Combined lensectomy, vitrectomy, and primary intraocular lens implantation in patients with traumatic eye injury

Management and Outcomes of Traumatic Cataract During Ruptured Globe Repair

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of primary lensectomy (PL) versus no lensectomy (NL) during repair of zone I (involving cornea and limbus) and II (up to 5mm posterior to the limbus) ruptured globe injuries (RGIs) with lens involvement.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical cohort study.

METHODS

107 patients with RGIs involving both blunt and penetrating injury to the lens who presented to Wills Eye Hospital between April 1, 2017 and August 31, 2022 were included. Data from presenting visit was collected including demographic information, time from injury to surgery, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP), injury characteristics, and years since residency graduation of surgeon. VA, IOP, retinal detachment (RD) rate, and endophthalmitis incidence were compared between PL and NL groups at postoperative week 1 (POW1) and postoperative month 1 (POM1). VA, peak IOP, need for further surgeries, and types of additional surgery were compared between the two groups at the final visit.

RESULTS

19 (17.8%) patients underwent PL. Age, sex, and initial VA were similar between groups (all p≥0.05). The PL group had surgery later from the time of injury (6.1±14.6 days vs. 1.3±1.9 days; p=0.010), higher IOP at presentation (12.9±11.6 mmHg vs. 7.7±11.3 mmHg; p=0.046), shorter wounds (2.3±1.4mm vs. 4.7±3.2mm; p=0.003), more frequent lens capsule violation (89.5% vs. 50%; p=0.010), increased likelihood of intraocular foreign bodies (52.6% vs. 17.0%; p=0.004), and were more likely to be operated on by surgeons with ≥ 5 years of experience post-residency (68.4% vs. 28.4%; p<0.001). At POW1, the PL group had significantly better logMAR VA (1.2±0.9 vs. 2.0±1.0; p=0.002), and this continued at POM1 (1.0±0.8 vs. 1.6±1.1; p=0.031) and the final visit (0.4±0.7 vs. 1.0±1.1; p=0.010). The PL group had lower IOP at POW1 (12.4±3.0 mmHg vs. 17.3±8.2 mmHg; p=0.005) than the NL group. There was no difference in RD or endophthalmitis rates between the two groups at POW1 or POM1 (p>0.05 for all). The NL group was more likely to require additional surgery by final follow-up (77.3% vs. 47.4%; p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, PL had better final VA and decreased need for further surgery (both p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In the appropriate circumstance, PL during lens-involving anterior RGI repair may lead to improved patient outcomes.

Visual Outcomes of Traumatic Lens Dislocations and Subluxations Managed by Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Lensectomy

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the visual outcome of lens dislocation and subluxation managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and lensectomy in patients with open (OGIs) or closed globe injuries (CGIs).

METHODS

Medical records of 70 consecutive patients treated by PPV and lensectomy over a period of 11 years (1 January 2010-31 December 2020) were retrospectively reviewed. We collected demographic data, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using a Snellen Chart pre- and postoperatively, associated ocular injuries and treatment strategy. Visual outcome was evaluated according to the final BCVA which was defined as poor <0.1 or good ≥0.1.

RESULTS

The mean age was 57.9 ± 17.6 years. CGIs were present in 49 (70.0%) cases and open OGIs in 21 (30.0%) cases. The dislocation mechanism was zonular lysis in 59 cases (84.3%) and capsular rupture in 11 cases (15.7%). The intraocular lens implant (IOL) was sutured to the sclera in 51 (72.9%) cases or positioned in the capsular bag or in the sulcus in 3 (4.3%) cases and 1 (1.4%) case, respectively, whereas 15 (21.4%) patients remained aphakic. A good BCVA ≥ 0.1 was achieved in 45.71% of the eyes. The presence of retinal detachment (RD) (p = 0.014), iridodonesis (p = 0.011) and initial BCVA (p = 0.000) achieved statistical significance in predicting visual outcome. After treatment, 45.71% of patients achieved a final BCVA ≥ 0.1.

CONCLUSION

RD, iridodonesis and initial BCVA were risk factors for poor visual outcome in our series.

Difference between both eyes in the calculation of the dioptre power of the intraocular lens in a series of 7994 patients

PURPOSE

To analyse the distribution of the difference between both eyes in the calculation of the dioptric power of the intraocular lens in a series of 7994 patients and the biometric variables that determine it.

METHODS

The data of patients between 3 and 99 years old, residents of the city of Guayaquil and neighbouring sites, who received ocular biometry by partial optical coherence interferometry between 2004 and 2020 were reviewed. Ocular biometrics, including axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and the mean corneal dioptre power (CD), were measured by partial coherence interferometry. Refraction without or with cycloplegia was recorded in spherical equivalent (SE). The Haigis formula from the IOL Master instrument was used to calculate the dioptric power of the intraocular lens in both eyes.

RESULTS

Data from the bilateral optical biometry of 7994 patients were analysed. The mean and standard deviation of AL, CD, ACD and dioptre power of the IOL were 23.66 ± 1.25, 43.70 ± 1.49, 3.34 ± 0.40 and +20.46 ± 3.84, respectively. 2538 (31.7%) patients had equal dioptre power of the IOL between both eyes. 3243 (40.6%) patients had a 0.50 D difference; 1162 (14.5%), 1.0 D; 425 (5.3%), 1.5 D. 626 patients (7.8%) had a difference in IOL dioptre of 2 D or more, with a maximum of 24 D. The asymmetry of AL between OU was ≥0.4 mm in 10.49%, while that of CD reached ≥1 D in 1.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

92.16% of patients had a difference within 1.5 D between both eyes in the calculation of the dioptre power of the intraocular lens. In case an eye is programmed in which it is impossible to perform a reliable biometry, either due to trauma or due to white or brunescent cataract, the calculation of the intraocular lens could be done taking as a reference the biometry of the contralateral eye.

