Use of recommended medications after myocardial infarction in Austria

Left Ventricular Remodeling after Myocardial Infarction: From Physiopathology to Treatment

Myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause of death and morbidity worldwide, with an incidence relatively high in developed countries and rapidly growing in developing countries. The most common cause of MI is the rupture of an atherosclerotic plaque with subsequent thrombotic occlusion in the coronary circulation. This causes cardiomyocyte death and myocardial necrosis, with subsequent inflammation and fibrosis. Current therapies aim to restore coronary flow by thrombus dissolution with pharmaceutical treatment and/or intravascular stent implantation and to counteract neurohormonal activation. Despite these therapies, the injury caused by myocardial ischemia leads to left ventricular remodeling; this process involves changes in cardiac geometry, dimension and function and eventually progression to heart failure (HF). This review describes the pathophysiological mechanism that leads to cardiac remodeling and the therapeutic strategies with a role in slowing the progression of remodeling and improving cardiac structure and function.

Physician Financial Incentives to Reduce Unplanned Hospital Readmissions: an Interrupted Time Series Analysis

BACKGROUND

In 2012, the Ministry of Health in British Columbia, Canada, introduced a $75 incentive payment that could be claimed by hospital physicians each time they produced a written post-discharge care plan for a complex patient at the time of hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether physician financial payments incentivizing enhanced discharge planning reduce subsequent unplanned hospital readmissions.

DESIGN

Interrupted time series analysis of population-based hospitalization data.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with one or more eligible hospitalizations occurring in British Columbia between 2007 and 2017.

MAIN MEASURES

The proportion of index hospital discharges with subsequent unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days, as measured each month of the 11-year study interval. We used interrupted time series analysis to determine if readmission risk changed after introduction of the incentive payment policy.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 40,588 unplanned hospital readmissions occurred among 409,289 eligible index hospitalizations (crude 30-day readmission risk, 9.92%). Policy introduction was not associated with a significant step change (0.393%; 95CI, - 0.190 to 0.975%; p = 0.182) or change-in-trend (p = 0.317) in monthly readmission risk. Policy introduction was associated with significantly fewer prescription fills for potentially inappropriate medications among older patients, but no improvement in prescription fills for beta-blockers after cardiovascular hospitalization and no change in 30-day mortality. Incentive payment uptake was incomplete, rising from 6.4 to 23.5% of eligible hospitalizations between the first and last year of the post-policy interval.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of a physician incentive payment was not associated with meaningful changes in hospital readmission rate, perhaps in part because of incomplete uptake by physicians. Policymakers should consider these results when designing similar interventions elsewhere.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT03256734.

Exploring the Barriers to and Facilitators of Using Evidence-Based Drugs in the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases: Findings From a Multistakeholder, Qualitative Analysis

BACKGROUND

Health-system barriers and facilitators associated with cardiovascular medication adherence have seldom been studied, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where uptake rates are poorest.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to explore the major obstacles and facilitators to the use of evidence-supported medications for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease using qualitative analysis in 2 diverse countries across multiple levels of their health care systems.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study approach was implemented in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and Delhi, India. A purposeful sample (n = 69) of 23 patients, 10 physicians, 2 nurse practitioners, 5 Department of Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha, and Homoeopathy physicians, 11 pharmacists, 3 nurses, 4 hospital administrators, 1 social worker, 3 nongovernmental organization workers, 2 pharmaceutical company representatives, and 5 policy makers participated in interviews in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (n = 21), and Delhi, India (n = 48). All interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed followed by directed content analysis to summarize and categorize the interviews.

RESULTS

Themes that emerged across the stakeholder groups included: medication counseling; monitoring adherence; medication availability; medication affordability and drug coverage; time restrictions; and task shifting. The depth of verbal medication counseling provided varied substantially between countries, with prescribers in India unable to convey relevant information about drug treatments due to time constraint and high patient load. Canadian patients reported drug affordability as a common issue and very few patients were familiar with government subsidized drug programs. In India, patients purchased medications out-of-pocket from private, community pharmacies to avoid long commutes, lost wages, and unavailability of medications from hospitals formularies. Task shifting medication-refilling and titration to nonphysician health workers was accepted and supported by physicians in Canada but not in India, where many of the physicians considered a high level of clinical expertise a precondition to carry out these tasks skillfully.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal context-specific, health system factors that affect the patient's choice or ability to initiate and/or continue cardiovascular medication. Strategies to optimize cardiovascular drug use should be targeted and relevant to the health care system.

