Surveillance using capsule endoscopy is safe in post-colectomy patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a prospective Japanese study

Genotype-phenotype correlation of small-intestinal polyps on small-bowel capsule endoscopy in familial adenomatous polyposis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), neoplastic lesions outside the colon have become increasingly important. The genotype-phenotype correlation has been established for duodenal polyps, and regular screening is recommended. However, this correlation remains unclear for small-intestinal lesions, except for reports on the relationship between their occurrence and Spigelman stage. Here, we used small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) to investigate the genotype-phenotype correlation of small-intestinal polyps in FAP.

METHODS

The genotype-phenotype correlation of small-intestinal polyps was investigated in patients with FAP who underwent SBCE, Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene analysis. Of 64 patients with FAP who underwent SBCE, 41 were included in the final analysis, 4 did not undergo a complete small intestine examination, and 19 did not undergo genetic analysis.

RESULTS

The prevalence (median number) of small-intestinal polyps by Spigelman stage was 26% (1.5), 0% (0), 44% (5), 60% (4), and 73% (25.5) for stages 0 to IV, respectively. Significantly more small-intestinal polyps were found in Spigelman stage III and IV groups than in the stage 0 group (P < .05). The APC variant was negative for 6 patients (15%), and the sites associated with more than 5 small-intestinal polyps were codons 278, 1062, 1114, 1281, 1307, 1314, and 1504.

CONCLUSIONS

In FAP patients, SBCE surveillance is potentially recommended for patients with pathogenic variants in the APC gene at codons 278 and 1062 to 1504 or with Spigelman stage III or higher.

Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2022

MR1: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy as the first-line examination, before consideration of other endoscopic and radiological diagnostic tests for suspected small-bowel bleeding, given the excellent safety profile of capsule endoscopy, its patient tolerability, and its potential to visualize the entire small-bowel mucosa.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR2: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with overt suspected small-bowel bleeding as soon as possible after the bleeding episode, ideally within 48 hours, to maximize the diagnostic and subsequent therapeutic yield.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR3: ESGE does not recommend routine second-look endoscopy prior to small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding or iron-deficiency anemia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR4: ESGE recommends conservative management in those patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding and high quality negative small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR5: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy to confirm and possibly treat lesions identified by small-bowel capsule endoscopy.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR6: ESGE recommends the performance of small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a first-line examination in patients with iron-deficiency anemia when small bowel evaluation is indicated.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR7: ESGE recommends small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn's disease and negative ileocolonoscopy findings as the initial diagnostic modality for investigating the small bowel, in the absence of obstructive symptoms or known bowel stenosis.Strong recommendation, high quality evidence. MR8: ESGE recommends, in patients with unremarkable or nondiagnostic findings from dedicated small-bowel cross-sectional imaging, small-bowel capsule endoscopy as a subsequent investigation if deemed likely to influence patient management.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. MR9: ESGE recommends, in patients with established Crohn's disease, the use of a patency capsule before small-bowel capsule endoscopy to decrease the capsule retention rate.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR10: ESGE recommends device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) as an alternative to surgery for foreign bodies retained in the small bowel requiring retrieval in patients without acute intestinal obstruction.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. MR11: ESGE recommends DAE-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DAE-ERCP) as a first-line endoscopic approach to treat pancreaticobiliary diseases in patients with surgically altered anatomy (except for Billroth II patients).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in familial adenomatous polyposis syndromes

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome is a complex entity, which includes FAP, attenuated FAP, and MUTYH-associated polyposis. These patients are at significant risk for colorectal cancer and carry additional risks for extracolonic malignancies. In this guideline, we reviewed the most recent literature to formulate recommendations on the role of endoscopy in this patient population. Relevant clinical questions were how to identify high-risk individuals warranting genetic testing, when to start screening examinations, what are appropriate surveillance intervals, how to identify endoscopically high-risk features, and what is the role of chemoprevention. A systematic literature search from 2005 to 2018 was performed, in addition to the inclusion of seminal historical studies. Most studies were from worldwide registries, which have compiled years of data regarding the natural history and cancer risks in this cohort. Given that most studies were retrospective, recommendations were based on epidemiologic data and expert opinion. Management of colorectal polyps in FAP has not changed much in recent years, as colectomy in FAP is the standard of care. What is new, however, is the developing body of literature on the role of endoscopy in managing upper GI and small-bowel polyposis, as patients are living longer and improved endoscopic technologies have emerged.

Update on small bowel surveillance in hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes

Despite its rarity in the general population, small bowel adenocarcinoma risk is increased in individuals with hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes (HCCS). In the last decade, the advent of capsule endoscopy and device-assisted balloon enteroscopy procedures in patients with HCCS have allowed to investigate the whole small bowel, increasing the diagnostic yield of small bowel tumor. Nonetheless, there is a significant variability in the international guideline recommendations. The aim of this review is to provide an update on surveillance of small bowel in HCCS and to identify the key points for the clinical management of these patients.

The impact of hospitalization on the performance of capsule endoscopy (CE)

BACKGROUND

For proper evaluation of capsule endoscopy (CE), a complete examination is necessary.

AIM

We evaluated risk factors of an incomplete CE with focus on patient hospitalization.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 161 consecutive patients who underwent CE between 01.07.2013 and 13.03.2016. Main indications were active bleeding, iron deficiency anemia (IDA), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), abdominal pain, and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

RESULTS

We report the results of 103 in-patients and 56 out-patients. Eighty-two patients were male, average age was 58.9 years (range 18-90). Indications for CE were active bleeding (103 patients), IDA and IBD (16 patients), and FAP, abdominal pain and others (eight examinations each). All FAP patients were out-patients, but showed the longest small bowel transit time (SBTT) of 443.6min (p=0.0001). The shortest SBTT was found in out-patients without FAP (267.5min, p<0.05). In the in-patient group, nine endoscopies did not record the entire small bowel (8.7%) due to battery depletion, compared with only one incomplete examination in the out-patients (1.8%, p=0.036). We found pathologic lesions in the last 30min of the SBTT in 43 patients, and this indicates the necessity for complete examination. Thirteen of these 43 patients showed major lesions such as ulcers or angiodysplasia in this last region alone.

CONCLUSION

In-patients might require special treatment to ensure complete examination, since a considerable amount of pathologies can only be found in the ileum.