Epiretinal Membrane Peeling in Eyes with Retinal Vein Occlusion: Visual and Morphologic Outcomes

Introduction

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling in patients with retinal vein occlusion (RVO) and secondary ERM.

Methods

Retrospective, multicenter study including patients with RVO and ERM who underwent PPV and ERM peeling with or without phacoemulsification. Demographic, clinical, surgical, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were recorded at the time of ERM peeling (baseline). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were longitudinally collected up to 36 months after surgery. Clinical factors associated with BCVA and CMT and disappearance of macular edema during follow-up were investigated.

Results

Twenty-one eyes of 21 patients with a median follow-up of 18 months were included. The BCVA improved significantly after ERM peeling (baseline vs. 24 months, p = 0.01). Absence of the external liming membrane/ellipsoid zone on OCT was associated with worse visual outcomes (regression estimate [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.93 [0.39–1.48] logMAR, p = 0.004). Eyes with disorganization of the inner retinal layers at baseline had higher CMT values at each visit (regression estimate [95% CI] = 114.1 [78.9–219.4] μm, p = 0.004). Older age at the time of RVO (p = 0.03) and branch RVO (p = 0.04) were risk factors for persistent macular edema after ERM removal.

Conclusion

PPV and ERM removal provided encouraging functional and morphological results in eyes with RVO, with disappearance of macular edema in most eyes. The integrity of the outer retina and preservation of inner retinal segmentation were associated with better visual and anatomical outcomes after ERM removal, respectively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40123-022-00461-7.

Clinical Characteristics and Visual Outcomes in Patients with Intralenticular Foreign Bodies with Self-Sealing Corneal Penetrating Wounds

Purpose

Siderosis bulbi may occur as a result of retained intralenticular foreign bodies (ILFBs) that were missed during examination in patients with self-sealing wounds and without a significant decrease in visual acuity. This study aimed to explore the clinical characteristics and visual outcomes of ILFBs with self-sealing corneal penetrating wounds.

Methods

Fifteen eyes of 15 patients with ILFBs and self-sealing corneal penetrating wounds, seen between October 2014 and September 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Data regarding the patient demographics, clinical features, surgical procedure, and initial and final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were analyzed.

Results

All patients were male with a mean age of 41 years. The foreign bodies passed through the cornea, sometimes through the iris, through the anterior capsule, and finally localized in the lens. All ILFBs were pointed and metallic objects and were successfully removed with phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Anterior capsule violation was found in three eyes, but no posterior capsule rupture was found. The IOL was placed in a capsule bag in all the cases. The BCVA ranged from 20/200 to 20/25 preoperatively and improved to between 20/32 and 20/20 at the last follow-up visit. The IOLs were well-centered. Apart from posterior capsule opacity in four eyes, no other postoperative complications were found.

Conclusions

In patients with a pointed metallic ILFB and self-sealing corneal penetrating wounds (with or without cataracts), early diagnosis and removal of the metallic ILFB combined with lens removal and IOL implantation may avoid late complications and achieve good visual outcomes.

INTRAOCULAR LENS SCAFFOLD TO PREVENT INTRAOCULAR FOREIGN BODY SLIPPAGE

PURPOSE

To report the application of intraocular lens (IOL) scaffold technique in intraocular foreign body (IOFB) removal.

METHODS

Patient with IOFB in posterior segment is included. The IOFB is retrieved from the posterior segment (pars plana vitrectomy and exteriorization of the IOFB from the retinal surface using an intravitreal forceps via the posterior capsulotomy) and placed on the iris. A three-piece posterior chamber IOL is placed in the sulcus via the clear corneal incision. IOFB is then removed from the anterior chamber over the IOL by forceps.

RESULTS

Metallic IOFB of 4 mm × 3 mm has been retrieved by IOL scaffold technique after rescuing it from the posterior segment. There has been no drop or slip of IOFB in the vitreous during removal. Posterior chamber IOL served as scaffold during IOFB removal from anterior chamber.

CONCLUSION

The IOL scaffold maneuver has shown to prevent slippage by acting as a barrier between the IOFB and the vitreous.

Cataract surgery in the setting of trauma

PURPOSE

To review the changes in the surgical techniques used for cataract removal in the setting of trauma and their postoperative outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Primary cataract removal with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is the commonly followed procedure for penetrating injuries with cataract. IOL implantation has evolved through various techniques namely 'in the bag', 'in the sulcus', epilenticular implantation, anterior chamber IOL, scleral fixated IOL and recently glued IOL.

SUMMARY

Certain lacerating injuries of the anterior segment are particularly amenable to cataract extraction and IOL implantation at the time of primary laceration repair. This approach obviates additional operative and anesthetic risks, while affording timelier visual rehabilitation. Secondary lens removal may also be indicated in cases of severe corneal injury and marked edema, which may interfere with intraocular visualization.