Health system barriers and facilitators to medication adherence for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review

Background

Secondary prevention is cost-effective for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but uptake is suboptimal. Understanding barriers and facilitators to adherence to secondary prevention for CVD at multiple health system levels may inform policy.

Objectives

To conduct a systematic review of barriers and facilitators to adherence/persistence to secondary CVD prevention medications at health system level.

Methods

Included studies reported effects of health system level factors on adherence/persistence to secondary prevention medications for CVD (coronary artery or cerebrovascular disease). Studies considered at least one of β blockers, statins, angiotensin–renin system blockers and aspirin. Relevant databases were searched from 1 January 1966 until 1 October 2015. Full texts were screened for inclusion by 2 independent reviewers.

Results

Of 2246 screened articles, 25 studies were included (12 trials, 11 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study and 1 case–control study) with 132 140 individuals overall (smallest n=30, largest n=63 301). 3 studies included upper middle-income countries, 1 included a low middle-income country and 21 (84%) included high-income countries (9 in the USA). Studies concerned established CVD (n=4), cerebrovascular disease (n=7) and coronary heart disease (n=14). Three studies considered persistence and adherence. Quantity and quality of evidence was limited for adherence, persistence and across drug classes. Studies were concerned with governance and delivery (n=19, including 4 trials of fixed-dose combination therapy, FDC), intellectual resources (n=1), human resources (n=1) and health system financing (n=4). Full prescription coverage, reduced copayments, FDC and counselling were facilitators associated with higher adherence.

Conclusions

High-quality evidence on health system barriers and facilitators to adherence to secondary prevention medications for CVD is lacking, especially for low-income settings. Full prescription coverage, reduced copayments, FDC and counselling may be effective in improving adherence and are priorities for further research.

Contrast-associated AKI and use of cardiovascular medications after acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

AKI after coronary angiography is associated with poor long-term outcomes. The relationship between contrast-associated AKI and subsequent use of prognosis-modifying cardiovascular medications is unknown.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A cohort study of 5911 participants 66 years of age or older with acute coronary syndrome who received a coronary angiogram in Alberta, Canada was performed between November 1, 2002, and November 30, 2008. AKI was identified according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes AKI criteria.

RESULTS

In multivariable logistic regression models, compared with participants without AKI, those with stages 1 and 2-3 AKI had lower odds of subsequent use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker within 120 days of hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.80 and odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.48, respectively). Subsequent statin and β-blockers use within 120 days of hospital discharge was significantly lower among those with stages 2-3 AKI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.64 and odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.66, respectively). These associations were consistently seen in patients with diabetes mellitus, heart failure, low baseline eGFR, and albuminuria; 952 participants died during subsequent follow-up after hospital discharge (mean=3.1 years). The use of each class of cardiovascular medication was associated with lower mortality, including among those who had experienced AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Strategies to optimize the use of cardiac medications in people with AKI after coronary angiography might improve care.

Initial and subsequent therapy for newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care using data from a vendor-based electronic health record

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a leading cause of death and disability, and its prevalence is increasing. When diet fails, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are prescribed oral hypoglycemics for glycemic control. Few studies have explored initial use or change from initial oral hypoglycemic therapy in the primary care setting. We aimed to describe the utilization of initial oral hypoglycemics among newly diagnosed patients with diabetes from 1998-2009 and changes from initial to subsequent therapy among patients prescribed older oral hypoglycemic agents using electronic health records.

METHODS

This observational cohort study used electronic health records from newly diagnosed patients with T2DM between 1 January 1998 and 31 March 2009 at two large health systems in the USA. Oral hypoglycemics included older (biguanide, sulfonylurea, and thiazolidinedione) and newer agents (incretin mimetic agents, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, and D-phenylalanine derivatives). Multinomial regression models were fit to evaluate initial older oral hypoglycemic medication. We used incidence density sampling and conditional logistic regression models to evaluate predictors of regimen change.

