Visual evoked cortical potential elicited by pseudoisochromatic stimulus

Chromatic visual evoked potentials: A review of physiology, methods and clinical applications

Objective assessment of the visual system can be performed electrophysiologically using the visual evoked potential (VEP). In many clinical circumstances, this is performed using high contrast achromatic patterns or diffuse flash stimuli. These methods are clinically valuable but they may only assess a subset of possible physiological circuitries within the visual system, particularly those involved in achromatic (luminance) processing. The use of chromatic VEPs (cVEPs) in addition to standard VEPs can inform us of the function or dysfunction of chromatic pathways. The chromatic VEP has been well studied in human health and disease. Yet, to date our knowledge of their underlying mechanisms and applications remains limited. This likely reflects a heterogeneity in the methodology, analysis and conclusions of different works, which leads to ambiguity in their clinical use. This review sought to identify the primary methodologies employed for recording cVEPs. Furthermore cVEP maturation and application in understanding the function of the chromatic system under healthy and diseased conditions are reviewed. We first briefly describe the physiology of normal colour vision, before describing the methodologies and historical developments which have led to our understanding of cVEPs. We thereafter describe the expected maturation of the cVEP, followed by reviewing their application in several disorders: congenital colour vision deficiencies, retinal disease, glaucoma, optic nerve and neurological disorders, diabetes, amblyopia and dyslexia. We finalise the review with recommendations for testing and future directions.

Visual evoked potentials in patients with congenital color vision deficiency

BACKGROUND/AIM

Congenital color vision deficiency (CCVD) is an eye disease characterized by abnormalities in the cone cells in the photoreceptor layer. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) are electrophysiological tests that physiologically examine the optic nerve, other visual pathways, and the visual cortex. The aim of this research was to determine whether there are VEP abnormalities in CCVD patients.

METHODS

Patients with CCVD and healthy individuals were included in this prospective case-control study. Participants with eye disease or neurodegenerative disease were excluded from the study. Pattern reversal VEP (PVEP), flash VEP (FVEP), and optical coherence tomography were performed on all participants.

RESULTS

Twenty healthy individuals (15 male) and 21 patients with CCVD (18 male) were included in the study. The mean ages of healthy individuals and patients with CCVD were 29.8 ± 9.6 and 31.1 ± 10.9 years (p = 0.804). Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and central macular thickness values did not differ between the two groups. In PVEP, Right P100, Left N75, P100, N135 values were delayed in CCVD patients compared to healthy individuals (p = 0.001, p = 0.032, p = 0.003, p = 0.032). At least one PVEP and FVEP abnormality was present in nine (42.9%) and six (28.6%) of the patients, respectively. PVEP or FVEP abnormalities were found in 13 (61.9%) of the patients.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that there may be PVEP and FVEP abnormalities in patients with CCVD.

Quantitative and objective diagnosis of color vision deficiencies based on steady-state visual evoked potentials

PURPOSE

Traditional color vision tests depend on subjective judgments and are not suitable for infant children and subjects with cognitive dysfunction. We aimed to explore an objective and quantitative color vision testing method based on sweep steady-state visual evoked potentials (sweep SSVEPs) and compare the results with subjective Farnsworth-Munsell (FM) 100-hue test results.

METHODS

A red-green SSVEP pattern reversal checkboard paradigm at different luminance ratios was used to induce visual evoked potentials (VEPs) from 15 color vision deficiencies (CVDs) and 11 normal color vision subjects. After electroencephalography signals were processed by canonical correlation analysis, an equiluminance turning curve corresponding to the activation of the L-cones and M-cones at different levels of color vision was established. Then, we obtained different equiluminance T and proposed the SSVEP color vision severity index (I_CVD) to quantify color vision function and the severity of CVDs. In addition, the FM 100-hue test was used to obtain subjective data for the diagnosis of color vision.

RESULTS

The value of I_CVD can be an indicator of the level of color vision. Both the total error scores (TES) and confusion index (C-index) of the FM 100-hue test were significantly correlated with I_CVD values (P < 0.001, respectively). I_CVD also had a good classification effect in detecting normals, anomalous trichromats and dichromats. Moreover, equiluminance T had a good effect on classifying protans and deutans in subjects with CVDs.

CONCLUSION

Color vision evaluation with sweep SSVEPs showed a good correlation with subjective psychophysical methods. SSVEPs can be an objective and quantitative method to test color vision and diagnose CVDs.