Phase II study of amrubicin, 9-amino-anthracycline, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group (WJTOG) study

Phase II study of amrubicin plus erlotinib in previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (TORG1320)

Background Amrubicin (AMR) is a completely synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline and clinically active against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted a phase I study of AMR and erlotinib (ERL) combination therapy in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and have already reported the safety and effectiveness. Methods We conducted a multi-center, single-arm phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of AMR and ERL combination therapy in patients with previously treated, advanced NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR, PS 0-1 and < 75 years of age. Patients were treated at 3-week intervals with AMR plus ERL. The primary endpoint was the PFS, and the secondary endpoints were the response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. The trough ERL concentration (C_trough) was measured as an exploratory study to analyze the relationship between the efficacy/safety and pharmacokinetics. Results From June 2013 to July 2016, 25 patients were enrolled in this trial. The PFS according to the central test was 3.6 months (95% confidence interval 2.1-5.1). The RR and DCR were 24.0% and 64.0%, respectively. We had no treatment-related deaths in this study. Conclusions The PFS of AMR and ERL combination therapy was superior to that of AMR monotherapy in the historical setting, but the primary endpoint was not met in this trial. In our study, the pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the C_trough of ERL was elevated with combination therapy. This combination therapy might be a viable treatment for previously treated NSCLC patients without a driver oncogene mutation. Clinical trial information UMIN 000010582.

Antineoplastic-related cardiovascular toxicity: A systematic review and meta-analysis in Asia

BACKGROUND

Cancer and heart diseases are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in many countries worldwide. Recent advancement in chemotherapy and targeted therapies has led to an improvement in cancer survival rates, but at a cost of higher cardiac side effects. However, report on antineoplastic-related cardiotoxicities incidence in Asia is lacking.

METHODS

We systematically searched multiple databases to identify studies reporting incidence of antineoplastic-related cardiovascular toxicity in Asia published from inception to November 2018. Pre-specified subgroups were performed to explore heterogeneity and study quality assessed and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 61 studies across 11 countries in Asia reported 8 types of cardiovascular toxicities were included. These studies mostly reported on adult populations, and usually examined cardiotoxicities related to anthracycline use. The most frequently reported cardiotoxicities were heart failure, electrocardiogram abnormalities and left ventricular dysfunction. The pooled estimated incidence of cardiotoxicity was 4.27% (95% CI: 3.53-5.07). Subgroup analysis showed higher incidence in middle income countries compared to high income countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Although robust incidence studies are sparse, cardiovascular complications affects approximately one in twenty cancer patients in Asia. This highlights a unique opportunity of cancer patients caring that need cardiologists and oncologist to become familiar with this emerging sub-specialty.

A randomized, open-label, phase III trial comparing amrubicin versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Amrubicin is approved for treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer. However, no direct comparisons between amrubicin and docetaxel, a standard treatment for NSCLC, have been reported.

Patients and methods

We conducted a randomized phase III trial of Japanese NSCLC patients after one or two chemotherapy regimens. Patients were randomized to amrubicin (35 mg/m2 on days 1-3 every 3 weeks) or docetaxel (60 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks). Outcomes included progression-free survival, overall survival, tumor responses, and safety.

Results

Between October 2010 and June 2012, 202 patients were enrolled across 32 institutions. Median progression-free survival (3.6 versus 3.0 months; P = 0.54) and overall survival (14.6 versus 13.5 months; P = 0.86) were comparable in the amrubicin and docetaxel groups, respectively. The overall response rate was 14.4% (14/97) and 19.6% (19/97) in the amrubicin and docetaxel groups, respectively (P = 0.45). The disease control rate was 55.7% in both groups. Adverse events occurred in all patients, and included grade ≥3 neutropenia occurred in 82.7% and 78.8% of patients in the amrubicin and docetaxel groups, respectively, grade ≥3 leukopenia occurred in 63.3% and 70.7%, and grade ≥3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 13.3% and 18.2% of patients in the amrubicin and docetaxel groups, respectively. Of eight cardiac-related events in the amrubicin group, three were considered related to amrubicin and resolved without treatment discontinuation.

Conclusions

This was the first phase III study to compare amrubicin and docetaxel in patients with pretreated NSCLC. Amrubicin did not significantly improve the primary endpoint of PFS compared with docetaxel.