RESULTS

Most patients were treated from the biguanide class of oral hypoglycemics (67%), but there were differences in initial prescribing by age and race. HbA1c (Odds Ratio for HbA1c 7.0-8.9 vs < 7.0, 5.87 [95% Confidence Interval: 3.62-9.52]; Odds Ratio for HbA1c ≥ 9 vs < 7.0, 20.25 [95% Confidence Interval: 8.32-49.29] and Black people (Odds Ratio, 0.29 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.14, 0.60]) versus White people were associated with regimen change in the adjusted analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and demographic characteristics influence choice and duration of initial oral hypoglycemic treatment as well as regimen changes.

[LDL-cholesterol in secondary prevention: goal-attainment in patients on lipid-lowering drugs in private practice and in hospitals in Austria (ZIEL)]

BACKGROUND

A hospital-based screening project (HSP) in Austria found 47% of high-risk patients (LDL-C < 100 mg/dl) and 24% of very high-risk patients (LDL-C < 70 mg/dl) at goal. Separate data for the sexes were not reported. We analyze whether LDL-C goal attainment in patients with manifest atherosclerosis and/or diabetes on stable lipid-lowering treatment differs between private practice and hospital and between men and women.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From September to November 2007, 49 Austrian centers (36 private practice, 13 hospitals) documented vascular morbidity, lipid levels, and lipid lowering treatment in patients with high risk (atherosclerosis or diabetes, n = 978) and very high risk (coronary heart disease and diabetes or acute coronary syndrome, n = 322).

RESULTS

75% and 25% of the 1300 patients were high and very high risk, respectively. LDL-C goals of < 100 and < 70 mg/dl, respectively, were attained by 45.4% and 26.4% of patients (p < 0.001). A similar percentage of patients with very high risk was found in men and women (26.4% vs. 22.9%, NS) and goal attainment was not influenced by sex (high risk: 47.2% (m) vs. 43.8% (w), NS and very high risk: 29.1% (m) vs. 22.4% (w), NS). In patients with high risk, 41.6% treated in private practice vs. 57.9% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). In patients with very high risk, 15.9% treated in private practice vs. 45.2% treated in the hospital were at goal (p < 0.001). Lower goal-attainment in private practice occurred despite significantly more intensive lipid intervention and probably reflects higher baseline LDL-C. LDL-C > 100 mg/dl leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in approx. 70% of patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital. LDL-C between 70 and 100 mg/dl, however, leads to a more aggressive lipid lowering in < 5% of patients, irrespective of whether they are high or very high risk.

CONCLUSION

As observed in EUROASPIRE III for other European countries, there is substantial potential for improvement in lipid control in Austrian cardiovascular high-risk patients, irrespective of whether they are treated in private practice or in the hospital.

Early influences on cardiovascular and renal development

The hypothesis that a developmental component plays a role in subsequent disease initially arose from epidemiological studies relating birth size to both risk factors for cardiovascular disease and actual cardiovascular disease prevalence in later life. The findings that small size at birth is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease have led to concerns about the effect size and the causality of the associations. However, recent studies have overcome most methodological flaws and suggested small effect sizes for these associations for the individual, but an potential important effect size on a population level. Various mechanisms underlying these associations have been hypothesized, including fetal undernutrition, genetic susceptibility and postnatal accelerated growth. The specific adverse exposures in fetal and early postnatal life leading to cardiovascular disease in adult life are not yet fully understood. Current studies suggest that both environmental and genetic factors in various periods of life may underlie the complex associations of fetal growth retardation and low birth weight with cardiovascular disease in later life. To estimate the population effect size and to identify the underlying mechanisms, well-designed epidemiological studies are needed. This review is focused on specific adverse fetal exposures, cardiovascular adaptations and perspectives for new studies.

Analysis of individual drug use as a time-varying determinant of exposure in prospective population-based cohort studies

In pharmaco-epidemiology, the use of drugs is the determinant of interest when studying exposure-outcome associations. The increased availability of computerized information about drug use on an individual basis has greatly facilitated analyses of drug effects on a population-based scale. It seems likely that many negative findings in the early days of pharmaco-epidemiology can be explained by non-differential misclassification because of too simple (yes/no) exposure measures. In this paper, the authors discuss the importance of an adequate definition of drug exposure in pharmaco-epidemiological research and how this time-varying determinant can be analyzed in cohort studies. To reduce the risk of non-differential misclassification, a precise definition of exposure is mandatory and it is important to distinguish the complete follow-up period of a population into mutually exclusive episodes of non-use, past use and current use for each individual. By analyzing exposure to drugs as a time-dependent variable in a Cox regression model, cohort studies with complete coverage of all filled prescriptions can provide us with valid and precise risk estimates of drug-outcome associations. However, such estimates may be biased in the presence of time-dependent confounders which are themselves affected by prior exposure.

