospital admissions (51.2%, 51.1%, 51.4%, and 52.1%; p-for-trend <0.001), intensive care unit admissions (27.8%, 27.9%, 28.2%, and 28.3%; p-for-trend = 0.03), or mechanical ventilation or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (14.2, 14.9%, 15.2%, and 15.3%; p-for-trend <0.001) in the last 30 days of life, and in-hospital death (20.2%, 20.6%, 21.3%, and 21.5%; p-for-trend <0.001). CONCLUSIONS We found that differences in patterns of EOL care between beneficiaries cared for by younger and older physicians were small, and thus, not clinically meaningful. Future research is warranted to understand the factors that can influence patterns of EOL care provided by physicians, including initial and continuing medical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Gotanda
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Ryo Ikesu
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Epidemiology, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anne M. Walling
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jessica J. Zhang
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Haiyong Xu
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David B Reuben
- Multicampus Program in Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Neil S. Wenger
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - David S. Zingmond
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Anupam B. Jena
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Yusuke Tsugawa
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Karvellas CJ, Bajaj JS, Kamath PS, Napolitano L, O'Leary JG, Solà E, Subramanian R, Wong F, Asrani SK. AASLD Practice Guidance on Acute-on-chronic liver failure and the management of critically ill patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology 2024; 79:1463-1502. [PMID: 37939273 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Constantine J Karvellas
- Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jasmohan S Bajaj
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Central Virginia Veterans Healthcare System, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Patrick S Kamath
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Jacqueline G O'Leary
- Department of Medicine, Dallas Veterans Medical Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Elsa Solà
- Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ghoshal A, Marks S, Esteban JP. When Is the Optimal Time to Refer Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease to Palliative Care Specialists? #481. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:813-815. [PMID: 38686513 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2024.0111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
|
4
|
Moreno-Loro A, Giráldez Á, Jiménez F, López-Bueno I, Pérez-Ramírez A, Romero-Gómez M. Novel approaches in the medical management of compensated cirrhosis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:239-256. [PMID: 38785070 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2358149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Classically, clinical practice guidelines and expert recommendations have focused on the management of decompensated cirrhotic patients, so we focused this review on improving care for compensated cirrhotic patients who are followed up in outpatient clinics. AREAS COVERED We reviewed the current methods for establishing liver function, the diagnosis and management of advanced chronic liver disease and clinically significant portal hypertension as well as the prevention of its complications, with special attention to covert hepatic encephalopathy, we also paid attention to the extrahepatic complications of cirrhosis and the palliative care. All this from the perspective of evidence-based medicine and trying to empower precision medicine. The literature search was undertaken by PubMed with 'cirrhosis,' 'advanced chronic liver disease,' 'liver function,' 'portal hypertension,' 'covert hepatic encephalopathy,' 'minimal hepatic encephalopathy,' 'palliative care' as MeSH terms. EXPERT OPINION We must offer compensated cirrhotic patients specific care and measures to prevent the progression of the disease and the appearance of its complications beyond the calculation of liver function and imaging screening for hepatocellular carcinoma that we perform every six months. Entities that have typically received little attention, such as covert hepatic encephalopathy, extrahepatic complications and symptoms of cirrhosis, and palliative care, must come to the spotlight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Moreno-Loro
- Digestive Diseases Department and ciberehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Álvaro Giráldez
- Digestive Diseases Department and ciberehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Fernando Jiménez
- Digestive Diseases Department and ciberehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Ignacio López-Bueno
- Digestive Diseases Department and ciberehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Alberto Pérez-Ramírez
- Digestive Diseases Department and ciberehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Manuel Romero-Gómez
- Digestive Diseases Department and ciberehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng H, Cheng Q, Xu X, Yan Y, Luo G, Gong Y, Chen Y. Development of care quality indicators for palliative care in China: A modified Delphi method study. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100324. [PMID: 38106440 PMCID: PMC10724491 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective While there are limited studies addressing palliative care quality in China, the availability of an effective set of care quality indicators is scarce. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive set of quality indicators for palliative care in China. Methods Conducting a systematic literature search across databases and guideline websites from inception to October 2020, combined with qualitative interviews, we established a preliminary pool of indicators. Subsequently, two rounds of Delphi expert consultation surveys were administered to 19 multidisciplinary experts (specializing in clinical nursing/medicine, nursing/medicine management, and health care administration, as well as those engaged in teaching and research) from 12 provinces in Mainland China (three each from North, East, and South China, and four from Central China) via email from March to June 2021. The analytic hierarchy process was employed to determine indicator weights. Results Both rounds of expert consultation yielded a 100% positive coefficient, with expert authority coefficient values of 0.91 and 0.93, respectively. Kendall coefficient of concordance values for the two rounds were 0.148 and 0.253 (P < 0.001), indicating consensus among experts. Consequently, 71 quality indicators deemed important in the Chinese palliative care setting were identified, comprising 22 structure indicators, 35 process indicators, and 14 outcome indicators. Conclusions This study established an evidence-based set of quality indicators, addressing previously unmet needs and providing a novel approach to assessing and monitoring palliative care quality. Furthermore, ongoing refinement and integration with the evolving social context are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongling Zheng
