Ovarian cancer patients at high risk of BRCA mutation: the constitutional genetic characterization does not change prognosis

Olaparib plus bevacizumab as a first-line maintenance treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer by molecular status: an updated PAOLA-1 based cost-effectiveness analysis

OBJECTIVE

The PAOLA-1 trial (NCT02477644) reported final survival benefit associated with olaparib plus bevacizumab maintenance treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) based on molecular status. Our aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab for overall patients, patients with a breast cancer susceptibility genes (BRCA) mutation, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), or HRD without BRCA mutations AOC from the context of the American healthcare system.

METHODS

Analysis of health outcomes in life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in various molecular status-based AOC patient at a $150,000/QALY of willingness-to-pay was performed using a state-transitioned Markov model with a 20-year time horizon. Meanwhile, sensitivity analyses assessments were also used to gauge the model's stability.

RESULTS

The ICERs of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab alone were $487,428 ($374,758), $249,579 ($191,649), $258,859 ($198,739), and $270,736 ($206,640) per QALY (LY) in the overall patients, patients with BRCA mutations, patients with HRD, and patients with HRD without BRCA mutations AOC, respectively, which indicated that The ICERs was higher than $150,000/QALY in the US. Progression-free survival (PFS) value and olaparib cost emerged as the primary influencing factors of these findings in the sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

At current cost levels, olaparib plus bevacizumab treatment is not a cost-effective treatment for patients with AOC regardless of their molecular status in the US. However, this maintenance treatment may be more favorable health advantages for patients with BRAC mutations AOC.

The cost-effectiveness analysis of maintenance olaparib plus Bevacizumab in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: based on the final survival results from PAOLA-1 trial

INTRODUCTION

In 2023, the final PAOLA-1 trial (NCT02477644) survival data were published documenting the benefits of therapy consisting of olaparib plus bevacizumab for patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) as a function of molecular status. In light of these new data, the present study was conducted with the goal of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of olaparib plus bevacizumab for the treatment of the overall AOC patient population and for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive patients, patients with a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutations, homologous recombination proficiency (HRD)-positive, or patients not harboring BRCA mutations AOC from a US payers perspective.

METHODS

A Markov state-transition model with a 15-year time horizon was used to evaluate outcomes of patients administered Olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values were evaluated in this study in light of a $150,000/QALY of willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold. The stability of the established model was evaluated through sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Relative to bevacizumab alone, Olaparib plus bevacizumab was associated with mean incremental costs and QALYs (LYs) of olaparib plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab were $293,656 and 1.85 (2.16), $265,668 and 3.34 (4.02), $242,746 and 1.71 (2.06), and $193,792 and 0.97 (1.14) for overall, BRCA mutation-positive, HRD-positive, and HRD-positive BRCA mutation-negative AOC patients, respectively. The corresponding ICER values for these patient subgroups were $158,729 ($136,218), $79,434 ($66,120), $141,636 ($117,747), and $200,595 ($169,733) per QALY (LY) gained Utility value and the price of olaparib were identified in sensitivity analyses as the primary factors influencing these results.

CONCLUSION

At current pricing levels, maintenance treatment with olaparib plus bevacizumab treatment may represent a cost-effective therapeutic option for BRCA mutations and HRD-positive AOC patients in the USA.

Association of BRCA1/2 mutations with prognosis and surgical cytoreduction outcomes in ovarian cancer patients: An updated meta-analysis

AIM

This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of BRCA mutations on survival outcomes of ovarian cancer patients and assess whether the BRCA status was an independent predictor of complete cytoreduction.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases for studies that evaluated the associations among BRCA mutations, ovarian cancer survival and surgical cytoreduction before August 2021 based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 61 articles that compared the clinical features, survival outcomes, and optimal surgical cytoreduction rates between BRCA-positive patients and BRCA-negative patients. The results showed that BRCA mutation carriers were diagnosed with ovarian cancer at a younger age than the age at which nonmutation carriers were diagnosed. In addition, BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to be in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III-IV, and the pathological grade was commonly grade 3. The pathological type of BRCA mutation carriers was more likely to be high-grade serous carcinoma. Patients with BRCA mutations had higher response rates to platinum-based chemotherapy than the noncarriers. However, patients in both groups had equivalent rates of surgical cytoreduction, and BRCA-positive patients had longer overall survival (OS) time (HR = 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.73; p < 0.001) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.63, 0.82; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

BRCA mutations appear to be associated with improved OS and PFS in patients with ovarian cancer. However, we did not find any difference in the surgical resection rate between participants in the two groups.

