1
|
Mullish BH, Merrick B, Quraishi MN, Bak A, Green CA, Moore DJ, Porter RJ, Elumogo NT, Segal JP, Sharma N, Marsh B, Kontkowski G, Manzoor SE, Hart AL, Settle C, Keller JJ, Hawkey P, Iqbal TH, Goldenberg SD, Williams HRT. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and other potential indications: second edition of joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. Gut 2024; 73:1052-1075. [PMID: 38609165 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin H Mullish
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Blair Merrick
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mohammed Nabil Quraishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - Aggie Bak
- Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - Christopher A Green
- Department of Infectious Diseases & Tropical Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David J Moore
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Robert J Porter
- Department of Microbiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospitals, Barrack Road, UK
| | - Ngozi T Elumogo
- Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - Jonathan P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Naveen Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - Belinda Marsh
- Lay representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - Graziella Kontkowski
- Lay representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
- C.diff support, London, UK
| | - Susan E Manzoor
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - Ailsa L Hart
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Josbert J Keller
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Hawkey
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Public Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tariq H Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - Simon D Goldenberg
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Horace R T Williams
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mullish BH, Merrick B, Quraishi MN, Bak A, Green CA, Moore DJ, Porter RJ, Elumogo NT, Segal JP, Sharma N, Marsh B, Kontkowski G, Manzoor SE, Hart AL, Settle C, Keller JJ, Hawkey P, Iqbal TH, Goldenberg SD, Williams HRT. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection and other potential indications: second edition of joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. J Hosp Infect 2024; 148:189-219. [PMID: 38609760 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B H Mullish
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B Merrick
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK
| | - M N Quraishi
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - A Bak
- Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - C A Green
- Department of Infectious Diseases & Tropical Medicine, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK; School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D J Moore
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - R J Porter
- Department of Microbiology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospitals, Barrack Road, UK
| | - N T Elumogo
- Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK; Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - J P Segal
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - N Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - B Marsh
- Lay Representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK
| | - G Kontkowski
- Lay Representative for FMT Working Party, Healthcare Infection Society, London, UK; C.diff support, London, UK
| | - S E Manzoor
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK
| | - A L Hart
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Gastroenterology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Unit, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, Middlesex, UK
| | - C Settle
- South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK
| | - J J Keller
- Department of Gastroenterology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, The Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - P Hawkey
- Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Public Health Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - T H Iqbal
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Microbiome Treatment Centre, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, London, UK
| | - S D Goldenberg
- Centre for Clinical Infection and Diagnostics Research, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - H R T Williams
- Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peery AF, Kelly CR, Kao D, Vaughn BP, Lebwohl B, Singh S, Imdad A, Altayar O. AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Fecal Microbiota-Based Therapies for Select Gastrointestinal Diseases. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:409-434. [PMID: 38395525 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Fecal microbiota-based therapies include conventional fecal microbiota transplant and US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, fecal microbiota live-jslm and fecal microbiota spores live-brpk. The American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) developed this guideline to provide recommendations on the use of fecal microbiota-based therapies in adults with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection; severe to fulminant C difficile infection; inflammatory bowel diseases, including pouchitis; and irritable bowel syndrome. METHODS The guideline was developed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, and conduct an evidence synthesis. The guideline panel used the Evidence-to-Decision framework to develop recommendations for the use of fecal microbiota-based therapies in the specified gastrointestinal conditions and provided implementation considerations for clinical practice. RESULTS The guideline panel made 7 recommendations. In immunocompetent adults with recurrent C difficile infection, the AGA suggests select use of fecal microbiota-based therapies on completion of standard of care antibiotics to prevent recurrence. In mildly or moderately immunocompromised adults with recurrent C difficile infection, the AGA suggests select use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant. In severely immunocompromised adults, the AGA suggests against the use of any fecal microbiota-based therapies to prevent recurrent C difficile. In adults hospitalized with severe or fulminant C difficile not responding to standard of care antibiotics, the AGA suggests select use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant. The AGA suggests against the use of conventional fecal microbiota transplant as treatment for inflammatory bowel diseases or irritable bowel syndrome, except in the context of clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS Fecal microbiota-based therapies are effective therapy to prevent recurrent C difficile in select patients. Conventional fecal microbiota transplant is an adjuvant treatment for select adults hospitalized with severe or fulminant C difficile infection not responding to standard of care antibiotics. Fecal microbiota transplant cannot yet be recommended in other gastrointestinal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne F Peery
