Novel percutaneous interventional therapies in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an integrative review

Large animal models to study effectiveness of therapy devices in the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

Our understanding of the complex pathophysiology of Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is limited by the lack of a robust in vivo model. Existing in-vivo models attempt to reproduce the four main phenotypes of HFpEF; ageing, obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. To date, there is no in vivo model that represents all the haemodynamic characteristics of HFpEF, and only a few have proven to be reliable for the preclinical evaluation of potentially new therapeutic targets. HFpEF accounts for 50% of all the heart failure cases and its incidence is on the rise, posing a huge economic burden on the health system. Patients with HFpEF have limited therapeutic options available. The inadequate effectiveness of current pharmaceutical therapeutics for HFpEF has prompted the development of device-based treatments that target the hemodynamic changes to reduce the symptoms of HFpEF. However, despite the potential of device-based solutions to treat HFpEF, most of these therapies are still in the developmental stage and a relevant HFpEF in vivo model will surely expedite their development process. This review article outlines the major limitations of the current large in-vivo models in use while discussing how these designs have helped in the development of therapy devices for the treatment of HFpEF.

Study on the Efficacy of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Peritoneal Dialysis

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular disease is the most common cause of death and morbidity in patients with end-stage renal disease. Sacubitril/valsartan (SAC/VAL) can reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality among patients with heart failure (HF). The present study set out to evaluate the efficacy of SAC/VAL in the treatment of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) (HFpEF&PD).

METHODS

A total of 160 patients with HFpEF&PD were enrolled and randomly divided into the control group (N = 80) and SAC/VAL group (N = 80). The cardiac function efficacy, HF scoring efficacy, echocardiographic parameters, serological indicators, and 6-minute walking test were compared before and after treatment.

RESULTS

After 6 months of treatment, the total number of patients who responded to treatment in the SAC/VAL group was higher than that of the control group in terms of cardiac function and HF scoring efficacy. After treatment, levels of early diastolic/late diastolic filling velocity and left ventricular ejection fraction were increased in both groups, while the levels of left atrial diameter, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, left ventricular end-systolic diameter, inter-ventricular septal diameter, and left ventricular posterior wall diameter were decreased; the NT-proBNP levels were diminished in both groups, while hemoglobin levels and the 6-minute walk distance were increased; the systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and 24-h ultrafiltration volume were lowered in all patients. The changes in these indexes in the SAC/VAL group were more obvious than those in the controls.

CONCLUSION

SAC/VAL can significantly improve cardiac function in patients with HFpEF&PD.

Left atrial assist device for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: initial results with torque control mode in diastolic heart failure model

A novel pump, the left atrial assist device (LAAD), is a device specifically for the treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The LAAD is a mixed-flow pump that is implanted in the mitral position and delivers blood from the left atrium to the left ventricle. During the development process, we aimed to explore whether device activation in torque control (TC) mode would improve the function of the LAAD. The TC mode causes adjustment of the pump speed automatically during each cardiac cycle in order to maintain a specified torque. In this study, we tested four different TC settings (TC modes 0.9, 1.0, 1.25, and 1.5) using an in vitro mock circulatory loop. Mild, moderate, and severe diastolic heart failure (DHF) conditions, as well as normal heart condition, were simulated with the four TC modes. Also, we evaluated the LAAD in vivo with three calves. The LAAD was implanted at the mitral position with four TC settings (TC modes 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2). With LAAD support, the in vitro cardiac output and aortic pressure recovered to normal heart levels at TC 1.25 and 1.5 even under severe DHF conditions with little pump regurgitation. The TC mode tested in vivo with three calves, and it also showed favorable result without elevating the left ventricular end-diastolic pressure. These initial in vitro and in vivo results suggest that the TC mode could be potentially effective, and the LAAD could be a treatment option for HFpEF patients.

Can mechanical circulatory support be an effective treatment for HFpEF patients?