Clinical trial registration

NCT01207011 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of erlotinib administered in combination with amrubicin in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a phase I trial of erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with amrubicin, a topoisomerase II inhibitor. The aim was to determine the maximum tolerated dose, the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the pharmacokinetics of this combination in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who had received previous chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 9 patients with stage IV disease were treated at 3-week intervals with erlotinib once daily on days 1 through 21 plus a 5-minute intravenous injection of amrubicin on days 1 through 3.

RESULTS

The dose levels evaluated were erlotinib (mg/body)/amrubicin (mg/m): 100/30 (n=3), 100/35 (n=3), and 150/30 (n=3). The maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib and amrubicin was 100 mg/body and 35 mg/m because 2 of the 3 patients experienced DLTs during the first cycle of treatment at the third dose level of 150 mg/body and 30 mg/m. Cessation of erlotinib administration for 8 days because of grade 3 leukopenia and grade 3 skin infection (erysipelas) were the DLTs. No drug-drug interactions between erlotinib and amrubicin were observed in this study. The overall response rate was 33%, including 3 partial responses, in the 9 patients. The median progression-free survival for all patients was quite long, 11.3 months, and the median overall survival has not yet been reached.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined erlotinib plus amrubicin therapy seems to be highly effective, with acceptable toxicity, against non-small cell lung cancer. The recommended dose for phase II studies was erlotinib 100 mg once daily on days 1 through 21, and amrubicin 35 mg/m on days 1 through 3 administered every 21 days.

Phase I dose escalation study of amrubicin plus paclitaxel in previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD) and the safety profile of amrubicin (AMR) plus paclitaxel (PTX) combination regimen for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

PTX was administered at a fixed dose of 150 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 and AMR was intravenously administered at a starting dose of 25 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3, and this was repeated every 4 weeks. Doses of each drug were planned as follows-level 0, 20/150; level 1, 25/150; level 2, 30/150; level 3, 30/180 AMR mg/m(2) per day/PTX mg/m(2) per day.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the regimen was assessed during the first cycle. At level 1, all three patients developed a DLT due to grade 4 neutropenia lasting >4 days, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Therefore, level 1 was considered the MTD and level 0 was selected as the RD. Objective responses were seen in two patients (response rate 16.7 %). Overall disease control rate was 91.7 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of AMR and PTX is a feasible and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. Although our study included a small number of patients, encouraging disease control and progression-free survival were achieved at the recommended doses. Further clinical trials are warranted.

Phase I/II study of amrubicin and nedaplatin in patients with untreated, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with amrubicin and nedaplatin for patients with untreated, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conducted. Amrubicin was given on days 1-3, with nedaplatin given on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. In the phase I trial, the initial amrubicin dose of 25 mg/m(2) was escalated in 5-mg/m(2) increments until the maximum tolerated dose was reached, with the dose of nedaplatin fixed at 100 mg/m(2). In the phase II trial, the primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR), assuming 20% for a standard therapy and 40% for a target therapy (α = 0.05 and β = 0.20), and the estimated required total number of patients was 35. In the phase I study, nedaplatin 100 mg/m(2) and amrubicin 25 mg/m(2) was recommended. In the phase II study, 17 out of 35 patients achieved a partial response, and the ORR was 48.6%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, grade 3 anemia and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 62.9, 11.4 and 11.4% of cycles, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 5 cycles (3.9%) and all cases were manageable. The recommended dose of this combination is well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Dose escalation and feasibility study of amrubicin combined with cisplatin in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Cisplatin is a key drug used in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and amrubicin is one of the new active agents for NSCLC. The objective of this study was to determine the recommended dose (RD) of amrubicin in combination with a fixed dose of cisplatin, and to assess the toxicity profile and feasibility of this regimen.

METHODS

We conducted a dose escalation study of amrubicin and cisplatin in previously untreated patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. Dose level 1 of amrubicin was 30 mg/m on days 1 to 3 and level 2 was 35 mg/m. Cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m on day 1. Chemotherapy was given in a 3-week cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and creatinine elevation. Level 1 (30 mg/m) was determined to be the RD, and 35 mg/m exceeded the RD. In 17 patients treated with the RD, the overall response rate was 41.2% (95% confidence interval, 17.7-64.7) and the median survival time was 16.4 months (95% confidence interval, 13.1-19.5).

CONCLUSIONS

This amrubicin and cisplatin regimen may be feasible and promising against advanced NSCLC. The efficacy and safety of this regimen should be confirmed in a phase II study.

