1
|
Zheng J, Wang Y, Li L, Chen M, Chen R, Zhang S. Platelet-to-lymphocyte percentage ratio for assessing disease activity and predicting therapeutic outcomes in ulcerative colitis. Int Immunopharmacol 2024; 137:112506. [PMID: 38914032 DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 06/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Disease activity assessment and treatment outcome prediction are crucial in the patient management of ulcerative colitis (UC); yet the significance of platelet-to-lymphocyte percentage ratio (PLpR) remains unknown, which was investigated in this study. METHODS We used data from three clinical trials: ACT 1, PURSUIT, and UNIFI. In total, 7,614 endoscopic procedures and 1,365 patients were included for assessing severity and predicting outcome, respectively. The primary outcome was endoscopic remission, defined as a Mayo endoscopic score of 0. The diagnostic capacity of PLpR was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) while multivariable logistic regression was employed to assess the prognostic power of PLpR. RESULTS PLpR showed higher AUCs than C-reactive protein in identifying endoscopic remission (P < 0.001) and improvement (P < 0.001). Besides, combining PLpR with fecal calprotectin enhanced the power to distinguish disease activity. In therapeutic outcome analyses, higher PLpR level indicated worse long-term outcomes. PLpR ≥ 1016.7 predicted a lower likelihood of endoscopic remission (OR: 0.50 [95 % CI: 0.39-0.65]; P < 0.001), endoscopic improvement (OR: 0.45 [95 % CI: 0.36-0.57]; P < 0.001), clinical remission (OR: 0.50 [95 % CI: 0.39-0.62]; P < 0.001), histologic improvement (OR: 0.50 [95 % CI: 0.31-0.79]; P = 0.004), and histologic-endoscopic mucosal improvement (OR: 0.42 [95 % CI: 0.27-0.66]; P < 0.001). Moreover, PLpR added the prognostic value to C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, clinical and endoscopic scores to predict long-term outcomes. CONCLUSION PLpR could be a promising biomarker for monitoring disease activity and predicting long-term therapeutic outcomes in UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jieqi Zheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Minhu Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rirong Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Shenghong Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Guangxi Hospital Division of The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Nanning, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mestrovic A, Perkovic N, Bozic D, Kumric M, Vilovic M, Bozic J. Precision Medicine in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Spotlight on Emerging Molecular Biomarkers. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1520. [PMID: 39062093 PMCID: PMC11274502 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12071520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 06/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) remain challenging in terms of understanding their causes and in terms of diagnosing, treating, and monitoring patients. Modern diagnosis combines biomarkers, imaging, and endoscopic methods. Common biomarkers like CRP and fecal calprotectin, while invaluable tools, have limitations and are not entirely specific to IBD. The limitations of existing markers and the invasiveness of endoscopic procedures highlight the need to discover and implement new markers. With an ideal biomarker, we could predict the risk of disease development, as well as the possibility of response to a particular therapy, which would be significant in elucidating the pathogenesis of the disease. Recent research in the fields of machine learning, proteomics, epigenetics, and gut microbiota provides further insight into the pathogenesis of the disease and is also revealing new biomarkers. New markers, such as BAFF, PGE-MUM, oncostatin M, microRNA panels, αvβ6 antibody, and S100A12 from stool, are increasingly being identified, with αvβ6 antibody and oncostatin M being potentially close to being presented into clinical practice. However, the specificity of certain markers still remains problematic. Furthermore, the use of expensive and less accessible technology for detecting new markers, such as microRNAs, represents a limitation for widespread use in clinical practice. Nevertheless, the need for non-invasive, comprehensive markers is becoming increasingly important regarding the complexity of treatment and overall management of IBD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Mestrovic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 2, 21000 Split, Croatia; (A.M.); (N.P.); (D.B.)
| | - Nikola Perkovic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 2, 21000 Split, Croatia; (A.M.); (N.P.); (D.B.)
| | - Dorotea Bozic
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Split, Spinciceva 2, 21000 Split, Croatia; (A.M.); (N.P.); (D.B.)
