Elevated Serum Liver-Type Fatty Acid Binding Protein Levels in Non-acetaminophen Acute Liver Failure Patients with Organ Dysfunction

An overview of circulating and urinary biomarkers capable of predicting the transition of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Acute kidney injury (AKI) defined by a substantial decrease in kidney function within hours to days and is often irreversible with higher risk to chronic kidney disease (CKD) transition.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss the diagnostic and predictive utilities of serum and urinary biomarkers on AKI and on the risk of AKI-to-CKD progression. The authors focus on the relevant literature covering evidence of circulating and urinary biomarkers' capability to predict the transition of AKI to CKD.

EXPERT OPINION

Based on the different modalities of serum and urinary biomarkers, multiple biomarker panel seems to be potentially useful to distinguish between various types of AKI, to detect the severity and the risk of AKI progression, to predict the clinical outcome and evaluate response to the therapy. Serum/urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), serum/urinary uromodulin, serum extracellular high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1), serum cystatin C and urinary liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) were the most effective in the prediction of AKI-to-CKD transition regardless of etiology and the presence of critical state in patients. The current clinical evidence on the risk assessments of AKI progression is mainly based on the utility of combination of functional, injury and stress biomarkers, mainly NGAL, L-FABP, HMGB-1 and cystatin C.

Future directions in acute liver failure

Acute liver failure (ALF) describes a clinical syndrome of rapid hepatocyte injury leading to liver failure manifested by coagulopathy and encephalopathy in the absence of pre-existing cirrhosis. The hallmark diagnostic features are a prolonged prothrombin time (ie, an international normalized ratio of prothrombin time of ≥1.5) and any degree of mental status alteration (HE). As a rare, orphan disease, it seemed an obvious target for a multicenter network. The Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG) began in 1997 to more thoroughly study and understand the causes, natural history, and management of ALF. Over the course of 22 years, 3364 adult patients were enrolled in the study registry (2614 ALF and 857 acute liver injury-international normalized ratio 2.0 but no encephalopathy-ALI) and >150,000 biosamples collected, including serum, plasma, urine, DNA, and liver tissue. Within the Registry study sites, 4 prospective substudies were conducted and published, 2 interventional ( N -acetylcysteine and ornithine phenylacetate), 1 prognostic [ 13 C-methacetin breath test (MBT)], and 1 mechanistic (rotational thromboelastometry). To review ALFSG's accomplishments and consider next steps, a 2-day in-person conference was held at UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, entitled "Acute Liver Failure: Science and Practice," in May 2022. To summarize the important findings in the field, this review highlights the current state of understanding of ALF and, more importantly, asks what further studies are needed to improve our understanding of the pathogenesis, natural history, and management of this unique and dramatic condition.

Acute Liver Failure: Biomarkers Evaluated by the Acute Liver Failure Study Group

There has been a growing interest in identifying prognostic biomarkers that alone or with available prognostic models (King's College Criteria, KCC; MELD and ALFSG Prognostic Index) would improve prognosis in acute liver failure (ALF) patients being assessed for liver transplantation. The Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG) has evaluated 15 potential prognostic biomarkers: serum AFP; apoptosis-associated proteins; serum actin-free Gc-globulin; serum glycodeoxycholic acid; sRAGE/RAGE ligands; plasma osteopontin; circulating MBL, M-, L-, H-ficolin and CL-1; plasma galectin-9; serum FABP1; serum Lct2; miRNAs; factor V; thrombocytopenia, and sCD163. The ALFSG also has reported on 4 susceptibility biomarkers: keratins 8 and 18 (K8/K18) gene variants; polymorphisms of genes encoding putative APAP-metabolizing enzymes ( UGT1A1 , UGT 1A0 , UGT 2B15 , SULT1A1 , CYP2E1 , and CYP3A5 ) as well as CD44 and BHMT1 ; single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of genes associated with human behavior, rs2282018 in the arginine vasopressin ( AVP ) gene and rs11174811 in the AVP receptor 1A gene. Finally, rs2277680 of the CSCL16 gene in HBV-ALF patients. In conclusion, we have reviewed the prognostic and susceptibility biomarkers studied by the ALFSG. We suggest that a better approach to predicting the clinical outcome of an ALF patient will require a combination of biomarkers of pathogenic processes such as cell death, hepatic regeneration, and degree of inflammation that could be incorporated into prognostic models such as KCC, MELD or ALFSG PI.

