1
|
Helderman NC, van Leerdam ME, Kloor M, Ahadova A, Nielsen M. Emerge of colorectal cancer in Lynch syndrome despite colonoscopy surveillance: A challenge of hide and seek. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 197:104331. [PMID: 38521284 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Revised: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Even with colonoscopy surveillance, Lynch syndromes (LS) carriers still develop colorectal cancer (CRC). The cumulative incidence of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance varies depending on the affected mismatch repair (MMR) gene. However, the precise mechanisms driving these epidemiological patterns remain incompletely understood. In recent years, several potential mechanisms explaining the occurrence of CRCs during colonoscopy surveillance have been proposed in individuals with and without LS. These encompass biological factors like concealed/accelerated carcinogenesis through a bypassed adenoma stage and accelerated progression from adenomas. Alongside these, various colonoscopy-related factors may contribute to formation of CRCs under colonoscopy surveillance, like missed yet detectable (pre)cancerous lesions, detected yet incompletely removed (pre)cancerous lesions, and colonoscopy-induced carcinogenesis due to tumor cell reimplantation. In this comprehensive literature update, we reviewed these potential factors and evaluated their relevance to each MMR group in an attempt to raise further awareness and stimulate research regarding this conflicting phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah C Helderman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vink-Börger E, Dabir PD, Krekels J, van Kouwen MCA, Ligtenberg MJL, van der Post RS, Nagtegaal ID. Deficient mismatch repair screening of advanced adenomas in the population screening program for colorectal cancer is not effective. Histopathology 2024; 84:1056-1060. [PMID: 38275207 DOI: 10.1111/his.15150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
AIM Currently, screening of colorectal cancers (CRC) by assessing mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) or microsatellite instability (MSI) is used to identify Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. Advanced adenomas are considered immediate precursor lesions of CRC. In this study we investigate the relevance of screening of advanced adenomas for LS in population screening. METHODS AND RESULTS Advanced adenomas (n = 1572) were selected from the Dutch colorectal cancer population screening programme, based on one or more of the criteria: tubulovillous (n = 848, 54%) or villous adenoma (n = 118, 7.5%), diameter ≥ 1 cm (n = 1286, 82%) and/or high-grade dysplasia (n = 176, 11%). In 86 cases (5%), all three criteria were fulfilled at the same time. MMR-IHC and/or MSI analyses were performed on all cases. Only five advanced adenomas (0.3%) showed dMMR and MSI, including two cases with hypermethylation. In at least two patients a germline event was suspected based on allelic frequencies. No pathogenic explanation was found in the last case. CONCLUSION Timely testing of precursor lesions would be preferable to detect new LS patients before CRC development. However, standard assessment of dMMR of advanced adenomas from the population screening is not effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Vink-Börger
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Parag D Dabir
- Institute of Pathology, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Joyce Krekels
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëtte C A van Kouwen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel S van der Post
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker R, Mahmood K, Como J, Clendenning M, Joo JE, Georgeson P, Joseland S, Preston SG, Pope BJ, Chan JM, Austin R, Bojadzieva J, Campbell A, Edwards E, Gleeson M, Goodwin A, Harris MT, Ip E, Kirk J, Mansour J, Mar Fan H, Nichols C, Pachter N, Ragunathan A, Spigelman A, Susman R, Christie M, Jenkins MA, Pai RK, Rosty C, Macrae FA, Winship IM, Buchanan DD. DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variant Classification: Evaluating the Utility of Somatic Mutations and Mismatch Repair Deficient Colonic Crypts and Endometrial Glands. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4925. [PMID: 37894291 PMCID: PMC10605939 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Germline pathogenic variants in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (Lynch syndrome) predispose to colorectal (CRC) and endometrial (EC) cancer. Lynch syndrome specific tumor features were evaluated for their ability to support the ACMG/InSiGHT framework in classifying variants of uncertain clinical significance (VUS) in the MMR genes. Twenty-eight CRC or EC tumors from 25 VUS carriers (6xMLH1, 9xMSH2, 6xMSH6, 4xPMS2), underwent targeted tumor sequencing for the presence of microsatellite instability/MMR-deficiency (MSI-H/dMMR) status and identification of a somatic MMR mutation (second hit). Immunohistochemical testing for the presence of dMMR crypts/glands in normal tissue was also performed. The ACMG/InSiGHT framework reclassified 7/25 (28%) VUS to likely pathogenic (LP), three (12%) to benign/likely benign, and 15 (60%) VUS remained unchanged. For the seven re-classified LP variants comprising nine tumors, tumor sequencing confirmed MSI-H/dMMR (8/9, 88.9%) and a second hit (7/9, 77.8%). Of these LP reclassified variants where normal tissue was available, the presence of a dMMR crypt/gland was found in 2/4 (50%). Furthermore, a dMMR endometrial gland in a carrier of an MSH2 exon 1-6 duplication provides further support for an upgrade of this VUS to LP. Our study confirmed that identifying these Lynch syndrome features can improve MMR variant classification, enabling optimal clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romy Walker
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Khalid Mahmood
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Julia Como
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Mark Clendenning
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Jihoon E. Joo
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Peter Georgeson
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Sharelle Joseland
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Susan G. Preston
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Bernard J. Pope
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Melbourne Bioinformatics, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - James M. Chan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
| | - Rachel Austin
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (R.A.); (H.M.F.)
| | - Jasmina Bojadzieva
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia; (J.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Ainsley Campbell
- Clinical Genetics Unit, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia; (J.B.); (A.C.)
| | - Emma Edwards
- Familial Cancer Service, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2145, Australia;
| | - Margaret Gleeson
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia; (M.G.); (J.K.); (A.R.)
| | - Annabel Goodwin
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (A.G.); (A.S.)