| | - Marko Kumric
- Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia;
- Laboratory for Cardiometabolic Research, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Marino Vilovic
- Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia;
- Laboratory for Cardiometabolic Research, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia
| | - Josko Bozic
- Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia;
- Laboratory for Cardiometabolic Research, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2A, 21000 Split, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ananthakrishnan AN, Adler J, Chachu KA, Nguyen NH, Siddique SM, Weiss JM, Sultan S, Velayos FS, Cohen BL, Singh S. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Role of Biomarkers for the Management of Crohn's Disease. Gastroenterology 2023; 165:1367-1399. [PMID: 37981354 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Biomarkers are used frequently for evaluation and monitoring of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of biomarkers for the management of CD. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to formulate patient-centered clinical questions and review evidence on the performance of fecal calprotectin, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), and Endoscopic Healing Index in patients with established CD who were asymptomatic, had symptoms of varying severity, or were in surgically induced remission. Biomarker performance was assessed against the gold standard of endoscopic activity, defined as a Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease ≥3. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Evidence-to-Decision framework to develop recommendations for use of biomarkers in various settings. Implementation considerations were formulated for each recommendation to inform clinical practice. RESULTS The guideline panel made 11 conditional recommendations. In patients with CD in symptomatic remission, the panel suggests use of a biomarker- and symptom-based monitoring strategy over symptoms alone. In patients in symptomatic remission, a fecal calprotectin <150 μg/g and normal CRP rules out active inflammation, avoiding endoscopic evaluation for assessment of disease activity. However, elevated biomarkers in this setting merit confirmation with endoscopy before treatment adjustment. In patients with CD with mild symptoms, neither normal nor elevated biomarkers alone are sufficiently accurate to determine endoscopic activity. In patients with CD with moderate to severe symptoms, elevated fecal calprotectin or serum CRP suggests endoscopic activity, precluding routine endoscopic assessment for disease activity. In patients with CD in surgically induced remission in low-risk patients on pharmacologic prophylaxis, a normal fecal calprotectin reliably rules out endoscopic recurrence. In other postoperative settings, the panel suggests endoscopic assessment for establishing postoperative recurrence. CONCLUSIONS In patients with CD, fecal calprotectin and serum CRP can inform disease management in both asymptomatic and symptomatic disease. Discordance between symptom assessment and biomarker value may merit endoscopic evaluation for confirmation of status of disease activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jeremy Adler
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Karen A Chachu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Nghia H Nguyen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Riverside, California
| | - Shazia M Siddique
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Evidence-Based Practice, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer M Weiss
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Fernando S Velayos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California
| | - Benjamin L Cohen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dolinger MT. The Role of Noninvasive Surrogates of Inflammation in Monitoring Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Old and the New. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2023; 52:497-515. [PMID: 37543396 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2023.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
Effectiveness of limited available therapies for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease has reached stagnation. Previous non-invasive monitoring strategies have relied upon cumbersome tools to evaluate clinical symptoms and biochemical markers that do not reflect endoscopic activity or respond quickly to treatments. Novel, patient-centric, and highly accurate, monitoring strategies with a focus on intestinal ultrasound for a direct, precise monitoring of activity to achieve disease modification are now possible. Ultimately, research on the optimal tight control monitoring strategies, individualized to each pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patient, are in development and offer a hope to potential therapeutic ceiling breakthrough on the horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Todd Dolinger
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holmer AK, Boland BS, Singh S, Neill J, Le H, Miralles A, Collins AE, Sandborn WJ, Dulai PS. A Serum Biomarker Panel Can Accurately Identify Mucosal Ulcers in Patients With Crohn's Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2023; 29:555-562. [PMID: 35704691 PMCID: PMC10069658 DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Endoscopic Healing Index (EHI) is a serum biomarker panel that can predict endoscopic inflammation in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS Paired serum samples with endoscopies from adult patients participating in a prospective biobank (June 2014 to December 2018) were analyzed post hoc. Diagnostic performance for EHI was assessed against the individual parameters of the Simple Endoscopic Score for CD using previously identified cutoffs. Confounders for EHI performance were identified using logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 205 CD patients were included (50% male, median age 37 years). An EHI of 20 points was sensitive for ruling out any ulcers (85%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 77%-91%) and large (5-20 mm) or very large (>20 mm) ulcers (93%; 95% CI, 84%-97%). An EHI of 50 points was specific for ruling in any ulcers (86%; 95% CI, 76%-92%) and large or very large ulcers (87%; 95% CI, 79%-92%). After accounting for total extent of inflamed mucosa, strictures, and disease location, each 20-point increase in EHI was associated with a 1.7-fold increased probability for the presence of large or very large ulcers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6). CONCLUSIONS The EHI was independently associated with ulcer size and accurately identified large or very large ulcers. A cutoff of 50 points can reliably rule in mucosal ulcers and allow for treatment adjustment. A cutoff of 20 points can reliably rule out mucosal ulcers and signal completion of treatment adjustment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariela K Holmer
- Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brigid S Boland
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Neill
