Phytotoxicity testing of diesel-contaminated water using Petunia grandiflora Juss. Mix F1 and Marigold-Nemo Mix (Tagetes patula L.)

Influence of toxic diesel fuel on Petunia grandiflora calli and after plant regeneration

The toxic effects of diesel fuel on whole plants have been reported before, but little is known about the toxic effect of diesel fuel on callus cultures. This knowledge is a pre-requisite for exploring the possibility of using a sub-lethal diesel concentration as an agent for in vitro cell line selection to obtain novel somaclonal variants resistant to diesel toxicity. These novel variants could be useful for the phytoremediation of diesel-contaminated soil. Here, a callus induction medium [Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 1.8 µM of naphthlene-1-acetic acid (NAA) and 6.6 µM of 6-benzyladenine (BA)] was found to induce 85% of Petunia grandiflora leaf explants to form light green calli. Since it was not possible to include diesel in aseptic culture, the P. grandiflora calli were exposed to diesel under non-aseptic conditions. It was found that the calli did not exhibit any sign of necrosis immediately after up to 9 min of diesel exposure. The diesel-treated calli were subsequently subcultured successfully on the callus induction medium using the proliferating, non-necrotic cells. Transverse sections of the control and diesel-treated calli after 2 weeks of culture revealed that the control calli exhibited more small meristematic cells while diesel-treated calli exhibited larger, empty-looking parenchyma cells. Moreover, it was possible to induce, though at a low frequency (< 15%), shoot formation in the control calli and those derived from the diesel treatment on the Murashige and Skoog medium supplemented with 1.1 µM of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and 13.3 µM of BA. Under glasshouse conditions, the shoots regenerated from the calli derived from the diesel treatment exhibited higher biomass than those from the control calli and P. grandiflora seedlings when grown in a potting mix spiked with 0%, 2% and 7% diesel. Taken together, these results suggest that up to 9 min of diesel exposure of P. grandiflora calli was sub-lethal.

Biosurfactants Produced by Phyllosphere-Colonizing Pseudomonads Impact Diesel Degradation but Not Colonization of Leaves of Gnotobiotic Arabidopsis thaliana

Biosurfactant production is a common trait in leaf surface-colonizing bacteria that has been associated with increased survival and movement on leaves. At the same time, the ability to degrade aliphatics is common in biosurfactant-producing leaf colonizers. Pseudomonads are common leaf colonizers and have been recognized for their ability to produce biosurfactants and degrade aliphatic compounds. In this study, we investigated the role of biosurfactants in four non-plant-pathogenic Pseudomonas strains by performing a series of experiments to characterize their surfactant properties and their role during leaf colonization and diesel degradation. The biosurfactants produced were identified using mass spectrometry. Two strains produced viscosin-like biosurfactants, and the other two produced massetolide A-like biosurfactants, which aligned with the phylogenetic relatedness between the strains. To further investigate the role of surfactant production, random Tn5 transposon mutagenesis was performed to generate knockout mutants. The knockout mutants were compared to their respective wild types with regard to their ability to colonize gnotobiotic Arabidopsis thaliana and to degrade diesel or dodecane. It was not possible to detect negative effects during plant colonization in direct competition or individual colonization experiments. When grown on diesel, knockout mutants grew significantly slower than their respective wild types. When grown on dodecane, knockout mutants were less impacted than during growth on diesel. By adding isolated wild-type biosurfactants, it was possible to complement the growth of the knockout mutants.IMPORTANCE Many leaf-colonizing bacteria produce surfactants and are able to degrade aliphatic compounds; however, whether surfactant production provides a competitive advantage during leaf colonization is unclear. Furthermore, it is unclear if leaf colonizers take advantage of the aliphatic compounds that constitute the leaf cuticle and cuticular waxes. Here, we tested the effect of surfactant production on leaf colonization, and we demonstrate that the lack of surfactant production decreases the ability to degrade aliphatic compounds. This indicates that leaf surface-dwelling, surfactant-producing bacteria contribute to degradation of environmental hydrocarbons and may be able to utilize leaf surface waxes. This has implications for plant-microbe interactions and future studies.