1
|
Leclercq P, Bisschops R, Bergman JJGHM, Pouw RE. Management of high risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma following endoscopic resection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2024; 68:101882. [PMID: 38522880 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2024.101882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
High-risk T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma (HR-T1 EAC) is defined as T1 cancer, with one or more of the following histological criteria: submucosal invasion, poorly or undifferentiated cancer, and/or presence of lympho-vascular invasion. Esophagectomy has long been the only available treatment for these HR-T1 EACs and was considered necessary because of a presumed high risk of lymph node metastases up to 46%. However, endoscopic submucosal disscection have made it possible to radically remove HR-T1 EAC, irrespective of size, while leaving the esophageal anatomy intact. Parallel to this development, new publications demonstrated that the risk of lymph node metastases for HR-T1 EAC may be even <24%. Therefore, indications for endoscopic treatment of HR-T1 EAC are being reconsidered and current research aims at finding the optimal management strategy for this indication, where watchful waiting may proof to be an acceptable strategy in selected patients. In this review, we will discuss the latest developments in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Leclercq
- Departement of Gastroenterology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, 49 Herestraat, 3000, LEUVEN, Belgium.
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Departement of Gastroenterology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven, 49 Herestraat, 3000, LEUVEN, Belgium.
| | - Jacques J G H M Bergman
- Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, Netherlands.
| | - Roos E Pouw
- Dept. of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, 1081, HV, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McKay SC, DeSouza ML, Dunst CM, Reavis KM, Bradley DD, DeMeester SR. Missed Opportunities: the Timing and Frequency of Screening Colonoscopy in Patients That Develop Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2711-2717. [PMID: 37932595 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05874-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Screening colonoscopy (SC) is widely accepted and has been shown to decrease the rate of colorectal cancer death. Guidelines and acceptance of screening for Barrett's esophagus (BE) are less established despite the fact that esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) remains the fastest increasing cancer in the USA. The aim of this study was to assess the timing and frequency of SC in patients ultimately found to have EA and to evaluate the presence of symptoms and risk factors that might have prompted an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and potentially earlier diagnosis of the EA. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all patients who were referred to a single center with esophageal cancer between July 2016 and November 2022. Patients with any histology other than adenocarcinoma were excluded. RESULTS There were 221 patients referred with EA. Of these, a SC had been done prior to the diagnosis of EA in 108 patients (49%): 96 men and 12 women. A total of 203 SC had been done (range 1-7 per patient), and 47% of patients had more than 1 SC. The median interval from the last SC to the diagnosis of EA was 2.9 years. At the time of SC, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms or chronic acid suppression medication use was reported by 81% of patients, and 80% had an American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) indication for a screening EGD. Only 19 patients (18%) that had a SC had an EGD at any time prior to the diagnosis of EA, and in these patients, 74% had erosive esophagitis or BE. The EA in most patients was stage III or IV and associated with lymph node metastases. CONCLUSIONS Nearly one-half of patients ultimately diagnosed with EA had one or more SCs, and most of these patients had GERD symptoms, were using acid suppression medications or had an ASGE indication for a screening EGD. Despite this, only 18% had an EGD prior to the EA diagnosis. The addition of an EGD at the time of SC in these patients may have allowed the detection of BE or EA at an early, endoscopically curable stage and represents a missed opportunity to intervene in the natural history of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C McKay
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Melissa L DeSouza
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
| | - Christy M Dunst
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Kevin M Reavis
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Daniel Davila Bradley
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Steven R DeMeester
- The Oregon Clinic: Center for Advanced Surgery, 4805 NE Glisan Ave, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
- Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Valdovinos-Andraca F, Bartnicki-Navarrete I, Bernal-Mendez AR, Rafael Barreto-Zuñiga R, Romano-Munive AF, Gamboa-Domínguez A, Elizondo-Rivera J, Briseño-García D, Tellez-Ávila FI. Clinical and Endoscopic Differences Between Patients With Barrett's Esophagus With and Without Dysplasia/Adenocarcinoma. Cureus 2023; 15:e46323. [PMID: 37916254 PMCID: PMC10617646 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the main precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with BE progression to dysplasia or EAC in a Latin population. METHODS The study is a retrospective analysis of a single-center cohort of patients with BE, evaluated from 2002 to 2012. RESULTS We identified 420 patients with BE; 281 (66.9%) of them were men with a mean age of 57.2 ± 15.3 years. Among all BE patients evaluated, 81 (19.3%) had progression to some degree of dysplasia/EAC. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years. Multivariate analysis showed that age (OR = 1.03), cigarette smoking (OR = 3.05), long-segment BE (OR = 4.81), and a visible lesion on BE (OR = 6.94) were associated with progression to dysplasia/EAC. CONCLUSION In Latin patients with BE, age, cigarette smoking, long-segment BE, and the presence of lesions were associated with the presence of dysplasia/EAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ambrosio R Bernal-Mendez
- Endoscopy, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, MEX
| | | | - Adriana F Romano-Munive
- Endoscopy, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, MEX
| | - Armando Gamboa-Domínguez
- Pathology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, MEX
| | - Javier Elizondo-Rivera
- Endoscopy, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, MEX
| | - Daniel Briseño-García
- Endoscopy, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, MEX
| | - Felix I Tellez-Ávila