- Nursing Department, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
- Nursing Department, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Qinqin Cheng
- Pain Management Department, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xianghua Xu
- Health Service Center, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yixia Yan
- Nursing Department, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Ge Luo
- Nursing Department, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Youwen Gong
- Nursing Department, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yongyi Chen
- Hospital Office, Hunan Cancer Hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lee KC, Walling AM, Senglaub SS, Bernacki R, Fleisher LA, Russell MM, Wenger NS, Cooper Z. Improving Serious Illness Care for Surgical Patients: Quality Indicators for Surgical Palliative Care. Ann Surg 2022; 275:196-202. [PMID: 32502076 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Develop quality indicators that measure access to and the quality of primary PC delivered to seriously ill surgical patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PC for seriously ill surgical patients, including aligning treatments with patients' goals and managing symptoms, is associated with improved patient-oriented outcomes and decreased healthcare utilization. However, efforts to integrate PC alongside restorative surgical care are limited by a lack of surgical quality indicators to evaluate primary PC delivery. METHODS We developed a set of 27 preliminary indicators that measured palliative processes of care across the surgical episode, including goals of care, decision-making, symptom assessment, and issues related to palliative surgery. Then using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness method, a 12-member expert advisory panel rated the validity (primary outcome) and feasibility of each indicator twice: (1) remotely and (2) after an in-person moderated discussion. RESULTS After 2 rounds of rating, 24 indicators were rated as valid, covering the preoperative evaluation (9 indicators), immediate preoperative readiness (2 indicators), intraoperative (1 indicator), postoperative (8 indicators), and end of life (4 indicators) phases of surgical care. CONCLUSIONS This set of quality indicators provides a comprehensive set of process measures that possess the potential to measure high quality PC for seriously ill surgical patients throughout the surgical episode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Anne M Walling
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
- Affiliated Adjunct Staff, RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Steven S Senglaub
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rachelle Bernacki
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lee A Fleisher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marcia M Russell
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Surgery, Dave Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Neil S Wenger
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
- Affiliated Adjunct Staff, RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Zara Cooper
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Hebrew SeniorLife Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Patel AA, Woodrell C, Ufere NN, Hansen L, Tandon P, Verma M, Lai J, Pinotti R, Rakoski M. Developing Priorities for Palliative Care Research in Advanced Liver Disease: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Hepatol Commun 2021; 5:1469-1480. [PMID: 34510839 PMCID: PMC8435283 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.1743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Individuals with advanced liver disease (AdvLD), such as decompensated cirrhosis (DC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), have significant palliative needs. However, little research is available to guide health care providers on how to improve key domains related to palliative care (PC). We sought to identify priority areas for future research in PC by performing a comprehensive literature review and conducting iterative expert panel discussions. We conducted a literature review using search terms related to AdvLD and key PC domains. Individual reviews of these domains were performed, followed by iterative discussions by a panel consisting of experts from multiple disciplines, including hepatology, specialty PC, and nursing. Based on these discussions, priority areas for research were identified. We identified critical gaps in the available research related to PC and AdvLD. We developed and shared five key priority questions incorporating domains related to PC. Conclusion: Future research endeavors focused on improving PC in AdvLD should consider addressing the five key priorities areas identified from literature reviews and expert panel discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpan A. Patel
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive DiseasesDepartment of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCAUSA
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesCAUSA
| | - Christopher Woodrell
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative MedicineIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
- James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical CenterBronxNYUSA
| | - Nneka N. Ufere
- Gastrointestinal UnitDepartment of MedicineMassachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMAUSA
| | - Lissi Hansen
- School of NursingOregon Health Sciences UniversityPortlandORUSA
| | - Puneeta Tandon
- Department of MedicineCirrhosis Care ClinicEdmontonALCanada
- Liver Transplant UnitUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonALCanada
| | - Manisha Verma
- Department of Digestive Diseases and TransplantationEinstein Healthcare NetworkPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Jennifer Lai
