Effect of selection of QTc formula on eligibility of cancer patients for phase I clinical trials

Ventricular Arrhythmia in Cancer Patients: Mechanisms, Treatment Strategies and Future Avenues

Cardiovascular disease and cancer are the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the US. Despite the significant progress made in cancer treatment leading to improved prognosis and survival, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) remain a known cardiovascular complication either exacerbated or induced by the direct and indirect effects of both traditional and novel cancer treatments. Although interruption of cancer treatment because of VA is rarely required, knowledge surrounding this issue is essential for optimising the overall care of patients with cancer. The mechanisms of cancer-therapeutic-induced VA are poorly understood. This review will discuss the ventricular conduction (QRS) and repolarisation abnormalities (QTc prolongation), and VAs associated with cancer therapies, as well as existing strategies for the identification, prevention and management of cancer-treatment-induced VAs.

Using the appropriate formula for QT measurement can save lives

CDK 4/6 inhibitors, in combination with endocrine therapy, are the standard of care for patients with endocrine-sensitive advanced breast cancer. This class of drug, however, is associated with QT prolongation, which serves as a surrogate marker for Torsades de Pointes (TdP), a cause of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The ICH E14 guidance document uses the Bazett formula for reporting of cardio-dynamic and safety ECG data in clinical trials. While there is substantial familiarity with the Bazett (QTcB) formula (QT/(RR) 1/2), the Fridericia (QTcF) formula (QT/(RR) 1/3 ) is preferred in the cancer population as it is often more accurate at heart rate extreme. Accordingly, the Fridericia formula is currently the standard adopted by the FDA when submitting QT data for review. At the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, a total of 82 patients with advanced breast cancer, had a baseline ECG on day 1 before the initiation of ribociclib based therapy. Of the enrolled 82 patients, 19 (23%) were initially excluded from receiving ribociclib based due to a prolonged QTc >450ms, however, when the QTc-interval was manually measured and recalculated using Fridericia and Framingham formulae using MDCalC (https//:www.mdcalc.com),17 of 19 patients successfully received their treatment without any arrhythmogenic effects. Repeat ECG on day14, and day 1 of cycle 2 demonstrated that none of these patients had QTc exceeding 480 ms. Our data highlights the complexities of evaluating the QT interval in oncology patients and the utility of the Fridericia/Framingham formulae in this population. Given these findings, we recommend the adoption of the Fridericia or Framingham formulae for measurement of QTc in all cancer patients exposed to potentially QT-prolonging cancer therapy.

Management of cardiac disease in cancer patients throughout oncological treatment: ESMO consensus recommendations

Cancer and cardiovascular (CV) disease are the most prevalent diseases in the developed world. Evidence increasingly shows that these conditions are interlinked through common risk factors, coincident in an ageing population, and are connected biologically through some deleterious effects of anticancer treatment on CV health. Anticancer therapies can cause a wide spectrum of short- and long-term cardiotoxic effects. An explosion of novel cancer therapies has revolutionised this field and dramatically altered cancer prognosis. Nevertheless, these new therapies have introduced unexpected CV complications beyond heart failure. Common CV toxicities related to cancer therapy are defined, along with suggested strategies for prevention, detection and treatment. This ESMO consensus article proposes to define CV toxicities related to cancer or its therapies and provide guidance regarding prevention, screening, monitoring and treatment of CV toxicity. The majority of anticancer therapies are associated with some CV toxicity, ranging from asymptomatic and transient to more clinically significant and long-lasting cardiac events. It is critical however, that concerns about potential CV damage resulting from anticancer therapies should be weighed against the potential benefits of cancer therapy, including benefits in overall survival. CV disease in patients with cancer is complex and treatment needs to be individualised. The scope of cardio-oncology is wide and includes prevention, detection, monitoring and treatment of CV toxicity related to cancer therapy, and also ensuring the safe development of future novel cancer treatments that minimise the impact on CV health. It is anticipated that the management strategies discussed herein will be suitable for the majority of patients. Nonetheless, the clinical judgment of physicians remains extremely important; hence, when using these best clinical practices to inform treatment options and decisions, practitioners should also consider the individual circumstances of their patients on a case-by-case basis.

Incidence, Diagnosis, and Management of QT Prolongation Induced by Cancer Therapies: A Systematic Review

Background

The cardiovascular complications of cancer therapeutics are the focus of the burgeoning field of cardio‐oncology. A common challenge in this field is the impact of cancer drugs on cardiac repolarization (ie, QT prolongation) and the potential risk for the life‐threatening arrhythmia torsades de pointes. Although QT prolongation is not a perfect marker of arrhythmia risk, this has become a primary safety metric among oncologists. Cardiologists caring for patients receiving cancer treatment should become familiar with the drugs associated with QT prolongation, its incidence, and appropriate management strategies to provide meaningful consultation in this complex clinical scenario.

Methods and Results

In this article, we performed a systematic review (using Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines) of commonly used cancer drugs to determine the incidence of QT prolongation and clinically relevant arrhythmias. We calculated summary estimates of the incidence of all and clinically relevant QT prolongation as well as arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. We then describe strategies to prevent, identify, and manage QT prolongation in patients receiving cancer therapy. We identified a total of 173 relevant publications. The weighted incidence of any corrected QT (QTc) prolongation in our systematic review in patients treated with conventional therapies (eg, anthracyclines) ranged from 0% to 22%, although QTc >500 ms, arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death was extremely rare. The risk of QTc prolongation with targeted therapies (eg, small molecular tyrosine kinase inhibitors) ranged between 0% and 22.7% with severe prolongation (QTc >500 ms) reported in 0% to 5.2% of the patients. Arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death were rare.

Conclusions

Our systematic review demonstrates that there is variability in the incidence of QTc prolongation of various cancer drugs; however, the clinical consequence, as defined by arrhythmias or sudden cardiac death, remains rare.