New insight into visual function with aspherical intraocular lenses (IOLs): Tecnis ZCB00 and Acrysof SN60WF

Intraindividual Comparison of an Enhanced Monofocal and an Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens of the Same Platform

PURPOSE

To compare intraindividual differences in visual performance of a monofocal and enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) of the same platform.

DESIGN

Prospective, interventional, fellow-eye comparison clinical study.

METHODS

In total, 55 patients (110 eyes) with bilateral age-related cataract were enrolled. All patients received a monofocal ZCB00 IOL in the dominant and an enhanced monofocal Eyhance ICB00 IOL in the nondominant eye. After 2 to 4 months, monocular best-corrected distant visual acuity (BCDVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), contrast visual acuity, monocular defocus curves, internal higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and spherical aberrations (SA), decentration, and tilt were compared.

RESULTS

The monocular mean BCDVA, DCIVA at 80 cm and 66 cm, and DCNVA were -0.03 ± 0.07, 0.24 ± 0.12, 0.32 ± 0.13, and 0.50 ± 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for the enhanced ICB00 and -0.06 ± 0.06 (P = .014), 0.30 ± 0.11 (P = .005), 0.38 ± 0.12 (P = .004), and 0.55 ± 0.14 (P = .034) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution for the ZCB00, respectively. Internal HOAs (P = .001) and negative SA (P < .001) were increased with the ICB00 at 3 mm and comparable at 5 mm (P > .05). Contrast acuity, tilt, and decentration were similar (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly increased monocular DCIVA at 80 cm and 66 cm and DCNVA at 40 cm were observed with the enhanced ICB00 IOL, and the ZCB00 IOL demonstrated better BCDVA. This would result in a mean gain of 2 to 3 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at near and intermediate distance. Monocular defocus curves displayed highest differences of 5 Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters at -1.25 diopters (D) and -1.50 D levels of defocus and a depth of focus of 1.23 D for the ICB00 IOL and 0.94 D for the ZCB00 IOL. Decentration, tilt, and HOAs were generally low.

Comparison of visual performances of enhanced monofocal versus standard monofocal IOLs in a mini-monovision approach

PURPOSE

To compare visual performance and quality of life in patients who received either monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) or an enhanced monofocal IOL in a mini-monovision target approach.

BACKGROUND

Monofocal lenses are the most common intraocular IOLs employed during cataract surgery because of their relatively low cost and good performance for distance sight. However, these lenses, generally, do not exonerate patients from spectacle use for near or intermediate tasks. On the other hand, enhanced monofocal IOLs (e.g., Tecnis Eyhance®) feature optical properties providing patients with good intermediate visual outcomes. Satisfactory near visual acuity results, regardless of IOL type, may be achieved through mini-monovision. We assessed visual performance outcomes between these IOLs, in a mini-monovision approach.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery at our institution with implantation of Alcon SN60WF, J&J Tecnis DCB00 or J&J Tecnis Eyhance® DIB00 with a pre-operative mini-monovision target. The postoperative spherical equivalent was measured by a Nidek® auto-refractometer. Best-uncorrected binocular visual acuity (BUBVA) at far (3 m), intermediate (66 cm), and near (40 cm) distance and binocular contrast sensitivity (100%, 25%, and 5%, all at 1 m) were measured using Snellen and Pelli-Robson charts, respectively. Visual performance in daily life was evaluated with the Cataract VF-14 quality of life survey.

RESULTS

71 patients (35 in the monofocal IOL and 37 enhanced IOL group) were enrolled. Patients implanted with enhanced IOL exhibited statistically significant better BUBVA results at 66 cm and 40 cm distances compared to patients in the monofocal group. Additionally, patients in the enhanced IOL group presented a better contrast sensitivity in lower contrast conditions (5%) than patients with monofocal IOL. The quality of life survey showed statistically significant higher scores in daily activities without spectacles for patients with enhanced IOL.

CONCLUSION

Enhanced monofocal IOLs, combined with a mini-monovision approach, provided patients with good visual performance at all tested distances, with superiority of enhanced monofocal IOLs at near and intermediate distances.

Capsular bag performance of a novel hydrophobic acrylic single-piece intraocular lens: Two-year results of a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

To determine the visual outcome, intraocular lens (IOL) stability and posterior capsule opacification (PCO) rate of a hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens.

SETTING

Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria.

DESIGN

This double-masked randomised study included patients who underwent standard cataract surgery.

METHOD

Patients received either the hydrophobic acrylic IOL (iPure, PhysIOL) or the hydrophobic acrylic control IOL (Tecnis ZCB00, Johnson&Johnson). Subjective refraction, uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity (UDVA, CDVA), IOL tilt and decentration (Purkinje meter) and PCO intensity using retroillumination images with automated image analysis (automated quantification of after-cataract, AQUA), were evaluated for both groups 2 years after surgery.

RESULTS

A total number of 31 patients completed the 2-year follow-up, 16 in the study group and 15 in the control group. The CDVA was 0.0 logMAR (standard deviation - SD: 0.1) for the study IOL and 0.1 logMAR (SD: 0.2) for the control IOL, p = 0.001. The AQUA PCO score for the study group was 2.1 and 1.4 for the control group, p = 0.44. Mean IOL tilt was 2.9° (SD: 1.8) in the study group and 5.0° (SD: 4.5) in the control group, whilst the mean decentration was 0.37 mm (SD: 0.18) and 0.45 mm (SD: 0.3), p = 0.610.

CONCLUSION

The studied parameters revealed a good performance for both IOLs. Both IOLs had good CDVA, a small amount of tilt and decentration and none of the patients required laser capsulotomies during the follow-up time of 2 years after surgery.Presented at the 37th ESCRS Congress Paris, France, September 2019.

High order aberration and straylight evaluation after cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric, aberration correcting monofocal intraocular lens

AIM

To evaluate the quality of vision in respect to high order aberrations and straylight perception after implantation of an aspheric, aberration correcting, monofocal intraocular lens (IOL).

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (34 eyes) aged 50 to 83y underwent cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric, aberration correcting IOL (Tecnis ZCB00, Abbott Medical Optics). Three months after surgery they were examined for uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic and mesopic conditions with and without glare source, ocular high order aberrations (HOA, Zywave II) and retinal straylight (C-Quant).

RESULTS

Postoperatively, patients achieved a postoperative CDVA of 0.0 logMAR or better in 97.1% of eyes. Mean values of high order abberations were +0.02±0.27 (primary coma components) and -0.04±0.16 (spherical aberration term). Straylight values of the C-Quant were 1.35±0.44 log which is within normal range of age matched phakic patients. The CS measurements under mesopic and photopic conditions in combination with and without glare did not show any statistical significance in the patient group observed (P≥0.28).

CONCLUSION

The implantation of an aspherical aberration correcting monofocal IOL after cataract surgery resulted in very low residual higher order aberration (HOA) and normal straylight.