Intraocular triamcinolone acetonide for macular edema due to CRVO. A multifocal-ERG and OCT study

Effects of Dexamethasone Implant on Multifocal Electroretinography in Central Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose:

To investigate the effect of Ozurdex (dexamethasone intravitreal implant) on multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) findings during the treatment of macular edema secondary to the central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

Methods:

Fifteen eyes of 15 patients who were treated with Ozurdex implant due to CRVO-related macular edema were included in this study. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and mfERG evaluations were performed for all patients before injection of Ozurdex. After the injection, BCVA and CMT were measured at months 3 and 6 and mfERG test was performed at month 6 for all patients.

Results:

Pre-implantation mfERG P wave amplitude values of r1, r2, r3, r4 and r5 were 57.8 ± 14.8, 25.1 ± 10.6, 17.2 ± 7.3, 12.0 ± 5.0 and 7.1 ± 3.6 nV/deg², respectively. They increased to 72.9 ± 33.2, 31.2 ± 9.3, 22.6 ± 7.6, 15.6 ± 7.1 and 10.9 ± 5.7 nV/deg², respectively, at month 6. However, these increases were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05). Pre-implantation mfERG r1, r2, r3, r4 and r5 P wave implicit times were 40.1 ± 10.9, 39.4 ± 3, 38.4 ± 3.4, 38.2 ± 3.1 and 39.3 ± 2.2 ms, respectively and these values were measured as 38.9 ± 8.2, 38.4 ± 4.7, 37 ± 3.8, 37.5 ± 4.6 and 37.7 ± 4.7 ms at 6 months. Although there were reductions in P wave implicit times in all rings, they were not statistically significant (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion:

In this prospective study, we found that the Ozurdex implant had no effect on mfERG findings 6 months after insertion for treatment of CRVO-related macular edema.

Evaluation of pattern electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion treated with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide

PURPOSE

To evaluate pattern electroretinogram (pattern ERG) and anatomical changes in optical coherence tomography (OCT) in acute retinal vein occlusion with macular oedema after intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) injection.

METHODS

In this prospective interventional study, 20 patients with acute retinal vein occlusion (branch and central) of less than 1 month duration were evaluated for pattern ERG, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness on OCT, and contrast sensitivity (CS) before and 1, 6 and 12 weeks after 1 mg IVTA injection.

RESULTS

The amplitude of P50 wave (pattern ERG) improved from 3.01 ± 1.22 to 3.56 ± 1.29 µv, mean logMAR BCVA improved from 1.10 ± 0.60 to 0.69 ± 0.45, and CS improved from 0.45 ± 0.41 to 0.79 ± 0.29; mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased from 515.35 ± 202.83 to 358.35 ± 135.4µ at 12 weeks. All the values were statistically significant (p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

IVTA injection in acute retinal vein occlusion with macular oedema results in electrophysiological (pattern ERG) improvement in addition to anatomical (OCT) improvement.

Intravitreal steroids versus observation for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common retinal vascular abnormality associated with conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, glaucoma, and a wide variety of hematologic disorders. Macular edema (ME) represents an important vision-threatening complication of CRVO. Intravitreal steroids (IVS), such as triamcinolone acetonide, have been utilized to treat macular edema stemming from a variety of etiologies and may be a treatment option for CRVO-ME.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal steroids in the treatment of CRVO-ME.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) (2014 Issue 10), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to November 2014), EMBASE (January 1980 to November 2014), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 13 November 2014. For all included primary studies, we used The Science Citation Index (3 December 2014) and manually reviewed reference lists to identify other possible relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intravitreal steroids, of any dosage and duration of treatment of at least six months, with observation for the treatment of CRVO-ME.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts identified from the electronic searches and assessed full-text articles from potentially eligible trials. Two review authors independently assessed trial characteristics, risk of bias, and extracted data from included trials. We contacted investigators of included trials for desired data not provided in the trial reports.