A phase II study of amrubicin as a third-line or fourth-line chemotherapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: Hokkaido Lung Cancer Clinical Study Group Trial (HOT) 0901

Amrubicin, a third-generation synthetic anthracycline agent, has favorable clinical activity and acceptable toxicity for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin for advanced NSCLC patients as a third- or fourth-line therapy. Eligible patients had recurrent or refractory advanced NSCLC after second- or third-line therapy. Patients received amrubicin, 35 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1-3 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR). Secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) time, progression-free survival (PFS) time, response rate, and toxicity profile. Of the 41 patients enrolled, 26 received amrubicin as a third-line and 15 received it as a fourth-line therapy. The median number of treatment cycles was two (range, 1-9). Objective responses were complete response (n = 0), partial response (n = 4), stable disease (n = 21), progressive disease (n = 15), and not evaluable (n = 1), resulting in a DCR of 61.0% (95% confidence interval, 46.0%-75.9%). The overall response rate was 9.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.6%-18.8%). The median PFS interval was 3.0 months, median OS time was 12.6 months, and 1-year survival rate was 53.7%. Grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicities were neutropenia (68%), anemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (12%), and febrile neutropenia (17%). Nonhematological toxicities were mild and reversible. No treatment-related deaths were observed. Amrubicin showed significant clinical activity with manageable toxicities as a third- or fourth-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC. This study provides relevant data for routine practice and future prospective trials evaluating third- or fourth-line treatment strategies for patients with advanced NSCLC.

C609T Polymorphism of NADPH Quinone Oxidoreductase 1 Correlates Clinical Hematological Toxicities in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Amrubicin

Background:

Amrubicin hydrochloride (AMR) is a key agent for lung cancer. NADPH quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) metabolizes the quinone structures contained in both amrubicin (AMR) and amrubicinol (AMR-OH). We hypothesized that NQO1 C609T polymorphism may affect AMR-related pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

Methods:

Patients received AMR doses of 30 or 40 mg/m²/day on days 1–3. Plasma sampling was performed 24 hours after the first and third AMR injections. Concentrations of AMR and AMR-OH were determined by HPLC and the NQO1 C609T polymorphism was assayed by RT-PCR.

Results:

A total of 35 patients were enrolled. At a dose of 40 mg/m², the T/T genotype exhibited a tendency toward a relationship with decrease concentrations of AMR-OH on days 2 and 4. The genotype also showed a significant decrease of hematological toxicities (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

NQO1 C609T polymorphism had a tendency of correlation with the plasma concentrations of AMR-OH, and thereby had significant correlations with hematologic toxicities.

Phase I/II study of amrubicin in combination with S-1 as second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer without EGFR mutation

INTRODUCTION

Both amrubicin (Am) and S-1 are effective against non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and preclinical studies have demonstrated that the effect of tegafur/uracil, the original compound of S-1, in combination with Am significantly inhibits tumor growth.

METHODS

We conducted a phase I/II study of Am and S-1 against pretreated NSCLC without EGFR mutation. We fixed the dose of S-1 at 40 mg/m(2) on days 1-14 and escalated the Am dose in increments of 5 mg/m(2) from a starting dose of 30 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-3 and repeated the cycle every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were registered. In phase I, at an Am dose of 35 mg/m(2)/day, three patients experienced grade 2 leukopenia during S-1 administration, and S-1 was withdrawn. Another patient developed grade 2 serum bilirubin in the first cycle. DLTs were observed in four of six patients at this dose level, and therefore, 30 mg/m(2)/day was set as the recommended dose for Am. Twenty patients received this recommended Am dose. Febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients, and one patient developed a grade 4 increase in serum creatinine. Grade 3 vomiting, infection, hypotension, and urinary retention were observed in one patient each, respectively. Other toxicities were mild, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Two patients showed a CR, three showed a PR, and the overall response rate was 25.0%. The median progression-free and the median survival times were 3.8 and 15.6 months, respectively, and the 1-year survival rate was 60%.

CONCLUSION

Am and S-1 every 4 weeks is an effective combination for pretreated NSCLC without EGFR mutation.

Risk factors for predicting severe neutropenia induced by amrubicin in patients with advanced lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia is one of the most frequent and dose-limiting toxicities in amrubicin (AMR) therapy. However, the predictive factors for the development of severe neutropenia in AMR therapy remain unknown.

