1
|
Wadhwa V, Gonzalez A, Azar F, Singh H, Gupta K, Liang H, Schneider A, Ponsky J, Erim T, Rodriguez J, Castro FJ. Response to botulinum toxin may predict response to peroral pyloromyotomy in patients with gastroparesis. Endoscopy 2023; 55:508-514. [PMID: 36417930 DOI: 10.1055/a-1986-4292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Patients with gastroparesis who have undergone prior intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection (BTI) may seek an opinion regarding peroral pyloromyotomy (POP). There are only two small reports assessing the role of BTI as a predictor for successful treatment with POP. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess whether symptomatic improvement after BTI predicts a response to POP. We included 119 patients who had undergone both BTI and POP at Cleveland Clinic Ohio or Cleveland Clinic Florida from January 2016 to September 2019. RESULTS 65.5 % of patients had symptomatic improvement after BTI. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) scores were available for 74 patients, with 64 % achieving a response to POP, defined as a decrease in mean GCSI ≥ 1. In multivariable analysis, response to BTI (odds ratio [OR] 7.7 [95 %CI 2.2-26.1]) and higher pre-POP GCSI score (OR 2.3 [95 %CI 1.2-4.6]) were independent predictors of response to POP. CONCLUSIONS Clinical improvement after BTI is a predictor of response to POP in patients with gastroparesis. This information may aid in improving patient selection for POP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vaibhav Wadhwa
- Center for Interventional Gastroenterology, University of Texas Health Science, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Adalberto Gonzalez
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| | - Francisco Azar
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| | - Harjinder Singh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| | - Kapil Gupta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| | - Hong Liang
- Department of Clinical Research, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| | - Alison Schneider
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| | - Jeffery Ponsky
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Tolga Erim
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| | - John Rodriguez
- Department of General Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
| | - Fernando J Castro
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Longley KJ, Ho V. Practical management approach to gastroparesis. Intern Med J 2021; 50:909-917. [PMID: 31314176 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Revised: 06/16/2019] [Accepted: 07/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Gastroparesis is a syndrome characterised by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Symptoms can include early satiety, abdominal pain, bloating, vomiting and regurgitation which cause significant morbidity in addition to nutritional deficits. There is a higher prevalence in diabetics and females, but the incidence in the Australian population has not been well studied. Management of gastroparesis involves investigating and correcting nutritional deficits, optimising glycaemic control and improving gastrointestinal motility. Symptom control in gastroparesis can be challenging. Nutritional deficits should be addressed initially through dietary modification. Enteral feeding is a second-line option when oral intake is insufficient. Home parenteral nutrition is rarely used, and only accessible through specialised clinics in the outpatient setting. Prokinetic medication classes that have been used include dopamine receptor antagonists, motilin receptor agonists, 5-HT4 receptor agonists and ghrelin receptor agonists. Anti-emetic agents are often used for symptom control. Interventional treatments include gastric electrical stimulation, gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy, feeding jejunostomy and gastrostomy/jejunstomy for gastric venting and enteral feeding. In this article we propose a framework to manage gastroparesis in Australia based on current evidence and available therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran J Longley
- Department of Medicine, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vincent Ho
- Gastroenterology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abell TL, Yamada G, McCallum RW, Van Natta ML, Tonascia J, Parkman HP, Koch KL, Sarosiek I, Farrugia G, Grover M, Hasler W, Nguyen L, Snape W, Kuo B, Shulman R, Hamilton FA, Pasricha PJ. Effectiveness of gastric electrical stimulation in gastroparesis: Results from a large prospectively collected database of national gastroparesis registries. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31:e13714. [PMID: 31584238 PMCID: PMC6863164 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 08/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric electrical stimulation (GES) for treating gastroparesis symptoms is controversial. METHODS We studied 319 idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis symptom patients from the Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium (GpCRC) observational studies: 238 without GES and 81 with GES. We assessed the effects of GES using change in GCSI total score and nausea/vomiting subscales between baseline and 48 weeks. We used propensity score methods to control for imbalances in patient characteristics between comparison groups. KEY RESULTS GES patients were clinically worse (40% severe vs. 18% for non-GES; P < .001); worse PAGI-QOL (2.2. vs. 2.6; P = .003); and worse GCSI total scores (3.5 vs. 2.8; P < .001). We observed improvements in 48-week GCSI total scores for GES vs. non-GES: improvement by ≥ 1-point (RR = 1.63; 95% CI = (1.14, 2.33); P = .01) and change from enrollment (difference = -0.5 (-0.8, -0.3); P < .001). When adjusting for patient characteristics, symptom scores were smaller and not statistically significant: improvement by ≥ 1-point (RR = 1.29 (0.88, 1.90); P = .20) and change from the enrollment (difference = -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0); P = .07). Of the individual items, the nausea improved by ≥ 1 point (RR = 1.31 (1.03, 1.67); P = .04). Patients with GCSI score ≥ 3.0 tended to improve more than those with score < 3.0. (Adjusted P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES This multicenter study of gastroparesis patients found significant improvements in gastroparesis symptoms among GES patients. Accounting for imbalances in patient characteristics, only nausea remained significant. Patients with greater symptoms at baseline improved more after GES. A much larger sample of patients is needed to fully evaluate symptomatic responses and to identify patients likely to respond to GES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas L. Abell
- Digestive Diseases, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Braden Kuo
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Robert Shulman
- Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston TX, Baylor University, Waco, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abell TL, Kedar A, Stocker A, Beatty K, McElmurray L, Hughes M, Rashed H, Kennedy W, Wendelschafer-Crabb G, Yang X, Fraig M, Omer E, Miller E, Griswold M, Pinkston C. Gastroparesis syndromes: Response to electrical stimulation. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2019; 31:e13534. [PMID: 30706646 DOI: 10.1111/nmo.13534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Factors underlying gastroparesis are not well defined, nor is the mechanism of action of gastric electrical stimulation (GES). We hypothesized that GES acts via several mechanisms related to underlying disordered pathophysiology. METHODS We studied 43 consecutive eligible patients with gastroparetic symptoms, previously evaluated by two methods in each of five core areas: inflammatory, autonomic, enteric, electrophysiologic, and hormonal; and also categorized by GI symptoms, metabolic status, illness quantification, and gastric physiology. We then studied 41 patients who underwent temporary GES for 5-7 days. Thirty-six of those patients were implanted and 30 were followed up at 6 months after permanent GES. RESULTS In previous but separately reported work, patients had similar GI symptoms regardless of baseline gastric emptying or diabetic/idiopathic status and all patients demonstrated abnormalities in each of the five areas studied. After GES, patients showed early and late effects of electrical stimulation with changes noted in multiple areas, categorized by improvement status. CONCLUSION Patients with symptoms of gastroparesis have multiple abnormalities, including systemic inflammation and disordered hormonal status. GES affects many of these abnormalities. We conclude electrical stimulation improves symptoms and physiology with (a) an early and sustained anti-emetic effect; (b) an early and durable gastric prokinetic effect in delayed emptying patients; (c) an early anti-arrhythmic effect that continues over time; (d) a late autonomic effect; (e) a late hormonal effect; (f) an early anti-inflammatory effect that persists; and (g) an early and sustained improvement in health-related quality of life. This study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov under study # NCT03178370 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03178370).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Xiu Yang
- University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | | | | | - Ed Miller
- University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chang KJ. Endoscopic foregut surgery and interventions: The future is now. The state-of-the-art and my personal journey. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:1-41. [PMID: 30643356 PMCID: PMC6328959 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Revised: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In this paper, I reviewed the emerging field of endoscopic surgery and present data supporting the contention that endoscopy can now be used to treat many foregut diseases that have been traditionally treated surgically. Within each topic, the content will progress as follows: "lessons learned", "technical considerations" and "future opportunities". Lessons learned will provide a brief background and update on the most current literature. Technical considerations will include my personal experience, including tips and tricks that I have learned over the years. Finally, future opportunities will address current unmet needs and potential new areas of development. The foregut is defined as "the upper part of the embryonic alimentary canal from which the pharynx, esophagus, lung, stomach, liver, pancreas, and part of the duodenum develop". Foregut surgery is well established in treating conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), achalasia, esophageal diverticula, Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal cancer, stomach cancer, gastric-outlet obstruction, and obesity. Over the past decade, remarkable progress in interventional endoscopy has culminated in the conceptualization and practice of endoscopic foregut surgery for various clinical conditions summarized in this paper. Regarding GERD, there are now several technologies available to effectively treat it and potentially eliminate symptoms, and the need for long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors. For the first time, fundoplication can be performed without the need for open or laparoscopic surgery. Long-term data going out 5-10 years are now emerging showing extended durability. In respect to achalasia, per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) which was developed in Japan, has become an alternative to the traditional Heller's myotomy. Recent meta-analysis show that POEM may have better results than Heller, but the issue of post-POEM GERD still needs to be addressed. There is now a resurgence of endoscopic treatment of Zenker's diverticula with improved technique (Z-POEM) and equipment; thus, patients are choosing flexible endoscopic treatment as opposed to open or rigid endoscopy options. In regard to BE, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) which is well established in Asia, is now becoming more mainstream in the West for the treatment of BE with high grade dysplasia, as well as early esophageal cancer. In combination with all the ablation technologies (radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy, hybrid argon plasma coagulation), the entire spectrum of Barrett's and related dysplasia and early cancer can be managed predominantly by endoscopy. Importantly, in regard to early gastric cancer and submucosal tumors (SMTs) of the stomach, ESD and full thickness resection (FTR) can excise these lesions en-bloc and endoscopic suturing is now used to close large defects and perforations. For treatment of patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), endoscopic gastro-jejunostomy is now showing better results than enteral stenting. G-POEM is also emerging as a treatment option for patients with gastroparesis. Obesity has become an epidemic in many western countries and is becoming also prevalent in Asia. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is now becoming an established treatment option, especially for obese patients with body mass index between 30 and 35. Data show an average weight loss of 16 kg after ESG with long-term data confirming sustainability. Finally, in respect to endo-hepatology, there are many new endoscopic interventions that have been developed for patients with liver disease. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided liver biopsy and EUS-guided portal pressure measurement are exciting new frontiers for the endo-hepatologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth J Chang
- H.H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Disease Center, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA 92868, United States
| |
Collapse
|