1
|
Dalton B, Austin A, Ching BCF, Potterton R, McClelland J, Bartholdy S, Kekic M, Campbell IC, Schmidt U. 'My dad was like "it's your brain, what are you doing?"': Participant experiences of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in severe enduring anorexia nervosa. EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2022; 30:237-249. [PMID: 35150473 PMCID: PMC9304183 DOI: 10.1002/erv.2890] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Objective Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a promising emerging treatment for anorexia nervosa (AN). However, to date, patients' views and experiences of this treatment have not been fully explored. To assess these, we integrated a qualitative study into a feasibility randomised controlled trial of rTMS in individuals with severe enduring AN. Method Twenty‐nine (of 34) trial participants contributed to this study. Semi‐structured interviews were conducted 3‐months following the completion of rTMS treatment (4‐months post‐randomisation), prior to unblinding. Transcripts were analysed using content analysis. Results rTMS was deemed an acceptable but time‐consuming treatment. Many emphasised how their lives had changed to some extent during, but mainly after treatment by making them more positive, open‐minded, flexible and willing to try new things in relation to their AN and other aspects of their lives. Conclusions These qualitative data will be valuable in shaping participant information, recruitment and planning of future large‐scale trials of rTMS in AN. Trial Registration ISRCTN14329415, registered 23rd July 2015, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14329415 This study is the first to systematically explore participants' experiences of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment for severe enduring anorexia nervosa (AN), as part of a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Participants expressed that rTMS was an acceptable but time‐consuming treatment. Many participants who received real rTMS described positive changes in relation to AN and quality of life. Findings from this qualitative study will help to shape future research of rTMS treatment for AN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Dalton
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Amelia Austin
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Brian C F Ching
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rachel Potterton
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jessica McClelland
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Savani Bartholdy
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Kekic
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Iain C Campbell
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Eating Disorders, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gordon G, Williamson G, Gkofa V, Schmidt U, Brockmeyer T, Campbell I. Participants' experience of approach bias modification training with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a combination treatment for binge eating disorder. EUROPEAN EATING DISORDERS REVIEW 2021; 29:969-984. [PMID: 34460140 DOI: 10.1002/erv.2859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Revised: 06/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study explored participants' experience of approach bias modification training (ABM) with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for binge eating disorder (BED) within a randomised controlled trial (RCT). A subset of participants who completed the RCT were interviewed to attain feedback on treatment experience and outcomes. METHOD 15 participants with BED who completed the RCT were recruited, using purposive sampling. Participants received six sessions of concurrent ABM training with either real or sham tDCS. Semi-structured interviews relating to study experience and treatment outcomes were conducted and data were analysed thematically. RESULTS The combined ABM and tDCS intervention was deemed acceptable and worthwhile by participants interviewed across both intervention groups. Negative preconceptions of tDCS were an initial deterrent to study participation for some, yet the brain stimulation experience was found to be tolerable. Minor and transient sensations and side effects attributed to tDCS were reported by most participants during and after stimulation, in addition to less pleasant aspects of ABM training, with no significant adverse effects reported by interviewees. Positive outcomes were described by participants across both intervention groups, relating to changes in BED symptoms and to broader beneficial effects on associated cognitive and emotional factors. Two participants experienced a shift in autonomy, attributed to tDCS and the combined intervention respectively. CONCLUSIONS Adults with symptoms of BED found concurrent ABM and tDCS sessions to be acceptable, despite initial apprehension about the safety of tDCS. Findings are relevant to the neuroethics literature and may inform science communication strategies on neuromodulation treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Gordon
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Grace Williamson
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Vasiliki Gkofa
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Timo Brockmeyer
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Gottingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Iain Campbell
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dalton B, Bartholdy S, Campbell IC, Schmidt U. Neurostimulation in Clinical and Sub-clinical Eating Disorders: A Systematic Update of the Literature. Curr Neuropharmacol 2018; 16:1174-1192. [PMID: 29308739 PMCID: PMC6187753 DOI: 10.2174/1570159x16666180108111532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2017] [Revised: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Whilst psychological therapies are the main approach to treatment of eating disorders (EDs), advances in aetiological research suggest the need for the development of more targeted, brain-focused treatments. A range of neurostimulation approaches, most prominently repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS), are rapidly emerging as potential novel interventions. We have previously reviewed these techniques as potential treatments of EDs. AIM To provide an update of the literature examining the effects of DBS, rTMS and tDCS on eating behaviours, body weight and associated symptoms in people with EDs and relevant analogue populations. METHODS Using PRISMA guidelines, we reviewed articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO from 1st January 2013 until 14th August 2017, to update our earlier search. Studies assessing the effects of neurostimulation techniques on eating and weight-related outcomes in people with EDs and relevant analogue populations were included. Data from both searches were combined. RESULTS We included a total of 32 studies (526 participants); of these, 18 were newly identified by our update search. Whilst findings are somewhat mixed for bulimia nervosa, neurostimulation techniques have shown potential in the treatment of other EDs, in terms of reduction of ED and associated symptoms. Studies exploring cognitive, neural, and hormonal correlates of these techniques are also beginning to appear. CONCLUSIONS Neurostimulation approaches show promise as treatments for EDs. As yet, large wellconducted randomised controlled trials are lacking. More information is needed about treatment targets, stimulation parameters and mechanisms of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bethan Dalton
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, King`s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Savani Bartholdy
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, King`s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Iain C Campbell
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, King`s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ulrike Schmidt
- Section of Eating Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, King`s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Park RJ, Singh I, Pike AC, Tan JOA. Deep Brain Stimulation in Anorexia Nervosa: Hope for the Hopeless or Exploitation of the Vulnerable? The Oxford Neuroethics Gold Standard Framework. Front Psychiatry 2017; 8:44. [PMID: 28373849 PMCID: PMC5357647 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Neurosurgical interventions for psychiatric disorders have a long and troubled history (1, 2) but have become much more refined in the last few decades due to the rapid development of neuroimaging and robotic technologies (2). These advances have enabled the design of less invasive techniques, which are more focused, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) (3). DBS involves electrode insertion into specific neural targets implicated in pathological behavior, which are then repeatedly stimulated at adjustable frequencies. DBS has been used for Parkinson's disease and movement disorders since the 1960s (4-6) and over the last decade has been applied to treatment-refractory psychiatric disorders, with some evidence of benefit in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), major depressive disorder, and addictions (7). Recent consensus guidelines on best practice in psychiatric neurosurgery (8) stress, however, that DBS for psychiatric disorders remains at an experimental and exploratory stage. The ethics of DBS-in particular for psychiatric conditions-is debated (1, 8-10). Much of this discourse surrounds the philosophical implications of competence, authenticity, personality, or identity change following neurosurgical interventions, but there is a paucity of applied guidance on neuroethical best practice in psychiatric DBS, and health-care professionals have expressed that they require more (11). This paper aims to redress this balance by providing a practical, applied neuroethical gold standard framework to guide research ethics committees, researchers, and institutional sponsors. We will describe this as applied to our protocol for a particular research trial of DBS in severe and enduring anorexia nervosa (SE-AN) (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01924598, unique identifier NCT01924598), but believe it may have wider application to DBS in other psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J. Park
- OxBREaD Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ilina Singh
- Neuroscience Ethics and Society Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alexandra C. Pike
- OxBREaD Research Group, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|