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Marion T. Harris
- Monash Health Familial Cancer Centre, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia;
| | - Emilia Ip
- Cancer Genetics Service, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia;
| | - Judy Kirk
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia; (M.G.); (J.K.); (A.R.)
| | - Julia Mansour
- Tasmanian Clinical Genetics Service, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, TAS 7000, Australia;
| | - Helen Mar Fan
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (R.A.); (H.M.F.)
| | - Cassandra Nichols
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA 6008, Australia; (C.N.); (N.P.)
| | - Nicholas Pachter
- Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA 6008, Australia; (C.N.); (N.P.)
- Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
- School of Medicine, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
| | - Abiramy Ragunathan
- Hunter Family Cancer Service, Newcastle, NSW 2298, Australia; (M.G.); (J.K.); (A.R.)
| | - Allan Spigelman
- Cancer Genetics Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (A.G.); (A.S.)
- St Vincent’s Cancer Genetics Unit, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
- Surgical Professorial Unit, UNSW Clinical School of Clinical Medicine, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Rachel Susman
- Genetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia; (R.A.); (H.M.F.)
| | - Michael Christie
- Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia;
- Department of Pathology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Mark A. Jenkins
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Rish K. Pai
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA;
| | - Christophe Rosty
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Envoi Specialist Pathologists, Brisbane, QLD 4059, Australia
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Finlay A. Macrae
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.A.M.); (I.M.W.)
- Colorectal Medicine and Genetics, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Ingrid M. Winship
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.A.M.); (I.M.W.)
- Department of Medicine, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Daniel D. Buchanan
- Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Department of Clinical Pathology, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (K.M.); (J.C.); (M.C.); (J.E.J.); (P.G.); (S.J.); (S.G.P.); (B.J.P.); (D.D.B.)
- University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia;
- Genomic Medicine and Familial Cancer Centre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia; (F.A.M.); (I.M.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu JH, Xiao BY, Tang JH, Li DD, Wang F, Ding Y, Han K, Kong LH, Ling YH, Mei WJ, Hong ZG, Liao LE, Yang WJ, Pan ZZ, Zhang XS, Jiang W, Ding PR. Efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors for colorectal cancer and polyps in Lynch syndrome patients. Eur J Cancer 2023; 192:113253. [PMID: 37625240 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor is effective for colorectal cancer (CRC) with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) or high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). We aimed to explore its effects on CRCs and colonic polyps in Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. METHODS LS patients with CRC who had evaluable tumours and received at least 2 cycles of PD-1 inhibitors were retrospectively included. PD-1 inhibitors were given as a monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, including anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 treatment, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Correlations of treatment responses with clinicopathological characteristics and genomic profiles were analysed. RESULTS A total of 75 LS patients were included, with a median age of 39 years. The median duration of follow-up was 27 months (range, 3-71). The objective response rate (ORR) was 70.7%, including 28.0% (n = 21) complete responses and 42.7% (n = 32) partial responses. Four of five cases of LS CRCs displaying proficient MMR (pMMR) or microsatellite stable (MSS) were not responsive. Mucinous/signet-ring cell differentiation was associated with a lower ORR (P = 0.013). The 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 91.2% and 82.2%, respectively. A polyp was detected in 26 patients during surveillance. Seven adenomas disappeared after treatment, and they were all larger than 7 mm. CONCLUSION PD-1 inhibitors are highly effective for dMMR and MSI-H LS CRCs, but not for pMMR or MSS LS CRCs or mucinous/signet-ring cell CRC. Large LS adenomas may also be eliminated by anti-PD-1 treatment. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Due to the privacy of patients, the related data cannot be available for public access but can be obtained from Pei-Rong Ding (dingpr@sysucc.org.cn) upon reasonable request. The key raw data have been uploaded to the Research Data Deposit public platform (www.researchdata.org.cn).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie-Hai Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Bin-Yi Xiao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Jing-Hua Tang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Dan-Dan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Biological Therapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Fang Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Molecular Diagnosis, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ya Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Biological Therapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Kai Han
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Ling-Heng Kong
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Yi-Hong Ling
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Wei-Jian Mei
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhi-Gang Hong
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Le-En Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Wan-Jun Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Zhi-Zhong Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Xiao-Shi Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Biological Therapy Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Wu Jiang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China
| | - Pei-Rong Ding
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cerretelli G, Zhou Y, Müller MF, Adams DJ, Arends MJ. Acetaldehyde and defective mismatch repair increase colonic tumours in a Lynch syndrome model with Aldh1b1 inactivation. Dis Model Mech 2023; 16:dmm050240. [PMID: 37395714 PMCID: PMC10417510 DOI: 10.1242/dmm.050240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
