Loss of Tyrosine Phosphatase Delta Promotes Gastric Cancer Progression via Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 Pathways

Cancer-associated point mutations within the extracellular domain of PTPRD affect protein stability and HSPG interaction

PTPRD, a well-established tumor suppressor gene, encodes the protein tyrosine phosphatase-type D. This protein consists of three immunoglobulin-like (Ig) domains, four to eight fibronectin type 3 (FN) domains, a single transmembrane segment, and two cytoplasmic tandem tyrosine phosphatase domains. PTPRD is known to harbor various cancer-associated point mutations. While it is assumed that PTPRD regulates cellular functions as a tumor suppressor through the tyrosine phosphatase activity in the intracellular region, the function of its extracellular domain (ECD) in cancer is not well understood. In this study, we systematically examined the impact of 92 cancer-associated point mutations within the ECD. We found that 69.6% (64 out of 92) of these mutations suppressed total protein expression and/or plasma membrane localization. Notably, almost all mutations (20 out of 21) within the region between the last FN domain and transmembrane segment affected protein expression and/or localization, highlighting the importance of this region for protein stability. We further found that some mutations within the Ig domains adjacent to the glycosaminoglycan-binding pocket enhanced PTPRD's binding ability to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). This interaction is proposed to suppress phosphatase activity. Our findings therefore suggest that HSPG-mediated attenuation of phosphatase activity may be involved in tumorigenic processes through PTPRD dysregulation.

In Silico and In Vitro Mapping of Receptor-Type Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type D in Health and Disease: Implications for Asprosin Signalling in Endometrial Cancer and Neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase Receptor Type D (PTPRD) is involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and oncogenic transformation, as well as in brain development. PTPRD also mediates the effects of asprosin, which is a glucogenic hormone/adipokine derived following the cleavage of the C-terminal of fibrillin 1. Since the asprosin circulating levels are elevated in certain cancers, research is now focused on the potential role of this adipokine and its receptors in cancer. As such, in this study, we investigated the expression of PTPRD in endometrial cancer (EC) and the placenta, as well as in glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

An array of in silico tools, in vitro models, tissue microarrays (TMAs), and liquid biopsies were employed to determine the gene and protein expression of PTPRD in healthy tissues/organs and in patients with EC and GBM.

RESULTS

PTPRD exhibits high expression in the occipital lobe, parietal lobe, globus pallidus, ventral thalamus, and white matter, whereas in the human placenta, it is primarily localised around the tertiary villi. PTPRD is significantly upregulated at the mRNA and protein levels in patients with EC and GBM compared to healthy controls. In patients with EC, PTPRD is significantly downregulated with obesity, whilst it is also expressed in the peripheral leukocytes. The EC TMAs revealed abundant PTPRD expression in both low- and high-grade tumours. Asprosin treatment upregulated the expression of PTPRD only in syncytialised placental cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that PTPRD may have potential as a biomarker for malignancies such as EC and GBM, further implicating asprosin as a potential metabolic regulator in these cancers. Future studies are needed to explore the potential molecular mechanisms/signalling pathways that link PTPRD and asprosin in cancer.

An integrative prognostic and immune analysis of PTPRD in cancer

PTPRD plays an indispensable role in the occurrence of multiple tumors. However, pan-cancer analysis is unavailable. The purpose of this research was to preliminarily study its prognostic landscape across various tumors and investigate its relationship with immunotherapy. We exhibited the expression profile, survival analysis, and genomic alterations of PTPRD based on the TIMER, GEPIA, UALCAN, PrognoScan and cBioPortal database. The frequency of PTPRD mutation and its correlation with response to immunotherapy were evaluated using the cBioPortal database. The relationship between PTPRD and immune-cell infiltration was analyzed by the TIMER and TISIDB databases. A protein interaction network was constructed by the STRING database. GO and KEGG enrichment analysis was executed by the Metascape database. A correlation between PTPRD expression and prognosis was found in various cancers. Aberrant PTPRD expression was closely related to immune infiltration. In non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma, patients with PTPRD mutations had better overall survival with immune checkpoint inhibitors, and these patients had higher TMB scores. PTPRD mutation was involved in numerous biological processes, including immunological signaling pathways. A PTPRD protein interaction network was constructed, and genes that interacted with PTPRD were identified. Functional enrichment analysis demonstrated that a variety of GO biological processes and KEGG pathways associated with PTPRD were involved in the therapeutic mechanisms. These results revealed that PTPRD might function as a biomarker for prognosis and immune infiltration in cancers, throwing new light on cancer therapeutics.

Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases: Mechanisms in Cancer

Protein tyrosine kinases, especially receptor tyrosine kinases, have dominated the cancer therapeutics sphere as proteins that can be inhibited to selectively target cancer. However, protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs) are also an emerging target. Though historically known as negative regulators of the oncogenic tyrosine kinases, PTPs are now known to be both tumor-suppressive and oncogenic. This review will highlight key protein tyrosine phosphatases that have been thoroughly investigated in various cancers. Furthermore, the different mechanisms underlying pro-cancerous and anti-cancerous PTPs will also be explored.