Combination of TACE and Lenvatinib as a promising option for downstaging to surgery of initially unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Clinical Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Microsphere Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with First-Line Chemotherapy as the Initial Treatment for Patients with Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the combination of drug-eluting microsphere (DEM) transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) with those of chemotherapy in treating unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients diagnosed with unresectable ICC between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively included in this study. Of these, 39 patients received DEM-TACE and first-line chemotherapy (TACE+Chemo group) and 31 received chemotherapy alone (Chemo group). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias between the TACE+Chemo and the Chemo groups. Differences in tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared between 2 groups.

RESULTS

The patients in the TACE+Chemo group had better median OS (18.6 vs 11.9 months; P = .018), median PFS (11.9 vs 6.9 months, P = .033), and objective response rates (56.8% vs 13.3%; P < .001) than those in the Chemo group. TRAEs showed a higher incidence of transient elevation of transaminase and abdominal pain in the TACE+Chemo group than in the Chemo group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with chemotherapy alone, DEM-TACE combined with first-line chemotherapy may be a viable and safe treatment option for unresectable ICC.

PD-L1 inhibitor plus gemcitabine and cisplatin therapy followed by conversion surgery for initially unresectable advanced gallbladder cancer

Advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) is not amenable to surgical resection. There are limited treatment options and the prognosis is dismal. The role of immune checkpoint inhibitors in conversion therapy remains unclear for initially unresectable advanced GBC. We present a case of a woman in her late 60s diagnosed with stage IV GBC with liver and para-aortic and retroperitoneal lymph node metastases, who achieved a pathological complete response after three cycles of programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor durvalumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen and underwent conversion surgery without complication. The patient went on to develop disease progression without adjuvant therapy 6 months after surgery.

Update on Locoregional Therapies for Cholangiocellular Carcinoma

Locoregional therapy options for CCA are used, in particular, for non-resectable tumors and aim to reduce tumor viability or delay tumor growth and ultimately prolong overall survival. In addition to local ablative procedures such as radiofrequency- or microwave-ablation, transarterial procedures such as transarterial embolization (TAE), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), or selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) play a major role. In particular, in combination with advances in molecular medicine and immunotherapy, there has been a further development in the therapy of primary malignant liver tumors in recent years. In this review, we analyze data from recent studies and examine the implications for therapy of CCA, particularly with regard to the combination of locoregional therapies with modern systemic therapies.

Transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib with or without programmed death-1 inhibitors for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

Purpose

We conducted a retrospective study to compare transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors with TACE plus lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patients and methods

Patients with HCC were analyzed from January 2018 to January 2022 in three hospitals. Patients received TACE plus lenvatinib with or without PD-1 inhibitors (TACE+L+PD-1 or TACE+L, respectively). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) of the two groups were compared. Adverse events in the two groups were analyzed.

Results

A total of 166 patients were evaluated (TACE+L+PD-1, n = 75; TACE+L, n = 91). Before PSM, OS was prolonged in the TACE+L+PD-1 group (p = 0.010), but PFS was similar between the two groups (p = 0.18). ORR was higher in the TACE+L+PD-1 group (p = 0.047). After PSM, estimated OS rates at 6, 12, and 24 months were 97.9%, 84.6%, and 74.1%, respectively, in the TACE+L+PD-1 group (n = 48) and 93.1%, 66.1%, and 43.4%, respectively, in the TACE+L group (n = 48). Estimated PFS rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 81.9%, 61.8%, and 30.9%, respectively, in the TACE+L group and 95.7%, 82.1%, and 68.4%, respectively, in the TACE+L+PD-1 group. OS, PFS, and ORR were improved in the TACE+L+PD-1 group compared to the TACE+L group (p = 0.030; p = 0.027; p = 0.013). The safety of the TACE+L+PD-1 regimen was acceptable.

Conclusions

The addition of PD-1 inhibitors to TACE+L significantly improved clinical outcomes in patients with unresectable HCC. Side effects were manageable.

Systemic Therapy Is Associated with Improved Oncologic Outcomes in Resectable Stage II/III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: An Examination of the National Cancer Database over the Past Decade

Limited evidence-based management guidelines for resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) currently exist. Using a large population-based cancer registry; the utilization rates and outcomes for patients with clinical stages I-III ICC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) in relation to other treatment strategies were investigated, as were the predictors of treatment regimen utilization. Oncologic outcomes were compared between treatment strategies. Amongst 2736 patients, chemotherapy utilization was low; however, NAT use increased from 4.3% to 7.2% (p = 0.011) over the study period. A higher clinical stage was predictive of the use of NAT, while higher pathologic stage and margin-positive resections were predictive of the use of adjuvant therapy (AT). For patients with more advanced disease, the receipt of NAT or AT was associated with significantly improved survival compared to surgery alone (cStage II, p = 0.040; cStage III, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients receiving NAT were more likely to undergo margin-negative resections compared to those treated with AT (72.5% vs. 62.6%, p = 0.027), despite having higher-risk tumors. This analysis of treatment strategies for resectable ICC suggests a benefit for systemic therapy. Prospective and randomized studies evaluating the sequencing of treatments for patients with high-risk resectable ICC are needed.