ALDH1B1 expressed in the intestinal epithelium metabolises acetaldehyde to acetate, protecting against acetaldehyde-induced DNA damage. MSH2 is a key component of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) pathway involved in Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated colorectal cancers. Here, we show that defective MMR (dMMR) interacts with acetaldehyde, in a gene/environment interaction, enhancing dMMR-driven colonic tumour formation in a LS murine model of Msh2 conditional inactivation (Lgr5-CreER; Msh2flox/-, or Msh2-LS) combined with Aldh1b1 inactivation. Conditional (Aldh1b1flox/flox) or constitutive (Aldh1b1-/-) Aldh1b1 knockout alleles combined with the conditional Msh2flox/- intestinal knockout mouse model of LS (Msh2-LS) received either ethanol, which is metabolised to acetaldehyde, or water. We demonstrated that 41.7% of ethanol-treated Aldh1b1flox/flox Msh2-LS mice and 66.7% of Aldh1b1-/- Msh2-LS mice developed colonic epithelial hyperproliferation and adenoma formation, in 4.5 and 6 months, respectively, significantly greater than 0% in water-treated control mice. Significantly higher numbers of dMMR colonic crypt foci precursors and increased plasma acetaldehyde levels were observed in ethanol-treated Aldh1b1flox/flox Msh2-LS and Aldh1b1-/- Msh2-LS mice compared with those in water-treated controls. Hence, ALDH1B1 loss increases acetaldehyde levels and DNA damage that interacts with dMMR to accelerate colonic, but not small intestinal, tumour formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guia Cerretelli
- University of Edinburgh, Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Ying Zhou
- University of Edinburgh, Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - Mike F. Müller
- University of Edinburgh, Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| | - David J. Adams
- Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1HH, UK
| | - Mark J. Arends
- University of Edinburgh, Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Freitag CE, Chen W, Pearlman R, Hampel H, Stanich PP, Cosgrove CM, Konnick EQ, Pritchard CC, Frankel WL. Mismatch Repair Protein Status of Non-Neoplastic Uterine and Intestinal Mucosa in Patients with Lynch Syndrome and Double Somatic Mismatch Repair Protein Mutations. Hum Pathol 2023; 137:1-9. [PMID: 37030500 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
Mismatch repair protein-deficient non-neoplastic colonic crypts and endometrial glands (dMMR crypts and glands) have been reported as a unique marker of underlying Lynch syndrome (LS). However, no large studies have directly compared the frequency of detection in cases with double somatic (DS) MMR mutations. We retrospectively analyzed 42 colonic resection specimens (24 LS, 18 DS) and 20 endometrial specimens (9 LS, 11 DS) including 19 hysterectomies and 1 biopsy for dMMR crypts and glands. All specimens were from patients with known primary cancers including colonic adenocarcinomas and endometrial endometrioid carcinomas (including two mixed carcinomas). Four blocks of normal mucosa away from tumor were selected from most cases, as available. MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) specific to the primary tumor mutations were analyzed. dMMR crypts were found in 65% of LS and 0% of DS MMR mutated colonic adenocarcinomas (p < 0.001). Most dMMR crypts were detected in the colon (12 of 15) compared to ileum (3). dMMR crypts showed single and grouped loss of MMR IHC expression. dMMR glands were found in 67% of LS and 9% (1 of 11) of DS endometrial cases (p = 0.017). Most dMMR glands were found in the uterine wall, with 1 LS and 1 DS case exhibiting dMMR glands in the lower uterine segment. The majority of cases exhibited multifocal and grouped dMMR glands. No morphologic atypia was identified in dMMR crypts or glands. Overall, we demonstrate that dMMR crypts and glands are highly associated with underlying LS, while rarer in those with DS MMR mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Eric Freitag
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, 43210
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, 43210
| | - Rachel Pearlman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, 43210
| | - Heather Hampel
- Division of Genetics and Genetic Counseling, City of Hope, Duarte, California, 91010
| | - Peter P Stanich
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, 43210
| | - Casey M Cosgrove
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio, 43210
| | - Eric Q Konnick
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195
| | - Colin C Pritchard
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195
| | - Wendy L Frankel
- Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, 43210.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hernandez-Sanchez A, Grossman M, Yeung K, Sei SS, Lipkin S, Kloor M. Vaccines for immunoprevention of DNA mismatch repair deficient cancers. J Immunother Cancer 2022; 10:e004416. [PMID: 35732349 PMCID: PMC9226910 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of cancer vaccines to induce tumor-antigen specific immune responses was sparked by the identification of antigens specific to or overexpressed in cancer cells. However, weak immunogenicity and the mutational heterogeneity in many cancers have dampened cancer vaccine successes. With increasing information about mutational landscapes of cancers, mutational neoantigens can be predicted computationally to elicit strong immune responses by CD8 +cytotoxic T cells as major mediators of anticancer immune response. Neoantigens are potentially more robust immunogens and have revived interest in cancer vaccines. Cancers with deficiency in DNA mismatch repair have an exceptionally high mutational burden, including predictable neoantigens. Lynch syndrome is the most common inherited cancer syndrome and is caused by DNA mismatch repair gene mutations. Insertion and deletion mutations in coding microsatellites that occur during DNA replication include tumorigenesis drivers. The induced shift of protein reading frame generates neoantigens that are foreign to the immune system. Mismatch repair-deficient cancers and Lynch syndrome represent a paradigm population for the development of a preventive cancer vaccine, as the mutations induced by mismatch repair deficiency are predictable, resulting in a defined set of frameshift peptide neoantigens. Furthermore, Lynch syndrome mutation carriers constitute an identifiable high-risk population. We discuss the pathogenesis of DNA mismatch repair deficient cancers, in both Lynch syndrome and sporadic microsatellite-unstable cancers. We review evidence for pre-existing immune surveillance, the three mechanisms of immune evasion that occur in cancers and assess the implications of a preventive frameshift peptide neoantigen-based vaccine. We consider both preclinical and clinical experience to date. We discuss the feasibility of a cancer preventive vaccine for Lynch syndrome carriers and review current antigen selection and delivery strategies. Finally, we propose RNA vaccines as having robust potential for immunoprevention of Lynch syndrome cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Hernandez-Sanchez
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology, University Hospital Heidelberg Institute of Pathology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark Grossman
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Kevin Yeung
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shizuko S Sei
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Steven Lipkin
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthias Kloor