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Colleen R Kelly
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Dina Kao
- University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | - Osama Altayar
- Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vongsavath T, Rahmani R, Tun KM, Manne V. The Use of Fecal Microbiota Transplant in Overcoming and Modulating Resistance to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Patients with Skin Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:499. [PMID: 38339251 PMCID: PMC10854771 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
While immune checkpoint inhibitors have evolved into the standard of care for advanced melanoma, 40-50% of melanoma cases progress while on therapies. The relationship between bacterium and carcinogenesis is well founded, such as in H. pylori in gastric cancers, and Fusobacterium in colorectal cancers. This interplay between dysbiosis and carcinogenesis questions whether changes in the microbiome could affect treatment. Thus, FMT may find utility in modifying the efficacy of anti-PD-1. This review aims to examine the use of FMT in treatment-resistant melanoma. A literature search was performed using the keywords "fecal microbiota transplant" and "skin cancer". Studies were reviewed for inclusion criteria and quality and in the final stage, and three studies were included. Overall objective responses were reported in 65% of patients who were able to achieve CR, and 45% who achieved PR. Clinical benefit rate of combined CR/PR with stable disease greater or equal to 6 months was 75%. Reported objective responses found durable stable disease lasting 12 months. Overall survival was 7 months, and overall PRS was 3 months. As for the evaluation of safety, many patients reported grade 1-2 FMT related AE. Only following the administration of anti-PD-1 therapy were there a grade 3 or higher AE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahne Vongsavath
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA; (R.R.)
| | - Rodd Rahmani
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA; (R.R.)
| | - Kyaw Min Tun
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA; (R.R.)
| | - Vignan Manne
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ciernikova S, Sevcikova A, Drgona L, Mego M. Modulating the gut microbiota by probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation: An emerging trend in cancer patient care. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2023; 1878:188990. [PMID: 37742728 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Treatment resistance, together with acute and late adverse effects, represents critical issues in the management of cancer patients. Promising results from preclinical and clinical research underline the emerging trend of a microbiome-based approach in oncology. Favorable bacterial species and higher gut diversity are associated with increased treatment efficacy, mainly in chemo- and immunotherapy. On the other hand, alterations in the composition and activity of gut microbial communities are linked to intestinal dysbiosis and contribute to high treatment-induced toxicity. In this Review, we provide an overview of studies concerning gut microbiota modulation in patients with solid and hematologic malignancies with a focus on probiotics, prebiotics, postbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation. Targeting the gut microbiome might bring clinical benefits and improve patient outcomes. However, a deeper understanding of mechanisms and large clinical trials concerning microbiome and immunological profiling is warranted to identify safe and effective ways to incorporate microbiota-based interventions in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sona Ciernikova
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia.
| | - Aneta Sevcikova
- Cancer Research Institute, Biomedical Research Center of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Lubos Drgona
- Department of Oncohematology, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Michal Mego
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University and National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Warraich F, Sohail SH, Knee A, Smith J, Schlecht H, Skiest D. Factors Associated With Fecal Microbiota Transplant Failure in the Treatment of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e45118. [PMID: 37842346 PMCID: PMC10569438 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a major cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Recurrences following treatment are common. