Experience with Esophageal Granular Cell Tumors: Clinical and Endoscopic Analysis of 22 Cases

The diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound for esophageal subepithelial lesions: A review

Esophageal subepithelial lesions (ESELs) encompass a variety of diseases, including leiomyoma, granular cell tumors, hemangioma, lipoma, stromal tumors, leiomyosarcoma, schwannoma, neuroendocrine tumors and more. These lesions often present asymptomatically, leading to a generally low clinical diagnosis rate. Common imaging techniques for diagnosing ESELs include conventional endoscopy, spiral computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Among these, EUS is currently regarded as one of the most accurate methods for diagnosing ESELs. In recent years, EUS has increasingly been combined with advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, submucosal saline injection, high-frequency impedance measurement, and enhanced imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce missed diagnoses. This article reviews the application and recent advancements of EUS in diagnosing esophageal submucosal lesions.

Endoscopic resection for esophageal granular cell tumors: report of 62 cases

BACKGROUND

To analyze the clinical manifestations, endoscopic features, pathological features, endoscopic resection, and prognosis of esophageal granular cell tumors (GCTs).

METHODS

The present study retrospectively analyzed and followed up the clinical data of 62 patients diagnosed with esophageal GCTs who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University between July 2007 and March 2022. The clinicopathological features, endoscopic diagnosis, and treatment experience of esophageal GCT patients were summarized.

RESULTS

Among the 62 patients with esophageal GCT, there were 34 males and 28 females, with an average age of 49.3 ± 11.7 years. Only 11 patients had symptoms, such as epigastric discomfort, regurgitation or dysphagia. One patient had multiple lesions, and the rest had single lesions, totaling 63 lesions. Most lesions (53/63) were located in the median and lower esophagus, the diameters ranged from 3 to 22 mm. The endoscopic morphology of the GCTs was molar, flat, hemispherical, or irregular submucosal protuberance. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed in 38 cases, most cases (31/38) were hypoechoic, and 32 cases were appeared as homogeneous lesions. There were no complications during or after the endoscopic operations, and the en bloc resection rate was 100%. The negative rate of microscopic incisional margin was 63.5% (40/63). No patients developed recurrence during the follow-up period. The follow-up duration was 21-197 months (100.5 months for average).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal GCT is a rare disease with no obvious symptoms and a good prognosis. Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective method of diagnosis and treatment for esophageal GCTs. A microscopic positive tumor margin may not increase the rate of recurrence.

Successful endoscopic submucosal dissection of an esophageal granular cell tumor in a pediatric patient: A case report and a therapeutic insight

Esophageal granular cell tumors (GCTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms that originate from the Schwann cells of the neural sheath in the esophageal wall. Esophageal GCTs represent approximately 2% of all GCTs. Most cases of esophageal GCT occur in adults with few cases reported in pediatric patients. Although typically benign, these tumors can occasionally exhibit malignant behavior, necessitating timely and appropriate intervention. Traditionally, surgical resection was considered for treatment, nonetheless, considering the invasive nature of such interventions, endoscopic approaches have been developed for diagnosis and treatment. Endoscopic approaches have been shown to lead to serious complications at times, such as incomplete resection or perforation. Here, we present a successful application of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of an adolescent female patient with esophageal GCT which was discovered during her prior esophagogastroduodenoscopy for vomiting.

Gastrointestinal Tract Granular Cell Tumor in the Pediatric Population: A Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND

Pediatric granular cell tumors (GCT) involving the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) are rare with limited case report/series reported to date.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective study of pediatric GIT GCT.

RESULTS

A total of 10 cases were included in the study with a median age of 13.5 years (range: 7-18 years) and were predominantly female patients (60%). In half of the patients no significant medical history was present with the remaining 5 having Crohn disease (10%), eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) (10%), Crohn disease and EoE (10%), growth hormone deficiency (10%), and aplasia cutis congenita (10%). The GCT median size was 1.3 cm (range: 1-1.6 cm) and were more commonly located in the esophagus (70%) followed by the stomach (20%) and rectum (10%). Most of the cases showed round/polygonal tumor cells with abundant granular cytoplasm, and none of the cases had nuclear atypia, increased mitotic activity, or tumor cell necrosis. None of our cases received specific therapy for GCT other than clinical follow-up, and none of the patients had evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

We present our multicenter experience with GIT GCT, all cases had a benign course. Interestingly, 4 of the esophageal GCT cases (including 2 patients with EoE) showed an eosinophil-rich esophagitis in the underlying mucosa.

Clinical outcomes of esophageal granular cell tumors with different endoscopic resection methods

Esophageal granular cell tumors (GCTs), the second most common subepithelial tumors (SETs) of the esophagus, are potentially malignant with no definite management guidelines available. We retrospectively enrolled 35 patients with endoscopically resected esophageal GCTs between December 2008 and October 2021 and evaluated the clinical outcomes from the various methods performed. Several modified endoscopic mucosal resections (EMRs) were performed for treating esophageal GCTs. Clinical and endoscopic outcomes were evaluated. Mean age of patients was 55.8 ± 8.2, with majority being men (57.1%). Mean tumor size was 7.2 ± 2.6 mm, most (80.0%) were asymptomatic and present in the distal third of the esophagus (77.1%). Endoscopic characteristics predominantly included broad-based (85.7%) and whitish-to-yellowish color changes (97.1%). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) of 82.9% of the tumors revealed homogeneous hypoechoic SETs originating from the submucosa. The five endoscopic treatment methods used were: ligation-assisted (77.1%), conventional (8.7%), cap-assisted (5.7%), and underwater (5.7%) EMRs and ESD (2.9%). Mean procedure time was 6.6 ± 2.1 min, and no procedure-associated complications were noted. The en-bloc and complete histologic resection rates were 100% and 94.3%, respectively. No recurrences were noted during follow-up, and no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of the different methods of endoscopic resection were found. Based on tumor characteristics and therapeutic outcomes, modified EMR methods can be effective and safe. However, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of the different methods of endoscopic resection.