MAIN RESULTS

We included two RCTs that enrolled a total of 708 participants with CRVO-ME. SCORE compared triamcinolone acetonide intravitreal injections (n = 165) with observation (n = 72); GENEVA compared dexamethasone intravitreal implants (n = 290) with sham injections (n = 147). We observed characteristics indicative of high risk of bias due to incomplete outcome data in SCORE and selective outcome reporting in GENEVA. Loss to follow-up was high with 10% in the steroid groups and almost twice as much (17%) in the observation group. GENEVA enrolled participants with both branch and central retinal vein occlusion, but did not present subgroup data for the CRVO-ME population. A qualitative assessment of the results from GENEVA indicated that the dexamethasone implant was not associated with improvement in visual acuity after six months among participants with CRVO-ME. Although the SCORE investigators reported that participants treated with 1 mg (n = 82) or 4 mg (n = 83) triamcinolone intravitreal injections were five times more likely to have gained 15 letters or more in visual acuity compared with participants in the observation group (1 mg; risk ratio (RR): 5.27; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62 to 17.15; 4 mg RR 4.92; 95% CI 1.50 to 16.10) by the eighth-month follow-up examination, the average visual acuity decreased in all three groups. However, eyes treated with triamcinolone lost fewer letters than participants in the observation group at 8 months (1 mg mean difference (MD): 8.70 letters, 95% CI 1.86 to 15.54; 4 mg MD: 9.80 letters, 95% CI 3.32 to 16.28). A higher incidence of adverse events was noted with IVS therapy when compared with observation alone. As many as 20% to 35% of participants experienced an adverse event in the IVS groups compared with 8% of participants in the observation group of the SCORE study. The GENEVA investigators reported 63% in the treatment arm versus 43% in the observation arm experienced an adverse event. The most commonly encountered adverse events were elevated intraocular pressure, progression of cataracts, and retinal neovascularization. We graded the quality of evidence as low due to study limitations, imprecision of treatment estimates, and selective outcome reporting.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The two RCTs reviewed herein provide insufficient evidence to determine the benefits of IVS for individuals with CRVO-ME. The improvement in visual acuity noted in the SCORE trial should be interpreted with caution as outcome data were missing for a large proportion of the observation group. Adverse events were observed more often with IVS treatment compared with observation/no treatment.

Changes in macular function after ozurdex for retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate changes in macular function after intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) for macular edema (ME) secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

Nineteen treatment-naive patients with RVO-related ME were treated with intravitreal Ozurdex and followed up to 6 months to evaluate functional outcomes, by means of best-corrected visual acuity, microperimetry, and multifocal electroretinography, and their correlations with morphological parameters by enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Nineteen eyes of 19 patients were included for analysis. At 1 month, mean best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity, and central macular thickness (CMT) improved from 0.50 ± 0.34 LogMAR, 10.51 ± 4.31 dB, and 762 ± 259 μm (baseline) to 0.38 ± 0.34 LogMAR (p = 0.043), 12.28 ± 5.06 dB (p = 0.025), and 385 ± 191 μm (p = 0.001), respectively. At 3 months, improvement of mean retinal sensitivity and CMT was still significant (11.62 ± 5.05 dB [p = 0.047] and 518 ± 251 μm [p = 0.006]). Multifocal electroretinography measurements also showed (nonsignificant) improvement. No significant changes in choroidal thickness were recorded. Improvements recorded during the first 3 months were no longer significant from month 4. At each time point, we found a negative significant correlation between CMT and retinal sensitivity. Interestingly, 7 eyes did not undergo retreatment of less than 6 months; these eyes showed a significantly better baseline retinal sensitivity than eyes requiring retreatment of less than 6 months (12.27 ± 3.52 dB vs. 9.48 ± 4.53 dB [p = 0.038]).

CONCLUSIONS

In eyes with ME secondary to RVO, intravitreal dexamethasone implant provides functional benefits as soon as 1 month after treatment. In most cases, the optimum retreatment interval is less than 6 months from first intravitreal Ozurdex. Microperimetry is a very useful tool to characterize macular function. Baseline macular sensitivity may predict the need for early (<6 months) retreatment.

Impact of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) on macular morphology and function

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) on macular morphology and function in eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Twelve treatment-naive patients with decreased visual acuity because of central retinal vein occlusion-related macular edema were enrolled in this prospective uncontrolled study. Patients were treated with intravitreal Ozurdex and followed up at 1 month and 3 months for the evaluation of morphologic and functional outcomes, by means of best-corrected visual acuity, microperimetry, multifocal electroretinography, and customized high-resolution enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes of 12 patients (10 men, 2 women; mean age 56.2 ± 13.0 years) were included for analysis. At 1 month, mean best-corrected visual acuity, retinal sensitivity (microperimetry), multifocal electroretinography parameters, central macular thickness, and specific neurosensorial retinal measurements improved significantly. We found a significant negative correlation between retinal sensitivity and central macular thickness at 1 month and 3 months (r = -0.831, P = 0.001; r = -0.881, P = 0.001; respectively). Moreover, retinal sensitivity was negatively related to both outer and inner retinal thickness in all four intervals from the fovea. From baseline to Month 1, change in outer retinal thickness was positively related to multifocal electroretinography N1R1 amplitude change (r = 0.698, P = 0.012), whereas change in central macular thickness was negatively related to multifocal electroretinography P1R1 amplitude change (r = -0.701, P = 0.011). At 3 months, improvement of mean retinal sensitivity and central macular thickness slightly decreased.

CONCLUSION

In eyes with macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion, intravitreal dexamethasone provides functional benefits that correlate well with ultrastructural macular changes.