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasing in prevalence and represents approximately 50% of all heart failure (HF) patients. Patients with this complex clinical scenario, characterized by high filling pressures, and reduced cardiac output (CO) associated with progressive multi-organ involvement, have so far not experienced any significant improvement in quality of life or survival with traditional HF treatment. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have offered a new treatment alternative in terminal heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), providing a unique combination of significant pressure and volume unloading together with an increase in CO. The small left ventricular cavity in HFpEF patients challenges left-sided pressure unloading, and new anatomical entry points need to be explored for mechanical pressure and volume unloading. Optimized and pressure/volume-adjusted mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for HFrEF patients may conceivably be customized for HFpEF anatomy and hemodynamics. We have developed a long-term MCS device for HFpEF patients with atrial unloading in a pulsed algorithm, leading to a significant reduction of filling pressure, maintenance of pulse pressure, and increase in CO demonstrated in animal testing. In this article, we will discuss HFpEF pathology, hemodynamics, and the principles behind our novel MCS device that may improve symptoms and prognosis in HFpEF patients. Data from mock-loop hemolysis studies, acute, and chronic animal studies will be presented.

New concepts in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypertension (HTN) remains the most common and strongest contributing factor to the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In this review, we aim to summarize the pathophysiological processes linking HTN to HFpEF and highlight novel concepts in medical and device-based management of HFpEF and HTN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite the global increase in the prevalence of HFpEF, there has been limited benefit in current medication and device-based therapy for this complex syndrome. The hallmark of HFpEF is an elevated left intra-atrial and ventricular pressure and exertional dyspnea. Traditional medications used for treating HTN in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction have unclear benefits in patients with HFpEF. Careful analysis of emerging medications such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors showed benefit in reducing not only blood pressure but also hospitalizations in patients with HFpEF. Current data on device-based therapy aims to reduce left intra-atrial pressure, ventricular pressure and stimulate baroreceptors to lower blood pressure; however, needs further investigation.

SUMMARY

The nexus of HTN and HFpEF remains strong and complex. Although traditional medications for treating HFrEF did not affect long-term outcomes, novel therapies with angiotensin receptor neprilysin-inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor offer promising results. Many device-based interventions in the HFpEF population are being developed with the aim to reduce left intra-atrial and ventricular pressure; however, their role in HFpEF hypertensive patients needs to be further investigated.

Novel approaches for left atrial pressure relief: Device-based monitoring and management in heart failure

The importance of the left atrium (LA) has been emphasized in recent years as the features of heart failure (HF), especially with regard to variability in patient and pathology phenotypes, continue to be uncovered. Of note, among the population with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), pressure or size of the LA have become a target for advanced monitoring and a therapeutic approach. In the case of diastolic dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension, which are often observed in patients with HFpEF, a conventional approach with clinical symptoms and physical signs of decompensation turned out to have a poor correlation with LA pressure. Therefore, to optimize HF treatment for these populations, several devices that are applied directly to the LA have been developed. First, two LA pressure (LAP) sensors (Heart POD and V-LAP Device) were developed and may enable patient self-management remotely with LAP-guided and physician-directed style. Second, there are device-based approaches that aim to decompress the LA directly. These include: (1) interatrial shunt devices; (2) left ventricular assist devices with LA cannulation; and (3) the left atrial assist device. While these novel device-based therapies are not yet commercially available, there is expected to be a rise in the proposition and adoption of a wider range of choices for monitoring or treating LA using device-based options, based on LA dimensional reduction and optimization of the clinically significant pressure relief. Further development and evaluation are necessary to establish a more favorable management strategy for HF.

