Justification of the starting dose as the main determinant of accrual time in dose-seeking oncology phase 1 trials

Intracavitary cisplatin-fibrin chemotherapy after surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: A phase I trial

OBJECTIVES

Intracavitary chemotherapy is a promising concept to improve local tumor control for malignant pleural mesothelioma with reported high morbidity rates. We have demonstrated that administration of cisplatin loaded to fibrin increased local drug concentration and reduced systemic toxicity in preclinical models. We present a phase I trial of intracavitary cisplatin-fibrin after surgical tumor resection.

METHODS

A total of 12 patients (75% International Mesothelioma Interest Group stage III-IV) were treated with 4 dose levels of intracavitary cisplatin-fibrin (11-44 mg/m² body surface area) in a dose-escalating design. Cisplatin-fibrin was sprayed on the resected surfaces after pleurectomy/decortication. Blood and tissue samples were taken to assess toxicity and pharmacokinetics. Patients were regularly followed up.

RESULTS

No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Major morbidity occurred in 4 patients (33%). The 30-day and 90-day mortality were both 0%. Of 80 adverse events, 9 were classified serious, but none of these were related to study treatment. Local cisplatin concentration in the chest wall tissue was high at all dose levels (median, 46.3 μg/g [12-133 μg/g]). In serum, median cisplatin area under the concentration time curve values were always below renal toxicity levels. The median overall survival with 95% confidence interval was 21 months (10-31 months). In 1 patient with epithelioid malignant pleural mesothelioma (International Mesothelioma Interest Group stage I), there was no sign of relapse 48 months after treatment (44 mg/m² body surface area).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of intracavitary cisplatin-fibrin is safe with favorable pharmacokinetics. Although most patients had advanced disease, long-term outcomes are comparable to other multimodal concepts. A confirmation phase II trial is ongoing.

Factors influencing time to determination of the recommended phase 2 dose in phase 1 clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Cancer clinical trials are the means to develop safe and effective novel treatment options for patients. The longer it takes for these trials to reach the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), the fewer therapy options are available to patients and physicians. The purpose of this study is to examine the factors that delay RP2D determination in phase 1 clinical trials.

METHODS

Thirty-five consecutive phase 1 clinical trials for advanced solid tumors that started between February 2006 and March 2009 in a single institution were examined for inclusion. Factors potentially contributing to trial delays were analyzed against time to determination of an RP2D (TDR).

RESULTS

Thirty-one phase 1 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the statistical analysis. Investigational agents under evaluation included single agent cytotoxic (N=4), monoclonal antibody (N=3), single agent cytostatic/targeted (N=16), or combination of an investigational agent and commercially available systemic chemotherapy (N=8). A protocol defined phase 2 dose decreased the TDR (P<0.001). Other factors that significantly increased TDR included a larger minimum estimated patient sample size (P=0.022), a greater number of predefined dose levels (P<0.001), and a higher number of expansion cohorts (P=0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Including a predefined phase 2 dose and reducing the number of dose levels and expansion cohorts may shorten phase 1 trial TDR.

Dose-levels and first signs of efficacy in contemporary oncology phase 1 clinical trials

PURPOSE

Phase 1 trials play a crucial role in oncology by translating laboratory science into efficient therapies. Molecular targeted agents (MTA) differ from traditional cytotoxics in terms of both efficacy and toxicity profiles. Recent reports suggest that higher doses are not essential to produce the optimal anti-tumor effect. This study aimed to assess if MTA could achieve clinical benefit at much lower dose than traditional cytotoxics in dose seeking phase 1 trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed 317 recent phase 1 oncology trials reported in the literature between January 1997 and January 2009. First sign of efficacy, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and their associated dose level were recorded in each trial.

RESULTS

Trials investigating conventional cytotoxics alone, MTA alone and combination of both represented respectively 63.0% (201/317), 23.3% (74/317) and 13.7% (42/317) of all trials. The MTD was reached in 65.9% (209/317) of all trials and was mostly observed at the fifth dose level. First sign of efficacy was less frequently observed at the first three dose-levels for MTA as compared to conventional cytotoxics or combinations regimens (48.3% versus 63.2% and 61.3%). Sign of efficacy was observed in the same proportion whatever the treatment type (73-82%). MTD was less frequently established in trials investigating MTA alone (51.3%) or combinations (42.8%) as compared to conventional cytotoxic agents (75.6%).

CONCLUSION

First sign of efficacy was less frequently reported at the early dose-levels and MTD was less frequently reached in trials investigating molecular targeted therapy alone. Similar proportion of trials reported clinical benefit.