Endoscopic resection in the treatment of intramural esophageal bronchogenic cysts: A retrospective analysis of 17 cases

BACKGROUND

Intramural esophageal bronchogenic cysts (EBCs) are rare congenital malformations. Differences in reports on the clinical features of intramural EBCs and some controversies about the treatment strategy for intramural EBCs exist.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical characteristics of intramural EBCs and evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection.

METHODS

The clinical and endoscopic features, endoscopic resection treatment, postoperative adverse events, and follow-up results of 17 patients with intramural EBCs were retrospectively studied.

RESULTS

Intramural EBCs exhibited male predominance with a male/female ratio of 58.8% (10/7) and were predominantly found in the distal esophagus. Approximately 94.1% of patients presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. All lesions were protruding masses covered by intact mucosal epithelium. The morphologies of intramural EBCs were diverse under white light endoscopy. On endoscopic ultrasonography, intramural EBCs presented as homogeneous or inhomogeneous hypoechoic or anechoic lesions. Eleven lesions originated from the muscularis propria, which underwent submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection (STER), and six lesions were from the submucosa, which underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Approximately 88.2% of patients underwent complete endoscopic resection. No serious pneumothorax, bleeding, pleural effusion, esophagotracheal fistula, or other adverse events occurred in all patients after endoscopic resection, and no cyst recurrence, metastasis, or esophageal scar stenosis was observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Intramural EBCs can be treated by digestive endoscopic surgery. STER and ESD are safe, effective, and minimally invasive resection methods.

Combination conventional endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound can differentiate between esophageal granular cell tumors and leiomyomas

Esophageal leiomyomas and granular cell tumors (GCTs) are the 2 most common subepithelial tumors found in the esophagus. We attempted to differentiate the 2 tumors using endoscopic findings and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) features. Between December 2008 and June 2021, a total of 38 esophageal GCTs and 11 esophageal leiomyomas originating from the muscularis mucosa were selected. Clinical characteristics and endoscopic features were retrospectively reviewed. Although esophageal GCTs are mainly located in the lower third of the esophagus (81.6%), esophageal leiomyomas are mainly located in the upper third of the esophagus (45.5%). Broad-based (84.2%, P = .002) and whitish-to-yellowish color changes (97.4%, P < .001) are significant endoscopic features of esophageal GCTs. The echogenicity of esophageal leiomyoma was similar to that of proper muscle echogenicity. However, the echogenicity of esophageal GCTs was hyperechoic compared to that of the proper muscle layer (90.0% vs 9.1%, respectively, P < .001). EUS revealed a clearer hyperechoic epithelial lining in the esophageal leiomyoma than in esophageal GCTs (100% vs 26.7%, respectively, P < .001). The 5 endoscopic factors (location of the lower third, broad base, whitish-to-yellowish color, hyper-echogenic, and unclear demarcated hyperechoic epithelial line) were counted to differentiate esophageal GCTs from esophageal leiomyomas. Tumors with 3 or more endoscopic factors were all esophageal GCTs. The characteristic endoscopic and EUS features of esophageal GCTs were broad-based, whitish-to-yellowish colored subepithelial tumors located in the lower third of the esophagus and hyperechoic tumor with an unclear demarcated hyperechoic epithelial line. A combination of these features can predict esophageal GCTs before endoscopic resection.

Role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal granular cell tumors

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Diagnosis and complete resection of esophageal granular cell tumors (GCTs) is an area of concern. However, articles on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic resection of esophageal granular cell tumors are few. To evaluate the role of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal granular cell tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 15 patients with esophageal granular cell tumors who underwent endoscopic ultrasound examination and endoscopic resection in our hospital was conducted. The clinical data, endoscopic ultrasound images, endoscopic treatment, pathological characteristics, postoperative complications and follow-up status of all patients were evaluated. Ten board-certified endoscopists independently evaluated the white light endoscopic images of the 15 patients (Test 1) and the endoscopic ultrasound images together with white light endoscopic images of the same patient set (Test 2).

RESULT

Female patients accounted for 53.4% of the participants. The average age at the time of diagnosis was 49.13 ± 9.31 years old. Ten lesions (66.67%) showed hypoechoic signal, four lesions (26.67%) showed hyperechoic signal and one lesion showed medium signal. The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher with Test 2(65.3% vs. 92.0%, p < .001). Complete endoscopic resection was performed in all the patients. No complications occurred in any of the patients. No esophageal stenosis, recurrence, or metastases was found in all patients during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic ultrasound images of esophageal granular cell tumors have certain characteristics that help diagnose esophageal granular cell tumors. Endoscopic resection of esophageal granular cell tumors is an effective, safe and feasible treatment method.

A case of esophageal granular cell tumor diagnosed by mucosal incision-assisted biopsy

For an esophageal submucosal mass suspicious of granular cell tumor (GCT) based on gross appearance and endoscopic ultrasound findings, a sufficient number of biopsy specimens is required for a definite diagnosis using immunohistochemical examination. When the specimen obtained by forceps biopsy is insufficient, endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is believed to be an useful alternative. However, it may be difficult to obtain an adequate amount of tumor material using EUS-FNA. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy (MIAB) is a simple method that can collect larger amounts of specimens. This procedure is helpful for physicians who encounter the problem of obtaining an adequate amount of biopsy material from esophageal tumors suspicious for GCT. We present a case of esophageal GCT that was successfully diagnosed through MIAB.