METHODS

The subjects were 61 advanced lung cancer patients treated with AMR monotherapy. All data were retrospectively collected from the electronic medical record system. A stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for grade 3-4 neutropenia.

RESULTS

Of a total 61 patients, 50 were male and 11 were female. The median dose of AMR was 35.0 mg/m(2). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia during the first course was 62%. In multivariate analysis, female gender (OR = 6.68; 95% CI 1.01-134.15; p = 0.049), higher AMR doses (40 mg/m(2) or more) (OR = 5.98; 95% CI 1.77-23.74; p = 0.003), and lower hematocrit values (OR = 2.04 per 5% decrease; 95% CI 1.04-4.38; p = 0.036) were significantly associated with severe neutropenia induced by AMR.

CONCLUSION

The present results suggest that female gender, higher doses of AMR, and lower baseline hematocrit values are predictive factors associated with severe neutropenia induced by AMR in patients with advanced lung cancer. Patients who have these predictive factors should be monitored carefully and considered for early granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support.

Gender difference in hematological toxicity among lung cancer patients receiving amrubicin monotherapy

BACKGROUND

Severe hematological toxicity has been frequently observed during amrubicin monotherapy for patients with lung cancer despite the favorable anti-tumor response. The purpose of this retrospective study was to identify pretreatment factors associated with severe hematological toxicity.

METHODS

The medical records of lung cancer patients treated with amrubicin monotherapy were reviewed, and univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

From January 2003 to December 2006, the medical records of 103 patients were extracted. Grade 4 neutropenia was frequently observed in females (male, 66% and female, 90%, P = 0.036 in a univariate analysis). In a multivariate analysis, female gender (P = 0.019), body weight loss (P = 0.021) and amrubicin dose (P = 0.028) were significantly correlated with Grade 4 neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Gender could be considered as one of the important predictive factors associated with Grade 4 neutropenia in patients receiving amrubicin monotherapy.

C609T polymorphism of NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 as a predictive biomarker for response to amrubicin

INTRODUCTION

Amrubicin is a promising agent in the treatment of lung cancer, but predictive biomarkers have not yet been described. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) is an enzyme known to metabolize amrubicinol, the active metabolite of amrubicin, to an inactive compound. We examined the relationship between NQO1 and amrubicinol cytotoxicity.

METHODS

Gene and protein expression of NQO1, amrubicinol cytotoxicity, and C609T single-nucleotide polymorphism of NQO1 were evaluated in 29 lung cancer cell lines: 14 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 15 non-SCLC (NSCLC). The involvement of NQO1 in amrubicinol cytotoxicity was evaluated by small interfering RNA against NQO1.

RESULTS

A significant inverse relationship between both gene and protein expression of NQO1 and amrubicinol cytotoxicity was found in all cell lines. Treatment with NQO1 small interfering RNA increased amrubicinol cytotoxicity and decreased NQO1 expression in both NSCLC and SCLC cells. Furthermore, cell lines genotyped homozygous for the 609T allele showed significantly lower NQO1 protein expression and higher sensitivity for amrubicinol than those with the other genotypes in both NSCLC and SCLC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

NQO1 expression is one of the major determinants for amrubicinol cytotoxicity, and C609T single-nucleotide polymorphism of NQO1 could be a predictive biomarker for response to amrubicin treatment.

Amrubicin monotherapy for patients with previously treated advanced large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung

OBJECTIVE

No standard chemotherapy has been established yet for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. Amrubicin is active for both small cell and non-small cell lung cancers, but its activity for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is still unknown.

METHODS

From January 2002 to December 2009, 18 patients with previously treated advanced large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma received amrubicin monotherapy. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatment were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The patients comprised 17 males and one female with a median age of 62 years (range, 51-77). Fourteen and four patients had a performance status of 0-1 and 2, respectively. Thirteen (72%) patients had received one prior chemotherapy, while the others had received two or more chemotherapies. All the patients had received platinum-based chemotherapy before the amrubicin treatment. A total of 63 cycles of amrubicin chemotherapy was administered in the 18 patients, with a median number of cycles per patient of 2.5 (range, 1-10). The median dose of amrubicin in the 63 cycles was 40 (range, 30-45) mg/m(2)/day for 3 days. Grades 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia were seen in 89, 17 and 22% of the patients, respectively. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia occurred in 33% of the patients. Non-hematological toxicity was generally mild and manageable. There were five cases of partial response, six of stable disease and six of progressive disease among the 18 patients, yielding an objective response rate of 27.7%. The median progression-free and overall survivals of the patients were 3.1 and 5.1 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin was potentially active against previously treated large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Amrubicin for the treatment of advanced lung cancer