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyDepartment of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Rachel Pinotti
- Gustave L. and Janet W. Levy LibraryIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Mina Rakoski
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyLoma Linda University HealthLoma LindaCAUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tandon P, Walling A, Patton H, Taddei T. AGA Clinical Practice Update on Palliative Care Management in Cirrhosis: Expert Review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 19:646-656.e3. [PMID: 33221550 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Care with palliative care principles (aka Palliative Care, PC) is an approach to care that focuses on improving the quality of life of patients and their caregivers who are facing life-limiting illness. It encompasses the assessment and management of symptoms and changes in functional status, the provision of advance care planning and goals of care discussions, prognostication and caregiver support. PC is applicable across the spectrum of cirrhosis regardless of transplant eligibility. Although a common misconception, PC is not synonymous with hospice care. Unfortunately, despite a high symptom burden and challenges with predicting disease course and mounting evidence to support the benefits of PC in patients with cirrhosis, comprehensive PC and referral to hospice are carried out infrequently and very late in the course of disease. In order to meet the needs of our increasingly prevalent cirrhosis population, it is important that all clinicians who care for these patients are able to work together to deliver PC as a standard of care. To date there are limited guidelines/guidance statements to direct clinicians in the area of PC and cirrhosis. Herein we present an evidence-based review of ten Best Practice Advice statements that address key issues pertaining to PC in patients with cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puneeta Tandon
- Liver Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Anne Walling
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Heather Patton
- Gastroenterology Section, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Tamar Taddei
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, and Department of Medicine, Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Laube R, Sabih AH, Strasser SI, Lim L, Cigolini M, Liu K. Palliative care in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:618-628. [PMID: 32627853 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is a common cancer with a poor prognosis, associated with high economic costs and a significant burden of disease. While it is often asymptomatic in the early stages, patients may experience great discomfort from advanced disease, treatment adverse effects, or decompensation of underlying cirrhosis. Palliative care has the potential to markedly improve quality of life, physical, and psychological symptoms in patients with end-stage liver disease, and has been shown to prolong survival in some nonhepatocellular carcinoma malignancies. However, this service is underutilized in hepatocellular carcinoma, and referrals are frequently late due to factors such as stigmatization, inadequate resources, lack of education for nonpalliative care physicians and inadequate modeling for integration of palliative and supportive care within liver disease services. In the future, education workshops, population-based awareness campaigns, increased funding and improved models of care, may improve the uptake of palliative care and subsequently optimize patient care, particularly towards the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Laube
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Abdul-Hamid Sabih
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Simone I Strasser
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lynn Lim
- Palliative Care Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Maria Cigolini
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Palliative Care Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ken Liu
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Liver Injury and Cancer Program, Centenary Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hernaez R, Patel A, Jackson LK, Braun UK, Walling AM, Rosen HR. Considerations for Prognosis, Goals of Care, and Specialty Palliative Care for Hospitalized Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure. Hepatology 2020; 72:1109-1116. [PMID: 32416642 DOI: 10.1002/hep.31316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ruben Hernaez
- Section of Gastroenterology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, TX Center, Houston, TX.,VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX.,Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Arpan Patel
- Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Leanne K Jackson
- Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Section of Rehabilitation and Extended Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ursula K Braun
- VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX.,Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Section of Rehabilitation and Extended Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anne M Walling
- Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.,VA Greater Los Angeles Health System, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hugo R Rosen
- Department of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA.,USC Research Center for Liver Diseases, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Hanlon CE, Lindvall C, Lorenz KA, Giannitrapani KF, Garrido M, Asch SM, Wenger N, Malin J, Dy SM, Canning M, Gamboa RC, Walling AM. Measure Scan and Synthesis of Palliative and End-of-Life Process Quality Measures for Advanced Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 17:e140-e148. [PMID: 32758085 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Monitoring and improving the quality of palliative and end-of-life cancer care remain pressing needs in the United States. Among existing measures that assess the quality of palliative and end-of-life care, many operationalize similar concepts. We identified existing palliative care process measures and synthesized these measures to aid stakeholder prioritization that will facilitate health system implementation in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS We reviewed MEDLINE/PubMed-indexed articles for process quality measures related to palliative and end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer, supplemented