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Institute of Pathology, Department of Applied Tumor Biology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cerretelli G, Zhou Y, Müller MF, Adams DJ, Arends MJ. Ethanol-induced formation of colorectal tumours and precursors in a mouse model of Lynch syndrome. J Pathol 2021; 255:464-474. [PMID: 34543445 PMCID: PMC9291843 DOI: 10.1002/path.5796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) confers inherited cancer predisposition due to germline mutations in a DNA mismatch repair (MMR) gene, e.g. MSH2. MMR is a repair pathway for removal of base mismatches and insertion/deletion loops caused by endogenous and exogenous factors. Loss of MMR through somatic alteration of the wild-type allele in LS results in defective MMR (dMMR). Lifestyle/environmental factors can modify colorectal cancer risk in sporadic and LS patients. Ethanol and its metabolite acetaldehyde are classified as group one carcinogens, and acetaldehyde causes a range of DNA lesions. However, DNA repair pathways responsible for correcting most of such DNA lesions remain uncharacterised. We hypothesised that MMR plays a role in protecting colorectal epithelium from ethanol/acetaldehyde-induced DNA damage. Here, an LS mouse model (intestinal epithelial conditional-knockout for Msh2) was used to determine if there is a gene-environment interaction between dMMR and ethanol/acetaldehyde that accelerates colorectal tumourigenesis in LS. Mice underwent either long-term ethanol treatment or water treatment. Most ethanol-treated mice demonstrated colonic hyperproliferation and adenoma formation (with some invasive adenocarcinomas) within 6 months (15/23, 65%), compared with one colonic tumour after 15 months in water-treated mice (1/23, 4%) (p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). A significantly greater number of dMMR colonic crypt foci precursors were observed in ethanol-treated compared with water-treated mice (p = 0.0029, Student's t-test). Moreover, increased plasma acetaldehyde levels were detected in ethanol-treated compared with water-treated mice (p = 0.0019, Mann-Whitney U-test), along with significantly increased DNA damage response in the colonic epithelium. Long-term ethanol treatment was associated with significantly increased colonic epithelial proliferation and markedly reduced apoptosis in dMMR adenomas, consistent with enhanced survival of aberrant dMMR relative to MMR-proficient colonic epithelium. In conclusion, there is strong evidence for a gene-environment interaction between dMMR and acetaldehyde, causing acceleration of dMMR-driven colonic tumour formation in this LS model, indicating that advice to limit alcohol consumption should be considered for LS patients. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guia Cerretelli
- Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General HospitalUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Ying Zhou
- Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General HospitalUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | - Mike F Müller
- Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General HospitalUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| | | | - Mark J Arends
- Division of Pathology, Centre for Comparative Pathology, CRUK Edinburgh Centre, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, Western General HospitalUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Helderman NC, Bajwa-Ten Broeke SW, Morreau H, Suerink M, Terlouw D, van der Werf-' T Lam AS, van Wezel T, Nielsen M. The diverse molecular profiles of lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancers are (highly) dependent on underlying germline mismatch repair mutations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 163:103338. [PMID: 34044097 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer syndrome that accounts for 3% of all new colorectal cancer (CRC) cases. Patients carry a germline pathogenic variant in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2), which encode proteins involved in a post-replicative proofreading and editing mechanism. The clinical presentation of LS is highly heterogeneous, showing high variability in age at onset and penetrance of cancer, which may be partly attributable to the molecular profiles of carcinomas. This review discusses the frequency of alterations in the WNT/B-CATENIN, RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathways identified in all four LS subgroups and how these changes may relate to the 'three pathway model' of carcinogenesis, in which LS CRCs develop from MMR-proficient adenomas, MMR-deficient adenomas or directly from MMR-deficient crypts. Understanding the specific differences in carcinogenesis for each LS subgroup will aid in the further optimization of guidelines for diagnosis, surveillance and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah C Helderman
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Hans Morreau
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Manon Suerink
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Diantha Terlouw
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Tom van Wezel
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maartje Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shia J. The diversity of tumours with microsatellite instability: molecular mechanisms and impact upon microsatellite instability testing and mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry. Histopathology 2021; 78:485-497. [PMID: 33010064 DOI: 10.1111/his.14271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) as a distinct molecular phenotype in human neoplasms was first recognised in 1993. Since then there has been tremendous progress in our understanding of this phenotype, including its genomic drivers and functional consequences. Currently, the multiple lines of investigation on MSI seem to have converged upon one important facet: its diversity, both genotypically and phenotypically, and both within and across tumour types. This review article offers a pathologist's perspective on our current understanding of this diversity, and highlights its potentially significant impact on the effective use of our current MSI detection tools: PCR- or sequencing-based MSI testing and mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Detection of DNA mismatch repair deficient crypts in random colonoscopic biopsies identifies Lynch syndrome patients. Fam Cancer 2021; 19:169-175. [PMID: 31997046 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00161-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The hallmark of Lynch syndrome (LS)-associated neoplasia is DNA mismatch repair protein (MMR) deficiency. Recent studies have demonstrated that histologically normal colonic crypts in patients with LS can exhibit deficient MMR expression. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of detecting MMR deficient crypts in random colonoscopic biopsies of normal mucosa in patients with and without LS. Forty-nine patients, including 33 with LS, 12 without LS, and 4 with germline MMR gene variants of uncertain significance (VUS), were prospectively and blindly evaluated by immunohistochemistry for MMR deficient crypts within random normal-appearing mucosal biopsies obtained during surveillance colonoscopy. MMR deficient crypts were identified in 70% (23/33) of patients with LS and in no patients without LS (0/12) (p < 0.001). MMR deficient crypts were identified with nearly equal frequency in both LS patients with and without a cancer history and were associated with germline variants in all four MMR genes and EPCAM. MMR deficient crypts were also identified in LS patients with a history of non-colorectal cancer types, including patients with endometrial cancer, skin sebaceous neoplasms, and renal cancer. Two of the four patients with germline MMR gene VUS had MMR deficient crypts. In conclusion, MMR deficient crypts are a specific biomarker of LS and can be identified in random normal mucosal biopsies in LS patients. Evaluation for MMR deficient crypts in colonoscopic biopsies