Is multifocal electroretinography an early predictor of glaucoma?

Visual function tests for glaucoma practice - What is relevant?

Glaucoma represents one of the most important ocular diseases causing irreversible ganglion cell death. It is one of the most common causes of visual impairment and morbidity in the elderly population. There are various tests for measuring visual function in glaucoma. While visual field remains the undisputed method for screening, diagnosis, and monitoring disease progression, other tests have been studied for their utility in glaucoma practice. This review discusses some of the commonly used tests of visual function that can be routinely used in clinics for glaucoma management. Among the various modalities of testing visual function in glaucoma, this review highlights the tests that are most clinically relevant.

Temporal contrast adaptation in the analysis of visual function in primary open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE

To explore the utility of the recovery time (RT) after temporal contrast adaptation in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) visual function analysis, especially in severe and end-stage glaucoma, by the Erlanger Flicker Test (EFT).

METHODS

This study included 80 POAG eyes (45 subjects) and 20 normal eyes (20 subjects). POAG eyes were divided into 5 groups. The diagnostic efficacy of the EFT was assessed, and the RT of POAG eyes at different stages was compared. The EFT results were compared with glaucomatous structure and function test results. A nomogram was developed to predict disease progression by the RT and structural indicators.

RESULTS

In the normal eyes, as the test contrast increased, the RT gradually decreased. The EFT test-retest reproducibility was good, with intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.6 (P < 0.05) for each test contrast. At 12%, 25%, and 35% contrast, the RT in the severe and end-stage glaucoma eyes was significantly prolonged compared with the control group (P < 0.05). The RT at different contrasts was significantly correlated with visual acuity, mean defect, mean sensitivity, and general and individual quadrant optic nerve fiber layer thickness (P ≤ 0.001). The receiver operating curve indicated that RT_12% showed the best overall area under the curve (0.863). We included RT_25% and average optic nerve fiber layer thickness in constructing the nomogram. POAG eyes were further divided into 8 stages. According to the probability distribution, this model showed good performance for visual function analysis in advanced glaucoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined with traditional glaucomatous structural and functional parameters, the EFT can be used in the diagnosis and visual function analysis of POAG, especially for severe and end-stage glaucoma. It could be a potential test for disease staging in severe and end-stage glaucoma.

Electrophysiology in Glaucoma

OBJECTIVES

Electrophysiological testing of the visual system has been continuously used in studies involving the evaluation of retinal ganglion cells and the diagnosis of glaucoma. This study aims to review the results of recent studies regarding the clinical applicability of electrophysiological tests to glaucoma.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was carried out by 2 independent reviewers using the PubMed and EMBASE electronic databases, searching for articles published in English from January 1, 2014 to July 1, 2019 using a combination of the following keywords: ("glaucoma" OR "ocular hypertension") AND ("electrophysiolog" OR "electroretinogra" OR "ERG" OR "mfERG" OR "Pattern-reversal electroretinography" OR "PERG" OR "mfPERG" OR "photopic negative response" OR "pattern electroretinogram" OR "visual evoked potential" OR "multifocal electroretinography" OR "multifocal electroretinogram" OR "electro-oculography" OR "multifocal VEP" OR "mf-ERG"). A total of 38 studies were selected and the data of 30 of them were tabulated in this review.

RESULTS

Among the 30 studies selected, the photopic negative response and the reversal pattern electroretinogram were found to be the major methods used to record the electroretinographic responses generated by the retinal ganglion cell. Their multifocal versions and the multifocal visual evoked potential were also proposed during this period. In general, the results underscored a consistent but general correlation between the amplitude and latency measures and routine tests for glaucoma, such as perimetry and optical coherence tomography.

DISCUSSION

In agreement with previous reviews, clinical electrophysiological testing of the visual system reasonably matched with both the structural and functional analyses for glaucoma. No definitive indications of these tests have been established either at early detection or during follow-up of the disease, and easier protocols and better topographical correspondence with current glaucoma tests are warranted for their routine use.

Will Perimetry Be Performed to Monitor Glaucoma in 2025?

Visual field testing has played an essential role in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma for more than a century. Methods to examine the visual field have been refined from early kinetic perimetry to current standard automated perimetry (SAP). Clinicians now use SAP for the diagnosis and management of glaucoma throughout the world. Various testing paradigms and analytic methods have been developed to simplify the diagnosis of glaucoma and the interpretation of progression. Moreover, strategies have been implemented to improve patient experience with visual field testing and to increase reliability. Objective functional tests, such as electroretinography, provide an alternative to subjective visual field testing but are not yet ready for widespread adoption. Standard automated perimetry is being adapted and improved constantly. New devices may allow patients to complete visual field tests at home, which could relieve patients and clinicians from in-office testing and allow for more frequent examinations. Glaucoma detection and progression analysis also are incorporating progressively more information and will be improved as deep learning strategies are applied. Finally, perimetric and structural testing likely will become more closely intertwined as testing platforms and progression analysis incorporate both of these measures. Visual field testing will continue to have an important role in the diagnosis and management of glaucoma.

Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure

PURPOSE

To compare diagnostic performance and structure-function correlations of multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG), full-field flash ERG (ff-ERG) photopic negative response (PhNR) and transient pattern-reversal ERG (PERG) in a non-human primate (NHP) model of experimental glaucoma (EG).

METHODS

At baseline and after induction of chronic unilateral IOP elevation, 43 NHP had alternating weekly recordings of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT) by spectral domain OCT (Spectralis) and retinal function by mfERG (7F slow-sequence stimulus, VERIS), ff-ERG (red 0.42 log cd-s/m² flashes on blue 30 scotopic cd/m² background, LKC UTAS-E3000), and PERG (0.8° checks, 99% contrast, 100 cd/m² mean, 5 reversals/s, VERIS). All NHP were followed at least until HRT-confirmed optic nerve head posterior deformation, most to later stages. mfERG responses were filtered into low- and high-frequency components (LFC, HFC, >75 Hz). Peak-to-trough amplitudes of LFC features (N1, P1, N2) and HFC RMS amplitudes were measured and ratios calculated for HFC:P1 and N2:P1. ff-ERG parameters included A-wave (at 10 ms), B-wave (trough-to-peak) and PhNR (baseline-to-trough) amplitudes as well as PhNR:B-wave ratio. PERG parameters included P50 and N95 amplitudes as well as N95:P50 ratio and N95 slope. Diagnostic performance of retinal function parameters was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A-ROC) to discriminate between EG and control eyes. Correlations to RNFLT were compared using Steiger's test.

RESULTS

Study duration was 15 ± 8 months. At final follow-up, structural damage in EG eyes measured by RNFLT ranged from 9% above baseline (BL) to 58% below BL; 29/43 EG eyes (67%) and 0/43 of the fellow control eyes exhibited significant (>7%) loss of RNFLT from BL. Using raw parameter values, the largest A-ROC findings for mfERG were: HFC (0.82) and HFC:P1 (0.90); for ff-ERG: PhNR (0.90) and PhNR:B-wave (0.88) and for PERG: P50 (0.64) and N95 (0.61). A-ROC increased when data were expressed as % change from BL, but the pattern of results persisted. At 95% specificity, the diagnostic sensitivity of mfERG HFC:P1 ratio was best, followed by PhNR and PERG. The correlation to RNFLT was stronger for mfERG HFC (R = 0.65) than for PhNR (R = 0.59) or PERG N95 (R = 0.36), (p = 0.20, p = 0.0006, respectively). The PhNR flagged a few EG eyes at the final time point that had not been flagged by mfERG HFC or PERG.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic performance and structure-function correlation were strongest for mfERG HFC as compared with ff-ERG PhNR or PERG in NHP EG.

Test-retest reliability of the multifocal photopic negative response

PURPOSE

To assess the test-retest reliability of the multifocal photopic negative response (mfPhNR) of normal human subjects.

METHODS

Multifocal electroretinograms were recorded from one eye of 61 healthy adult subjects on two separate days using a Visual Evoked Response Imaging System software version 4.3 (EDI, San Mateo, California). The visual stimulus delivered on a 75-Hz monitor consisted of seven equal-sized hexagons each subtending 12° of visual angle. The m-step exponent was 9, and the m-sequence was slowed to include at least 30 blank frames after each flash. Only the first slice of the first-order kernel was analyzed. The mfPhNR amplitude was measured at a fixed time in the trough from baseline (BT) as well as at the same fixed time in the trough from the preceding b-wave peak (PT). Additionally, we also analyzed BT normalized either to PT (BT/PT) or to the b-wave amplitude (BT/b-wave). The relative reliability of test-retest differences for each test location was estimated by the Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Absolute test-retest reliability was estimated by Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The test-retest amplitude differences for neither of the two measurement techniques were statistically significant as determined by Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. PT measurements showed greater ICC values than BT amplitude measurements for all test locations. For each measurement technique, the ICC value of the macular response was greater than that of the surrounding locations. The mean test-retest difference was close to zero for both techniques at each of the test locations, and while the coefficient of reliability (COR-1.96 times the standard deviation of the test-retest difference) was comparable for the two techniques at each test location when expressed in nanovolts, the %COR (COR normalized to the mean test and retest amplitudes) was superior for PT than BT measurements. The ICC and COR were comparable for the BT/PT and BT/b-wave ratios and were better than the ICC and COR for BT but worse than PT.

CONCLUSION

mfPhNR amplitude measured at a fixed time in the trough from the preceding b-wave peak (PT) shows greater test-retest reliability when compared to amplitude measurement from baseline (BT) or BT amplitude normalized to either the PT or b-wave amplitudes.