Negative impact of malignant effusion on osimertinib treatment for non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation

Efficacy of osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer with malignant pleural effusion

BACKGROUND

As an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), osimertinib has emerged as a standard EGFR-mutation positive treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of osimertinib for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains understudied. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of osimertinib on time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, comparing those with and without MPE.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with osimertinib at our hospital between April 2016 and June 2021. TTF was defined as the duration from osimertinib initiation to discontinuation, and OS as the duration until death, irrespective of the reason.

RESULTS

Among 229 patients receiving osimertinib, 84 had MPE before administration, 39 acquired EGFR exon20 T790M mutation following previous EGFR-TKI therapy, and 45 were EGFR-TKI-naive. Among EGFR-TKI-naive patients, median TTF was 14.8 and 19.8 months for those with and without MPE, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-2.18; p = 0.12). Median OS was 32.0 and 42.0 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.43; 95% CI: 0.86-2.38; p = 0.16). Among patients with T790M mutation, median TTF was 12.3 and 13.1 months for patients with and without MPE, respectively (HR 1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.55; p = 0.88). Median OS for patients with and without MPE was 23.2 and 24.7 months, respectively (HR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.72-1.67; p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with EGFR-mutation positive NSCLC, the evidence of MPE has little effect on survival with osimertinib.

Osimertinib-induced biventricular cardiomyopathy with abnormal cardiac MRI findings: a case report

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor that is currently the first-line treatment for metastatic EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to its favorable efficacy and tolerability profile compared to previous generations of EGFR inhibitors. However, it can cause uncommon, yet serious, cardiovascular adverse effects.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 63-year-old man with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with osimertinib who developed new-onset non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with biventricular dysfunction and heart failure in the context of an enlarging pericardial effusion. For the first time, we demonstrate cardiac MR imaging findings associated with osimertinib-associated cardiomyopathy, including focal late gadolinium enhancement and myocardial edema. The patient's biventricular function normalized after initiation of goal-directed medical therapy for heart failure and holding osimertinib. The patient was subsequently started on afatinib, a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), without recurrence of cardiomyopathy.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the need to better understand osimertinib-induced cardiotoxicity and strategies to optimize oncologic care in patients who develop severe cardiac toxicities from cancer therapy. It further underlines the importance of specialized multidisciplinary care of cancer patients who develop cardiotoxicities to optimize their oncologic outcomes.

Efficacy of osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer patients with pleural effusion

Background

Osimertinib is a standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Although malignant pleural effusion (PE) is a common clinical problem in NSCLC, information about the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with PE is limited, especially regarding its efficacy in EGFR T790M-negative patients with PE remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with osimertinib in our institution between May 2016 and December 2020.

Results

A total of 63 patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC were treated with osimertinib; 33 (12 with PE) had no EGFR T790M mutation, while 30 (12 with PE) had EGFR T790M mutation. In EGFR T790M-negative NSCLC, the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with PE was comparable to that of the patients without PE (median PFS 19.8 vs. 19.8 months, p = 0.693). In EGFR T790M- positive NSCLC, the PFS and overall survival (OS) of the patients with PE were significantly shorter than those of the patients without PE (median PFS 16.8 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.003; median OS 44.9 vs. 14.2 months, p = 0.007). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of PE was independently associated with shorter PFS and OS in EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients, but not EGFR T790M-negative patients.

Conclusions

These data suggest the efficacy of osimertinib may differ between EGFR T790M-positive and -negative NSCLC patients with PE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09701-2.

The efficacy and safety of osimertinib in treating nonsmall cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is the primary treatment in treating with EGFR mutant nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the third-generation EGFR-TKI, osimertinib, and summarize the risk factors associating with outcome after osimertinib treatment.

METHOD

The Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Pubmed were systematically searched due to December 10, 2019. All the studies that mentioned the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment response, and adverse events (AEs) of osimertinib were involved in our study. Hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals was used for comparing OS and PFS.

RESULT

A total of 47 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 14 studies were used to compare the efficacy between osimertinib and other EGFR-TKI or chemotherapy. Patients treating with osimertinib favors a higher OS and PFS in all the patients (HR = 0.56 and 0.38, P < .001, respectively), and in subgroup analysis, compared with other treatments. Median 55% T790 mutant NSCLC patients might experience partial response, and 25% of patients remained as stable disease. The incidence of severe AE ranged from 0% to 5%, and the most common severe AE was pneumonia (3%). Patients with the T858R mutation may have a better OS than Del 19 mutation (HR = 0.55, P = .037), while patients who have a smoking history may have a higher risk of progression than never-smoker patients (HR = 1.47, P = .028).

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib has an impressive antitumor activity compared with prior EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy with an acceptable response and tolerable AEs. EGFR mutation type and smoking status were the risk factors for mortality and progression in NSCLC patients.

Non-significant efficacy of icotinib plus pleurodesis in epidermal growth factor receptor positive mutant lung cancer patients after malignant pleural effusion drainage compared to icotinib alone

Background

To investigate the efficacy and safety of icotinib plus pleurodesis or icotinib alone in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) positive mutant lung cancer patients after malignant pleural effusion (MPE) drainage.

Methods

In this retrospective study from initially reviewed case reports of 230 lung adenocarcinoma patients with MPE who were EGFR mutation positive and treated in our hospital between Jan 2014 and Dec 2016 consecutively, 51 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into treated with oral icotinib plus pleurodesis and without pleurodesis after pleural effusion drainage groups. Case records including patient gender, age, smoking status and local treatments, as well as adverse events were collected and retrospectively analyzed. The clinical outcomes which were measured by progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) & adverse reactions were analyzed by a Kaplan-Meier curve and a log-rank test after follow-ups.

Results

The median PFS of patients who received icotinib plus pleurodesis was 8.4 months, while the median PFS of icotinib alone patients was 9.0 months (P=0.996, χ²=7.241). Similarly, the ORR for MPEs, with or without pleurodesis were not significantly difference (64.29% vs. 67.57%, P=0.824, χ²=0.049). Adverse reactions of pleurodesis were mainly fever, chest pain, gastrointestinal reactions and myelosuppression.

Conclusions

Our results suggested that pleurodesis after MPE drainage had no difference on outcomes of icotinib therapy patients. However, pleurodesis may increase some adverse reactions, which might be inconvenient for patients in clinical practice.