by expert input. Measures were inductively grouped into "measure concepts" and higher-level groups. RESULTS Literature review identified 226 unique measures from 23 measure sources, which we grouped into 64 measure concepts within 12 groups. Groups were advance care planning (11 measure concepts), pain (7), dyspnea (9), palliative care-specific issues (6), other specific symptoms (17), comprehensive assessment (2), symptom assessment (1), hospice/palliative care referral (1), spiritual care (2), mental health (5), information provision (2), and culturally appropriate care (1). CONCLUSION Measure concepts covered the spectrum of care from acute symptom management to advance care planning and psychosocial needs, with variability in the number of measure concepts per group. This taxonomy of process quality measure concepts can be used by health systems seeking stakeholder input to prioritize targets for improving palliative and end-of-life care quality in patients with advanced cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire E O'Hanlon
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; and Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Karl A Lorenz
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto, CA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Karleen F Giannitrapani
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto, CA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Melissa Garrido
- Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Partnered Evidence-Based Policy Resource Center, Boston, MA.,Department of Health Law, Policy, and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA
| | - Steven M Asch
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto, CA.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
| | - Neil Wenger
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Sydney Morss Dy
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MDThe views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government
| | - Mark Canning
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Raziel C Gamboa
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Center for Innovation to Implementation, Palo Alto, CA
| | - Anne M Walling
- Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Los Angeles, CA.,Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Weiss A, Porter S, Rozenberg D, O'Connor E, Lee T, Balter M, Wentlandt K. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Palliative Medicine Review of the Disease, Its Therapies, and Drug Interactions. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:135-150. [PMID: 32004618 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Despite significant advances in treatment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a chronic and progressive disease that frequently leads to premature mortality. COPD is associated with a constellation of significant symptoms, including dyspnea, cough, wheezing, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and insomnia, and is associated with increased morbidity. Palliative care is appropriate to support these patients. However, historically, palliative care has focused on supporting patients with malignant disease, rather than progressive chronic diseases such as COPD. Therapies for COPD often result in functional and symptomatic improvements, including health-related quality of life (HRQL), and palliative care may further improve symptoms and HRQL. Provision of usual palliative care therapies for this patient population requires understanding the pathogenesis of COPD and common disease-targeted pharmacotherapies, as well as an approach to balancing life-prolonging and HRQL care strategies. This review describes COPD and current targeted therapies and their effects on symptoms, exercise tolerance, HRQL, and survival. It is important to note that medications commonly used for symptom management in palliative care can interact with COPD medications resulting in increased risk of adverse effects, enhanced toxicity, or changes in clearance of medications. To address this, we review pharmacologic interactions with and precautions related to use of COPD therapies in conjunction with commonly used palliative care medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Weiss
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra Porter
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dmitry Rozenberg
- Division of Respirology and Lung Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erin O'Connor
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tiffany Lee
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Meyer Balter
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kirsten Wentlandt
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rozenberg D, Sitzer N, Porter S, Weiss A, Colman R, Reid WD, Shapera S, Fisher J, Wentlandt K. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review of Disease, Pharmacological, and Nonpharmacological Strategies With a Focus on Symptoms, Function, and Health-Related Quality of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 59:1362-1378. [PMID: 31887400 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.12.364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Despite several advances in treatment, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains a progressive, symptomatic, and terminal disease in patients not suitable for lung transplantation. With disease progression, IPF often leads to a constellation of symptoms, including dyspnea, cough, anxiety, and depression. Palliative care is appropriate to support these patients. However, traditional curriculum in palliative care has often focused on supporting patients with malignant disease, and clinicians are not universally trained to manage patients with progressive nonmalignant diseases such as IPF. Current antifibrotic therapies aim to slow disease progression but are not able to reduce symptoms or improve daily function and health-related quality of life (HRQL). Palliative care in this patient group requires an understanding of the clinical characteristics of IPF, comorbidities, common medications used, and nonpharmacological strategies that can be undertaken to improve daily function and HRQL. This review focuses on IPF management strategies and their effects on symptoms, exercise tolerance, HRQL, and survival. Pharmacological interactions and considerations related to commonly used palliative care medications are also reviewed. This review highlights the needs of patients with IPF and caregivers, psychosocial function, patient-reported assessment tools, and topics related to advance care planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitry Rozenberg
