Poor Concordance Between Clinical Activity and Endoscopic Severity in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: Before and After Induction Therapy

Association of endoscopic findings and histological alterations in pediatric Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by chronic, transmural, and relapsing inflammation that can affect any segment of the gastrointestinal tract, from the oral cavity to the anus (1). The clinicopathological association of various endoscopic abnormalities in CD is under study. An analytical study was conducted on patients under the age of 15 who underwent esophagoscopy and/or colonoscopy for suspected IBD at a pediatric hospital between 2015 and 2022 (Reg. No. 3318-0000206). Subjects with normal histopathological findings and those with a histological diagnosis of CD were included. The prevalence of different endoscopic alterations and their association with histopathological abnormalities were compared between patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and those with normal histology (NCD). Of the 502 endoscopies performed during this period, 22 subjects with CD and 14 children with NCD were included. Endoscopic normality, defined as the absence of mucosal abnormalities, was higher among NCD patients (43%), while the most prevalent macroscopic abnormality in CD patients was the presence of ulcers.

[Value of different endoscopic scoring methods in assessing disease activity in pediatric Crohn's disease]

OBJECTIVES

To explore the value of different endoscopic scoring methods in assessing disease activity in pediatric Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

A total of 70 children diagnosed with CD at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from January 2018 to January 2023 were included. Clinical disease activity was assessed using the Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI), while different endoscopic scores were assigned based on endoscopic findings. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to evaluate the correlation between each endoscopic scoring method and PCDAI as well as laboratory indicators. Kappa test was used to assess the consistency between colonoscopy/capsule endoscopy scoring methods and PCDAI in determining CD activity. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of laboratory indicators in predicting endoscopic activity.

RESULTS

The PCDAI score showed a moderate positive correlation with the scores of Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) (rs=0.696, P<0.01), Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD) (rs=0.680, P<0.01), Lewis Score (rs=0.540, P<0.01), and Capsule Endoscopy-Crohn's Disease Index (CE-CD) (rs=0.502, P<0.01). The consistency between all endoscopic scoring methods and PCDAI in determining CD activity was poor (Kappa=0.069-0.226). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), hematocrit (HCT), and serum albumin (ALB) levels showed a moderate correlation with the PCDAI score and the scores of colonoscopy scoring methods (CDEIS and SES-CD) (|rs|=0.581-0.725, P<0.01), but a weak correlation with the scores of capsule scoring methods (P<0.05). ESR and CRP had higher area under the curve (AUC) values in predicting disease activity based on PCDAI, CDEIS, SES-CD, and Lewis Score compared to HCT and ALB (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CDEIS, SES-CD, Lewis Score, and CE-CD can be used to evaluate disease activity in pediatric CD, but they do not fully correspond with disease activity assessed by PCDAI. Elevated levels of ESR and CRP can predict clinical and endoscopic disease activity in children with CD.

The Role of Noninvasive Surrogates of Inflammation in Monitoring Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Old and the New

Effectiveness of limited available therapies for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease has reached stagnation. Previous non-invasive monitoring strategies have relied upon cumbersome tools to evaluate clinical symptoms and biochemical markers that do not reflect endoscopic activity or respond quickly to treatments. Novel, patient-centric, and highly accurate, monitoring strategies with a focus on intestinal ultrasound for a direct, precise monitoring of activity to achieve disease modification are now possible. Ultimately, research on the optimal tight control monitoring strategies, individualized to each pediatric inflammatory bowel disease patient, are in development and offer a hope to potential therapeutic ceiling breakthrough on the horizon.

Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscopy and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Children With Crohn's Disease: Manifestations and the Value of Assessing Disease Activity

Objective: To investigate the value of magnetically guided capsule endoscopy (MGCE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) in assessing the activity of pediatric Crohn's disease. Methods: Clinical data from 82 subjects with pediatric Crohn's disease, who underwent MGCE and MRE from October 2018 to March 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Pairwise comparisons of several indexes, including MaRIA, CECDAI, PCDAI, and SES-CD, were performed by Spearman's rank correlation test and kappa consistency analysis. CECDAI and MaRIA values predicted whether patients were moderately or severely active (PCDAI ≥30) clinically by logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) quantified the evaluation value of moderate to severe activity of pediatric CD. Results: In judging the severity of CD in the small intestine, the correlation coefficient between CECDAI and MaRIA was 0.406 (p < 0.05), and the kappa value of the consistency analysis was 0.299 (p < 0.05). MaRIA was weakly correlated with PCDAI (r = 0.254, p < 0.05), and they were weakly consistent in assessing the activity of Crohn's disease (kappa = 0.135, p < 0.05). For predicting clinically moderate to severe activity, the fitted AUC based on CECDAI and MarRIA was 0.917, which was higher than applying a single parameter (CECDAI = 0.725, MarRIA = 0.899, respectively). MaRIA and serum albumin were significantly and negatively correlated (r = -1.064, p < 0.05). The consistency of the detection rate of gastric ulcers by MGCE and gastroscopy was moderate (kappa = 0.586, p < 0.05), and the detection rate of ulcers in the terminal ileum between MGCE and colonoscopy showed high consistency (kappa = 0.609, p < 0.05). Conclusions: MGCE and MRE are valuable, non-invasive methods for evaluating small bowel lesions in children with CD. The combined application of MGCE and MRE can better characterize the disease activity.

Assessing disease activity using the pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index: Can we use subjective or objective parameters alone?

BACKGROUND

The pediatric Crohn’s disease activity index (PCDAI) is used as a standard tool to assess disease activity in clinical trials for pediatric Crohn’s disease.

AIM

To examine which items on the PCDAI drive assessment of disease activity, and how subgroups of subjective and objective items reflect change in disease state over time.

METHODS

Selective raw data from three prospectively collected datasets were combined, including 703 children with full PCDAI data at baseline, at 3-mo (Q1, n = 670), and 1-year (Q4, n = 474). Change in individual PCDAI scores from baseline to Q1 and to Q4 were examined using the non-weighted PCDAI.

RESULTS

Abdominal pain, well-being, weight, and stooling had the highest change scores over time. Objective indicators including albumin, abdominal exam, and height velocity followed. Change scores for well-being and abdominal exam did not explain significant variance at Q1 but were significant predictors at Q4 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05). Subjective and objective subgroups of items predicted less variance (18% and 22%) on total PCDAI scores at Q1 and Q4 compared to the full PCDAI, or a composite scale (both 32%) containing significant predictors.

CONCLUSION

Although subjective items on the PCDAI change the most over time, the full PCDAI or a smaller composite of items including a combination of subjective and objective components classifies disease activity better than a subgroup of either subjective or objective items alone. Reliance on subjective or objective items as stand-alone proxies for disease activity measurement could result in misclassification of disease state.