Germline mutations of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 mismatch repair genes in Belgian hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) patients

Dual primary gastric and colorectal cancer: The known hereditary causes and underlying mechanisms

In this editorial, I commented on the paper by Lin et al, published in this issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. The work aimed at analysing the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of synchronous and metachronous cancers in patients with dual primary gastric and colorectal cancer (CRC). The authors concluded the necessity for regular surveillance for metachronous cancer during postoperative follow-up and reported the prognosis is influenced by the gastric cancer (GC) stage rather than the CRC stage. Although surveillance was recommended in the conclusion, the authors did not explore this area in their study and did not include tests used for such surveillance. This editorial focuses on the most characterized gastrointestinal cancer susceptibility syndromes concerning dual gastric and CRCs. These include hereditary diffuse GC, familial adenomatous polyposis, hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer, Lynch syndrome, and three major hamartomatous polyposis syndromes associated with CRC and GC, namely Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, juvenile polyposis syndrome, and PTEN hamartoma syndrome. Careful assessment of these syndromes/conditions, including inheritance, risk of gastric and colorectal or other cancer development, genetic mutations and recommended genetic investigations, is crucial for optimum management of these patients.

Worldwide prevalence of Lynch syndrome in patients with colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Lynch syndrome (LS) is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC) syndrome, with an estimated prevalence of 2% to 3% of CRC. A prevalence study is needed to provide accurate estimates of the true prevalence of LS.

METHODS

MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Prevalence was calculated by random effects meta-analysis models. I² score was used to assess heterogeneity across studies. Meta-regression was performed for between-study variance.

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies were included in this review. The overall pooled yield of LS screening was 2.2% based on all methods of detection. Studies performing germline tests on all participants with CRC reported higher prevalence (5.1%) as opposed to studies only performing germline tests on participants with tumors with mismatch repair deficiency (1.6%) or microsatellite instability (1.1%). Selected cohorts of CRC had a higher prevalence of germline LS diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

LS prevalence across multiple ethnic, geographic, and clinical populations is remarkably similar. Universal germline testing of patients presenting with cancer identifies that most CRCs are attributed to LS. Young patients presenting with CRC and those who fulfill criteria for a familial risk provide the highest returns for LS identification. Our study supports the universal germline CRC screening for LS.

EPCAM germline and somatic rearrangements in Lynch syndrome: identification of a novel 3'EPCAM deletion

3'EPCAM (Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule) genomic rearrangements can be a cause of mismatch repair deficiency in rare Lynch syndrome families. 3'EPCAM deletions include the polyadenylation signal and might result in promoter hypermethylation of the centromeric MSH2 gene in cis. A somatic rearrangement in trans affecting MSH2 is responsible for the final mismatch repair deficiency in the corresponding tumors but the mechanisms are not well documented. In this report two germline 3'EPCAM deletions are described together with the corresponding somatic mutations in the patient's colorectal tumors. Mutation and breakpoint analysis resulted in the identification of one novel (c.556-531_*872del) and one known EPCAM deletion (c.859-689_*14697del). Both deletions resulted from Alu mediated homologous recombination causing aberrant EPCAM-MSH2 fusion transcripts. The colorectal tumors of the deletion carriers were MSI-high. Strong hypermethylation of the MSH2 promoter was measured. Analysis of somatic genomic rearrangements showed a 4 Mb deletion including the EPCAM, MSH2 and MSH6 genes in one tumor and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity in the EPCAM-MSH2 region in the other tumor. This indicates that hemi- and homozygous hypermethylation of the MSH2 promoter and hence complete silencing of MSH2 expression was responsible for the mismatch repair deficiency in both colorectal tumors.

Molecular epidemiology of DNA repair gene polymorphisms and head and neck cancer

Although tobacco and alcohol consumption are two common risk factors of head and neck cancer (HNC), other specific etiologic causes, such as viral infection and genetic susceptibility factors, remain to be understood. Human DNA is often damaged by numerous endogenous and exogenous mutagens or carcinogens, and genetic variants in interaction with environmental exposure to these agents may explain interindividual differences in HNC risk. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in the DNA damage-repair response are reported to be risk factors for various cancer types, including HNC. Here, we reviewed epidemiological studies that have assessed the associations between HNC risk and SNPs in DNA repair genes involved in base-excision repair, nucleotide-excision repair, mismatch repair, double-strand break repair and direct reversion repair pathways. We found, however, that only a few SNPs in DNA repair genes were found to be associated with significantly increased or decreased risk of HNC, and, in most cases, the effects were moderate, depending upon locus-locus interactions among the risk SNPs in the pathways. We believe that, in the presence of exposure, additional pathway-based analyses of DNA repair genes derived from genome-wide association studies (GWASs) in HNC are needed.