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole Sitzer
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sandra Porter
- Department of Pharmacy, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Weiss
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca Colman
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - W Darlene Reid
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shane Shapera
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Toronto Lung Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jolene Fisher
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kirsten Wentlandt
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel A, Ufere NN. Integrating Palliative Care in the Management of Patients With Advanced Liver Disease. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 2020; 15:136-140. [PMID: 32395238 PMCID: PMC7206323 DOI: 10.1002/cld.936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
http://aasldpubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2046-2484/video/15-4-reading-patel a video presentation of this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpan Patel
- Digestive DiseasesUniversity of California Los AngelesLos AngelesCA,GastroenterologyWest Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical CenterLos AngelesCA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patel A, Asch S, Antonio AL, Kanwal F, Lorenz K, Riopelle D, Dickey A, Larkin J, Lee M, Walling A. Measuring the Quality of Palliative Care for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease. Dig Dis Sci 2020; 65:2562-2570. [PMID: 31927765 PMCID: PMC7223418 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05983-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS We examined the quality of palliative care received by patients with decompensated cirrhosis using an explicit set of palliative care quality indicators (QIs) for patients with end-stage liver disease (PC-ESLD). METHODS We identified patients newly diagnosed with decompensated cirrhosis at a single veterans health center and followed up them for 2 years or until death. We piloted measurement of PC-ESLD QIs in all patients confirmed to have ESLD using a chart abstraction tool. RESULTS Out of 167 patients identified using at least one sampling strategy, 62 were confirmed to meet ESLD criteria with chart abstraction. Ninety-eight percent of veterans in the cohort were male, mean age at diagnosis was 61 years, and 74% were White. The overall QI pass rate was 68% (64% for information care planning QIs and 76% for supportive care QIs). Patients receiving specialty palliative care consultation were more likely to receive information care planning QIs (67% vs. 37%, p = 0.02). The best performing sampling strategy had a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 60%. CONCLUSION Measuring the quality of palliative care for patients with ESLD is feasible in the veteran population. Our single-center data suggest that the quality of palliative care is inadequate in the veteran population with ESLD, though patients offered specialty palliative care consultation and those affected by homelessness, drug, and alcohol abuse may receive better care. Our combination of ICD-9 codes can be used to identify a cohort of patients with ESLD, though better sensitivity and specificity may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpan Patel
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Steven Asch
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | | | - Fasiha Kanwal
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Karl Lorenz
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Deborah Riopelle
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Anna Dickey
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Jennifer Larkin
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Martin Lee
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Anne Walling
- West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ufere NN, Donlan J, Waldman L, Dienstag JL, Friedman LS, Corey KE, Hashemi N, Carolan P, Mullen AC, Thiim M, Bhan I, Nipp R, Greer JA, Temel JS, Chung RT, El-Jawahri A. Barriers to Use of Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning Discussions for Patients With End-Stage Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:2592-2599. [PMID: 30885884 PMCID: PMC6745282 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Despite evidence for the benefits of palliative care (PC) referrals and early advance care planning (ACP) discussions for patients with chronic diseases, patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) often do not receive such care. We sought to examine physicians' perceptions of the barriers to PC and timely ACP discussions for patients with ESLD. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of hepatologists and gastroenterologists who provide care to adult patients with ESLD, recruited from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 2018 membership registry. Using a questionnaire adapted from prior studies, we assessed physicians' perceptions of barriers to PC use and timely ACP discussions; 396 of 1236 eligible physicians (32%) completed the questionnaire. RESULTS The most commonly cited barriers to PC use were cultural factors that affect perception of PC (by 95% of respondents), unrealistic expectations from patients about their prognosis (by 93% of respondents), and competing demands for clinicians' time (by 91% of respondents). Most respondents (81%) thought that ACP discussions with patients who have ESLD typically occur too late in the course of illness. The most commonly cited barriers to timely ACP discussions were insufficient communication between clinicians and families about goals of care (by 84% of respondents) and insufficient cultural competency training about end-of-life care (81%). CONCLUSION There are substantial barriers to use of PC and timely discussions about ACP-most hepatologists and gastroenterologists believe that ACP occurs too late for patients with ESLD. Strategies are needed to overcome barriers and increase delivery of high-quality palliative and end-of-life care to patients with ESLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nneka N. Ufere
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - John Donlan
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Lauren Waldman
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jules L. Dienstag
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | | | - Kathleen E. Corey