of normal mucosa can help identify LS patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Vyas M, Firat C, Hechtman JF, Weiser MR, Yaeger R, Vanderbilt C, Benhamida JK, Keshinro A, Zhang L, Ntiamoah P, Gonzalez M, Andrade R, El Dika I, Markowitz AJ, Smith JJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Vakiani E, Klimstra DS, Stadler ZK, Shia J. Discordant DNA mismatch repair protein status between synchronous or metachronous gastrointestinal carcinomas: frequency, patterns, and molecular etiologies. Fam Cancer 2020; 20:201-213. [PMID: 33033905 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-020-00210-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The widespread use of tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry in gastrointestinal tract (GIT) carcinomas has unveiled cases where the MMR protein status differs between synchronous/metachronous tumors from the same patients. This study aims at examining the frequency, patterns and molecular etiologies of such inter-tumoral MMR discordances. We analyzed a cohort of 2159 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients collected over a 5-year period and found that 1.3% of the patients (27/2159) had ≥ 2 primary CRCs, and 25.9% of the patients with ≥ 2 primary CRCs (7/27) exhibited inter-tumoral MMR discordance. We then combined the seven MMR-discordant CRC patients with three additional MMR-discordant GIT carcinoma patients and evaluated their discordant patterns and associated molecular abnormalities. The 10 patients consisted of 3 patients with Lynch syndrome (LS), 1 with polymerase proofreading-associated polyposis (PAPP), 1 with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and 5 deemed to have no cancer disposing hereditary syndromes. Their MMR discordances were associated with the following etiologies: (1) PMS2-LS manifesting PMS2-deficient cancer at an old age when a co-incidental sporadic MMR-proficient cancer also occurred; (2) microsatellite instability-driven secondary somatic MSH6-inactivation occurring in only one-and not all-PMS2-LS associated MMR-deficient carcinomas; (3) "compound LS" with germline mutations in two MMR genes manifesting different tumors with deficiencies in different MMR proteins; (4) PAPP or FAP syndrome-associated MMR-proficient cancer co-occurring metachronously with a somatic MMR-deficient cancer; and (5) non-syndromic patients with sporadic MMR-proficient cancers co-occurring synchronously/metachronously with sporadic MMR-deficient cancers. Our study thus suggests that inter-tumoral MMR discordance is not uncommon among patients with multiple primary GIT carcinomas (25.9% in patients with ≥ 2 CRCs), and may be associated with widely varied molecular etiologies. Awareness of these patterns is essential in ensuring the most effective strategies in both LS detection and treatment decision-making. When selecting patients for immunotherapy, MMR testing should be performed on the tumor or tumors that are being treated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Vyas
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Canan Firat
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jaclyn F Hechtman
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chad Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jamal K Benhamida
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajaratu Keshinro
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Liying Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter Ntiamoah
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marco Gonzalez
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rebecca Andrade
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Imane El Dika
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arnold J Markowitz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Efsevia Vakiani
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - David S Klimstra
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Zsofia K Stadler
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Jinru Shia
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cuatrecasas M, Gorostiaga I, Riera C, Saperas E, Llort G, Costa I, Matias-Guiu X, Carrato C, Navarro M, Pineda M, Dueñas N, Brunet J, Marco V, Trias I, Busteros JI, Mateu G, Balaguer F, Fernández-Figueras MT, Esteller M, Musulén E. Complete Loss of EPCAM Immunoexpression Identifies EPCAM Deletion Carriers in MSH2-Negative Colorectal Neoplasia. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12102803. [PMID: 33003511 PMCID: PMC7599495 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12102803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal carcinomas from patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) due to EPCAM deletions show loss of MSH2 expression. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of EPCAM expression in identifying carriers of EPCAM deletion among patients with MSH2-negative lesions. MSH2 and EPCAM immunohistochemistry was performed in a large series of lesions (190) composed of malignant and benign neoplasms as well as precursor lesions of different organs from 71 patients with suspected LS due to MSH2 alterations. Germ-line analysis confirmed LS in 68 patients due to MSH2 mutations (53) and EPCAM deletions (15). Among colorectal lesions with lack of MSH2 expression, only 17 were EPCAM-negative and belonged to patients with EPCAM deletions. We confirm that loss of EPCAM expression identifies EPCAM deletion carriers with 100% specificity and we recommend adding EPCAM IHC to the algorithm of MSH2-negative colorectal neoplasia. Abstract The use of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM) immunohistochemistry (IHC) is not included in the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening algorithm to detect Lynch syndrome (LS) patients. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate that EPCAM IHC is a useful tool to guide the LS germ-line analysis when a loss of MSH2 expression was present. We retrospectively studied MSH2 and EPCAM IHC in a large series of 190 lesions composed of malignant neoplasms (102), precursor lesions of gastrointestinal (71) and extra-gastrointestinal origin (9), and benign neoplasms (8) from different organs of 71 patients suspicious of being LS due to MSH2 alterations. LS was confirmed in 68 patients, 53 with MSH2 mutations and 15 with EPCAM 3′-end deletions. Tissue microarrays were constructed with human normal tissues and their malignant counterparts to assist in the evaluation of EPCAM staining. Among 154 MSH2-negative lesions, 17 were EPCAM-negative, including 10 CRC and 7 colorectal polyps, and 5 of them showed only isolated negative glands. All lesions showing a lack of EPCAM expression belonged to patients with EPCAM 3′-end deletions. EPCAM IHC is a useful screening tool, with 100% specificity to identify LS patients due to EPCAM 3′-end deletions in MSH2-negative CRC and MSH2-negative colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Míriam Cuatrecasas
- Department of Pathology, Center of Biomedical Diagnosis (CDB), Hospital Clínic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08007 Barcelona, Spain; (X.M.-G.); (M.E.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Iñigo Gorostiaga
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario de Araba, 01009 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain;
| | - Cristina Riera
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya-Grupo Quirónsalud, Sant Cugat del Valles, 08195 Barcelona, Spain; (C.R.); (E.S.)