Large animal models of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by diastolic dysfunction and multiple comorbidities. The number of patients is continuously increasing, with no improvement in its unfavorable prognosis, and there is a strong need for novel treatments. New devices and drugs are difficult to assess at the translational preclinical step due to the lack of high-fidelity large animal models of HFpEF. In this review, we describe the summary of historical and evolving techniques for developing large animal models. The representative methods are pressure overload models, including (1) aortic banding, (2) aortic stent, (3) renal hypertension, and (4) mineralocorticoid-induced hypertension. Diet-induced metabolic syndromes are also used. A new technique with an inflatable balloon inside the left ventricle can be used during acute/chronic in vivo surgeries to simulate HFpEF-like hemodynamics for pump-based therapies. Canines and porcine are most widely used, but other non-rodent animals (sheep, non-human primates, felines, or calves) have been used. Feline models present the most well-simulated HFpEF pathology, but small size is a concern, and the information is still very limited. The rapid and reliable establishment of large animal models for HFpEF, and novel methodology based on the past experimental attempts with large animals, are needed.

Device-Based Solutions to Improve Cardiac Physiology and Hemodynamics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Characterized by a rapidly increasing prevalence, elevated mortality and rehospitalization rates, and inadequacy of pharmaceutical therapies, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has motivated the widespread development of device-based solutions. HFpEF is a multifactorial disease of various etiologies and phenotypes, distinguished by diminished ventricular compliance, diastolic dysfunction, and symptoms of heart failure despite a normal ejection performance; these symptoms include pulmonary hypertension, limited cardiac reserve, autonomic imbalance, and exercise intolerance. Several types of atrial shunts, left ventricular expanders, stimulation-based therapies, and mechanical circulatory support devices are currently under development aiming to target one or more of these symptoms by addressing the associated mechanical or hemodynamic hallmarks. Although the majority of these solutions have shown promising results in clinical or preclinical studies, no device-based therapy has yet been approved for the treatment of patients with HFpEF. The purpose of this review is to discuss the rationale behind each of these devices and the findings from the initial testing phases, as well as the limitations and challenges associated with their clinical translation.

Device-based treatment options for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome with an unfavorable prognosis, and the number of the patients continues to grow. Because there is no effective therapy established as a standard, including pharmacological treatments, a movement to develop and evaluate device-based therapies is an important emerging area in the treatment of HFpEF patients. Many devices have set their target to reduce the left atrial pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure because they are strongly related to the symptoms and prognosis of HFpEF, but the methodology to achieve it varies based on the devices. In this review, we summarize and categorize these devices into the following: (1) interatrial shunt devices, (2) left ventricle expander, (3) electrical therapy, (4) left ventricular assist devices, and (5) mechanical circulatory support devices under development. Here, we describe the features and specifications of device-based therapies currently under development and those at more advanced stages of preclinical testing. Advantages and limitations of these technologies, with insights on their safety and feasibility for HFpEF patients, are described.

Adverse Cardiac Remodelling after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Old and New Biomarkers

The prevalence of heart failure (HF) due to cardiac remodelling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) does not decrease regardless of implementation of new technologies supporting opening culprit coronary artery and solving of ischemia-relating stenosis with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Numerous studies have examined the diagnostic and prognostic potencies of circulating cardiac biomarkers in acute coronary syndrome/AMI and heart failure after AMI, and even fewer have depicted the utility of biomarkers in AMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Although complete revascularization at early period of acute coronary syndrome/AMI is an established factor for improved short-term and long-term prognosis and lowered risk of cardiovascular (CV) complications, late adverse cardiac remodelling may be a major risk factor for one-year mortality and postponded heart failure manifestation after PCI with subsequent blood flow resolving in culprit coronary artery. The aim of the review was to focus an attention on circulating biomarker as a promising tool to stratify AMI patients at high risk of poor cardiac recovery and developing HF after successful PCI. The main consideration affects biomarkers of inflammation, biomechanical myocardial stress, cardiac injury and necrosis, fibrosis, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular reparation. Clinical utilities and predictive modalities of natriuretic peptides, cardiac troponins, galectin 3, soluble suppressor tumorogenicity-2, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, growth differential factor-15, midregional proadrenomedullin, noncoding RNAs, and other biomarkers for adverse cardiac remodelling are discussed in the review.