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Nikroo Hashemi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Peter Carolan
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Alan C. Mullen
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Michael Thiim
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Irun Bhan
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Ryan Nipp
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Joseph A. Greer
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Jennifer S. Temel
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Raymond T. Chung
- Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA, USA
| | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee KC, Walling AM, Senglaub SS, Kelley AS, Cooper Z. Defining Serious Illness Among Adult Surgical Patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:844-850.e2. [PMID: 31404642 PMCID: PMC7155422 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Palliative care (PC) for seriously ill surgical patients, including aligning treatments with patients' goals and managing symptoms, is associated with improved patient-oriented outcomes and decreased health care utilization. However, efforts to integrate PC alongside restorative surgical care are limited by the lack of a consensus definition for serious illness in the perioperative context. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this study were to develop a serious illness definition for surgical patients and identify a denominator for quality measurement efforts. METHODS We developed a preliminary definition including a set of criteria for 11 conditions and health states. Using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method, a 12-member expert advisory panel rated the criteria for each condition and health state twice, once after an in-person moderated discussion, for validity (primary outcome) and feasibility of measurement. RESULTS All panelists completed both rounds of rating. All 11 conditions and health states defining serious illness for surgical patients were rated as valid. During the in-person discussion, panelists refined and narrowed criteria for two conditions (vulnerable elder, heart failure). The final definition included the following 11 conditions and health states: vulnerable elder, heart failure, advanced cancer, oxygen-dependent pulmonary disease, cirrhosis, end-stage renal disease, dementia, critical trauma, frailty, nursing home residency, and American Society of Anesthesiology Risk Score IV-V. CONCLUSION We identified a consensus definition for serious illness in surgery. Opportunities remain in measuring the prevalence, identifying health trajectories, and developing screening criteria to integrate PC with restorative surgical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C Lee
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
| | - Anne M Walling
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; Affiliated Adjunct Staff, RAND Health, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Steven S Senglaub
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy S Kelley
- Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Hebrew SeniorLife Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Esteban JPG, Rein L, Szabo A, Saeian K, Rhodes M, Marks S. Attitudes of Liver and Palliative Care Clinicians toward Specialist Palliative Care Consultation for Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease. J Palliat Med 2019; 22:804-813. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa Rein
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Aniko Szabo
- Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Society, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kia Saeian
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Mary Rhodes
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sean Marks
- Section of Palliative Care, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fricker ZP, Serper M. Current Knowledge, Barriers to Implementation, and Future Directions in Palliative Care for End-Stage Liver Disease. Liver Transpl 2019; 25:787-796. [PMID: 30758901 DOI: 10.1002/lt.25434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
End-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with a high degree of morbidity and mortality as well as symptom burden. Despite this, the rate of consultation with palliative care (PC) providers remains low, and invasive procedures near the end of life are commonplace. Studies show that involvement of PC providers improves patient satisfaction, and evidence from other chronic diseases demonstrates reduced costs of care and potentially increased survival. Better integration of PC is imperative but hindered by patient and provider misconceptions about its role in the care of patients with ESLD, specifically among candidates for liver transplantation. Additionally, reimbursement barriers and lack of provider knowledge may contribute to PC underutilization. In this review, we discuss the benefits of PC in ESLD, the variability of its delivery, and key stakeholders' perceptions about its use. Additionally, we identify barriers to more widespread PC adoption and highlight areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary P Fricker
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marina Serper
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.,Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Amador S, Sampson EL, Goodman C, Robinson L. A systematic review and critical appraisal of quality indicators to assess optimal palliative care for older people with dementia. Palliat Med 2019; 33:415-429. [PMID: 30854933 PMCID: PMC6439949 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319834227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A challenge for commissioners and providers of end-of-life care in dementia is to translate recommendations for good or effective care into quality indicators that inform service development and evaluation. AIM To identify and critically evaluate quality indicators for end-of-life care in dementia. RESULTS We found 8657 references, after de-duplication. In all, 19 publications describing 10 new and 3 updated sets of indicators were included in this review. Ultimately, 246 individual indicators were identified as being relevant to dementia end-of-life care and mapped against EAPC guidelines. CONCLUSIONS We systematically derived and assessed a set of quality indicators using a robust framework that provides clear definitions of aspects of palliative care, which are dementia specific, and strengthens the theoretical underpinning of new complex interventions in end-of-life care in dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Amador