BRCA1/2 status and chemotherapy response score to tailor ovarian cancer surgery

In advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) the complete eradication of all macroscopic disease at primary debulking surgery (PDS) is associated with the best outcome. If this cannot be achieved, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) can make complete cytoreduction possible while reducing postoperative morbidity. It is still debated if PDS and NACT- IDS are associated with similar survival and if they provide different outcomes when optimal cytoreduction is achieved. For a tailored surgical planning, accurate prediction of tumor's resectability, assessment of patient's performance status and in-depth knowledge of tumor biology are required. Both BRCA1/2 status and the "chemotherapy response score" are reliable markers of chemosensitivity and may thus improve our way to triage patients to PDS or NACT-IDS; furthermore, they could be used to modulate our surgical approach and define appropriate subgroups of patients for whom new therapies should be tested.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mRNA-expression prove to be of clinical impact in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are associated with better survival in ovarian cancer (OC) patients due to a better response to platinum-based chemotherapy. However, the impact of the BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression is not well characterized in OC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We investigated BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression in 12 non-neoplastic fallopian tubes and 201 epithelial OCs in relation to their clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We found higher BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression in OCs compared to controls (P = 0.011, P < 0.001, respectively). BRCA1 mutated OCs exhibited lower BRCA1 (P = 0.014) but higher BRCA2 mRNA-expression (P = 0.001). Low BRCA1-expression was associated with favorable overall survival (OS) (P = 0.012) and low BRCA2-expression with better progression-free survival (PFS) and OS (P = 0.004, P = 0.001, respectively). A subgroup-analysis showed that this effect was confined only to the BRCA1-wildtype cancers. Cox-regression confirmed the prognostic significance of BRCA1-expression for OS (P = 0.028). Independency of the prognostic value of BRCA2-expression for PFS (P = 0.045) and OS (P = 0.015) was restricted to high-grade serous OCs. Fully platinum-sensitivity was characterized by lower BRCA1/2 mRNA-expression in BRCA1-wildtype cancers in comparison to platinum-refractory OC.

CONCLUSION

Our findings may reflect higher platinum-sensitivity due to reduced capacity of DNA damage repair in tissues with low BRCA1/2-expression. In this context, especially in BRCA-wildtype cancers both parameters could also be potential predictors for PARP-sensitivity.

Prognostic significance of BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis

There is no consensus on the syntheses concerning the impact of BRCA mutation on ovarian cancer survival. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted that evaluated the impact of BRCA mutations on the survival outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We presented data with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled them using the random-effects models. From 2,624 unique records, 34 eligible studies including 18,396 patients were identified. BRCA1/2 mutations demonstrated both OS and PFS benefits in patients with ovarian cancer (OS: HR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.78, I² = 76.5%, P <0.001; PFS: HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.73, I² = 18.1%, P = 0.261). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the HRs for OS and PFS benefits were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.86) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89), respectively. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, the HRs for OS and PFS benefits were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.73) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.75), respectively. The results of subgroup analyses for OS stratified by study quality, tumor stage, study design, sample size, number of research center, duration of follow-up, baseline characteristics adjusted and tumor histology were mostly constant across BRCA1/2, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation subtypes. In summary, for patients with ovarian cancer, BRCA mutations were associated with improved OS and PFS. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to test its benefits in specific patients.

Association of BRCA1/2 mutations with ovarian cancer prognosis: An updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis was performed to determine if BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ovarian cancer.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Studies of patients with primary or recurrent ovarian cancer that examined the relationship between BRCA1/2 mutation status and outcomes were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes were OS and PFS of patients with and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. The secondary outcome was treatment response: complete response, partial response, and overall response.

RESULTS

Overall analysis revealed BRCA1/2 mutations were associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64, 0.88; P < .001] and PFS (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.64, 0.99; P = .039). BRCA1 mutations were significantly associated with improved OS (HR = 0.75) but not PFS, and BRCA2 mutations alone were not associated with either improved OS or PFS. The presence of BCRA1/2 mutations was associated with a better overall response rate, higher complete response rate, and lower partial response rate; however, BRCA1 or BRCA2 alone was not associated with overall response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

BRCA1 mutations appear to be associated with improved OS in patients with ovarian cancer. However, the effect of BRCA1 mutations on PFS and BRCA2 mutations alone on OS and PFS is less clear.

Prognostic significance of BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis

There is no consensus on the syntheses concerning the impact of BRCA mutation on ovarian cancer survival. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted that evaluated the impact of BRCA mutations on the survival outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We presented data with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled them using the random-effects models. From 2,624 unique records, 34 eligible studies including 18,396 patients were identified. BRCA1/2 mutations demonstrated both OS and PFS benefits in patients with ovarian cancer (OS: HR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.78, I2 = 76.5%, P <0.001; PFS: HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.73, I2 = 18.1%, P = 0.261). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the HRs for OS and PFS benefits were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.86) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89), respectively. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, the HRs for OS and PFS benefits were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.73) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.75), respectively. The results of subgroup analyses for OS stratified by study quality, tumor stage, study design, sample size, number of research center, duration of follow-up, baseline characteristics adjusted and tumor histology were mostly constant across BRCA1/2, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation subtypes. In summary, for patients with ovarian cancer, BRCA mutations were associated with improved OS and PFS. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to test its benefits in specific patients.

Prognostic significance of BRCA mutations in ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review with meta-analysis

There is no consensus on the syntheses concerning the impact of BRCA mutation on ovarian cancer survival. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was conducted that evaluated the impact of BRCA mutations on the survival outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). We presented data with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) and pooled them using the random-effects models. From 2,624 unique records, 34 eligible studies including 18,396 patients were identified. BRCA1/2 mutations demonstrated both OS and PFS benefits in patients with ovarian cancer (OS: HR = 0.67, 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.78, I2 = 76.5%, P <0.001; PFS: HR = 0.62, 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.73, I2 = 18.1%, P = 0.261). For BRCA1 mutation carriers, the HRs for OS and PFS benefits were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.86) and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.89), respectively. For BRCA2 mutation carriers, the HRs for OS and PFS benefits were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.45 to 0.73) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.30 to 0.75), respectively. The results of subgroup analyses for OS stratified by study quality, tumor stage, study design, sample size, number of research center, duration of follow-up, baseline characteristics adjusted and tumor histology were mostly constant across BRCA1/2, BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation subtypes. In summary, for patients with ovarian cancer, BRCA mutations were associated with improved OS and PFS. Further large-scale prospective cohort studies should be conducted to test its benefits in specific patients.