| | - Esteban Saperas
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya-Grupo Quirónsalud, Sant Cugat del Valles, 08195 Barcelona, Spain; (C.R.); (E.S.)
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08017 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Gemma Llort
- Oncology Department, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain;
- Oncology Department, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Terrassa, 08208 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irmgard Costa
- Department of Pathology, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari, Sabadell, 08208 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Xavier Matias-Guiu
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08007 Barcelona, Spain; (X.M.-G.); (M.E.)
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, 25198 Lleida, Spain
- Universitat de Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, 25003 Lleida, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (M.N.); (M.P.); (N.D.); (J.B.)
| | - Cristina Carrato
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Matilde Navarro
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (M.N.); (M.P.); (N.D.); (J.B.)
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), ONCOBELL Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Pineda
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (M.N.); (M.P.); (N.D.); (J.B.)
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), ONCOBELL Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Dueñas
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (M.N.); (M.P.); (N.D.); (J.B.)
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), ONCOBELL Program, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Brunet
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (M.N.); (M.P.); (N.D.); (J.B.)
- Hereditary Cancer Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica de Girona (IDIBGI), Universitat de Girona, 17190 Girona, Spain
| | - Vicente Marco
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Quirónsalud Barcelona, 08023 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Isabel Trias
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Platón, 08006 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - José Ignacio Busteros
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain;
| | - Gemma Mateu
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Josep Trueta, 17007 Girona, Spain;
| | - Francesc Balaguer
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Gastroenterology Department, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, Hospital Clínic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - María-Teresa Fernández-Figueras
- Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08017 Barcelona, Spain;
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya-Grupo Quirónsalud, Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08190 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Manel Esteller
- Universitat de Barcelona (UB), 08007 Barcelona, Spain; (X.M.-G.); (M.E.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cancer (CIBERONC), 28029 Madrid, Spain; (M.N.); (M.P.); (N.D.); (J.B.)
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eva Musulén
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain;
- Department of Pathology, Hospital Universitari General de Catalunya-Grupo Quirónsalud, Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08190 Barcelona, Spain
- Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute (IJC), 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
- Correspondence: or
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wong S, Hui P, Buza N. Frequent loss of mutation-specific mismatch repair protein expression in nonneoplastic endometrium of Lynch syndrome patients. Mod Pathol 2020; 33:1172-1181. [PMID: 31932681 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-020-0455-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is most often caused by a germline mutation in one of four DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, or MSH6) or EPCAM and is associated with a significantly increased risk of endometrial cancer in affected women. Although universal screening of endometrial cancer for Lynch syndrome is becoming increasingly common by various algorithms using MMR immunohistochemistry and/or microsatellite instability testing by PCR, establishing the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome can be still challenging. MMR-deficient nonneoplastic colonic crypts have been recently described in Lynch syndrome patients with colorectal carcinoma, and have been proposed to be a novel indicator of Lynch syndrome. Presence of MMR-deficient nonneoplastic endometrial glands have not yet been systematically evaluated in Lynch syndrome patients. We performed MMR protein immunohistochemistry in prophylactic hysterectomies and endometrial curettings/biopsies from 27 patients with known Lynch syndrome confirmed by germline mutation analysis. A total of 56 control benign endometrial tissues were also analyzed, and included benign endometrium adjacent to MMR-deficient sporadic (MLH1 promoter hypermethylated) endometrial carcinoma (n = 9), adjacent to MMR-intact sporadic endometrial carcinoma (n = 27), and normal endometrium from hysterectomies performed for benign disease (n = 20). MMR protein deficient nonneoplastic endometrial glands were identified in 70% (19 of 27) of Lynch syndrome patients. In all 19 cases the MMR protein loss was specific for the patients' known germline mutation. None of the control cases showed loss of MMR protein expression in nonneoplastic endometrium. Our findings suggest that MMR-deficient nonneoplastic endometrial glands may be a unique, specific marker of Lynch syndrome, and may provide an important insight into the pathogenesis of Lynch syndrome-associated endometrial cancer. Evaluation of MMR protein expression of benign background endometrium in endometrial cancer patients may be further explored as a possible useful addition to the Lynch syndrome screening algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Wong
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street LH 108, PO Box 208023, New Haven, CT, 06520-8023, USA
| | - Pei Hui
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street LH 108, PO Box 208023, New Haven, CT, 06520-8023, USA
| | - Natalia Buza
- Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street LH 108, PO Box 208023, New Haven, CT, 06520-8023, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Enhancing the efficacy of colonoscopy in Lynch syndrome: the search for the holy grail continues. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:633-635. [PMID: 31540631 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
16
|