Management of Acute Liver Failure: Update 2022

Abbreviated pathogenesis and clinical course of the acute liver failure syndrome. The pathogenesis and clinical course of the syndrome of acute liver failure (ALF) differs depending upon the etiology of the primary liver injury. In turn, the severity of the liver injury and resulting synthetic failure is often the primary determinant of whether a patient is referred for emergency liver transplantation. Injuries by viral etiologies trigger the innate immune system via pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), while toxin-induced (and presumably ischemia-induced) injuries do so via damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). The course of the clinical syndrome further depends upon the relative intensity and composition of cytokine release, resulting in an early proinflammatory phenotype (SIRS) and later compensatory anti-inflammatory response phenotype (CARS). The outcomes of overwhelming immune activation are the systemic (extrahepatic) features of ALF (cardiovascular collapse, cerebral edema, acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, sepsis) which ultimately determine the likelihood of death.Acute liver failure (ALF) continues to carry a high risk of mortality or the need for transplantation despite recent improvements in overall outcomes over the past two decades. Optimal management begins with identifying that liver failure is indeed present and its etiology, since outcomes and the need for transplantation vary widely across the different etiologies. Most causes of ALF can be divided into hyperacute (ischemia and acetaminophen) and subacute types (other etiologies), based on time of evolution of signs and symptoms of liver failure; the former evolve in 3 to 4 days and the latter typically in 2 to 4 weeks. Both involve intense release of cytokines and hepatocellular contents into the circulation with multiorgan effects/consequences.Management involves optimizing fluid balance and cardiovascular support, including the use of continuous renal replacement therapy, vasopressors, and pulmonary ventilation. Early evaluation for liver transplantation is advised particularly for acetaminophen toxicity, which evolves so rapidly that delay is likely to lead to death.Vasopressor support, high-grade hepatic encephalopathy, and unfavorable (subacute) etiologies heighten the need for urgent listing for liver transplantation. Prognostic scores such as Kings Criteria, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease, and the Acute Liver Failure Group prognostic index take these features into account and provide reasonable but imperfect predictive accuracy. Future treatments may include liver support devices and/or agents that improve hepatocyte regeneration.

Proteomics Indicates Lactate Dehydrogenase Is Prognostic in Acetaminophen-Induced Acute Liver Failure Patients and Reveals Altered Signaling Pathways

Better biomarkers to predict death early in acute liver failure (ALF) are needed. To that end, we obtained early (study day 1) and later (day 3) serum samples from transplant-free survivors (n = 28) and nonsurvivors (n = 30) of acetaminophen-induced ALF from the NIH-sponsored Acute Liver Failure Study Group and from control volunteers (n = 10). To identify proteins that increase early in serum during ALF, we selected individuals from this cohort for whom alanine aminotransferase was lower on day 1 than day 3, indicating a time point before peak injury (n = 10/group). We then performed untargeted proteomics on their day 1 samples. Out of 1682 quantifiable proteins, 361 were ≥ 4-fold elevated or decreased in ALF patients versus controls and 16 of those were further elevated or decreased ≥ 4-fold in nonsurvivors versus survivors, indicating potential to predict death. Interestingly, 1 of the biomarkers was lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which is already measured in most clinical laboratories. To validate our proteomics results and to confirm the prognostic potential of LDH, we measured LDH activity in all day 1 and 3 samples from all 58 ALF patients. LDH was elevated in the nonsurvivors versus survivors on both days. In addition, it had prognostic value similar to the model for end-stage liver disease and outperformed the King's College Criteria, while a combination of model for end-stage liver disease and LDH together outperformed either alone. Finally, bioinformatics analysis of our proteomics data revealed alteration of numerous signaling pathways that may be important in liver regeneration. Overall, we conclude LDH can predict death in APAP-induced ALF.

The Role of Elevated Liver-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins in Liver Diseases

Liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) is mainly expressed in the liver as well as the proximal tubular epithelial cells in the kidney. In general, the proteins and enzymes existing within the hepatocytes have the potential to become biomarkers, for instance alanine aminotransferase, which reflects hepatocellular damage. However, due to reduced hepatocellular function in late stage of chronic liver diseases (e.g. cirrhosis), proteins and enzymes relating to hepatocellular damage are not always accurate measures of disease progression. Recently, several publications have demonstrated elevated serum L-FABP levels during the progression of human liver diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and were a prognostic factor for survival in acute and chronic liver disease patients. However, the study regarding serum L-FABP levels and hepatic L-FABP expression in liver diseases is not sufficient to understand the molecular mechanism of L-FABP during the progression of these disease states. In this review, we focus on the use of serum and/or hepatic L-FABP expression as a biomarker in human liver diseases, including mechanistic potential in HCC.

Early identification using the referral system prolonged the time to onset for hepatic encephalopathy after diagnosing severe acute liver injury

In 2004, we implemented a referral system for patients with acute liver injury (ALI) based on an established formula that estimates the risk of progression to acute live failure (ALF); however, the benefits of the system for patients with severe acute liver injury (SLI) remain unclear. We have evaluated the clinical significance of the referral system for SLI patients. Patients with ALI/SLI who were consecutively and prospectively listed on the system between 2004 and 2018 were analyzed. Of the 371 ALI/SLI/ALF patients on the system, 124 satisfied the criteria for SLI; 34 of these 124 progressed to SLI after registration. Multivariate analysis using age, sex, AST, ALT, creatinine, total bilirubin, prothrombin, presence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and SLI at registration revealed that HE was associated with high mortality. Among the 23 patients who developed HE, five who progressed to SLI after registration showed an increased time to HE development compared with patients who had SLI at the time of registration. However, there was no significant difference in survival time after HE development. We concluded that early identification of SLI patients using the referral system increased the time from SLI diagnosis to HE development.