Although the advancement of the chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer is remarkable in recent years, it is still unsatisfactory. Therefore, some new agents or a new treatment strategy for lung cancer is required. Amrubicin is a totally synthetic anthracycline anticancer drug that acts as a potent topoisomerase II inhibitor. Recently, amrubicin has been approved in Japan for the treatment of small- and non-small cell lung cancers and some clinical trials about amrubicin were conducted in Japan, and promising results have been reported for the treatment of small cell lung cancer in particular. The preclinical, pharmacology and clinical data of amrubicin for the treatment of advanced lung cancer are reviewed.

Phase II trial of amrubicin for second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of the West Japan Thoracic Oncology Group trial (WJTOG0401)

BACKGROUND

Amrubicin is a synthetic anthracycline drug that is a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase II. We have performed a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of amrubicin for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC who experienced disease recurrence after one platinum-based chemotherapy regimen were eligible for enrollment in the study. Amrubicin was administered by intravenous injection at a dose of 40 mg/m2 on 3 consecutive days every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty-one enrolled patients received a total of 192 treatment cycles (median, 2; range, 1-15). Response was as follows: complete response, 0; partial response, seven (11.5%); stable disease, 20 (32.8%); and progressive disease, 34 (55.7%). Median progression-free survival was 1.8 months, whereas median overall survival was 8.5 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 32%. Hematologic toxicities of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (82.0%), leukopenia (73.8%), thrombocytopenia (24.6%), and anemia (27.9%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 18 patients (29.5%). One treatment-related death due to infection was observed. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Amrubicin is a possible alternative for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC, although a relevant hematological toxicity is significant, especially with a febrile neutropenia.

Chemotherapy for lung cancer: the state of the art in 2009

Lung cancer remains the most common cause of cancer-related death among men and women worldwide. Incremental and significant advances in available systemic treatments, however, have taken place in the last decade to provide improved survival rates and better palliation for patients with non-small-cell and small-cell lung cancer. Superior imaging techniques have enabled the detection of early-stage disease and adjuvant chemotherapy has earned a place for select patients following resection of their tumors. Perhaps the largest growth has been in the area of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, in which multiple new combination and single-agent systemic therapies have become standard where previously only 'best supportive care' was thought appropriate. In concert with broader applicability of chemotherapy, translational studies have provided the rationale for using molecular markers to identify the patients most likely to benefit from biological and targeted therapies. This review will discuss the current role of chemotherapy in both early and advanced non-small-cell and small-cell lung cancer. Novel targeted systemic therapies and the appropriate selection of treatments for patients based on their tumors' molecular phenotypes and histologies will also be reviewed.

A phase II study of amrubicin, a synthetic 9-aminoanthracycline, in patients with previously treated lung cancer

PURPOSE

This study was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of amrubicin, a new anthracycline agent, in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients were required to have recurrent or refractory NSCLC and SCLC after one or two previous chemotherapy regimens. All patients received intravenous amrubicin 35 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 every 3 weeks. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients (37 NSCLC and 29 SCLC) were assessable for efficacy and safety evaluation. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 39.4% of all patients (NSCLC, 37.8%; SCLC, 41.4%). Nonhematological toxicities were mild. No treatment-related death was observed. The ORRs were 13.5% (95% CI, 4.5-28.8%) in NSCLC and 44.8% (95% CI, 26.4-64.3%) in SCLC. In SCLC, ORRs were 60.0% in the sensitive relapse and 36.8% in the refractory relapse (p=0.2332). In NSCLC, the PFS, OS, and 1-year survival were 3.3 months, 12.0 months, and 35.3%, respectively. In SCLC, the PFS, OS, and 1-year survival were 4.0 months, 12.0 months, and 46.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Amrubicin is an active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with previously treated lung cancer. Amrubicin 35 mg/m(2) seems to achieve similar efficacy with less toxicity than amrubicin 40 mg/m(2) in this patient population. These results warrant further evaluation in previously treated lung cancer.