Prevalence of pathological germline mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes in colorectal cancer

The prevalence of pathological germline mutations in colorectal cancer has been widely studied, as germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes hMLH1 and hMSH2 confer a high risk of colorectal cancer. However, because the sample size and population of previous studies are very different from each other, the conclusions still remain controversial. In this paper, Databases such as PubMed were applied to search for related papers. The data were imported into Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V2, which was used to estimate the weighted prevalence of hMLH1 and hMSH2 pathological mutations and compare the differences of prevalence among different family histories, ethnicities and related factors. This study collected and utilized data from 102 papers. In the Amsterdam-criteria positive group, the prevalence of pathological germline mutations of the hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes was 28.55% (95%CI 26.04%–31.19%) and 19.41% (95%CI 15.88%–23.51%), respectively, and the prevalence of germline mutations in hMLH1/hMSH2 was 15.44%/10.02%, 20.43%/13.26% and 15.43%/11.70% in Asian, American multiethnic and European/Australian populations, respectively. Substitution mutations accounted for the largest proportion of germline mutations (hMLH1: 52.34%, hMSH2: 43.25%). The total prevalence of mutations of hMLH1 and hMSH2 in Amsterdam-criteria positive, Amsterdam-criteria negative and sporadic colorectal cancers was around 45%, 25% and 15%, respectively, and there were no obvious differences in the prevalence of germline mutations among different ethnicities.

Spectrum of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Chilean families with suspected Lynch syndrome

PURPOSE

Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited syndrome of colorectal cancer, caused principally by germline mutations in MLH1 and MSH2. We report our experience with genetic screening in the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome in Chile, a country previously underserved in the capacity to diagnose hereditary colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Families from our Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry were selected for this study if they fulfilled either Amsterdam I/II or Bethesda criteria for classification of Lynch syndrome. Analysis of colorectal tumors from probands included a microsatellite instability study and immunohistochemical evaluation for MLH1 and MSH2. Screening of germline mutations was performed by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and DNA sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 21 families were evaluated, 14 meeting Amsterdam criteria and 7 meeting Bethesda criteria. Tumors in 20 families (95%) showed microsatellite instability (19 high and 1 low) and 9 of these 20 families (45%) harbored a germline mutation (7 of 13 Amsterdam and 2 of 7 Bethesda families). Of the 9 mutations identified, 6 were in MLH1 and 3 in MSH2. Two of the mutations were novel, 3 were previously found in 1 to 2 European populations, and 4 were previously found in various ethnic populations worldwide. Only 2 mutations were previously found in another Latin American population (Colombia). In our probands, colorectal cancer was located mainly (57%) in the right or transverse colon. Pedigree information from 104 family affected members of 21 studied families showed endometrial cancer to be the most frequent primary extracolonic tumor, accounting for 15.1% of total cases, followed by stomach (13.2%) and breast cancer (11.3%). Analysis of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes showed a strong Amerindian genetic component in 15 (71.4%) of the 21 families analyzed.

CONCLUSION

The study of Lynch syndrome in families of different ethnic origins contributes to the definition of genetic and clinical differences among populations. Wide distribution in other ethnic populations strongly suggests varying origins of 4 the mutations found. Although cancer phenotype was consistent with those from other Latin American populations, only 2 of 9 mutations were shared with other South American populations and 2 novel mutations were found. The Chilean population is considered to be an admixture of Amerindian and European-mainly Spanish-populations, producing an ethnic group with significant genetic differences from populations previously studied.

Germ line MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Taiwanese Lynch syndrome families: characterization of a founder genomic mutation in the MLH1 gene

This multicenter study evaluated the mutation spectrum and frequencies of the MLH1 and MSH2 genes and determined the occurrence of large genomic deletions in 93 unrelated Taiwanese families that fulfilled the Amsterdam criteria II by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography analysis, DNA sequencing for aberrant chromatograms, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis. In total, 38 pathogenic mutations (10 large deletions and 28 point mutations or small deletion/insertions) in the MSH2 or MLH1 gene were identified in 61 of the 93 families (66%). Three of the 10 large deletions and 14 of the 28 point mutations or small insertions/deletions have not been reported elsewhere. Three mutations in the MLH1 gene, the MLH1c.1846_1848delAAG (5 families), deletion exons 11-15 (4 unrelated families), and MLH1c.793C>T (13 unrelated families), accounted for 35% of all cases with pathogenic mutations. Haplotype analysis indicated that mutant c.793C>T alleles were derived from two distinct common founders that might be inherited from a single ancestor of presumably Chinese origin. As a mutation detection strategy for Taiwanese Lynch syndrome patients, we recommend that diagnosis starts with screening for large genomic deletions and continues by screening for common mutations in exons 10 and 16 of the MLH1 gene prior to searching for small mutations in the remaining exons.

