1
|
Gangwani MK, Aziz M, Aziz A, Priyanka F, Weissman S, Phan K, Dahiya DS, Ahmed Z, Sohail AH, Lee-Smith W, Kamal F, Javaid T, Nawras A, Hart B. Fresh Versus Frozen Versus Lyophilized Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Recurrent Clostridium Difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57:239-245. [PMID: 36656270 DOI: 10.1097/mcg.0000000000001777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Clostridium difficile Infection is a significant source of morbidity and mortality, which is on the rise. Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) is an alternative therapy to antibiotics with a high success rate and low relapse rate. Current data regarding the efficacy of the types of FMT used, namely fresh, frozen, and lyophilized is conflicting. Our review attempts to consolidate this data and highlight the most efficacious treatment currently available. METHODOLOGY MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, SciELO, the Korean Citation Index, and Global Index Medicus were systematically searched from inception through May 3, 2022. Studies in which patients are undergoing any form of FMT who had failed antibiotic treatment previously were included. Both pairwise (direct) and network (direct + indirect) meta-analysis were performed using a random effects model and DerSimonian-Laird approach. A frequentist approach was used for network meta-analysis. Risk differences with (RD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS A total of 8 studies, including 4 RCTs and 4 cohort studies, were included with a total of 616 patients. Fresh FMT was determined to be most successful with 93% efficacy 95% CI (0.913 to 0.999) followed by frozen with 88% efficacy 95% CI (0.857 to 0.947) and lyophilized with 83% efficacy 95% CI (0.745 to 0.910). The direct meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference between fresh and frozen group. (RD -0.051 95% CI -0.116 to 0.014 P =0.178). No significant differences were noted in frozen versus lyophilized groups with an overall trend towards Fresh FM (RD -0.061 95% CI -0.038 to 0.160 P =0.617). On network meta-analysis, when compared with fresh group, a lower recovery rate was noted with both frozen group (RD -0.06 95% CI -0.11 to 0.00 P =0.05) and lyophilized group (RD -0.16 95% CI -0.27 to -0.05 P =0.01). CONCLUSION We conclude the efficacy of Frozen and Lyophilized preparations is high with no difference in direct comparison, and the relative efficacy reduction based on network analysis is outweighed by the safety, accessibility, and practicality of Frozen or Lyophilized preparations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Muhammad Aziz
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center
| | - Abeer Aziz
- Division of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi
| | - Fnu Priyanka
- Division of Medicine, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto University, Larkana, Pakistan
| | - Simcha Weissman
- Department of Medicine, Hackensack University, Palisade Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ
| | - Khiem Phan
- Department of Medicine, Hackensack University, Palisade Medical Center, North Bergen, NJ
| | - Dushyant Singh Dahiya
- Department of Medicine, Central Michigan University College of Medicine, Saginaw, MI
| | | | - Amir Humza Sohail
- Department of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, Long Island, NY
| | - Wade Lee-Smith
- University of Toledo Libraries, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio
| | - Faisal Kamal
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Toseef Javaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center
| | - Ali Nawras
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center
| | - Benjamin Hart
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Toledo Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:8266793. [PMID: 35795291 PMCID: PMC9251102 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8266793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Objectives Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic recurrent inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging therapy that modifies the patient's gut microbiota by transplanting feces from a healthy donor to achieve disease remission. However, its efficacy and safety need to be further investigated. Methods PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases (up to 8th November 2021) were searched and literature was screened by title and abstract as well as full text. The primary outcome was clinical remission, with the clinical response as a secondary outcome. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. Results A total of 14 trials were included in this study. In terms of clinical remission, FMT had a significant effect compared to placebo (RR = 1.44, 95 CI%: 1.03 to 2.02, I2 = 38%, P=0.03), with no significant risk of study heterogeneity. Moreover, FMT led to significant results in clinical response compared to placebo with moderate between-study heterogeneity (RR = 1.34, 95 CI%: 0.92 to 1.94, I2 = 51%, P=0.12). Subgroup analysis showed a higher clinical remission for fresh fecal FMT (40.9%) than that for frozen fecal FMT (32.2%); the efficacy of gastrointestinal (GI) pretreatment, the severity of disease, route of administration, and the donor selection remain unclear and require more extensive study. Safety analysis concluded that most adverse events were mild and self-resolving. The microbiological analysis found that the patient's gut microbiota varied in favor of the donor, with increased flora diversity and species richness. Conclusion FMT is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated therapy. Studies have found that fresh fecal microbiota transplant can increase clinical remission rates. However, more randomized controlled trials and long-term follow-ups are needed to assess its long-term effectiveness and safety.
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicholson MR, Alexander E, Ballal S, Davidovics Z, Docktor M, Dole M, Gisser JM, Goyal A, Hourigan SK, Jensen MK, Kaplan JL, Kellermayer R, Kelsen JR, Kennedy MA, Khanna S, Knackstedt ED, Lentine J, Lewis JD, Michail S, Mitchell PD, Oliva-Hemker M, Patton T, Queliza K, Sidhu S, Solomon AB, Suskind DL, Weatherly M, Werlin S, de Zoeten EF, Kahn SA. Efficacy and Outcomes of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J Crohns Colitis 2022; 16:768-777. [PMID: 34788420 PMCID: PMC9228903 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] are disproportionally affected by recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection [rCDI]. Although faecal microbiota transplantation [FMT] has been used with good efficacy in adults with IBD, little is known about outcomes associated with FMT in paediatric IBD. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of FMT at 20 paediatric centres in the USA from March 2012 to March 2020. Children with and without IBD were compared with determined differences in the efficacy of FMT for rCDI. In addition, children with IBD with and without a successful outcome were compared with determined predictors of success. Safety data and IBD-specific outcomes were obtained. RESULTS A total of 396 paediatric patients, including 148 with IBD, were included. Children with IBD were no less likely to have a successful first FMT then the non-IBD affected cohort [76% vs 81%, p = 0.17]. Among children with IBD, patients were more likely to have a successful FMT if they received FMT with fresh stool [p = 0.03], were without diarrhoea prior to FMT [p = 0.03], or had a shorter time from rCDI diagnosis until FMT [p = 0.04]. Children with a failed FMT were more likely to have clinically active IBD post-FMT [p = 0.002] and 19 [13%] patients had an IBD-related hospitalisation in the 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings from this large US multicentre cohort, the efficacy of FMT for the treatment of rCDI did not differ in children with IBD. Failed FMT among children with IBD was possibly related to the presence of clinically active IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maribeth R Nicholson
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Erin Alexander
- Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sonia Ballal
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Zev Davidovics
- Department of Pediatrics, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Michael Docktor
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael Dole
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jonathan M Gisser
- Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Alka Goyal
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Suchitra K Hourigan
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Specialists of Virginia, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - M Kyle Jensen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jess L Kaplan
- Department of Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard Kellermayer
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, USDA Children's Nutrition and Research Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Judith R Kelsen
- Department of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Melissa A Kennedy
- Department of Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sahil Khanna
- Department of Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Elizabeth D Knackstedt
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Department of Pediatrics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jennifer Lentine
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jeffery D Lewis
- Children's Center for Digestive Healthcare at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Sonia Michail
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul D Mitchell
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Maria Oliva-Hemker
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tiffany Patton
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Karen Queliza
- Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, USDA Children's Nutrition and Research Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarah Sidhu
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Aliza B Solomon
- Department of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - David L Suskind
- Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital and the University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Madison Weatherly
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven Werlin
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin and Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Edwin F de Zoeten
- Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Stacy A Kahn
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|