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a therapeutic intervention in which stool from a healthy donor is administered to a patient with recurrent CDI. Studies to date of predictors of FMT failure have primarily included inpatients. In this study, we aimed to describe FMT failure rates within one year of FMT and evaluate factors associated with FMT failure. Methodology We conducted an exploratory retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent outpatient FMT at a single tertiary care center in Western Massachusetts from December 2014 through September 2018. We collected patient data including demographics, CDI-related factors, and FMT-related factors. FMT failure was defined as non-response or recurrence of diarrhea, associated with positive stool C. difficile toxin or polymerase chain reaction. Unadjusted relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals for factors associated with FMT failure were estimated using log-binomial regression. Results A total of 92 patients were included with a mean age of 64 years. CDI severity was mild or moderate in 73% and severe or fulminant in 27%. The most common FMT indication was recurrent CDI in 76% of patients. FMT failure occurred in 25 of 92 (27%) patients, with half occurring within 11 days. Factors associated with FMT failure were active malignancy (RR = 2.56), prior hospitalizations (RR = 2.42), and receipt of non-CDI antibiotics within six months of FMT (RR = 2.80). We did not observe strong associations for risk of FMT failure with age ≥65, sex, use of proton pump inhibitors or H2 receptor agonists, history of colectomy, immunosuppression, history of malignancy, diabetes, appendectomy, CDI severity, or probiotic use. Conclusions Active malignancy, prior CDI hospitalizations, and non-CDI antibiotics within six months before FMT were associated with FMT failure in the outpatient setting. Knowledge of the above factors may help inform shared decision-making with patients at risk for FMT failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Warraich
- Internal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA
| | - Syed H Sohail
- Internal Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA
| | - Alexander Knee
- Office of Research/Epidemiology/Biostatistics Research Core, University of Massachusetts Chan Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA
| | - Jacob Smith
- Infectious Disease, University of Massachusetts Chan Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA
| | - Hans Schlecht
- Infectious Disease, University of Massachusetts Chan Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA
| | - Daniel Skiest
- Infectious Disease, University of Massachusetts Chan Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dong W, Zheng J, Huang Y, Tan H, Yang S, Zhang Z, Liang X, Liu H, Zeng G, Xu H, Jiang X, Zhong W. Sodium butyrate treatment and fecal microbiota transplantation provide relief from ulcerative colitis-induced prostate enlargement. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12:1037279. [PMID: 36389141 PMCID: PMC9640924 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1037279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to regulate the gut environment has resulted in remarkable great breakthroughs in the treatment of several diseases. Several studies have found that the regulation of the gut environment might provide relief from the symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, the correlation between the gut microenvironment and the colon and prostate glands is still unknown. We found that ulcerative colitis (UC) induced an increase in prostate volumes that could be reversed by sodium butyrate (NaB) and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). The mechanism by which UC induced changes in the prostate gland was examined via RNA-Seq. The results show that the expression level of GPER was significantly lower in the prostate gland of UC mices than in normal mices. The expression of GPER could be increased via treatment with NaB or FMT. We found that prostate tissues exhibited higher butryic acid levels after they were treated with NaB or FMT. In experiments conducted in vitro, NaB or the fecal filtrate (FF) from healthy mice up-regulated of the expression of GPER, inhibited cell growth, and induced apoptosis in BPH-1 cells. These changes could be alleviated by treatment with the G15 or in GPER-silenced cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weimin Dong
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jiefang Zheng
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yiqiao Huang
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huijing Tan
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengbang Yang
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiming Zhang
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xue Liang
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Guohao Zeng
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Haoming Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- *Correspondence: Xianhan Jiang, ; Haoming Xu,
| | - Xianhan Jiang
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Key Laboratory of Biological Targeting Diagnosis, Therapy and Rehabilitation of Guangdong Higher Education Institutes, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- *Correspondence: Xianhan Jiang, ; Haoming Xu,
| | - Weide Zhong
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Long-Term Safety Following Faecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Treatment for Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection Compared with Patients Treated with a Fixed Bacterial Mixture: Results from a Retrospective Cohort Study. Cells 2022; 11:cells11030435. [PMID: 35159245 PMCID: PMC8834574 DOI: 10.3390/cells11030435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is the recommended treatment for recurrent C. difficile infection (rCDI) following a second recurrence. FMT is considered safe in the short term when procedures for the screening of donors and transferred material are followed. However, the long-term safety profile of FMT treatment is largely unknown. In a retrospective cohort study, we assessed the long-term safety of patients treated for rCDI with FMT or a fixed bacterial mixture, rectal bacteriotherapy (RBT). The overall survival, risk of hospital admission, onset of certain pre-specified diseases (cancer, diabetes mellitus, hypertension and inflammatory bowel disease) and risk of being diagnosed with a multidrug-resistant organism were assessed by undertaking a review of the treated patients’ medical records for up to five years following treatment. A total of 280 patients were treated for rCDI with FMT (n = 145) or RBT (n = 135) between 2016 and 2020. In the five years following treatment, there were no differences in survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.03; 95% CI 0.68–1.56), p = 0.89), risk of hospital admission ((aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.72–1.18), p = 0.5) or onset of any of the analysed diseases. In conclusion, FMT was not associated with increased mortality, risk of hospital admission or onset of disease following treatment when compared with RBT.
Collapse
|