A new strategy to screen MMR genes in Lynch Syndrome: HA-CAE, MLPA and RT-PCR

AIMS

Hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disorder that is genetically heterogeneous because of underlying mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, primarily MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. One challenge to correctly diagnose HNPCC is that the large size of the causative genes makes identification of mutations both labour intensive and expensive.

METHODS

Our heteroduplex analysis by capillary array electrophoresis (HA-CAE) method, previously developed to increase the throughput and allow other multi-exon genes to be scanned, has been adapted for MMR genes. The altered peak patterns were then sequenced. Furthermore, the mutational scanning was completed using the Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) test in all negative HA-CAE cases, and these results were confirmed by RT-PCR.

RESULTS

We studied 216 individuals belonging to 100 unrelated families that met the Amsterdam I/II criteria for HNPCC. We detected 40 different variants that are classified as follows: 8 (20%) deleterious mutation, 8 (20%) unknown pathogenic significance variants and 24 (60%) coding and intronic sequence variants. Pathogenic mutations were detected in 12% of the families and about 42% of these had a deletion variant. Unknown pathogenic significance variants (UVs) affected 13% of the families. We also found 12.5% of novel polymorphisms in the rest of the variants. CONCLUDING: In short, using a combined method that includes HA-CAE, MLPA and RT-PCR, it is possible to detect the entire mutational spectrum of MMR genes. Twenty percent of the mutations found in the three genes have not been reported before. Relatives at risk will be offered predictive molecular analysis with potential exclusion of non-carriers of mutations.

MLPA mutation detection in Argentine HNPCC and FAP families

Colorectal cancer (CC) is the secondary cause of death in the Western countries of which approximately 15% are considered to be hereditary. The hereditary forms are Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP) and Hereditary Non Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) which is the commonest form. The detection of mutations in the MMR and apc related genes, allows the development of health prevention strategies. Different molecular diagnostic strategies are available for the detection of mutations in these genes, i.e. DGGE, SSCP and direct sequencing. However, deletions and duplications of one or more consecutive exons, which account for around 50% of the total alterations in MMR genes, cannot be detected by PCR based methodologies due to the non quantitative nature of these techniques. The aim of our work has been the standardization of a methodology, called Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification, which allows the detection of genomic deletions and duplications as primary analysis in HNPCC and FAP patients in Argentina. In this case, we inform that the application of MLPA allowed the detection of a missence mutation, without the need for direct sequencing of the complete genes involved. A PCR/RFLP strategy was afterwards designed to detect the C<T change on codon 718 of mlh1 gene in members of the family. For a developing country like Argentina, which has limited resources for genetic diagnosis, this MLPA application has avoided an unaffordable cost as the complete sequencing of all the involved genes. The application of MLPA in our country contributes to improvement in the diagnosis of hereditary CC and allows the development of preventive health interventions.

Partial duplications of the MSH2 and MLH1 genes in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Numerous reports have highlighted the contribution of MSH2 and MLH1 genomic deletions to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) or Lynch's syndrome, but genomic duplications of these genes have been rarely reported. Using quantitative multiplex PCR of short fluorescent fragments (QMPSF), 962 and 611 index cases were, respectively, screened for MSH2 and MLH1 genomic rearrangements. This allowed us to detect, in 11 families, seven MSH2 duplications affecting exons 1-2-3, exons 4-5-6, exon 7, exons 7-8, exons 9-10, exon 11, and exon 15, and three MLH1 duplications affecting exons 2-3, exon 4 and exons 6-7-8. All duplications were confirmed by an independent method. The contribution of genomic duplications of MSH2 and MLH1 to HNPCC can therefore be estimated approximately to 1% of the HNPCC cases. Although this frequency is much lower than that of genomic deletions, the presence of MSH2 or MLH1 genomic duplications should be considered in HNPCC families without detectable point mutations.