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Helen Le
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ara Miralles
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Angelina E Collins
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - William J Sandborn
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Parambir S Dulai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rohatinsky N, Zelinsky S, Dolinger M, Christensen B, Wilkens R, Radford S, Dubinsky M, Novak K. Crohn's Disease Patient Experiences and Preferences With Disease Monitoring: An International Qualitative Study. CROHN'S & COLITIS 360 2023; 5:otad012. [PMID: 36937136 PMCID: PMC10022708 DOI: 10.1093/crocol/otad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Strategies incorporating objective disease monitoring in Crohn's disease (CD), beyond clinical symptoms are important to improve patient outcomes. Little evidence exists to explore patient understanding of CD treatment goals, nor preferences and experiences with monitoring options. This qualitative study aimed to explore patient experiences and preferences of CD monitoring to inform monitoring strategies, improve patient engagement, and optimize a patient-centered approach to care. Methods This study used a patient-oriented, qualitative descriptive design. Convenience and snowball sampling were used to recruit adult participants diagnosed with CD who had experience with at least 2 types of disease monitoring. Online focus groups were conducted and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results This international study included 37 participants from Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, and the United States. Overall, participants preferred more noninvasive types of monitoring [eg, intestinal ultrasound (IUS)] but were willing to undergo more invasive monitoring (eg, colonoscopy) if required. To improve disease monitoring, participants wanted increased access to IUS, establishment of a patient-centered interdisciplinary team and access to information and self-testing. Participants identified challenges with communication between patients and providers and stressed the importance of participating in shared decision making and being equal team members in their care. Conclusions It is imperative to incorporate patient-driven preferences into how we can best structure monitoring strategies, to ensure equitable access to those preferred modalities and embrace a shared decision-making approach to disease management in CD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noelle Rohatinsky
- Address correspondence to: Noelle Rohatinsky, RN, PhD, College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, 104 Clinic Place, 4342 Health Sciences, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5E5 ()
| | | | - Michael Dolinger
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Britt Christensen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital and University of Melbourne Medicine, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rune Wilkens
- Gastrounit, Division of Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Copenhagen Centre for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children, Adolescents, and Adults, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Shellie Radford
- Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre and Clinical Research Facility, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Marla Dubinsky
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Kerri Novak
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Singh S, Ananthakrishnan AN, Nguyen NH, Cohen BL, Velayos FS, Weiss JM, Sultan S, Siddique SM, Adler J, Chachu KA. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Role of Biomarkers for the Management of Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterology 2023; 164:344-372. [PMID: 36822736 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Biomarkers are used frequently for noninvasive monitoring and treatment decision making in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) guideline is intended to support practitioners in decisions about the use of biomarkers for the management of UC. METHODS A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, and conduct an evidence synthesis on the clinical performance of serum C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin as biomarkers of disease activity in patients with established UC in symptomatic remission or with active symptoms. The guideline panel used the Evidence-to-Decision framework to develop recommendations for the use of biomarkers for monitoring and management of UC and provided implementation considerations for clinical practice. RESULTS The guideline panel made 7 conditional recommendations. In patients with UC in symptomatic remission, the panel suggests the use of a biomarker- and symptom-based monitoring strategy over a symptom-based monitoring strategy. For patients in symptomatic remission, the panel suggests using fecal calprotectin <150 μg/g, normal fecal lactoferrin, and/or normal CRP to rule out active inflammation and avoid routine endoscopic assessment of disease. In patients with UC with moderate to severe symptoms, the panel suggests using fecal calprotectin >150 μg/g, elevated fecal lactoferrin, or elevated CRP to inform treatment decisions and avoid routine endoscopic assessment of disease. However, in patients in symptomatic remission but elevated biomarkers, and in patients with moderate to severe symptoms with normal biomarkers, the panel suggests endoscopic assessment of disease to inform treatment decisions. In patients with UC with mild symptoms, the panel suggests endoscopic assessment of disease activity to inform treatment decisions. The panel identified the use of a biomarker-based monitoring strategy over an endoscopy-based monitoring strategy as a knowledge gap. The panel also proposed key implementation considerations for optimal use of biomarkers, and identified areas for future research. CONCLUSIONS In patients with UC, noninvasive biomarkers, including fecal calprotectin, fecal lactoferrin, and serum CRP can inform disease monitoring and management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddharth Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nghia H Nguyen
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Benjamin L Cohen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Fernando S Velayos
- Division of Gastroenterology, Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, California
| | - Jennifer M Weiss
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Shahnaz Sultan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shazia M Siddique
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Evidence-Based Practice, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeremy Adler