Variable selection: current practice in epidemiological studies

Selection of covariates is among the most controversial and difficult tasks in epidemiologic analysis. Correct variable selection addresses the problem of confounding in etiologic research and allows unbiased estimation of probabilities in prognostic studies. The aim of this commentary is to assess how often different variable selection techniques were applied in contemporary epidemiologic analysis. It was of particular interest to see whether modern methods such as shrinkage or penalized regression were used in recent publications. Stepwise selection methods remained the predominant method for variable selection in publications in epidemiological journals in 2008. Shrinkage methods were not used in any of the reviewed articles. Editors, reviewers and authors have insufficiently promoted the new, less controversial approaches of variable selection in the biomedical literature, whereas statisticians may not have adequately addressed the method's feasibility.

Use and cost of branded and generic drugs in patients with coronary heart disease--results from a prospective survey of 1008 patients in two London hospitals

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with three classes of drug, antiplatelet, cholesterol and blood pressure lowering treatment markedly reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Within each class, generic and branded (patented) drugs are available which have similar efficacy but differ in cost.

AIMS

(i) To assess the extent to which preventive medical drugs are prescribed in patients with CHD and to examine the reasons for drug omissions and (ii) to assess the relative use of branded and generic drugs and the reasons for drug selection.

METHODS

The medication charts and hospital notes of consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at a large cardiothoracic centre were reviewed over a 3-month period. Interviews with patients, attending cardiologists and general practitioners were undertaken to establish why drugs were and were not prescribed.

RESULTS

Among 1008 patients (755 who had PCI and 253 who had CABG) the use of aspirin, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), beta blockers and calcium channel blockers were, respectively, 97, 98, 81, 76 and 18%. The combination of any 4 classes of drug were used in 65% of patients. Almost all patients who did not receive aspirin or a statin had clinical contraindications and were on alternative drugs. In about 12% of patients without an ACE inhibitor (or ARB) and 7% of patients without a beta blocker, no reason to withhold such treatment was identified. Branded drugs were used in 52% of patients; the most commonly prescribed being atorvastatin in 33%. Clinical reasons for using branded rather than generic drugs were identified in 13% of cases.

CONCLUSION

Our results show a high rate of use of secondary preventive cardiac medications in patients undergoing coronary revascularization procedures, but the use of ACE inhibitors or beta blockers is still overlooked in about 1 in 10 patients. Branded drugs are prescribed in about half of all patients undergoing PCI and CABG, but in almost 90% of cases, a generic equivalent could have been used to achieve similar risk reduction. If our results reflect wider practice, an estimated 11 million pounds a year would be saved by the National Health Service by switching to generic alternative drugs.

Combined secondary prevention after hospitalization for myocardial infarction in France: analysis from a large administrative database

BACKGROUND

Both French and international guidelines recommend long-term use of betablockers, antiplatelet drugs, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARB) after a myocardial infarction (MI), but data on their combined use are scarce in France.

AIMS

To evaluate the use of combined medication 6 months after hospital admission for MI and the factors that can significantly influence their use.

METHODS

All hospital admissions for MI in France from January to June 2006 were selected from the national hospital discharge database. Data on medications used 6 months before and after hospitalization for patients covered by the general health insurance scheme (70% of French population) were collected from the reimbursement information system. A medication was considered to be used when there were more than three reimbursement applications over the 6 months following the index episode. Comorbidities were ascertained from the use of disease-specific medication reimbursements and registration in the national database of full coverage for 30 long-term disorders.

RESULTS

Of the 11,671 patients included, 82% were reimbursed for betablockers, 92% for antiplatelets, 85% for statins, 80% for ACE-I/ARBs and 62% for all four classes. After adjustment, significant underuse was found for women, the elderly and those with several comorbidities. Treatment at a university hospital or high-volume centre, follow-up by a cardiologist and use of revascularization procedures were associated with improved rates of combination therapy use.

CONCLUSION

Overall, use of recommended medications after MI in France is satisfactory, though not optimal. Specific recommendations focusing on subgroups such as older patients or those with comorbidities, as well as information directed towards non-specialized healthcare professionals, should help to improve appropriate use of these medications.