Is there spatial variation in phenotypic selection on floral traits in a generalist plant–pollinator system?

Natural selection fluctuates at an extremely fine spatial scale inside a wild population of snapdragon plants

Spatial variation in natural selection is expected to shape phenotypic variation of wild populations and drive their evolution. Although evidence of phenotypic divergence across populations experiencing different selection regimes is abundant, investigations of intrapopulation variation in selection pressures remain rare. Fine-grained spatial environmental heterogeneity can be expected to influence selective forces within a wild population and thereby alter its fitness function by producing multiple fitness optima at a fine spatial scale. Here, we tested this hypothesis in a wild population of snapdragon plants living on an extremely small island in southern France (about 7500 m² ). We estimated the spline-based fitness function linking individuals' fitness and five morphological traits in interaction with three spatially variable ecological drivers. We found that selection acting on several traits varied both in magnitude and direction in response to environmental variables at the scale of a meter. Our findings illustrate how different phenotypes can be selected at different locations within a population in response to environmental variation. Investigating spatial variation in selection within a population, in association with ecological conditions, represents an opportunity to identify putative ecological drivers of selection in the wild.

What Maintains Flower Colour Variation within Populations?

Natural selection acts on phenotypic trait variation. Understanding the mechanisms that create and maintain trait variation is fundamental to understanding the breadth of diversity seen on Earth. Flower colour is among the most conspicuous and highly diverse traits in nature. Most flowering plant populations have uniform floral colours, but a minority exhibit within-population colour variation, either discrete (polymorphic) or continuous. Colour variation is commonly maintained by balancing selection through multiple pollinators, opposing selection regimes, or fluctuating selection. Variation can also be maintained by heterozygote advantage or frequency-dependent selection. Neutral processes, or a lack of selection, may maintain variation, although this remains largely untested. We suggest several prospective research directions that may provide insight into the evolutionary drivers of trait variation.