Willis JA, Reyes-Uribe L, Chang K, Lipkin SM, Vilar E. Immune Activation in Mismatch Repair-Deficient Carcinogenesis: More Than Just Mutational Rate. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 26:11-17. [PMID: 31383734 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient colorectal cancers (dMMR colorectal cancer) are characterized by the expression of highly immunogenic neoantigen peptides, which stimulate lymphocytic infiltration as well as upregulation of inflammatory cytokines. These features are key to understanding why immunotherapy (specifically PD-1 and/or CTLA-4 checkpoint blockade) has proved to be highly effective for the treatment of patients with advanced dMMR colorectal cancer. Importantly, preclinical studies also suggest that this correlation between potent tumor neoantigens and the immune microenvironment is present in early (premalignant) stages of dMMR colorectal tumorigenesis as well, even in the absence of a high somatic mutation burden. Here, we discuss recent efforts to characterize how neoantigens and the tumor immune microenvironment coevolve throughout the dMMR adenoma-to-carcinoma pathway. We further highlight how this preclinical evidence forms the rational basis for developing novel immunotherapy-based colorectal cancer prevention strategies for patients with Lynch syndrome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason A Willis
- Hematology and Oncology Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura Reyes-Uribe
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kyle Chang
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,MD Anderson Cancer Center UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven M Lipkin
- Department of Medicine, Weill-Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. .,MD Anderson Cancer Center UT Health Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dow E, Buchanan DD, Winship IM. Utility of immunohistochemistry for mismatch repair proteins on colorectal polyps in the familial cancer clinic. Intern Med J 2019; 48:1325-1330. [PMID: 29717530 DOI: 10.1111/imj.13953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunohistochemistry for loss of expression of one or more of the mismatch repair proteins is performed on colorectal cancer tissue as a screening test for Lynch syndrome; however, its role in pre-malignant polyps remains controversial. AIM To determine the effectiveness of mismatch repair immunohistochemistry performed on pre-malignant colorectal polyps in identifying Lynch syndrome, focusing on clinical utility and value. METHODS A retrospective audit was conducted of mismatch repair immunohistochemistry performed on non-malignant polyps in patients who attended the Family Cancer Clinic at the Royal Melbourne Hospital. Two hundred and six patient records over a 10-year period (2006-2016) were reviewed. Personal and family history data were collected, including genetic testing results. RESULTS Of the 57 patients who underwent polyp testing, the family histories comprised Amsterdam II Criteria (12.3%), Lynch syndrome-associated malignancies (42.1%), Lynch syndrome-associated malignancies and polyps (35.1%) and polyps only (8.8%); 10.5% of patients had no significant family history. Normal expression of the mismatch repair proteins was observed in 94.7% of patients; loss of expression was observed in three individuals with concordant germline variants in two patients (one PMS2 variant of unknown significance and one MSH6 mutation). Additional genetic testing in 21 patients with normal immunohistochemistry did not identify any additional Lynch syndrome cases. CONCLUSION The clinical utility of mismatch repair immunohistochemistry on polyp tissue was low. No additional cases of Lynch syndrome were identified, and a large proportion of patients proceeded to germline testing despite normal polyp immunohistochemistry. We suggest there is no value in this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eryn Dow
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Daniel D Buchanan
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Colorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,The University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ingrid M Winship
- Genetic Medicine and Family Cancer Clinic, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
DNA methylation changes and somatic mutations as tumorigenic events in Lynch syndrome-associated adenomas retaining mismatch repair protein expression. EBioMedicine 2018; 39:280-291. [PMID: 30578081 PMCID: PMC6355728 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2018] [Revised: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background DNA mismatch repair (MMR) defects are a major factor in colorectal tumorigenesis in Lynch syndrome (LS) and 15% of sporadic cases. Some adenomas from carriers of inherited MMR gene mutations have intact MMR protein expression implying other mechanisms accelerating tumorigenesis. We determined roles of DNA methylation changes and somatic mutations in cancer-associated genes as tumorigenic events in LS-associated colorectal adenomas with intact MMR. Methods We investigated 122 archival colorectal specimens of normal mucosae, adenomas and carcinomas from 57 LS patients. MMR-deficient (MMR-D, n = 49) and MMR-proficient (MMR-P, n = 18) adenomas were of particular interest and were interrogated by methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and Ion Torrent sequencing. Findings Promoter methylation of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)-associated marker genes and selected colorectal cancer (CRC)-associated tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) increased and LINE-1 methylation decreased from normal mucosa to MMR-P adenomas to MMR-D adenomas. Methylation differences were statistically significant when either adenoma group was compared with normal mucosa, but not between MMR-P and MMR-D adenomas. Significantly increased methylation was found in multiple CIMP marker genes (IGF2, NEUROG1, CRABP1, and CDKN2A) and TSGs (SFRP1 and SFRP2) in MMR-P adenomas already. Furthermore, certain CRC-associated somatic mutations, such as KRAS, were prevalent in MMR-P adenomas. Interpretation We conclude that DNA methylation changes and somatic mutations of cancer-associated genes might serve as an alternative pathway accelerating LS-associated tumorigenesis in the presence of proficient MMR. Fund Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, Academy of Finland, Cancer Foundation Finland, Sigrid Juselius Foundation, and HiLIFE.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ahadova A, Gallon R, Gebert J, Ballhausen A, Endris V, Kirchner M, Stenzinger A, Burn J, von Knebel Doeberitz M, Bläker H, Kloor M. Three molecular pathways model colorectal carcinogenesis in Lynch syndrome. Int J Cancer 2018; 143:139-150. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 88] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2017] [Revised: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aysel Ahadova
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Richard Gallon
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway; Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
| | - Johannes Gebert
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Alexej Ballhausen
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Volker Endris
- Department of General Pathology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; Heidelberg 69120 Germany
| | - Martina Kirchner
- Department of General Pathology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; Heidelberg 69120 Germany
| | - Albrecht Stenzinger
- Department of General Pathology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; Heidelberg 69120 Germany