Vitreous levels of interleukine-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in macular oedema with branch retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate whether interleukine-8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) are related with macular oedema in patients with branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVOs).

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen patients who had macular oedema due to BRVO and nine patients with non-ischaemic ocular diseases (control group).

METHODS

Macular oedema was examined by optical coherence tomography. Both venous blood and vitreous samples were obtained at the time of vitreoretinal surgery. IL-8 and MCP-1 levels in vitreous fluid and plasma were determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. Variables were compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test, Wilcoxon's signed-ranked test, and the chi2-test, when appropriate. To examine correlations, Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficients were calculated. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

The vitreous fluid levels of IL-8 (median: 63.5 pg/ml) and MCP-1 (median: 1522.4 pg/ml) were significantly higher in the patients with BRVO than in the control group (median: 5.1 and 746.5 pg/ml respectively; P<0.001 and <0.001 respectively). Vitreous IL-8 and MCP-1 were significantly correlated in patients with BRVO (P=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Both IL-8 and MCP-1 were elevated in the vitreous fluid of patients with BRVO and macular oedema. Both chemokines may contribute to the pathogenesis of macular oedema in patients with BRVO.

Intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis) for treatment of central retinal vein occlusion: a prospective study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of individualized repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (Lucentis) on visual acuity (VA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO)-induced macular edema.

METHODS

Our study was a prospective interventional case series. Twelve eyes of 12 consecutive patients diagnosed with CRVO-related macular edema (nine perfused, three ischemic CRVO) treated with repeated (when CFT was >220 microm) intravitreal injections of ranibizumab as a monotherapy within 3 months of onset were evaluated. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FA) were performed monthly and every 3 months respectively. Changes in VA (ETDRS) and CFT were analyzed using the student's paired t-test.

RESULTS

The mean time from diagnosis until injection was 80 days (2.7 months; range, 63-90 days) and the follow-up time was 12 months. In total, 89 injections were performed (mean 7.4). The mean CFT improved from 480 +/- 166 microm at baseline to 230 +/- 33 microm (P < 0.001) at the end of the follow-up. During the same period, of the 12 eyes, eight demonstrated improved VA (>0.3 LogMAR change, >15 letters), three stable VA and one worse VA as compared to baseline. None of the nine patients with perfused CRVO were converted to ischemic at 12 months, and one of the three eyes with ischemic CRVO developed iris neovascularization despite two ranibizumab injections. No ocular or systemic side-effects were noted.

CONCLUSION

Individualized repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab have shown promising results in VA improvement and decrease in CFT in patients with macular edema associated with CRVO. Further studies are needed in order to elucidate the role of intravitreal lucentis in the ischemic form of CRVO, and its efficacy in preventing conversion from the perfused to the ischemic form of the disease.

Effects of repeated injection of intravitreal triamcinolone on macular oedema in central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of repeated injections of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in the treatment of macular oedema caused by central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

Seventeen pseudophakic or aphakic eyes of 17 patients (10 male, seven female) with macular oedema caused by CRVO received a repeat injection of 4 mg IVTA, 16 weeks after the first injection of the same dose. The examination included measurements of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) for distance and central foveal thickness (CFT) by optical coherence tomography (OCT), preoperatively and 1, 2, 3 and 4 months postoperatively. The values were compared by paired-t test. Side-effects were monitored.

RESULTS

BCVA and CFT were not significantly different before initial and repeat injections. Transient improvements of BCVA and CFT were achieved after both injections. At the end of follow-up, BCVA and CFT were significantly different compared to pre-injection values in the same group (P = 0.032, 0.049 in the initial-injection group and P = 0.001, 0.008 in the repeat-injection group, respectively). However, compared to the initial injection, BCVA measurements were significantly worse at each time-point (P = 0.043, 0.011, 0.010 and 0.012, respectively) after the repeat injection, as were CFT at 1, 2 and 3 months post-injection (P = 0.040, 0.015 and 0.025, respectively). The achieved maximum mean intraocular pressures were 20.00 [standard deviation (SD) 2.06] mmHg and 18.56 (SD 3.65) mmHg after the first and repeat injections, respectively. These values were not significantly different (P = 0.467). No other significant adverse events were noted during the study.

CONCLUSION

A repeat injection of 4 mg IVTA may not be as effective as an initial injection for the treatment of macular oedema caused by CRVO.