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elizabeth L Sampson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Claire Goodman
- Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK
| | - Louise Robinson
- Institute for Ageing and Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brisebois A, Tandon P. Early Integration of Advance Care Planning (ACP) into Cirrhosis Care: Why We Need It. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s11901-018-0391-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|
22
|
Sudore RL, Heyland DK, Lum HD, Rietjens JAC, Korfage IJ, Ritchie CS, Hanson LC, Meier DE, Pantilat SZ, Lorenz K, Howard M, Green MJ, Simon JE, Feuz MA, You JJ. Outcomes That Define Successful Advance Care Planning: A Delphi Panel Consensus. J Pain Symptom Manage 2018; 55:245-255.e8. [PMID: 28865870 PMCID: PMC5794507 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 221] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Revised: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 08/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Standardized outcomes that define successful advance care planning (ACP) are lacking. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to create an Organizing Framework of ACP outcome constructs and rate the importance of these outcomes. METHODS This study convened a Delphi panel consisting of 52 multidisciplinary, international ACP experts including clinicians, researchers, and policy leaders from four countries. We conducted literature reviews and solicited attendee input from five international ACP conferences to identify initial ACP outcome constructs. In five Delphi rounds, we asked panelists to rate patient-centered outcomes on a seven-point "not-at-all" to "extremely important" scale. We calculated means and analyzed panelists' input to finalize an Organizing Framework and outcome rankings. RESULTS Organizing Framework outcome domains included process (e.g., attitudes), actions (e.g., discussions), quality of care (e.g., satisfaction), and health care (e.g., utilization). The top five outcomes included 1) care consistent with goals, mean 6.71 (±SD 0.04); 2) surrogate designation, 6.55 (0.45); 3) surrogate documentation, 6.50 (0.11); 4) discussions with surrogates, 6.40 (0.19); and 5) documents and recorded wishes are accessible when needed 6.27 (0.11). Advance directive documentation was ranked 10th, 6.01 (0.21). Panelists raised caution about whether "care consistent with goals" can be reliably measured. CONCLUSION A large, multidisciplinary Delphi panel developed an Organizing Framework and rated the importance of ACP outcome constructs. Top rated outcomes should be used to evaluate the success of ACP initiatives. More research is needed to create reliable and valid measurement tools for the highest rated outcomes, particularly "care consistent with goals."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Veteran Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
| | - Daren K Heyland
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Clinical Evaluation Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hillary D Lum
- Veteran Affairs Eastern Colorado Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Denver, Colorado, USA; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Judith A C Rietjens
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ida J Korfage
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christine S Ritchie
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Laura C Hanson
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diane E Meier
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven Z Pantilat
- Palliative Care Program, Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Karl Lorenz
- Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA; Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Michelle Howard
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael J Green
- Departments of Humanities and Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica E Simon
- Departments of Oncology, Community Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Mariko A Feuz
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; Veteran Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John J You
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Wentlandt K, Weiss A, O'Connor E, Kaya E. Palliative and end of life care in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant 2017; 17:3008-3019. [PMID: 28976070 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2017] [Revised: 09/17/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Palliative care is an interprofessional approach that focuses on quality of life of patients who are facing life-threatening illness. Palliative care is consistently associated with improvements in advance care planning, patient and caregiver satisfaction, quality of life, symptom burden, and lower healthcare utilization. Most transplant patients have advanced chronic disease, significant symptom burden, and mortality awaiting transplant. Transplantation introduces new risks including perioperative death, organ rejection, infection, renal insufficiency, and malignancy. Numerous publications over the last decade identify that palliative care is well-suited to support these patients and their caregivers, yet access to palliative care and research within this population are lacking. This review describes palliative care and summarizes existing research supporting palliative intervention in advanced organ failure and transplant populations. A proposed model to provide palliative care in parallel with disease-directed therapy in a transplant program has the potential to improve symptom burden, quality of life, and healthcare utilization. Further studies are needed to elucidate specific benefits of palliative care for this population. In addition, there is a tremendous need for education, specifically for clinicians, patients, and families, to improve understanding of palliative care and its benefits for patients with advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Wentlandt
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Multi-Organ Transplant Program, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - A Weiss
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E O'Connor
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - E Kaya
- Division of Palliative Care, Department of Supportive Care, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|