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sijben J, Peters Y, Rainey L, Gashi M, Broeders MJ, Siersema PD. Professionals' views on the justification for esophageal adenocarcinoma screening: A systematic literature search and qualitative analysis. Prev Med Rep 2023; 34:102264. [PMID: 37273526 PMCID: PMC10236474 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Screening for early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), including screening for its precursor Barrett's esophagus (BE), has the potential to reduce EAC-related mortality and morbidity. This literature review aimed to explore professionals' views on the justification for EAC screening. A systematic search of Ovid Medline, EMBASE, and PsycInfo, from January 1, 2000 to September 22, 2022, identified 5 original studies and 63 expert opinion articles reporting professionals' perspectives on EAC screening. Included articles were qualitatively analyzed using the framework method, which was deductively led by modernized screening principles. The analyses showed that many professionals are optimistic about technological advancements in BE detection and treatment. However, views on whether the societal burden of EAC merits screening were contradictory. In addition, knowledge of the long-term benefits and risks of EAC screening is still considered insufficient. There is no consensus on who to screen, how often to screen, which screening test to use, and how to manage non-dysplastic BE. Professionals further point out the need to develop technology that facilitates automated test sample processing and public education strategies that avoid causing disproportionately high cancer worry and social stigma. In conclusion, modernized screening principles are currently insufficiently fulfilled to justify widespread screening for EAC. Results from future clinical screening trials and risk prediction modeling studies may shift professionals' thoughts regarding justification for EAC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmijn Sijben
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Yonne Peters
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Rainey
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mejdan Gashi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mireille J.M. Broeders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Dutch Expert Center for Screening, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D. Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Optimizing Outcomes with Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's Esophagus: Candidates, Efficacy and Durability. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2021; 31:131-154. [PMID: 33213792 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of early Barrett's esophagus (BE) has undergone a paradigm shift from surgical subtotal esophagectomy to organ-saving endoluminal treatment. Over the past 15 years, several high-quality studies were conducted to assess safe oncological outcome of endoscopic resection of mucosal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia. It became clear that add-on ablative therapy with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) significantly reduces recurrence risk of neoplasia after resection. In this review, we highlight the most essential elements to optimize outcomes of RFA of BE, addressing the correct indication and patient selection in combination with the most efficient and safest treatment protocols to obtain long-term durability.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gibbens Y, Iyer PG. What is the optimal surveillance strategy for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus? CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN GASTROENTEROLOGY 2020; 18:369-383. [PMID: 33737800 PMCID: PMC7963123 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-020-00297-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There is conflicting data on the effectiveness of the currently recommended endoscopic surveillance strategy in non-dysplastic BE patients. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the (cost) effectiveness of the current surveillance strategy. We also reviewed critical strategies and new technologies which could improve dysplasia detection. RECENT FINDINGS Adherence to the current EGD surveillance guidelines is suboptimal with high rates of missed dysplasia/EAC. The influence of surveillance on EAC mortality appears modest. Careful cleansing, inspection and sampling of the BE mucosa using high resolution while light and (electronic) chromoendoscopy is critical. Newer sampling techniques coupled with computer aided diagnosis and emerging imaging technologies have shown promise in improving dysplasia detection. Personalized surveillance with risk stratification based on risk factors for progression may be on the horizon. SUMMARY Current BE surveillance strategy will likely be further refined and optimized by emerging new technologies in tissue sampling, advanced imaging and risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Gibbens
- Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
Minnesota
| | - Prasad G. Iyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic,
Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dam AN, Klapman J. A narrative review of Barrett's esophagus in 2020, molecular and clinical update. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:1107. [PMID: 33145326 PMCID: PMC7575938 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a condition resulting from an acquired metaplastic epithelial change in the esophagus in response to gastroesophageal reflux. BE is the only known precursor lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma, and can progress from non-dysplastic BE (NDBE) to low grade dysplasia (LGD) and high grade dysplasia (HGD), and ultimately invasive carcinoma. Although the risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in NBDE is less than 0.5% per year, there has been a rising incidence of EAC in Western countries, which continue to drive efforts to optimize screening and surveillance methods. The current gold standard for diagnosis is esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and there has been significant interest in alternative, minimally invasive methods for screening which would be more readily accessible in the primary care setting. Surveillance endoscopy in 3–5 years is recommended for NDBE given the low progression to EAC. The mainstay of treatment for LGD and HGD is endoscopic eradication therapy (EET). Visible lesions are treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is considered first line therapy for flat dysplastic BE and cryotherapy has shown promising results as an alternate form of treatment for of dysplasia. The molecular progression of BE to EAC is a complex process involving multiple pathways involving genetic and epigenetic modifications. Genomic studies have further led to the understanding of the complex molecular landscape that occurs early and late in the disease process. Promising biomarker panels have been investigated to help with the diagnosis of BE as well as aid in the risk stratification of BE during surveillance. In addition, clinical prediction models have been developed to categorize BE patients in low, intermediate, and high risk for progression to HGD and EAC. Further clinical and translational research is needed to help refine markers and techniques in diagnosis, screening, and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aamir N Dam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jason Klapman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|