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, CS Mott Children's Hospital, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Susan B. Meister Child Health Evaluation and Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Karen A Chachu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patient Perspectives and Expectations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67:1956-1974. [PMID: 34021425 PMCID: PMC8139371 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07025-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this systematic review, our objective was to assess inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patient preferences and perspectives relating to their disease diagnosis, treatment, knowledge needs and telemedicine. METHODS This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four databases and conference proceedings were searched between January 1, 1980, and May 1, 2020. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Standards for reporting qualitative research checklist. RESULTS Our search identified 240 citations and 52 studies met the inclusion criteria. The major expectations of the patients are symptomatic and pain control, quality of life and normal endoscopy. Patients' main concerns are access to information and healthcare, and shared decision making. At the time of diagnosis, patients expressed a greater need for knowledge about their IBD, preferentially by their treating gastroenterologist. The main treatment expectations in active disease are efficacy, safety and convenience. Patients are willing to accept relatively high risks of complications from medical therapy to avoid a permanent ostomy and to achieve durable remission. Patients are more interested in disease monitoring, research and development during the time of remission. Telemedicine and self-management with supervised e-health tools are feasible and acceptable amongst patients with IBD. CONCLUSION This systematic review demonstrates that patients with IBD expect more information about their disease process, shared decision making and symptom control. Further research is needed to help align patient and physician expectations in order to improve the quality of care provided to patients with IBD.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tontini GE, Prada A, Sferrazza S, Ciprandi G, Vecchi M. The unmet needs for identifying the ideal bowel preparation. JGH OPEN 2021; 5:1135-1141. [PMID: 34621998 PMCID: PMC8485412 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.12653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Colonoscopy, since it was first employed over 60 years ago, is now the gold standard method for visualizing the mucosa of the colon, but should be of good quality. Many factors affect quality, including the type of health service organization, type of facility, staff, equipment, patient characteristics, and bowel preparation (BP). The adequacy of bowel cleansing is critical, but, unfortunately, may be inadequate in up to one‐third of procedures. The current article will present and discuss the main BPs and their drawbacks, which include patient‐dependent and procedure‐dependent factors. Cleansing quality depends on the ease/complexity of solution preparation, volume, taste, and timing of consumption. Consequently, important positive factors include simple instructions, easy preparation of the solution, low volume, pleasant taste, short drinking time (e.g. <30 min), and splitting the dose between the evening before and the morning of the colonoscopy (or even better, only one dose in the early morning to avoid night‐time problems), and short onset of action. The BP solution must also be safe with negligible side effects. Furthermore, a positive experience supports patient willingness to repeat the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian E Tontini
- Department of Internal Medicine Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy
| | - Alberto Prada
- Digestive Endoscopy Istituto Auxologico Italiano Milan Italy
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Area Chirurgia Specialistica Santa Chiara Hospital Trento Italy
| | - Giorgio Ciprandi
- Outpatient Department, Casa di Cura Villa Montallegro Genoa Italy
| | - Maurizio Vecchi
- Department of Internal Medicine Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Selinger CP, Rafferty H, Mooney P, Donnellan C. Utility of Fecal Calprotectin in Routine Clinical Practice Is Impaired by Poor Sample Return Rates. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:3209-3210. [PMID: 33164147 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06694-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Selinger
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Bexley Wing, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK.
| | - Helen Rafferty
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Bexley Wing, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Peter Mooney
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Bexley Wing, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Clare Donnellan
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James University Hospital, Bexley Wing, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
A Microsimulation Model to Determine the Cost-Effectiveness of Treat-to-Target Strategies for Crohn's Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116:1709-1719. [PMID: 34587127 PMCID: PMC8481677 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cost-effectiveness of biomarker- vs endoscopy-based treat-to-target monitoring in Crohn's disease (CD) is unknown. METHODS A microsimulation model for CD was built to simulate biomarker (fecal calprotectin) vs endoscopy-based monitoring in a treat-to-target fashion. Published literature in combination with patient-level data from phase 3 clinical trials and population estimates for therapeutic drug monitoring were used to generate transition probabilities, costs, and utilities. Tracker variables were used to modify downstream probabilities and outcomes based on previous exposures, response patterns, and disease-related complications or surgery history. The primary outcome was cost-effectiveness over a 5-year horizon at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/quality-adjusted life-year. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses in addition to multiple 1-, 2-, and 3-way microsimulation sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS In the base-case model, the endoscopy-based monitoring strategy dominated the biomarker-based monitoring strategy over a 5-year horizon. Over shorter periods of observation, the biomarker-based monitoring strategy became progressively more cost-effective, with cost-effectiveness achieved for this strategy over a 1-year horizon. Therapeutic drug monitoring did not influence short-term cost-effectiveness of biomarker-based monitoring. Once in endoscopic remission, continued biomarker-based vs endoscopy-based monitoring was more cost-effective. A hybrid biomarker-endoscopy-based monitoring strategy dominated the endoscopy-based monitoring strategy over a 5-year horizon. The strongest determinants for cost-effectiveness were cost of colonoscopy and diagnostic performance of fecal calprotectin. DISCUSSION The most cost-effective approach for treat-to-target monitoring in CD is up-front biomarker-based monitoring followed by endoscopy-based monitoring if not in endoscopic remission by 1 year and then returning to biomarker-based monitoring once in endoscopic remission.
Collapse
|