Intravitreal steroids versus observation for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) is a common retinal vascular abnormality associated with conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, glaucoma, and a wide variety of hematologic disorders. Macular edema (ME) represents an important vision-threatening complication of CRVO. There is no proven treatment; laser photocoagulation is not effective in treating cystoid macular edema secondary to CRVO. Intravitreal steroids, such as triamcinolone acetonide, have been utilized to treat macular edema stemming from a variety of etiologies and may represent a treatment option for CRVO-ME.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to explore the effectiveness and safety of intravitreal steroids in the treatment of CRVO-ME.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2008), MEDLINE (January 1950 to November 2008) and EMBASE (January 1980 to November 2008). There were no language or date restrictions in the search for trials. The electronic databases were last searched on 5 November 2008. For all included primary studies, we used The Science Citation Index and manually reviewed reference lists to identify other possible relevant trials. We contacted researchers in the field, currently working on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on this topic (The Standard Care versus Corticosteroid for Retinal Vein Occlusion - SCORE study), for information on additional current, past, or unpublished trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered RCTs that compared intravitreal steroids of any dosage/duration to observation in the treatment of CRVO-ME for inclusion in this review. We focused on studies that included individuals of any age or gender with unilateral or bilateral disease, with a minimum of six months follow up. Secondarily we considered non-randomized studies with the same criteria for description of evidence, however we did not conduct a separate electronic search for finding all non-randomized studies.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We found no RCTs that met the inclusion criteria after independent and duplicate review of the search results.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no relevant RCTs and therefore performed no meta-analysis. Evidence from non-randomized studies is reported in this review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is inadequate evidence for the use of intravitreal steroids for CRVO-ME due to a paucity of RCTs and well-designed observational studies on the topic; therefore, it is still an experimental procedure.

Ranibizumab for the treatment of macular edema associated with perfused central retinal vein occlusions

PURPOSE

Assessment of biological effect, visual acuity changes, and safety of intravitreal (IVT) ranibizumab in patients with macular edema associated with perfused central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

DESIGN

Ongoing, prospective, open-label, single-center, uncontrolled study.

PARTICIPANTS

Ten adult patients with macular edema associated with perfused CRVO.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3 monthly IVT injections of either 0.3 or 0.5 mg ranibizumab (n = 5 at each dose). Additional injections were administered quarterly as needed over the ensuing 21 months at the physician's discretion for recurrent or persistent macular edema.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The predetermined primary endpoint was the percentage of patients gaining >or=15 letters of best-corrected Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study visual acuity (BCVA). The secondary endpoints include the mean change in BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) measured by optical coherence tomography, the rate of progression to ischemic CRVO, extent of intraocular hemorrhage, retinal vein diameter, optic nerve head swelling, and the incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events.

RESULTS

After 3, 6, and 9 months of follow-up, 40%, 10%, and 30% of patients, respectively, gained >or=15 letters in BCVA; mean BCVA improved by 12+/-20 letters, 3+/-21 letters, and 1+/-24 letters, respectively, compared with baseline; CRT showed a mean decrease of 272+/-244 microm, 88+/-178 microm, and 119+/-153 microm, compared with baseline. No significant differences were observed between the 0.3- and 0.5-mg doses. Most patients experienced decreases in the extent of retinal hemorrhage, retinal vein diameter, and optic nerve head swelling at months 3 and 6 compared with baseline. No patients progressed to ischemic CRVO or experienced a severe adverse event that was attributed to ranibizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Ranibizumab is generally well-tolerated and may improve BCVA and decrease CRT. The improvements in BCVA and CRT observed during the initial monthly injection period (0 to 3 months) were possibly lost to the recurrence of macular edema in between ranibizumab injection during the quarterly treatments (3 to 9 months). The extent of retinal hemorrhage, retinal vein diameter, and nerve swelling continued to normalize for most of the patients from baseline to 6 months. Follow-up is ongoing, and alternative dosing regimens are being evaluated.

Early bevacizumab treatment of central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate the change in visual acuity and retinal appearance in patients after early initiation of intravitreal bevacizumab treatment for central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

METHODS

Patients with CRVO of fewer than three months' duration receiving intravitreal bevacizumab as primary treatment were evaluated. Patients received an intravitreal 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) bevacizumab injection. Changes in visual acuity, central macular thickness, venous tortuosity and diameter, and optic disk edema were noted.

RESULTS

Six eyes of five consecutive patients with CRVO treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injection were reviewed retrospectively. The patients did not have other ocular conditions that could have compromised visual acuity. The mean baseline visual acuity was 20/428 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR] units, 1.33). The mean follow-up period was 12 months (range, seven to 15 months), and the number of bevacizumab injections ranged from four to 10. The patients showed a statistically significant decrease in optic nerve head swelling, venous tortuosity, and venous diameter, with the largest proportion of change occurring within one month of the first bevacizumab injection. The mean visual acuity at last follow-up was 20/53 (logMAR units, 0.42; P = .035, as compared with baseline). In no patient did collateral vessels at the optic nerve head develop.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients experienced a dramatic improvement in the visual acuity and clinical fundus appearance, without collateral vessel formation. These findings are difficult to explain with current theories of the pathophysiologic features of CRVO. These findings also suggest early initiation of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment should be studied in a larger trial for CRVO.