| | - John Burn
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, International Centre for Life, Central Parkway; Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
| | - Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| | - Hendrik Bläker
- Department of General Pathology; University Hospital Charité, Charitéplatz 1; Berlin 10117 Germany
| | - Matthias Kloor
- Department of Applied Tumor Biology; Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 224; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor Biology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280; 69120 Heidelberg Germany
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit (MMPU), University Hospital Heidelberg; Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Diagnosing colorectal medullary carcinoma: interobserver variability and clinicopathological implications. Hum Pathol 2016; 62:74-82. [PMID: 28034727 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2016] [Revised: 12/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal medullary carcinoma, recognized by the World Health Organization as a distinct histologic subtype, is commonly regarded as a specific entity with an improved prognosis and unique molecular pathogenesis. A fundamental but as yet unaddressed question, however, is whether it can be diagnosed reproducibly. In this study, by analyzing 80 colorectal adenocarcinomas whose dominant growth pattern was solid (thus encompassing medullary carcinoma and its mimics), we provided a detailed description of the morphological spectrum from "classic medullary histology" to nonmedullary poorly differentiated histologies and demonstrated significant overlapping between categories. By assessing a selected subset (n=30) that represented the spectrum of histologies, we showed that the interobserver agreement for diagnosing medullary carcinoma by using 2010 World Health Organization criteria was poor; the κ value among 5 gastrointestinal pathologists was only 0.157 (95% confidence interval, 0.127-0.263; P=.001). When we arbitrarily classified the entire cohort into "classic" and "indeterminate" medullary tumors (group 1, n=19; group 2, n=26, respectively) and nonmedullary poorly differentiated tumors (group 3, n=35), groups 1 and 2 were more likely to exhibit mismatch repair protein deficiency than group 3 (P<.001); however, improved survival could not be detected in either group compared with group 3. Our findings suggest that the diagnosis of medullary carcinoma, as currently applied, may only serve as a morphological descriptor indicating an increased likelihood of mismatch-repair deficiency. Additional evidence including a more objective classification system is needed before medullary carcinoma can be regarded as a distinct entity with prognostic relevance. Until such evidence becomes available, caution should be exercised when making this diagnosis, as well as when comparing results across different studies.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tanaka M, Nakajima T, Sugano K, Yoshida T, Taniguchi H, Kanemitsu Y, Nagino M, Sekine S. Mismatch repair deficiency in Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal adenomas is more prevalent in older patients. Histopathology 2016; 69:322-8. [DOI: 10.1111/his.12941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Tanaka
- Division of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories; National Cancer Center Hospital; Tokyo Japan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery; National Cancer Center Hospital; Tokyo Japan
- Division of Surgical Oncology; Department of Surgery; Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine; Nagoya Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakajima
- Division of Endoscopy; National Cancer Center Hospital; Tokyo Japan
| | - Kokichi Sugano
- Oncogene Research Unit/Cancer Prevention Unit; Tochigi Cancer Center Research Institute; Tochigi Japan
| | - Teruhiko Yoshida
- Division of Genetics; National Cancer Center Research Institute; Tokyo Japan
| | - Hirokazu Taniguchi
- Division of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories; National Cancer Center Hospital; Tokyo Japan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery; National Cancer Center Hospital; Tokyo Japan
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology; Department of Surgery; Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine; Nagoya Japan
| | - Shigeki Sekine
- Division of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories; National Cancer Center Hospital; Tokyo Japan
- Division of Molecular Pathology; National Cancer Center Research Institute; Tokyo Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
CTNNB1-mutant colorectal carcinomas with immediate invasive growth: a model of interval cancers in Lynch syndrome. Fam Cancer 2016; 15:579-86. [DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9899-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
23
|
Mismatch repair-deficient crypt foci in Lynch syndrome--molecular alterations and association with clinical parameters. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0121980. [PMID: 25816162 PMCID: PMC4376900 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2014] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Lynch syndrome is caused by germline mutations of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes, most frequently MLH1 and MSH2. Recently, MMR-deficient crypt foci (MMR-DCF) have been identified as a novel lesion which occurs at high frequency in the intestinal mucosa from Lynch syndrome mutation carriers, but very rarely progress to cancer. To shed light on molecular alterations and clinical associations of MMR-DCF, we systematically searched the intestinal mucosa from Lynch syndrome patients for MMR-DCF by immunohistochemistry. The identified lesions were characterised for alterations in microsatellite-bearing genes with proven or suspected role in malignant transformation. We demonstrate that the prevalence of MMR-DCF (mean 0.84 MMR-DCF per 1 cm2 mucosa in the colorectum of Lynch syndrome patients) was significantly associated with patients’ age, but not with patients’ gender. No MMR-DCF were detectable in the mucosa of patients with sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancer (n = 12). Microsatellite instability of at least one tested marker was detected in 89% of the MMR-DCF examined, indicating an immediate onset of microsatellite instability after MMR gene inactivation. Coding microsatellite mutations were most frequent in the genes HT001 (ASTE1) with 33%, followed by AIM2 (17%) and BAX (10%). Though MMR deficiency alone appears to be insufficient for malignant transformation, it leads to measurable microsatellite instability even in single MMR-deficient crypts. Our data indicate for the first time that the frequency of MMR-DCF increases with patients’ age. Similar patterns of coding microsatellite instability in MMR-DCF and MMR-deficient cancers suggest that certain combinations of coding microsatellite mutations, including mutations of the HT001, AIM2 and BAX gene, may contribute to the progression of MMR-deficient lesions into MMR-deficient cancers.
Collapse
|